THE DEBATE BETWEEN LUIGI FERRAJOLI AND ABOLITIONISTS: BETWEEN THE ATTRACTION OF THE FEAR DISCOURSE AND LIBERTY PRACTICES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ávila, Gustavo Noronha de
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4410
Resumo: From the beginning of the century, Ferrajoli´s penal guaranteeism has been accepted by several Brazilian jurists. Foregrounded on neo-contractualism, the political-criminal trend aims at the rationalization the punishing authority. It is different from the classical minimalist perspectives since it contains a pessimist strain with regard to the exercise of Penal Law, with a trend towards abuse. Skepticism does not mean overcoming the bases of the State´s law reinforcement apparatus. Current paper problematizes Ferrajoli´s criticism against the Abolitionists´ flows. We will indicate libertarian routes and underscore the limits of theory, acknowledged by the Italian jurist, but ignored by most of his followers. Results show that penal garanteeism constitutes an un-practical theory: its ties to metaphysics and the need to rethink punishment as from the pain that reveals it.
id UNICESU-0_dee9e04d2e480f03ae2834d65f93e39a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4410
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE DEBATE BETWEEN LUIGI FERRAJOLI AND ABOLITIONISTS: BETWEEN THE ATTRACTION OF THE FEAR DISCOURSE AND LIBERTY PRACTICESEL DEBATE ENTRE LUIGI FERRAJOLI Y LOS ABOLICIONISTAS: ENTRE LA SEDUCCIÓN POR EL DISCURSO DEL MIEDO Y LAS PRÁCTICAS LIBERTARIASO Debate entre Luigi Ferrajoli e os Abolicionistas: Entre a Sedução pelo Discurso do Medo e as Práticas Libertáriasenal AbolitionismPenal GuaranteeismLuigi FerrajoliCriminal policiesAbolicionismo PenalGarantismo PenalLuigi FerrajoliPolítica Criminal.Abolicionismo PenalGarantismo PenalLuigi FerrajoliPolítica Criminal.From the beginning of the century, Ferrajoli´s penal guaranteeism has been accepted by several Brazilian jurists. Foregrounded on neo-contractualism, the political-criminal trend aims at the rationalization the punishing authority. It is different from the classical minimalist perspectives since it contains a pessimist strain with regard to the exercise of Penal Law, with a trend towards abuse. Skepticism does not mean overcoming the bases of the State´s law reinforcement apparatus. Current paper problematizes Ferrajoli´s criticism against the Abolitionists´ flows. We will indicate libertarian routes and underscore the limits of theory, acknowledged by the Italian jurist, but ignored by most of his followers. Results show that penal garanteeism constitutes an un-practical theory: its ties to metaphysics and the need to rethink punishment as from the pain that reveals it.El garantismo penal de Ferrajoli ha conquistado, desde el principio del siglo, innúmeros adeptos entre los juristas brasileños. De base neocontractual, esta tendencia político-criminal tiene como objetivo racionalizar el poder punitivo. Se diferencia de las perspectivas minimalistas clásicas por poseer un acento pesimista en relación al ejercicio del Derecho Penal, que tienden al abuso. Tal escepticismo, sin embargo, no significa la posibilidad de superar las fundaciones del aparato represivo del estado. En este artículo, problematizamos las críticas de Ferrajoli a los flujos abolicionistas. Apuntamos itinerarios libertarios y llamamos la atención para los límites de la teoría, reconocidos por el propio italiano, pero ignorados por buena parte de sus seguidores. Argumentamos, al fin, como el garantismo penal constituye, él propio, una teoría irrealizable, sus vinculaciones con la metafísica y la necesidad de repensar la punición a partir de aquello que la desnuda, o sea, el dolor.O garantismo penal de Ferrajoli tem conquistado, desde o início do século, inúmeros adeptos entre os juristas brasileiros. De base neocontratualista, esta tendência político-criminal tem como objetivo racionalizar o poder punitivo. Diferencia-se das perspectivas minimalistas clássicas por possuir um acento pessimista quanto ao exercício do Direito Penal, tendente ao abuso. Tal ceticismo, porém, não significa a possibilidade de superar as fundações do aparato repressivo do Estado. Neste artigo, problematizamos as críticas de Ferrajoli aos fluxos abolicionistas. Apontamos percursos libertários e chamamos a atenção para os limites da teoria, reconhecidos pelo próprio italiano, mas ignorados por boa parte de seus seguidores. Argumentamos, ao fim, como o garantismo penal constitui, ele próprio, uma teoria irrealizável, suas vinculações com a metafísica e a necessidade de repensar a punição a partir daquilo que a desnuda, ou seja, a dor.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2016-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesRevisão de Literaturaapplication/pdfapplication/mswordhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/441010.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n2p543-561Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 16 n. 2 (2016): maio/ago.; 543-5612176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4410/2808https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4410/4761Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessÁvila, Gustavo Noronha de2020-10-20T17:46:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4410Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2020-10-20T17:46:34Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE DEBATE BETWEEN LUIGI FERRAJOLI AND ABOLITIONISTS: BETWEEN THE ATTRACTION OF THE FEAR DISCOURSE AND LIBERTY PRACTICES
EL DEBATE ENTRE LUIGI FERRAJOLI Y LOS ABOLICIONISTAS: ENTRE LA SEDUCCIÓN POR EL DISCURSO DEL MIEDO Y LAS PRÁCTICAS LIBERTARIAS
O Debate entre Luigi Ferrajoli e os Abolicionistas: Entre a Sedução pelo Discurso do Medo e as Práticas Libertárias
title THE DEBATE BETWEEN LUIGI FERRAJOLI AND ABOLITIONISTS: BETWEEN THE ATTRACTION OF THE FEAR DISCOURSE AND LIBERTY PRACTICES
spellingShingle THE DEBATE BETWEEN LUIGI FERRAJOLI AND ABOLITIONISTS: BETWEEN THE ATTRACTION OF THE FEAR DISCOURSE AND LIBERTY PRACTICES
Ávila, Gustavo Noronha de
enal Abolitionism
Penal Guaranteeism
Luigi Ferrajoli
Criminal policies
Abolicionismo Penal
Garantismo Penal
Luigi Ferrajoli
Política Criminal.
Abolicionismo Penal
Garantismo Penal
Luigi Ferrajoli
Política Criminal.
title_short THE DEBATE BETWEEN LUIGI FERRAJOLI AND ABOLITIONISTS: BETWEEN THE ATTRACTION OF THE FEAR DISCOURSE AND LIBERTY PRACTICES
title_full THE DEBATE BETWEEN LUIGI FERRAJOLI AND ABOLITIONISTS: BETWEEN THE ATTRACTION OF THE FEAR DISCOURSE AND LIBERTY PRACTICES
title_fullStr THE DEBATE BETWEEN LUIGI FERRAJOLI AND ABOLITIONISTS: BETWEEN THE ATTRACTION OF THE FEAR DISCOURSE AND LIBERTY PRACTICES
title_full_unstemmed THE DEBATE BETWEEN LUIGI FERRAJOLI AND ABOLITIONISTS: BETWEEN THE ATTRACTION OF THE FEAR DISCOURSE AND LIBERTY PRACTICES
title_sort THE DEBATE BETWEEN LUIGI FERRAJOLI AND ABOLITIONISTS: BETWEEN THE ATTRACTION OF THE FEAR DISCOURSE AND LIBERTY PRACTICES
author Ávila, Gustavo Noronha de
author_facet Ávila, Gustavo Noronha de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ávila, Gustavo Noronha de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv enal Abolitionism
Penal Guaranteeism
Luigi Ferrajoli
Criminal policies
Abolicionismo Penal
Garantismo Penal
Luigi Ferrajoli
Política Criminal.
Abolicionismo Penal
Garantismo Penal
Luigi Ferrajoli
Política Criminal.
topic enal Abolitionism
Penal Guaranteeism
Luigi Ferrajoli
Criminal policies
Abolicionismo Penal
Garantismo Penal
Luigi Ferrajoli
Política Criminal.
Abolicionismo Penal
Garantismo Penal
Luigi Ferrajoli
Política Criminal.
description From the beginning of the century, Ferrajoli´s penal guaranteeism has been accepted by several Brazilian jurists. Foregrounded on neo-contractualism, the political-criminal trend aims at the rationalization the punishing authority. It is different from the classical minimalist perspectives since it contains a pessimist strain with regard to the exercise of Penal Law, with a trend towards abuse. Skepticism does not mean overcoming the bases of the State´s law reinforcement apparatus. Current paper problematizes Ferrajoli´s criticism against the Abolitionists´ flows. We will indicate libertarian routes and underscore the limits of theory, acknowledged by the Italian jurist, but ignored by most of his followers. Results show that penal garanteeism constitutes an un-practical theory: its ties to metaphysics and the need to rethink punishment as from the pain that reveals it.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
Revisão de Literatura
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4410
10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n2p543-561
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4410
identifier_str_mv 10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n2p543-561
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4410/2808
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4410/4761
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/msword
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 16 n. 2 (2016): maio/ago.; 543-561
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042387325386752

Registros relacionados