Impacts of the Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araújo, Bruno César
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Pianto, Donald, Negri, Fernanda De, Cavalcante, Luiz Ricardo, Alves, Patrick
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649038
Resumo: The Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds were established at the end of the 1990s, aiming at providing more stable financial resources to science, technology, and innovation (ST&I) activities in the country. Similarly to other instruments used to foster innovation at the firm level, the sectoral funds are expected to increase firms’ technological efforts as well as their result indicators. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impacts of these funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs in Brazil during the period between 2001 and 2006. Several papers have discussed the additionality or crowding out effects of innovation policies that involve grants and fiscal incentives, for example. In this paper, the firms which accessed the sectoral funds are compared with the ones which did not, based upon the path followed by their indicators of technological efforts (R&D inputs) and results (R&D outputs). The control group was defined using a Propensity Score Matching (PSM) procedure aiming at reducing the selection bias that makes firms which accessed the funds follow a different path when compared to the ones that did not. Percentage differencein- differences indicate a significant detachment between the technological efforts of the treatment and control groups and permit the hypothesis of crowding out to be rejected. The growth differential on the PoTec variable – the proxy for technological efforts – is estimated in 6.8 p.p. in the first year, 11.5 in the second, 15.7 p.p. in the third and 26.7 p.p. in the fourth year after the access to the funds. The sectoral funds also presented a significant and positive impact on the number of employees, although only a marginally significant impact on high-tech exports was observed four years after the treatment. Additionally, a preliminary analysis of the impacts of the different instruments that form the sectoral funds suggests that most impacts observed in the technological efforts can be associated to the credit at favorable conditions.
id UNICAMP-9_204ae6270d54ed8adcfc4d0c0b706cfa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8649038
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-9
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Impacts of the Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputsImpactos dos fundos setoriais nas empresasSectoral fundsInnovation policiesResearch and developmentCrowding inO31Fundos setoriais. Políticas de inovação. Pesquisa e desenvolvimento. Adicionalidade.O31The Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds were established at the end of the 1990s, aiming at providing more stable financial resources to science, technology, and innovation (ST&I) activities in the country. Similarly to other instruments used to foster innovation at the firm level, the sectoral funds are expected to increase firms’ technological efforts as well as their result indicators. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impacts of these funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs in Brazil during the period between 2001 and 2006. Several papers have discussed the additionality or crowding out effects of innovation policies that involve grants and fiscal incentives, for example. In this paper, the firms which accessed the sectoral funds are compared with the ones which did not, based upon the path followed by their indicators of technological efforts (R&D inputs) and results (R&D outputs). The control group was defined using a Propensity Score Matching (PSM) procedure aiming at reducing the selection bias that makes firms which accessed the funds follow a different path when compared to the ones that did not. Percentage differencein- differences indicate a significant detachment between the technological efforts of the treatment and control groups and permit the hypothesis of crowding out to be rejected. The growth differential on the PoTec variable – the proxy for technological efforts – is estimated in 6.8 p.p. in the first year, 11.5 in the second, 15.7 p.p. in the third and 26.7 p.p. in the fourth year after the access to the funds. The sectoral funds also presented a significant and positive impact on the number of employees, although only a marginally significant impact on high-tech exports was observed four years after the treatment. Additionally, a preliminary analysis of the impacts of the different instruments that form the sectoral funds suggests that most impacts observed in the technological efforts can be associated to the credit at favorable conditions.Os fundos setoriais foram instituídos no final da década de 1990, com o propósito de criar condições mais estáveis de financiamento público às atividades de ciência, tecnologia e inovação (CT&I) no Brasil. De maneira análoga ao que se observa com outros instrumentos de incentivo à inovação nas empresas, a expectativa é que o acesso aos fundos setoriais contribuiria para o aumento dos esforços tecnológicos e para o alcance de melhores resultados pelas empresas. O objetivo deste trabalho é, portanto, avaliar o impacto desses fundos sobre os esforços tecnológicos e sobre os resultados das empresas industriais no Brasil, no período 2001 a 2006. A base teórica para a discussão é a literatura internacional que tem, recorrentemente, analisado o efeito crowding in ou crowding out de políticas de apoio à inovação nas empresas. Esses trabalhos buscam verificar se as políticas adotadas complementam os recursos alocados nas atividades de inovação pelas empresas ou se haveria simplesmente a substituição desses últimos por recursos públicos. Neste artigo, uma técnica quasi-experimental é aplicada para comparar as empresas que acessaram os fundos setoriais com aquelas que não os acessaram, usando dados de painel que incluem informações sobre esforços tecnológicos e resultados. O grupo de controle é definido com base no algoritmo de Propensity Score Matching (PSM), visando eliminar o viés de seleção no acesso aos fundos, o que faz com que, a priori, as empresas que acessam esses recursos trilhem uma trajetória distinta daquelas que não acessam. Estimativas das diferenças percentuais das taxas de crescimento dos esforços tecnológicos indicam significativo descolamento entre os grupos de tratamento e controle e permitem que se rejeite a hipótese de crowding out. Estima-se que o diferencial na taxa de crescimento do PoTec – que corresponde à proxy para os esforços tecnológicos – seja de 6,8 p.p. no primeiro ano, 11,5 p.p. no segundo, 15,7 p.p. no terceiro e 26,7 p.p. no quarto ano após o acesso. Os fundos setoriais apresentam ainda impacto positivo e significativo no pessoal ocupado total, embora apenas um impacto marginalmente significante nas exportações de alto conteúdo tecnológico tenha sido observado após quatro anos nas empresas que compõem o grupo de tratamento. Adicionalmente, uma análise preliminar dos impactos dos diferentes instrumentos que compõem os fundos setoriais permite associar a maior parte dos impactos dos recursos à concessão de crédito em condições mais favoráveis.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2012-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa qualitativaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/864903810.20396/rbi.v11i0.8649038Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 11 (2012): Número Especial - Fronteiras da Avaliação; 85-112Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 11 (2012): Número Especial - Fronteiras da Avaliação; 85-112Revista Brasileira de Inovação; v. 11 (2012): Número Especial - Fronteiras da Avaliação; 85-1122178-2822reponame:Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649038/15587Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Bruno CésarPianto, DonaldNegri, Fernanda DeCavalcante, Luiz RicardoAlves, Patrick2017-06-05T10:30:24Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8649038Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbiPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/oai||rbi@ige.unicamp.br2178-28221677-2504opendoar:2017-06-05T10:30:24Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impacts of the Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs
Impactos dos fundos setoriais nas empresas
title Impacts of the Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs
spellingShingle Impacts of the Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs
Araújo, Bruno César
Sectoral funds
Innovation policies
Research and development
Crowding in
O31
Fundos setoriais. Políticas de inovação. Pesquisa e desenvolvimento. Adicionalidade.
O31
title_short Impacts of the Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs
title_full Impacts of the Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs
title_fullStr Impacts of the Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of the Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs
title_sort Impacts of the Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs
author Araújo, Bruno César
author_facet Araújo, Bruno César
Pianto, Donald
Negri, Fernanda De
Cavalcante, Luiz Ricardo
Alves, Patrick
author_role author
author2 Pianto, Donald
Negri, Fernanda De
Cavalcante, Luiz Ricardo
Alves, Patrick
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo, Bruno César
Pianto, Donald
Negri, Fernanda De
Cavalcante, Luiz Ricardo
Alves, Patrick
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sectoral funds
Innovation policies
Research and development
Crowding in
O31
Fundos setoriais. Políticas de inovação. Pesquisa e desenvolvimento. Adicionalidade.
O31
topic Sectoral funds
Innovation policies
Research and development
Crowding in
O31
Fundos setoriais. Políticas de inovação. Pesquisa e desenvolvimento. Adicionalidade.
O31
description The Brazilian science and technology sectoral funds were established at the end of the 1990s, aiming at providing more stable financial resources to science, technology, and innovation (ST&I) activities in the country. Similarly to other instruments used to foster innovation at the firm level, the sectoral funds are expected to increase firms’ technological efforts as well as their result indicators. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impacts of these funds on the industrial firms’ R&D inputs and outputs in Brazil during the period between 2001 and 2006. Several papers have discussed the additionality or crowding out effects of innovation policies that involve grants and fiscal incentives, for example. In this paper, the firms which accessed the sectoral funds are compared with the ones which did not, based upon the path followed by their indicators of technological efforts (R&D inputs) and results (R&D outputs). The control group was defined using a Propensity Score Matching (PSM) procedure aiming at reducing the selection bias that makes firms which accessed the funds follow a different path when compared to the ones that did not. Percentage differencein- differences indicate a significant detachment between the technological efforts of the treatment and control groups and permit the hypothesis of crowding out to be rejected. The growth differential on the PoTec variable – the proxy for technological efforts – is estimated in 6.8 p.p. in the first year, 11.5 in the second, 15.7 p.p. in the third and 26.7 p.p. in the fourth year after the access to the funds. The sectoral funds also presented a significant and positive impact on the number of employees, although only a marginally significant impact on high-tech exports was observed four years after the treatment. Additionally, a preliminary analysis of the impacts of the different instruments that form the sectoral funds suggests that most impacts observed in the technological efforts can be associated to the credit at favorable conditions.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-07-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa qualitativa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649038
10.20396/rbi.v11i0.8649038
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649038
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/rbi.v11i0.8649038
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649038/15587
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 11 (2012): Número Especial - Fronteiras da Avaliação; 85-112
Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 11 (2012): Número Especial - Fronteiras da Avaliação; 85-112
Revista Brasileira de Inovação; v. 11 (2012): Número Especial - Fronteiras da Avaliação; 85-112
2178-2822
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbi@ige.unicamp.br
_version_ 1809464308774469632