To Be or Not to Be: The Supreme Federal Court During the 1964-1985 Military Dictatorship

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Bruno Bastos de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lazari, Rafael José Nadim de, Oliveira, José Djalisson Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/9044
Resumo: A juridical and historical discussion is provided between political and juridical narratives on the judicial autonomy of the Federal Supreme Court during the 1964-1985 military dictatorship. Discussions on the narratives with regard to the independence of the courts and their relationships with the government provide a historical comprehension on the impartiality of jurisdiction during the dictatorship. Research deals with the 1964-1985 Brazilian dictatorship and the participation of juridical authorities, with only a slight space in juridical and historical analyses. In spite of the internal influences of the regime on the Court´s prerogatives, the latter lay within a reality in which palpable concerns were mainly distant situations of what was occurring in Brazil. Historical, juridical and sociological research applies investigation techniques to an historical and juridical analysis. Bibliographical research recovered narratives by lawyers and authorities of the regime and the Court´s space and autonomy. Research also analyzes the influence of the military regime on the functions of the Supreme Court and the manifestations of its members, with historical aspects for a deeper understanding of the issue.
id UNICESU-0_d43eed570dd526e518c66b52229caed9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9044
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling To Be or Not to Be: The Supreme Federal Court During the 1964-1985 Military DictatorshipSer o No Ser: El Supremo Tribunal Federal en la Dictadura Militar de 1964Ser ou Não Ser: O Supremo Tribunal Federal na Ditadura Militar de 1964Military dictatorshipHistory of Brazilian LawSupreme Federal CourtDictadura militarHistoria del derecho brasileñoSupremo Tribunal FederalDitadura militarHistória do direito brasileiroSupremo Tribunal FederalDireito ConstitucionalSTFDitaduraA juridical and historical discussion is provided between political and juridical narratives on the judicial autonomy of the Federal Supreme Court during the 1964-1985 military dictatorship. Discussions on the narratives with regard to the independence of the courts and their relationships with the government provide a historical comprehension on the impartiality of jurisdiction during the dictatorship. Research deals with the 1964-1985 Brazilian dictatorship and the participation of juridical authorities, with only a slight space in juridical and historical analyses. In spite of the internal influences of the regime on the Court´s prerogatives, the latter lay within a reality in which palpable concerns were mainly distant situations of what was occurring in Brazil. Historical, juridical and sociological research applies investigation techniques to an historical and juridical analysis. Bibliographical research recovered narratives by lawyers and authorities of the regime and the Court´s space and autonomy. Research also analyzes the influence of the military regime on the functions of the Supreme Court and the manifestations of its members, with historical aspects for a deeper understanding of the issue. En el presente estudio se plantea una discusión jurídico-histórica entre las narrativas política y jurídica en lo que se refiere a la autonomía judicial del Supremo Tribunal Federal durante la dictadura militar de 1964. Las disputas de narrativas sobre la independencia del Judiciario y su relación con la política ofrecen comprensión histórica sobre la imparcialidad de jurisdicción en el período dictatorial. La investigación se refiere al período de la dictadura militar en Brasil (1964-1985) y a la participación de sus actores jurídicos, que aún ocupan espacio reducido en los análisis jurídico-históricas. Pese las influencias internas del régimen en las prerrogativas del STF, la Corte estaba en una realidad en la cual las preocupaciones tangibles, mayoritariamente, eran situaciones lejanas de las que sucedían en el país. La investigación se vincula a los métodos histórico y jurídico-sociológico, aplicando como técnica investigativa el análisis histórico-jurídica. Se buscó recuperar, bajo investigación bibliográfica, las narrativas de juristas y autoridades del régimen y los límites del espacio de autonomía de la Corte. El estudio también abordó em el análisis de la influencia del régimen en las funciones del STF y las manifestaciones de los ministros, encaminando aspectos históricos para una amplia comprensión.O presente trabalho traz à baila uma discussão jurídico-histórica entre as narrativas política e jurídica no que se refere à autonomia judicial do Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a ditadura militar de 1964. As disputas de narrativas sobre a independência do Judiciário e a sua relação com a política oferecem compreensão histórica sobre a imparcialidade de jurisdição no período ditatorial. A pesquisa se refere ao período da ditadura militar no Brasil (1964-1985) e à participação dos seus atores jurídicos, que ainda ocupam espaço reduzido nas análises jurídico-históricas. Apesar das influências internas do regime nas prerrogativas do STF, a Corte estava em uma realidade na qual as preocupações palpáveis, majoritariamente, eram situações distantes das que ocorriam no país. A pesquisa se vincula aos métodos histórico e jurídico-sociológico, aplicando como técnica investigativa a análise histórico-jurídica. Buscou recuperar, sob pesquisa bibliográfica, as narrativas de juristas e autoridades do regime e os limites do espaço de autonomia da Corte. O trabalho também se debruça na análise da influência do regime nas funções do STF e as manifestações dos Ministros, encaminhando aspectos históricos para uma ampla compreensão.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2021-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/904410.17765/2176-9184.2021v21n1p111-128Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 21 n. 1 (2021): jan./abr.; 111-1282176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/9044/6635Oliveira, Bruno Bastos deLazari, Rafael José Nadim deOliveira, José Djalisson Santosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-06-30T20:20:46Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9044Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-06-30T20:20:46Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv To Be or Not to Be: The Supreme Federal Court During the 1964-1985 Military Dictatorship
Ser o No Ser: El Supremo Tribunal Federal en la Dictadura Militar de 1964
Ser ou Não Ser: O Supremo Tribunal Federal na Ditadura Militar de 1964
title To Be or Not to Be: The Supreme Federal Court During the 1964-1985 Military Dictatorship
spellingShingle To Be or Not to Be: The Supreme Federal Court During the 1964-1985 Military Dictatorship
Oliveira, Bruno Bastos de
Military dictatorship
History of Brazilian Law
Supreme Federal Court
Dictadura militar
Historia del derecho brasileño
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Ditadura militar
História do direito brasileiro
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Direito Constitucional
STF
Ditadura
title_short To Be or Not to Be: The Supreme Federal Court During the 1964-1985 Military Dictatorship
title_full To Be or Not to Be: The Supreme Federal Court During the 1964-1985 Military Dictatorship
title_fullStr To Be or Not to Be: The Supreme Federal Court During the 1964-1985 Military Dictatorship
title_full_unstemmed To Be or Not to Be: The Supreme Federal Court During the 1964-1985 Military Dictatorship
title_sort To Be or Not to Be: The Supreme Federal Court During the 1964-1985 Military Dictatorship
author Oliveira, Bruno Bastos de
author_facet Oliveira, Bruno Bastos de
Lazari, Rafael José Nadim de
Oliveira, José Djalisson Santos
author_role author
author2 Lazari, Rafael José Nadim de
Oliveira, José Djalisson Santos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Bruno Bastos de
Lazari, Rafael José Nadim de
Oliveira, José Djalisson Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Military dictatorship
History of Brazilian Law
Supreme Federal Court
Dictadura militar
Historia del derecho brasileño
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Ditadura militar
História do direito brasileiro
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Direito Constitucional
STF
Ditadura
topic Military dictatorship
History of Brazilian Law
Supreme Federal Court
Dictadura militar
Historia del derecho brasileño
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Ditadura militar
História do direito brasileiro
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Direito Constitucional
STF
Ditadura
description A juridical and historical discussion is provided between political and juridical narratives on the judicial autonomy of the Federal Supreme Court during the 1964-1985 military dictatorship. Discussions on the narratives with regard to the independence of the courts and their relationships with the government provide a historical comprehension on the impartiality of jurisdiction during the dictatorship. Research deals with the 1964-1985 Brazilian dictatorship and the participation of juridical authorities, with only a slight space in juridical and historical analyses. In spite of the internal influences of the regime on the Court´s prerogatives, the latter lay within a reality in which palpable concerns were mainly distant situations of what was occurring in Brazil. Historical, juridical and sociological research applies investigation techniques to an historical and juridical analysis. Bibliographical research recovered narratives by lawyers and authorities of the regime and the Court´s space and autonomy. Research also analyzes the influence of the military regime on the functions of the Supreme Court and the manifestations of its members, with historical aspects for a deeper understanding of the issue.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/9044
10.17765/2176-9184.2021v21n1p111-128
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/9044
identifier_str_mv 10.17765/2176-9184.2021v21n1p111-128
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/9044/6635
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 21 n. 1 (2021): jan./abr.; 111-128
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042388600455168

Registros relacionados