An evaluation of the Brazilian Informatics Law and its impacts on business R&D expenditure in the 2000´s

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brigante, Paulo Cesar
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8650858
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to evaluate if the brazilian informatics law has been able to promote significant private expenditures in R & D resulting in so-called additionality effects (crowd in). The analysis is based on the microdata of the Innovation Research (Pintec-IBGE), through which three panels were constructed, each of which covering two consecutive periods. Through the estimates, it was possible to verify the effects of the law for the periods 2003-2005; 2005-2008 and 2008-2011. In order to overcome the problems of selection bias, which are typical of innovation policy evaluations estimates, it was apllied the differences-in-differences (DID) methodology with covariates. Although the results indicate no crowding out effects, additionality effects occurred in only one period. So, it was not possible to conclude that the law was effective throughout the whole period.
id UNICAMP-9_78abecc5e61f3a5d7e64fbd8c55f546d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8650858
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-9
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling An evaluation of the Brazilian Informatics Law and its impacts on business R&D expenditure in the 2000´sUma avaliação da Lei de Informática e seus impactos sobre os gastos empresariais em P&D nos anos 2000Brazilian Informatics Law. Industrial Policies. Crowd in. Crowding outL52Lei de Informática. Políticas Industriais. Crowd in. Crowding outL52The purpose of this article is to evaluate if the brazilian informatics law has been able to promote significant private expenditures in R & D resulting in so-called additionality effects (crowd in). The analysis is based on the microdata of the Innovation Research (Pintec-IBGE), through which three panels were constructed, each of which covering two consecutive periods. Through the estimates, it was possible to verify the effects of the law for the periods 2003-2005; 2005-2008 and 2008-2011. In order to overcome the problems of selection bias, which are typical of innovation policy evaluations estimates, it was apllied the differences-in-differences (DID) methodology with covariates. Although the results indicate no crowding out effects, additionality effects occurred in only one period. So, it was not possible to conclude that the law was effective throughout the whole period.O presente artigo tem como objetivo avaliar se a Lei de Informática tem sido capaz de provocar aumentos significativos de gastos em P&D, dando origem aos chamados efeitos de adicionalidade (crowd in). A análise é feita a partir da base de microdados da Pesquisa de Inovação (Pintec-IBGE), pela qual foram construídos três painéis, sendo que cada um abrange dois períodos consecutivos. Com isso, as estimativas possibilitaram verificar os efeitos da lei para os períodos de 2003-2005, 2005-2008 e 2008-2011. Buscando contornar os problemas de viés de seleção, típicos em estimativas de avaliação de políticas de inovação, aplicou-se a metodologia de diferenças-em-diferenças (DID) com covariadas. Embora os resultados indicam não haver efeitos de crowding out, os efeitos de crowd in ocorreram em apenas um período, não sendo possível concluir pela eficácia da lei ao longo de todo o período estudado.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-10-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa qualitativa e quantitativaPesquisa quantitativa e qualitativaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/865085810.20396/rbi.v17i1.8650858Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018); 119-148Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2018); 119-148Revista Brasileira de Inovação; v. 17 n. 1 (2018); 119-1482178-2822reponame:Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8650858/29729https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8650858/17642Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovaçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrigante, Paulo Cesar2022-08-09T15:51:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8650858Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbiPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/oai||rbi@ige.unicamp.br2178-28221677-2504opendoar:2022-08-09T15:51:06Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An evaluation of the Brazilian Informatics Law and its impacts on business R&D expenditure in the 2000´s
Uma avaliação da Lei de Informática e seus impactos sobre os gastos empresariais em P&D nos anos 2000
title An evaluation of the Brazilian Informatics Law and its impacts on business R&D expenditure in the 2000´s
spellingShingle An evaluation of the Brazilian Informatics Law and its impacts on business R&D expenditure in the 2000´s
Brigante, Paulo Cesar
Brazilian Informatics Law. Industrial Policies. Crowd in. Crowding out
L52
Lei de Informática. Políticas Industriais. Crowd in. Crowding out
L52
title_short An evaluation of the Brazilian Informatics Law and its impacts on business R&D expenditure in the 2000´s
title_full An evaluation of the Brazilian Informatics Law and its impacts on business R&D expenditure in the 2000´s
title_fullStr An evaluation of the Brazilian Informatics Law and its impacts on business R&D expenditure in the 2000´s
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the Brazilian Informatics Law and its impacts on business R&D expenditure in the 2000´s
title_sort An evaluation of the Brazilian Informatics Law and its impacts on business R&D expenditure in the 2000´s
author Brigante, Paulo Cesar
author_facet Brigante, Paulo Cesar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brigante, Paulo Cesar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brazilian Informatics Law. Industrial Policies. Crowd in. Crowding out
L52
Lei de Informática. Políticas Industriais. Crowd in. Crowding out
L52
topic Brazilian Informatics Law. Industrial Policies. Crowd in. Crowding out
L52
Lei de Informática. Políticas Industriais. Crowd in. Crowding out
L52
description The purpose of this article is to evaluate if the brazilian informatics law has been able to promote significant private expenditures in R & D resulting in so-called additionality effects (crowd in). The analysis is based on the microdata of the Innovation Research (Pintec-IBGE), through which three panels were constructed, each of which covering two consecutive periods. Through the estimates, it was possible to verify the effects of the law for the periods 2003-2005; 2005-2008 and 2008-2011. In order to overcome the problems of selection bias, which are typical of innovation policy evaluations estimates, it was apllied the differences-in-differences (DID) methodology with covariates. Although the results indicate no crowding out effects, additionality effects occurred in only one period. So, it was not possible to conclude that the law was effective throughout the whole period.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa qualitativa e quantitativa
Pesquisa quantitativa e qualitativa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8650858
10.20396/rbi.v17i1.8650858
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8650858
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/rbi.v17i1.8650858
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8650858/29729
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8650858/17642
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018); 119-148
Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2018); 119-148
Revista Brasileira de Inovação; v. 17 n. 1 (2018); 119-148
2178-2822
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbi@ige.unicamp.br
_version_ 1809464309957263360