The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First Century
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8648868 |
Resumo: | At the turn of the century we have seen a tightening of the patent system. However, policy makers systematically neglect the patent controversies. This article critically reviews the complex relationships between the rationales for patent rights on the one hand, and the social and economic effects of such on the other hand. Only when we understand this relationship, will we be able to design appropriate Intellectual Property Right (IPR) regimes for the new technoeconomic paradigm of knowledge-based micro-electronics and computer implemented pervasive inventions. Focus is on moral rationales, economic incentive rationales, increased competition and "market protection of entrepreneurial talent" rationales, and the economic rationales for organizing science, technology and creativity. It is argued that patent systems are not neutral, but set the rules of the game in which individuals and organizations are the players. |
id |
UNICAMP-9_9825be4979e4b1cd165ff618588684b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8648868 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-9 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First CenturyThe Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First CenturyIntellectual Property Rights (IPRs)Patent RationalesPolicyO34O38Direitos de propriedade intelectual. Sistemas de patentes. Política.O34O38At the turn of the century we have seen a tightening of the patent system. However, policy makers systematically neglect the patent controversies. This article critically reviews the complex relationships between the rationales for patent rights on the one hand, and the social and economic effects of such on the other hand. Only when we understand this relationship, will we be able to design appropriate Intellectual Property Right (IPR) regimes for the new technoeconomic paradigm of knowledge-based micro-electronics and computer implemented pervasive inventions. Focus is on moral rationales, economic incentive rationales, increased competition and "market protection of entrepreneurial talent" rationales, and the economic rationales for organizing science, technology and creativity. It is argued that patent systems are not neutral, but set the rules of the game in which individuals and organizations are the players.Na virada do século, assistimos a um reforço do sistema de patentes. No entanto, os gestores de políticas deixam sistematicamente de lado as controvérsias sobre patentes. Este artigo examina criticamente as complexas relações entre, por um lado, as razões para os direitos de patente e, por outro lado, seus efeitos sociais e econômicos. Só quando entendermos essa relação, seremos capazes de projetar regimes adequados de Direitos de Propriedade Intelectual (DPI) para o novo paradigma tecnoeconômico de microeletrônica baseada em conhecimento e invenções de amplo alcance implementadas por computador. O foco se concentra nas razões morais, nas razões de incentivo econômico, e nas razões de aumento da concorrência e "proteção do talento empresarial no mercado", e nas razões econômicas para organizar ciência, tecnologia e criatividade. Afirma-se aqui que os sistemas de patentes não são neutros, eles estabelecem as regras do jogo em que indivíduos e organizações são os jogadores.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2009-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAnálise criticaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/864886810.20396/rbi.v2i1.8648868Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2003): jan./jun.; 35-78Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2003): jan./jun.; 35-78Revista Brasileira de Inovação; v. 2 n. 1 (2003): jan./jun.; 35-782178-2822reponame:Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8648868/15406Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndersen, Birgitte2017-05-09T10:40:48Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8648868Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbiPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/oai||rbi@ige.unicamp.br2178-28221677-2504opendoar:2017-05-09T10:40:48Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First Century The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First Century |
title |
The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First Century |
spellingShingle |
The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First Century Andersen, Birgitte Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) Patent Rationales Policy O34 O38 Direitos de propriedade intelectual. Sistemas de patentes. Política. O34 O38 |
title_short |
The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First Century |
title_full |
The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First Century |
title_fullStr |
The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First Century |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First Century |
title_sort |
The Neglected Patent Controversies in the Twenty First Century |
author |
Andersen, Birgitte |
author_facet |
Andersen, Birgitte |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andersen, Birgitte |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) Patent Rationales Policy O34 O38 Direitos de propriedade intelectual. Sistemas de patentes. Política. O34 O38 |
topic |
Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) Patent Rationales Policy O34 O38 Direitos de propriedade intelectual. Sistemas de patentes. Política. O34 O38 |
description |
At the turn of the century we have seen a tightening of the patent system. However, policy makers systematically neglect the patent controversies. This article critically reviews the complex relationships between the rationales for patent rights on the one hand, and the social and economic effects of such on the other hand. Only when we understand this relationship, will we be able to design appropriate Intellectual Property Right (IPR) regimes for the new technoeconomic paradigm of knowledge-based micro-electronics and computer implemented pervasive inventions. Focus is on moral rationales, economic incentive rationales, increased competition and "market protection of entrepreneurial talent" rationales, and the economic rationales for organizing science, technology and creativity. It is argued that patent systems are not neutral, but set the rules of the game in which individuals and organizations are the players. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-08-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Análise critica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8648868 10.20396/rbi.v2i1.8648868 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8648868 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/rbi.v2i1.8648868 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8648868/15406 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2003): jan./jun.; 35-78 Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2003): jan./jun.; 35-78 Revista Brasileira de Inovação; v. 2 n. 1 (2003): jan./jun.; 35-78 2178-2822 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbi@ige.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1809464308129595392 |