DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
DOI: | 10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n3p753-784 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4835 |
Resumo: | The gravitational force of preceding jurisprudential acts on determining factors in juridical decision-taking is analyzed. Criteria are also established with regard to its occurrence in Brazil especially in the wake of the new Code of Civil Law. The above is especially due to a great increase in the importance of decisions, particularly the higher courts, as persuasive arguments for the formation of juridical conviction. Jurisprudence is actually a hierarchical juridical source which is decisive within the Brazilian juridical scenario, ranking below Normative Texts and Juridical Principles. Their relevance does not lie with that which is judged but in the presentation of arguments for the solution of similar cases (structured basis) to improve the launching of juridical decisions. Increase the coherence of Juridical ordering and to preserve the institutional history of law. Further, the New Civil Code provided a different treatment to the gravitational force of Jurisprudence within the Brazilian conditions by changing the functioning of the system in this specific point and requires the attention of professionals with regard to the operationalization of the stare decisis categories, analogy, distinction, exceeding, ratio decidendi and obter dicta. At the end of the investigation, the inductive method was employed; the Cartesian method was employed for data treatment and the final text was composed within the deductive logical basis. Reference, category, operational concept and bibliographical research were employed during the different phases of the research. |
id |
UNICESU-0_3dda65606f6d71f424c43f56222d60de |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4835 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICESU-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
spelling |
DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAWAPUNTES INICIALES SOBRE LA FUERZA GRAVITACIONAL DE LA JURISPRIDENCIA EN EL NUEVO CÓDIGO DE PROCESO CIVILApontamentos Iniciais sobre a Força Gravitacional da Jurisprudência no Novo Código de Processo CivilJurisprudenceJurisprudential precedentsJuridical normsJuridical decisionJurisprudenciaPrecedentes JurisprudencialesNormas JurídicasDecisión Judicial.JurisprudênciaPrecedentes JurisprudenciaisNormas JurídicasDecisão JudicialThe gravitational force of preceding jurisprudential acts on determining factors in juridical decision-taking is analyzed. Criteria are also established with regard to its occurrence in Brazil especially in the wake of the new Code of Civil Law. The above is especially due to a great increase in the importance of decisions, particularly the higher courts, as persuasive arguments for the formation of juridical conviction. Jurisprudence is actually a hierarchical juridical source which is decisive within the Brazilian juridical scenario, ranking below Normative Texts and Juridical Principles. Their relevance does not lie with that which is judged but in the presentation of arguments for the solution of similar cases (structured basis) to improve the launching of juridical decisions. Increase the coherence of Juridical ordering and to preserve the institutional history of law. Further, the New Civil Code provided a different treatment to the gravitational force of Jurisprudence within the Brazilian conditions by changing the functioning of the system in this specific point and requires the attention of professionals with regard to the operationalization of the stare decisis categories, analogy, distinction, exceeding, ratio decidendi and obter dicta. At the end of the investigation, the inductive method was employed; the Cartesian method was employed for data treatment and the final text was composed within the deductive logical basis. Reference, category, operational concept and bibliographical research were employed during the different phases of the research.El objetivo (o referente) de este texto es tratar de la fuerza gravitacional de los precedentes jurisprudenciales como elementos de determinación de la toma de decisiones judiciales y, también, establecer algunos criterios cuanto a su incidencia en el contexto brasileño, mayormente considerando en Nuevo Código Civil (NCPC). La motivación para tratar de este tema sucede del notable aumento de la importancia de las decisiones de los tribunales, especialmente los superiores, como argumentos persuasivos para la formación de la convicción judicial en el escenario brasileño. Las conclusiones fueron en el sentido de que la Jurisprudencia es una Fuente Jurídica de jerarquía decisiva en el escenario jurídico brasileño, posicionada tras los Textos Normativos y los Principios Jurídicos, cuya relevancia reside no en el sentido del juzgado (dispositivo), pero sí en la presentación de los argumentos pertinentes para la resolución de casos semejantes (fundamentación estructurada), de modo a perfeccionar el lanzamiento de decisiones judiciales, aumentar la coherencia del ordenamiento Jurídico y preservar la historia institucional del Derecho. También se ha aclarado que el NCPC ha conferido un tratamiento especial a la fuerza gravitacional de la Jurisprudencia en el escenario brasileño, de modo a alternar el funcionamiento del sistema en este quesito particular y, así, exigir atención de los profesionales cuanto a la operación de las categorías stare decisis, analogía, distinción, superación, ratio decidendi y obter dicta. Por fin, cuanto a la metodología empleada, se destaca que en la fase de investigación fue utilizado el método inductivo, en la fase de tratamiento de datos el cartesiano y el texto final fue compuesto en la base lógica deductiva. En las diversas fases de la pesquisa, fueron accionadas las técnicas del referente, de la categoría, del concepto operacional y de la pesquisa bibliográfica.O objetivo (ou referente) do presente texto é tratar da força gravitacional dos precedentes jurisprudenciais como elementos de determinação na tomada de decisões judiciais e, também, estabelecer alguns critérios quanto à sua incidência no contexto brasileiro, mormente considerando o Novo Código de Processo Civil (NCPC). A motivação para tratar deste assunto decorre do notável aumento da importância das decisões dos tribunais, notadamente os superiores, como argumentos persuasivos para formação da convicção judicial no cenário brasileiro. As conclusões foram no sentido de que a Jurisprudência é uma Fonte Jurídica de hierarquia decisiva no cenário jurídico brasileiro, posicionada logo abaixo dos Textos Normativos e dos Princípios Jurídicos, cuja relevância reside não no sentido do julgado (dispositivo), mas sim na apresentação dos argumentos pertinentes para resolução de casos similares (fundamentação estruturada), de modo a otimizar o lançamento de decisões judiciais, aumentar a coerência do Ordenamento Jurídico e preservar a história institucional do Direito. Também restou esclarecido que o NCPC conferiu um tratamento especial à força gravitacional da Jurisprudência no cenário brasileiro, de modo a alterar o funcionamento do sistema neste particular e, assim, exigir atenção dos profissionais quanto à operacionalização das categorias stare decisis, analogia, distinção, superação, ratio decidendi e obter dicta. Por fim, quanto à metodologia empregada, destaca-se que na fase de investigação foi utilizado o método indutivo, na fase de tratamento de dados o cartesiano e o texto final foi composto na base lógica dedutiva. Nas diversas fases da pesquisa, foram acionadas as técnicas do referente, da categoria, do conceito operacional e da pesquisa bibliográfica.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2016-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/483510.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n3p753-784Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 16 n. 3 (2016): set./dez.; 753-7842176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4835/2887Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZanon Junior, Orlando LuizLuiz, Fernando Vieira2020-10-20T17:48:14Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4835Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2020-10-20T17:48:14Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW APUNTES INICIALES SOBRE LA FUERZA GRAVITACIONAL DE LA JURISPRIDENCIA EN EL NUEVO CÓDIGO DE PROCESO CIVIL Apontamentos Iniciais sobre a Força Gravitacional da Jurisprudência no Novo Código de Processo Civil |
title |
DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW |
spellingShingle |
DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz Jurisprudence Jurisprudential precedents Juridical norms Juridical decision Jurisprudencia Precedentes Jurisprudenciales Normas Jurídicas Decisión Judicial. Jurisprudência Precedentes Jurisprudenciais Normas Jurídicas Decisão Judicial Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz Jurisprudence Jurisprudential precedents Juridical norms Juridical decision Jurisprudencia Precedentes Jurisprudenciales Normas Jurídicas Decisión Judicial. Jurisprudência Precedentes Jurisprudenciais Normas Jurídicas Decisão Judicial |
title_short |
DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW |
title_full |
DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW |
title_fullStr |
DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW |
title_full_unstemmed |
DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW |
title_sort |
DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW |
author |
Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz |
author_facet |
Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz Luiz, Fernando Vieira Luiz, Fernando Vieira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Luiz, Fernando Vieira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz Luiz, Fernando Vieira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Jurisprudence Jurisprudential precedents Juridical norms Juridical decision Jurisprudencia Precedentes Jurisprudenciales Normas Jurídicas Decisión Judicial. Jurisprudência Precedentes Jurisprudenciais Normas Jurídicas Decisão Judicial |
topic |
Jurisprudence Jurisprudential precedents Juridical norms Juridical decision Jurisprudencia Precedentes Jurisprudenciales Normas Jurídicas Decisión Judicial. Jurisprudência Precedentes Jurisprudenciais Normas Jurídicas Decisão Judicial |
description |
The gravitational force of preceding jurisprudential acts on determining factors in juridical decision-taking is analyzed. Criteria are also established with regard to its occurrence in Brazil especially in the wake of the new Code of Civil Law. The above is especially due to a great increase in the importance of decisions, particularly the higher courts, as persuasive arguments for the formation of juridical conviction. Jurisprudence is actually a hierarchical juridical source which is decisive within the Brazilian juridical scenario, ranking below Normative Texts and Juridical Principles. Their relevance does not lie with that which is judged but in the presentation of arguments for the solution of similar cases (structured basis) to improve the launching of juridical decisions. Increase the coherence of Juridical ordering and to preserve the institutional history of law. Further, the New Civil Code provided a different treatment to the gravitational force of Jurisprudence within the Brazilian conditions by changing the functioning of the system in this specific point and requires the attention of professionals with regard to the operationalization of the stare decisis categories, analogy, distinction, exceeding, ratio decidendi and obter dicta. At the end of the investigation, the inductive method was employed; the Cartesian method was employed for data treatment and the final text was composed within the deductive logical basis. Reference, category, operational concept and bibliographical research were employed during the different phases of the research. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4835 10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n3p753-784 |
url |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4835 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n3p753-784 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4835/2887 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 16 n. 3 (2016): set./dez.; 753-784 2176-9184 1677-6402 reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) instacron:UNICESU |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
instacron_str |
UNICESU |
institution |
UNICESU |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
collection |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||naep@unicesumar.edu.br |
_version_ |
1822181357084737536 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n3p753-784 |