Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SILVA, João Vitor da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: AMBROSIO, Matrheus Z
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Digital Unicesumar
Texto Completo: http://rdu.unicesumar.edu.br/handle/123456789/9227
Resumo: This work aimed to evaluate whether the use of herbicides such as glyphosate and atrazin, alone or in mixture, can cause damage to the crop, in addition to combinations with foliar fertilizers to reduce these damages. Thus, a completely randomized design (CRD) was used, with 10 treatments and 4 repetitions. All applications were carried out using a back sprayer when the plant had 4 permanent leaves and following the dosages indicated for each of the products. With the exception of stem diameter, all other parameters analyzed showed statistical differences (plant height, green matter weight, ear insertion height, ear weight, weight of a thousand grains and yield), with T1 (without weeding) , T5 (glyphosate), T2 (without weeding + foliar), T6 (glyphosate + foliar), T3 (without weeding + foliar), T10 (glyphosate + atrazin + foliar) and T9 (glyphosate + atrazin) the treatments with the worst averages obtained, as an example productivity: T1 (2.72 kg/6.3 m2); T5 (2.89 kg/6.3 m2); T2 (3.04 kg/6.3 m2); T6 (3.08 kg/6.3 m2); T3 (3.42 kg/6.3 m2); T10 (3.49 kg/6.3 m2); T9 (3.69 kg/6.3 m2) and T4 (weeding + foliar), T7 (atrazin) and T8 (atrazin + foliar) the treatments with the best averages: T4 (4.09 kg/6.3 m2); T7 (3.84 kg/6.3 m2); T8 (3.79 kg/6.3 m2), indicating that atrazin was more efficient in controlling weeds, less phytotoxic and that the foliar was efficient in reducing these injuries when combined with the treatment.
id UNICESU-1_ae02000505115d9551117da334ffc81d
oai_identifier_str oai:rdu.unicesumar.edu.br:123456789/9227
network_acronym_str UNICESU-1
network_name_str Repositório Digital Unicesumar
repository_id_str
spelling Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.)AtrazinGlyphosateToxidadeThis work aimed to evaluate whether the use of herbicides such as glyphosate and atrazin, alone or in mixture, can cause damage to the crop, in addition to combinations with foliar fertilizers to reduce these damages. Thus, a completely randomized design (CRD) was used, with 10 treatments and 4 repetitions. All applications were carried out using a back sprayer when the plant had 4 permanent leaves and following the dosages indicated for each of the products. With the exception of stem diameter, all other parameters analyzed showed statistical differences (plant height, green matter weight, ear insertion height, ear weight, weight of a thousand grains and yield), with T1 (without weeding) , T5 (glyphosate), T2 (without weeding + foliar), T6 (glyphosate + foliar), T3 (without weeding + foliar), T10 (glyphosate + atrazin + foliar) and T9 (glyphosate + atrazin) the treatments with the worst averages obtained, as an example productivity: T1 (2.72 kg/6.3 m2); T5 (2.89 kg/6.3 m2); T2 (3.04 kg/6.3 m2); T6 (3.08 kg/6.3 m2); T3 (3.42 kg/6.3 m2); T10 (3.49 kg/6.3 m2); T9 (3.69 kg/6.3 m2) and T4 (weeding + foliar), T7 (atrazin) and T8 (atrazin + foliar) the treatments with the best averages: T4 (4.09 kg/6.3 m2); T7 (3.84 kg/6.3 m2); T8 (3.79 kg/6.3 m2), indicating that atrazin was more efficient in controlling weeds, less phytotoxic and that the foliar was efficient in reducing these injuries when combined with the treatment.Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar se o uso de herbicidas como glyphosate e atrazin, isolados ou em mistura, podem causar injúrias na cultura, além de combinações com fertilizantes foliares para redução desses danos. Para isto, foi utilizado o Delineamento Inteiramente Casualizado (DIC), com 10 tratamentos e 4 repetições. Todas as aplicações foram realizadas com o uso de um pulverizador costal quando a planta apresentava 4 folhas definitivas e seguindo as dosagens indicadas para cada um dos produtos. Com exceção do diâmetro de colmo, todos os outros parâmetros analisados apresentaram diferenças estatísticas (altura de plantas, peso de matéria verde, altura de inserção de espiga, peso de espigas, peso de mil grãos e produtividade), sendo o T1 (sem capina), T5 (glyphosate), T2 (sem capina + foliar), T6 (glyphosate + foliar), T3 (sem capina + foliar), T10 (glyphosate + atrazin + foliar) e T9 (glyphosate + atrazin) os tratamentos com as piores médias obtidas, como exemplo produtividade: T1 (2,72 kg/6,3 m2); T5 (2,89 kg/6,3 m2); T2 (3,04 kg/6,3 m2); T6 (3,08 kg/6,3 m2); T3 (3,42 kg/6,3 m2); T10 (3,49 kg/6,3 m2); T9 (3,69 kg/6,3 m2) e T4 (capina + foliar), T7 (atrazin) e T8 (atrazin + foliar) os tratamentos com melhores médias: T4 (4,09 kg/6,3 m2); T7 (3,84 kg/6,3 m2); T8 (3,79 kg/6,3 m2), indicando que a atrazin foi mais eficiente no controle das plantas invasoras, menos fitotóxico e que o foliar foi eficiente em reduzir essas injúrias quando combinado ao tratamento.UNIVERSIDADE CESUMARBrasilUNICESUMARZULIANI, Aline Maria Orbolato GonçalvesZULIANI, Aline Maria Ordolato GonçalvesBIDO, Graciene de SouzaSPERANDIO, Isadora FernandaSILVA, João Vitor daAMBROSIO, Matrheus Z2021-12-22T13:16:47Z2021-12-222021-12-22T13:16:47Z2021-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfSILVA, João Vitor da; AMBROSIO, Matheus Crubelati. Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.). 18f. 2021. Unicesumar - Universidade Cesumar Maringá, 2021.Presencialhttp://rdu.unicesumar.edu.br/handle/123456789/9227porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Digital Unicesumarinstname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UniCesumar2021-12-23T06:00:54Zoai:rdu.unicesumar.edu.br:123456789/9227Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://rdu.unicesumar.edu.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-12-23T06:00:54Repositório Digital Unicesumar - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.)
title Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.)
spellingShingle Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.)
SILVA, João Vitor da
Atrazin
Glyphosate
Toxidade
title_short Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.)
title_full Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.)
title_fullStr Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.)
title_full_unstemmed Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.)
title_sort Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.)
author SILVA, João Vitor da
author_facet SILVA, João Vitor da
AMBROSIO, Matrheus Z
author_role author
author2 AMBROSIO, Matrheus Z
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv ZULIANI, Aline Maria Orbolato Gonçalves
ZULIANI, Aline Maria Ordolato Gonçalves
BIDO, Graciene de Souza
SPERANDIO, Isadora Fernanda
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SILVA, João Vitor da
AMBROSIO, Matrheus Z
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Atrazin
Glyphosate
Toxidade
topic Atrazin
Glyphosate
Toxidade
description This work aimed to evaluate whether the use of herbicides such as glyphosate and atrazin, alone or in mixture, can cause damage to the crop, in addition to combinations with foliar fertilizers to reduce these damages. Thus, a completely randomized design (CRD) was used, with 10 treatments and 4 repetitions. All applications were carried out using a back sprayer when the plant had 4 permanent leaves and following the dosages indicated for each of the products. With the exception of stem diameter, all other parameters analyzed showed statistical differences (plant height, green matter weight, ear insertion height, ear weight, weight of a thousand grains and yield), with T1 (without weeding) , T5 (glyphosate), T2 (without weeding + foliar), T6 (glyphosate + foliar), T3 (without weeding + foliar), T10 (glyphosate + atrazin + foliar) and T9 (glyphosate + atrazin) the treatments with the worst averages obtained, as an example productivity: T1 (2.72 kg/6.3 m2); T5 (2.89 kg/6.3 m2); T2 (3.04 kg/6.3 m2); T6 (3.08 kg/6.3 m2); T3 (3.42 kg/6.3 m2); T10 (3.49 kg/6.3 m2); T9 (3.69 kg/6.3 m2) and T4 (weeding + foliar), T7 (atrazin) and T8 (atrazin + foliar) the treatments with the best averages: T4 (4.09 kg/6.3 m2); T7 (3.84 kg/6.3 m2); T8 (3.79 kg/6.3 m2), indicating that atrazin was more efficient in controlling weeds, less phytotoxic and that the foliar was efficient in reducing these injuries when combined with the treatment.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-22T13:16:47Z
2021-12-22
2021-12-22T13:16:47Z
2021-12-22
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv SILVA, João Vitor da; AMBROSIO, Matheus Crubelati. Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.). 18f. 2021. Unicesumar - Universidade Cesumar Maringá, 2021.
Presencial
http://rdu.unicesumar.edu.br/handle/123456789/9227
identifier_str_mv SILVA, João Vitor da; AMBROSIO, Matheus Crubelati. Manejo da fitotoxicidade de herbicidas pós - emergentes na cultura do milho ( Zea mays L.). 18f. 2021. Unicesumar - Universidade Cesumar Maringá, 2021.
Presencial
url http://rdu.unicesumar.edu.br/handle/123456789/9227
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNIVERSIDADE CESUMAR
Brasil
UNICESUMAR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNIVERSIDADE CESUMAR
Brasil
UNICESUMAR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Digital Unicesumar
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UniCesumar
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UniCesumar
institution UniCesumar
reponame_str Repositório Digital Unicesumar
collection Repositório Digital Unicesumar
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Digital Unicesumar - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1813098713021677568