International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649130 |
Resumo: | During the negotiations of the Doha Round (2001-2007), several studies reported the evident concern of developing countries with the negotiations on the liberalization of trade in environmental goods and services. This is because, given their structural dependence on technology imported from developed countries, the expected gains of this liberalization should concentrate in the latter. From this initial discussion, this article examines the international trade of environmental technologies between the years 2002 and 2013, more specifically, trade flows between OECD countries and non-member countries of the OECD, considered here as a reference to, respectively, developed and developing countries. The goal is to analyze the extent to which developed countries keep the leadership of exports and developing countries are limited to the status of environmental goods importers. The results show this pattern of trade, but the scenery changes with the rise of China and the decline of US and Japan’s share. Regarding the level of tariff protection on environmental goods, the OECD member countries remain more open, ie, they apply low average import tariffs compared to those from OECD non-member countries. |
id |
UNICAMP-9_f64fa691d83a257539075a56a066836a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8649130 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-9 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under reviewComércio internacional de tecnologias ambientais: o padrão histórico em análiseEnvironmental TechnologyEnvironmental GoodsInternational TradeF18F14F13Tecnologia ambiental. Bens ambientais. Comércio internacional.F18F14F13During the negotiations of the Doha Round (2001-2007), several studies reported the evident concern of developing countries with the negotiations on the liberalization of trade in environmental goods and services. This is because, given their structural dependence on technology imported from developed countries, the expected gains of this liberalization should concentrate in the latter. From this initial discussion, this article examines the international trade of environmental technologies between the years 2002 and 2013, more specifically, trade flows between OECD countries and non-member countries of the OECD, considered here as a reference to, respectively, developed and developing countries. The goal is to analyze the extent to which developed countries keep the leadership of exports and developing countries are limited to the status of environmental goods importers. The results show this pattern of trade, but the scenery changes with the rise of China and the decline of US and Japan’s share. Regarding the level of tariff protection on environmental goods, the OECD member countries remain more open, ie, they apply low average import tariffs compared to those from OECD non-member countries.Durante as negociações da Rodada Doha (2001-2007), diversos estudos reportaram a preocupação dos países em desenvolvimento com as negociações sobre a liberalização do comércio de bens e serviços ambientais. Partindo dessa discussão inicial, o presente artigo analisa o comércio internacional de tecnologias ambientais entre 2002 e 2013, mais especificamente os fluxos de comércio entre os países-membros da OCDE e os não membros. O objetivo é analisar em que medida os países desenvolvidos seguem na liderança das exportações e aqueles em desenvolvimento limitam-se à condição de importadores de bens ambientais. Os resultados evidenciam este padrão de comércio, mas o cenário muda com a ascensão da China e o declínio da participação dos EUA e do Japão. No tocante ao nível de proteção tarifária sobre bens ambientais, os países-membros da OCDE seguem muito mais abertos, ou seja, aplicam baixas tarifas médias de importação comparadas àquelas dos países não membros.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-08-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa quantitativa e qualitativaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/864913010.20396/rbi.v15i2.8649130Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-274Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-274Revista Brasileira de Inovação; v. 15 n. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-2742178-2822reponame:Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649130/15679Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNascimento, Renata Muniz doAlmeida, Luciana Togeiro de2017-12-12T11:51:40Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8649130Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbiPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/oai||rbi@ige.unicamp.br2178-28221677-2504opendoar:2017-12-12T11:51:40Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review Comércio internacional de tecnologias ambientais: o padrão histórico em análise |
title |
International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review |
spellingShingle |
International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review Nascimento, Renata Muniz do Environmental Technology Environmental Goods International Trade F18 F14 F13 Tecnologia ambiental. Bens ambientais. Comércio internacional. F18 F14 F13 |
title_short |
International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review |
title_full |
International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review |
title_fullStr |
International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review |
title_full_unstemmed |
International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review |
title_sort |
International Trade in Environmental Technologies: the historical pattern under review |
author |
Nascimento, Renata Muniz do |
author_facet |
Nascimento, Renata Muniz do Almeida, Luciana Togeiro de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Luciana Togeiro de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nascimento, Renata Muniz do Almeida, Luciana Togeiro de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Technology Environmental Goods International Trade F18 F14 F13 Tecnologia ambiental. Bens ambientais. Comércio internacional. F18 F14 F13 |
topic |
Environmental Technology Environmental Goods International Trade F18 F14 F13 Tecnologia ambiental. Bens ambientais. Comércio internacional. F18 F14 F13 |
description |
During the negotiations of the Doha Round (2001-2007), several studies reported the evident concern of developing countries with the negotiations on the liberalization of trade in environmental goods and services. This is because, given their structural dependence on technology imported from developed countries, the expected gains of this liberalization should concentrate in the latter. From this initial discussion, this article examines the international trade of environmental technologies between the years 2002 and 2013, more specifically, trade flows between OECD countries and non-member countries of the OECD, considered here as a reference to, respectively, developed and developing countries. The goal is to analyze the extent to which developed countries keep the leadership of exports and developing countries are limited to the status of environmental goods importers. The results show this pattern of trade, but the scenery changes with the rise of China and the decline of US and Japan’s share. Regarding the level of tariff protection on environmental goods, the OECD member countries remain more open, ie, they apply low average import tariffs compared to those from OECD non-member countries. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa quantitativa e qualitativa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649130 10.20396/rbi.v15i2.8649130 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649130 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/rbi.v15i2.8649130 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/article/view/8649130/15679 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Inovação |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-274 Revista Brasileira de Inovação; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-274 Revista Brasileira de Inovação; v. 15 n. 2 (2016): jul./dez.; 247-274 2178-2822 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Inovação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbi@ige.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1809464309408858112 |