International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nascimento, Renata Muniz do
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Almeida, Luciana Togeiro de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649130
Resumo: During the negotiations of the Doha Round (2001-2007), several studies reported the evident concern of developing countries with the negotiations on the liberalization of trade in environmental goods and services. This is because, given their structural dependence on technology imported from developed countries, the expected gains of this liberalization should concentrate in the latter. From this initial discussion, this article examines the international trade of environmental technologies between the years 2002 and 2013, more specifically, trade flows between OECD countries and non-member countries of the OECD, considered here as a reference to, respectively, developed and developing countries. The goal is to analyze the extent to which developed countries keep the leadership of exports and developing countries are limited to the status of environmental goods importers. The results show this pattern of trade, but the scenery changes with the rise of China and the decline of US and Japan’s share. Regarding the level of tariff protection on environmental goods, the OECD member countries remain more open, ie, they apply low average import tariffs compared to those from OECD non-member countries.
id UNICAMP-9_f64fa691d83a257539075a56a066836a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8649130
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-9
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under reviewComércio internacional de tecnologias ambientais: o padrão histórico em análiseEnvironmental TechnologyEnvironmental GoodsInternational TradeF18F14F13Tecnologia ambiental. Bens ambientais. Comércio internacional.F18F14F13During the negotiations of the Doha Round (2001-2007), several studies reported the evident concern of developing countries with the negotiations on the liberalization of trade in environmental goods and services. This is because, given their structural dependence on technology imported from developed countries, the expected gains of this liberalization should concentrate in the latter. From this initial discussion, this article examines the international trade of environmental technologies between the years 2002 and 2013, more specifically, trade flows between OECD countries and non-member countries of the OECD, considered here as a reference to, respectively, developed and developing countries. The goal is to analyze the extent to which developed countries keep the leadership of exports and developing countries are limited to the status of environmental goods importers. The results show this pattern of trade, but the scenery changes with the rise of China and the decline of US and Japan’s share. Regarding the level of tariff protection on environmental goods, the OECD member countries remain more open, ie, they apply low average import tariffs compared to those from OECD non-member countries.Durante as negociações da Rodada Doha (2001-2007), diversos estudos reportaram a preocupação dos países em desenvolvimento com as negociações sobre a liberalização do comércio de bens e serviços ambientais. Partindo dessa discussão inicial, o presente artigo analisa o comércio internacional de tecnologias ambientais entre 2002 e 2013, mais especificamente os fluxos de comércio entre os países-membros da OCDE e os não membros. O objetivo é analisar em que medida os países desenvolvidos seguem na liderança das exportações e aqueles em desenvolvimento limitam-se à condição de importadores de bens ambientais. Os resultados evidenciam este padrão de comércio, mas o cenário muda com a ascensão da China e o declínio da participação dos EUA e do Japão. No tocante ao nível de proteção tarifária sobre bens ambientais, os países-membros da OCDE seguem muito mais abertos, ou seja, aplicam baixas tarifas médias de importação comparadas àquelas dos países não membros.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-08-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa quantitativa e qualitativaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/864913010.20396/rbi.v15i2.8649130Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-274Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-274Revista Brasileira de Inovação; v. 15 n. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-2742178-2822reponame:Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649130/15679Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNascimento, Renata Muniz doAlmeida, Luciana Togeiro de2017-12-12T11:51:40Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8649130Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbiPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/oai||rbi@ige.unicamp.br2178-28221677-2504opendoar:2017-12-12T11:51:40Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review
Comércio internacional de tecnologias ambientais: o padrão histórico em análise
title International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review
spellingShingle International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review
Nascimento, Renata Muniz do
Environmental Technology
Environmental Goods
International Trade
F18
F14
F13
Tecnologia ambiental. Bens ambientais. Comércio internacional.
F18
F14
F13
title_short International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review
title_full International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review
title_fullStr International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review
title_full_unstemmed International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review
title_sort International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review
author Nascimento, Renata Muniz do
author_facet Nascimento, Renata Muniz do
Almeida, Luciana Togeiro de
author_role author
author2 Almeida, Luciana Togeiro de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nascimento, Renata Muniz do
Almeida, Luciana Togeiro de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Environmental Technology
Environmental Goods
International Trade
F18
F14
F13
Tecnologia ambiental. Bens ambientais. Comércio internacional.
F18
F14
F13
topic Environmental Technology
Environmental Goods
International Trade
F18
F14
F13
Tecnologia ambiental. Bens ambientais. Comércio internacional.
F18
F14
F13
description During the negotiations of the Doha Round (2001-2007), several studies reported the evident concern of developing countries with the negotiations on the liberalization of trade in environmental goods and services. This is because, given their structural dependence on technology imported from developed countries, the expected gains of this liberalization should concentrate in the latter. From this initial discussion, this article examines the international trade of environmental technologies between the years 2002 and 2013, more specifically, trade flows between OECD countries and non-member countries of the OECD, considered here as a reference to, respectively, developed and developing countries. The goal is to analyze the extent to which developed countries keep the leadership of exports and developing countries are limited to the status of environmental goods importers. The results show this pattern of trade, but the scenery changes with the rise of China and the decline of US and Japan’s share. Regarding the level of tariff protection on environmental goods, the OECD member countries remain more open, ie, they apply low average import tariffs compared to those from OECD non-member countries.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa quantitativa e qualitativa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649130
10.20396/rbi.v15i2.8649130
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649130
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/rbi.v15i2.8649130
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649130/15679
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-274
Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-274
Revista Brasileira de Inovação; v. 15 n. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-274
2178-2822
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbi@ige.unicamp.br
_version_ 1809464309408858112