DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Luiz, Fernando Vieira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4835
Resumo: The gravitational force of preceding jurisprudential acts on determining factors in juridical decision-taking is analyzed. Criteria are also established with regard to its occurrence in Brazil especially in the wake of the new Code of Civil Law. The above is especially due to a great increase in the importance of decisions, particularly the higher courts, as persuasive arguments for the formation of juridical conviction. Jurisprudence is actually a hierarchical juridical source which is decisive within the Brazilian juridical scenario, ranking below Normative Texts and Juridical Principles. Their relevance does not lie with that which is judged but in the presentation of arguments for the solution of similar cases (structured basis) to improve the launching of juridical decisions. Increase the coherence of Juridical ordering and to preserve the institutional history of law. Further, the New Civil Code provided a different treatment to the gravitational force of Jurisprudence within the Brazilian conditions by changing the functioning of the system in this specific point and requires the attention of professionals with regard to the operationalization of the stare decisis categories, analogy, distinction, exceeding, ratio decidendi and obter dicta. At the end of the investigation, the inductive method was employed; the Cartesian method was employed for data treatment and the final text was composed within the deductive logical basis. Reference, category, operational concept and bibliographical research were employed during the different phases of the research.
id UNICESU-0_3dda65606f6d71f424c43f56222d60de
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4835
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAWAPUNTES INICIALES SOBRE LA FUERZA GRAVITACIONAL DE LA JURISPRIDENCIA EN EL NUEVO CÓDIGO DE PROCESO CIVILApontamentos Iniciais sobre a Força Gravitacional da Jurisprudência no Novo Código de Processo CivilJurisprudenceJurisprudential precedentsJuridical normsJuridical decisionJurisprudenciaPrecedentes JurisprudencialesNormas JurídicasDecisión Judicial.JurisprudênciaPrecedentes JurisprudenciaisNormas JurídicasDecisão JudicialThe gravitational force of preceding jurisprudential acts on determining factors in juridical decision-taking is analyzed. Criteria are also established with regard to its occurrence in Brazil especially in the wake of the new Code of Civil Law. The above is especially due to a great increase in the importance of decisions, particularly the higher courts, as persuasive arguments for the formation of juridical conviction. Jurisprudence is actually a hierarchical juridical source which is decisive within the Brazilian juridical scenario, ranking below Normative Texts and Juridical Principles. Their relevance does not lie with that which is judged but in the presentation of arguments for the solution of similar cases (structured basis) to improve the launching of juridical decisions. Increase the coherence of Juridical ordering and to preserve the institutional history of law. Further, the New Civil Code provided a different treatment to the gravitational force of Jurisprudence within the Brazilian conditions by changing the functioning of the system in this specific point and requires the attention of professionals with regard to the operationalization of the stare decisis categories, analogy, distinction, exceeding, ratio decidendi and obter dicta. At the end of the investigation, the inductive method was employed; the Cartesian method was employed for data treatment and the final text was composed within the deductive logical basis. Reference, category, operational concept and bibliographical research were employed during the different phases of the research.El objetivo (o referente) de este texto es tratar de la fuerza gravitacional de los precedentes jurisprudenciales como elementos de determinación de la toma de decisiones judiciales y, también, establecer algunos criterios cuanto a su incidencia en el contexto brasileño, mayormente considerando en Nuevo Código Civil (NCPC). La motivación para tratar de este tema sucede del notable aumento de la importancia de las decisiones de los tribunales, especialmente los superiores, como argumentos persuasivos para la formación de la convicción judicial en el escenario brasileño. Las conclusiones fueron en el sentido de que la Jurisprudencia es una Fuente Jurídica de jerarquía decisiva en el escenario jurídico brasileño, posicionada tras los Textos Normativos y los Principios Jurídicos, cuya relevancia reside no en el sentido del juzgado (dispositivo), pero sí en la presentación de los argumentos pertinentes para la resolución de casos semejantes (fundamentación estructurada), de modo a perfeccionar el lanzamiento de decisiones judiciales, aumentar la coherencia del ordenamiento Jurídico y preservar la historia institucional del Derecho. También se ha aclarado que el NCPC ha conferido un tratamiento especial a la fuerza gravitacional de la Jurisprudencia en el escenario brasileño, de modo a alternar el funcionamiento del sistema en este quesito particular y, así, exigir atención de los profesionales cuanto a la operación de las categorías stare decisis, analogía, distinción, superación, ratio decidendi y obter dicta. Por fin, cuanto a la metodología empleada, se destaca que en la fase de investigación fue utilizado el método inductivo, en la fase de tratamiento de datos el cartesiano y el texto final fue compuesto en la base lógica deductiva. En las diversas fases de la pesquisa, fueron accionadas las técnicas del referente, de la categoría, del concepto operacional y de la pesquisa bibliográfica.O objetivo (ou referente) do presente texto é tratar da força gravitacional dos precedentes jurisprudenciais como elementos de determinação na tomada de decisões judiciais e, também, estabelecer alguns critérios quanto à sua incidência no contexto brasileiro, mormente considerando o Novo Código de Processo Civil (NCPC). A motivação para tratar deste assunto decorre do notável aumento da importância das decisões dos tribunais, notadamente os superiores, como argumentos persuasivos para formação da convicção judicial no cenário brasileiro. As conclusões foram no sentido de que a Jurisprudência é uma Fonte Jurídica de hierarquia decisiva no cenário jurídico brasileiro, posicionada logo abaixo dos Textos Normativos e dos Princípios Jurídicos, cuja relevância reside não no sentido do julgado (dispositivo), mas sim na apresentação dos argumentos pertinentes para resolução de casos similares (fundamentação estruturada), de modo a otimizar o lançamento de decisões judiciais, aumentar a coerência do Ordenamento Jurídico e preservar a história institucional do Direito. Também restou esclarecido que o NCPC conferiu um tratamento especial à força gravitacional da Jurisprudência no cenário brasileiro, de modo a alterar o funcionamento do sistema neste particular e, assim, exigir atenção dos profissionais quanto à operacionalização das categorias stare decisis, analogia, distinção, superação, ratio decidendi e obter dicta. Por fim, quanto à metodologia empregada, destaca-se que na fase de investigação foi utilizado o método indutivo, na fase de tratamento de dados o cartesiano e o texto final foi composto na base lógica dedutiva. Nas diversas fases da pesquisa, foram acionadas as técnicas do referente, da categoria, do conceito operacional e da pesquisa bibliográfica.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2016-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/483510.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n3p753-784Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 16 n. 3 (2016): set./dez.; 753-7842176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4835/2887Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZanon Junior, Orlando LuizLuiz, Fernando Vieira2020-10-20T17:48:14Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4835Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2020-10-20T17:48:14Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW
APUNTES INICIALES SOBRE LA FUERZA GRAVITACIONAL DE LA JURISPRIDENCIA EN EL NUEVO CÓDIGO DE PROCESO CIVIL
Apontamentos Iniciais sobre a Força Gravitacional da Jurisprudência no Novo Código de Processo Civil
title DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW
spellingShingle DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW
Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz
Jurisprudence
Jurisprudential precedents
Juridical norms
Juridical decision
Jurisprudencia
Precedentes Jurisprudenciales
Normas Jurídicas
Decisión Judicial.
Jurisprudência
Precedentes Jurisprudenciais
Normas Jurídicas
Decisão Judicial
title_short DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW
title_full DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW
title_fullStr DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW
title_full_unstemmed DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW
title_sort DISCUSSIONS ON THE POWER OF JURISPRUDENCE ON THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL LAW
author Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz
author_facet Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz
Luiz, Fernando Vieira
author_role author
author2 Luiz, Fernando Vieira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz
Luiz, Fernando Vieira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Jurisprudence
Jurisprudential precedents
Juridical norms
Juridical decision
Jurisprudencia
Precedentes Jurisprudenciales
Normas Jurídicas
Decisión Judicial.
Jurisprudência
Precedentes Jurisprudenciais
Normas Jurídicas
Decisão Judicial
topic Jurisprudence
Jurisprudential precedents
Juridical norms
Juridical decision
Jurisprudencia
Precedentes Jurisprudenciales
Normas Jurídicas
Decisión Judicial.
Jurisprudência
Precedentes Jurisprudenciais
Normas Jurídicas
Decisão Judicial
description The gravitational force of preceding jurisprudential acts on determining factors in juridical decision-taking is analyzed. Criteria are also established with regard to its occurrence in Brazil especially in the wake of the new Code of Civil Law. The above is especially due to a great increase in the importance of decisions, particularly the higher courts, as persuasive arguments for the formation of juridical conviction. Jurisprudence is actually a hierarchical juridical source which is decisive within the Brazilian juridical scenario, ranking below Normative Texts and Juridical Principles. Their relevance does not lie with that which is judged but in the presentation of arguments for the solution of similar cases (structured basis) to improve the launching of juridical decisions. Increase the coherence of Juridical ordering and to preserve the institutional history of law. Further, the New Civil Code provided a different treatment to the gravitational force of Jurisprudence within the Brazilian conditions by changing the functioning of the system in this specific point and requires the attention of professionals with regard to the operationalization of the stare decisis categories, analogy, distinction, exceeding, ratio decidendi and obter dicta. At the end of the investigation, the inductive method was employed; the Cartesian method was employed for data treatment and the final text was composed within the deductive logical basis. Reference, category, operational concept and bibliographical research were employed during the different phases of the research.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4835
10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n3p753-784
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4835
identifier_str_mv 10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n3p753-784
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4835/2887
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 16 n. 3 (2016): set./dez.; 753-784
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042387386204160