POWER OF THE JUDGE AND “AUTARCHY ZONES”: DIRECT FORM IN THE COLLECTIVE INJUNCTION OF TJRS TRAINEES ON “COURT VACATION”
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/5220 |
Resumo: | Current analysis is based on the juridical and critical thought rooted in the Frankfurt School and on the investigation of the jurist José Rodrigo Rodriguez. The paper discusses the configuration of law on the collective injunction processed and judged by the Court of the state of Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS) on the vindication of trainees against the suspended payment during the 2014/2015 court vacation. The case study method was employed for an empirical research within the investigation of facts, their implications and relative consequences to a duly limited phenomenon. The issue may be resumed in the following questions: How did the judicialization of the conflict in the collective injunction occur against the suspension of payment for the 2014/2015 court vacation of the TJRS? How may social forces involved be characterized within the context of the decision? Current approach requires proper institutional reformulations to absorb social demands through the radicalization of democracy (RODRIGUEZ, 2009, 2013). It is thus inserted within the critical task of the problematization of the ‘autarchy zones’, a category formulated by Rodriguez and basic in current paper. Situations indicate some modes of existence of the autarchy zones and the employment of false legality. On the other hand, the democratically governed public debate permits that the up-till-now contra-hegemonic positions may be defended in the name of social emancipation. The ‘struggle for rights in democracy’ is the key to avoid backtracking. |
id |
UNICESU-0_e62b22417d6526d2676925f53091be1d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5220 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICESU-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
POWER OF THE JUDGE AND “AUTARCHY ZONES”: DIRECT FORM IN THE COLLECTIVE INJUNCTION OF TJRS TRAINEES ON “COURT VACATION”PODER (DEL) JUDICIARIO Y “ZONAS DE AUTARQUÍA”: LA FORMA DERECHO EN EL MANDADO DE SEGURANZA COLECTIVO DE LOS PRACTICANTES DEL TJRS SOBRE EL “RECESO FORENSE”PODER (DO) JUDICIÁRIO E “ZONAS DE AUTARQUIA”: A FORMA DIREITO NO MANDADO DE SEGURANÇA COLETIVO DOS ESTAGIÁRIOS DO TJRS SOBRE O “RECESSO FORENSE”Autarchy ZonesPublic SphereZonas de autarquíaEsfera públicaZonas de autarquiaEsfera públicaCurrent analysis is based on the juridical and critical thought rooted in the Frankfurt School and on the investigation of the jurist José Rodrigo Rodriguez. The paper discusses the configuration of law on the collective injunction processed and judged by the Court of the state of Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS) on the vindication of trainees against the suspended payment during the 2014/2015 court vacation. The case study method was employed for an empirical research within the investigation of facts, their implications and relative consequences to a duly limited phenomenon. The issue may be resumed in the following questions: How did the judicialization of the conflict in the collective injunction occur against the suspension of payment for the 2014/2015 court vacation of the TJRS? How may social forces involved be characterized within the context of the decision? Current approach requires proper institutional reformulations to absorb social demands through the radicalization of democracy (RODRIGUEZ, 2009, 2013). It is thus inserted within the critical task of the problematization of the ‘autarchy zones’, a category formulated by Rodriguez and basic in current paper. Situations indicate some modes of existence of the autarchy zones and the employment of false legality. On the other hand, the democratically governed public debate permits that the up-till-now contra-hegemonic positions may be defended in the name of social emancipation. The ‘struggle for rights in democracy’ is the key to avoid backtracking.Vinculado al pensamiento jurídico-crítico con raíces en la “Escuela de Frankfurt” y partiendo de los análisis del jurista José Rodrigo Rodríguez, en este estudio se buscará promover reflexiones sobre la configuración del derecho en el caso particular del mandado de seguranza colectivo procesado y juzgado por el Tribunal de Justicia del Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS) a propósito de la reivindicación de aprendices contra la suspensión del pago de la remuneración durante el “receso forense” de 2014/2015. Involucrado en tal propuesta, en este estudio se buscará promover reflexiones sobre la configuración del derecho en el caso particular del mandado de seguranza colectivo procesado y juzgado por el Tribunal de Justicia de Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS) a propósito da reivindicaciones de practicantes contra la suspensión del pago de la remuneración durante el “receso forense” de 2014/2015. Para tanto, se utilizó del método de estudio de caso, como vía de investigación empírica apto a investigar los hechos y sus implicaciones y consecuencias relativos a un dado fenómeno debidamente delimitado. El problema estudiado puede ser traducido con las siguientes preguntas: ¿cómo sucedió la “juridificación” del conflicto en el mandado de seguranza colectivo impetrado contra la suspensión del pago del “receso forense” 2014/2015 do TJRS? ¿De qué modo las fuerzas sociales implicadas pueden ser caracterizadas, considerando la decisión proferida? El abordaje tendrá en enfoque la necesidad de reformulaciones institucionales aptas a absorber inclusivamente las demandas sociales por intermedio de la radicalización de la democracia (RODRIGUEZ, 2009, 2013), lo que se insiere en una tarea crítica de problematización de las “zonas de autarquía”, categoría creada por Rodríguez y central al trabajo. Al final, las situaciones visualizadas apuntaron, entonces, algunos modos de ser de las zonas de autarquía y usos de la falsa legalidad. Por otro lado, el debate público regulado democráticamente permite que posiciones hasta el momento contra-hegemónicas sean defendidas en nombre de la emancipación social. La “lucha por derechos en la democracia” es la clave para evitar un paso hacia atrás.Vinculado ao pensamento jurídico-crítico com raízes na “Escola de Frankfurt” e partindo das análises do jurista José Rodrigo Rodriguez, este trabalho buscará promover reflexões sobre a configuração do direito no caso particular do mandado de segurança coletivo processado e julgado pelo Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS) a propósito da reivindicação de estagiários contra a suspensão do pagamento da remuneração durante o “recesso forense” de 2014/2015. Envolvido em tal proposta, este trabalho buscará promover reflexões sobre a configuração do direito no caso particular do mandado de segurança coletivo processado e julgado pelo Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS) a propósito da reivindicação de estagiários contra a suspensão do pagamento da remuneração durante o “recesso forense” de 2014/2015. Para tanto, utilizou-se do método de estudo de caso, como via de pesquisa empírica apto a investigar os fatos e suas implicações e consequências relativos a um dado fenômeno devidamente delimitado. O problema estudado pode ser traduzido com as seguintes perguntas: como ocorreu a juridificação do conflito no mandado de segurança coletivo impetrado contra a suspensão do pagamento do “recesso forense” 2014/2015 do TJRS? De que modo as forças sociais envolvidas podem ser caracterizadas, considerando a decisão proferida? A abordagem terá em foco a necessidade de reformulações institucionais aptas a absorver inclusivamente as demandas sociais por meio da radicalização da democracia (RODRIGUEZ, 2009, 2013), o que se insere numa tarefa crítica de problematização das “zonas de autarquia”, categoria criada por Rodriguez e central ao trabalho. Ao final, as situações visualizadas apontaram, então, alguns modos de ser das zonas de autarquia e usos da falsa legalidade. Por outro lado, o debate público regulado democraticamente permite que posições até agora contra-hegemônicas sejam defendidas em nome da emancipação social. A “luta por direitos na democracia” é a chave para evitar retrocessos.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2018-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesRevisão de Literatura; Análise Documentalapplication/pdfCDF V2 Document, corrupt: Cannot read summary infohttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/522010.17765/2176-9184.2018v18n2p429-457Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 18 n. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 429-4572176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/5220/3256https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/5220/4791Siqueira, Carlos Eduardo PereiraRodriguez, José Rodrigoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-10-20T17:45:55Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5220Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2020-10-20T17:45:55Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
POWER OF THE JUDGE AND “AUTARCHY ZONES”: DIRECT FORM IN THE COLLECTIVE INJUNCTION OF TJRS TRAINEES ON “COURT VACATION” PODER (DEL) JUDICIARIO Y “ZONAS DE AUTARQUÍA”: LA FORMA DERECHO EN EL MANDADO DE SEGURANZA COLECTIVO DE LOS PRACTICANTES DEL TJRS SOBRE EL “RECESO FORENSE” PODER (DO) JUDICIÁRIO E “ZONAS DE AUTARQUIA”: A FORMA DIREITO NO MANDADO DE SEGURANÇA COLETIVO DOS ESTAGIÁRIOS DO TJRS SOBRE O “RECESSO FORENSE” |
title |
POWER OF THE JUDGE AND “AUTARCHY ZONES”: DIRECT FORM IN THE COLLECTIVE INJUNCTION OF TJRS TRAINEES ON “COURT VACATION” |
spellingShingle |
POWER OF THE JUDGE AND “AUTARCHY ZONES”: DIRECT FORM IN THE COLLECTIVE INJUNCTION OF TJRS TRAINEES ON “COURT VACATION” Siqueira, Carlos Eduardo Pereira Autarchy Zones Public Sphere Zonas de autarquía Esfera pública Zonas de autarquia Esfera pública |
title_short |
POWER OF THE JUDGE AND “AUTARCHY ZONES”: DIRECT FORM IN THE COLLECTIVE INJUNCTION OF TJRS TRAINEES ON “COURT VACATION” |
title_full |
POWER OF THE JUDGE AND “AUTARCHY ZONES”: DIRECT FORM IN THE COLLECTIVE INJUNCTION OF TJRS TRAINEES ON “COURT VACATION” |
title_fullStr |
POWER OF THE JUDGE AND “AUTARCHY ZONES”: DIRECT FORM IN THE COLLECTIVE INJUNCTION OF TJRS TRAINEES ON “COURT VACATION” |
title_full_unstemmed |
POWER OF THE JUDGE AND “AUTARCHY ZONES”: DIRECT FORM IN THE COLLECTIVE INJUNCTION OF TJRS TRAINEES ON “COURT VACATION” |
title_sort |
POWER OF THE JUDGE AND “AUTARCHY ZONES”: DIRECT FORM IN THE COLLECTIVE INJUNCTION OF TJRS TRAINEES ON “COURT VACATION” |
author |
Siqueira, Carlos Eduardo Pereira |
author_facet |
Siqueira, Carlos Eduardo Pereira Rodriguez, José Rodrigo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodriguez, José Rodrigo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Siqueira, Carlos Eduardo Pereira Rodriguez, José Rodrigo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Autarchy Zones Public Sphere Zonas de autarquía Esfera pública Zonas de autarquia Esfera pública |
topic |
Autarchy Zones Public Sphere Zonas de autarquía Esfera pública Zonas de autarquia Esfera pública |
description |
Current analysis is based on the juridical and critical thought rooted in the Frankfurt School and on the investigation of the jurist José Rodrigo Rodriguez. The paper discusses the configuration of law on the collective injunction processed and judged by the Court of the state of Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS) on the vindication of trainees against the suspended payment during the 2014/2015 court vacation. The case study method was employed for an empirical research within the investigation of facts, their implications and relative consequences to a duly limited phenomenon. The issue may be resumed in the following questions: How did the judicialization of the conflict in the collective injunction occur against the suspension of payment for the 2014/2015 court vacation of the TJRS? How may social forces involved be characterized within the context of the decision? Current approach requires proper institutional reformulations to absorb social demands through the radicalization of democracy (RODRIGUEZ, 2009, 2013). It is thus inserted within the critical task of the problematization of the ‘autarchy zones’, a category formulated by Rodriguez and basic in current paper. Situations indicate some modes of existence of the autarchy zones and the employment of false legality. On the other hand, the democratically governed public debate permits that the up-till-now contra-hegemonic positions may be defended in the name of social emancipation. The ‘struggle for rights in democracy’ is the key to avoid backtracking. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares Revisão de Literatura; Análise Documental |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/5220 10.17765/2176-9184.2018v18n2p429-457 |
url |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/5220 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17765/2176-9184.2018v18n2p429-457 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/5220/3256 https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/5220/4791 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf CDF V2 Document, corrupt: Cannot read summary info |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 18 n. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 429-457 2176-9184 1677-6402 reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) instacron:UNICESU |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
instacron_str |
UNICESU |
institution |
UNICESU |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
collection |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||naep@unicesumar.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798042387420807168 |