Prohibition to add aroma and flavor to smoking products : what is the limit of the regulatory power of the brazilian health regulatory agency ?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/5249 |
Resumo: | In this study, we investigate whether the regulatory power of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) has violated the law and the Federal Constitution. We demonstrate this with the (in)decision of the Plenary of the Federal Supreme Court concerning the (in)validity of the sanitary regulation which has prohibited the tobacco industry in the country from adding essences of flavor and aroma to tobacco smoke products. As a problem, we see the limited regulatory function of Anvisa, which, by taking into account the conflicting interests of the market, includes the identification of problems with regulatory elements involving technical and legal requirements as well as political regulation. We will use the deductive method with a qualitative approach of the case study referent to the (un)constitutionality of the Resolution of the Board of Directors, RDC No. 14, of March 15, 2012, oriented towards the discussion about Anvisa's regulatory capacity versus the limits of its competency established by primary standards issued by the National Congress. We conclude that Anvisa has issued Resolution RDC No. 14, of 2012, which contains sufficient legal characteristics to authorize its impugnation before the Constitution. |
id |
UNICEUB-3_3b06eab5646813ae970ee47a3b1cd71f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/5249 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICEUB-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Prohibition to add aroma and flavor to smoking products : what is the limit of the regulatory power of the brazilian health regulatory agency ?Law; Economic law; Regulatory Law; Health law; Health Surveillance; Public healthBrazilian Health Regulatory Agency; Jurisprudence; Government Regulation. Smoke-Free Policy; Tobacco Products; Flavoring AgentsIn this study, we investigate whether the regulatory power of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) has violated the law and the Federal Constitution. We demonstrate this with the (in)decision of the Plenary of the Federal Supreme Court concerning the (in)validity of the sanitary regulation which has prohibited the tobacco industry in the country from adding essences of flavor and aroma to tobacco smoke products. As a problem, we see the limited regulatory function of Anvisa, which, by taking into account the conflicting interests of the market, includes the identification of problems with regulatory elements involving technical and legal requirements as well as political regulation. We will use the deductive method with a qualitative approach of the case study referent to the (un)constitutionality of the Resolution of the Board of Directors, RDC No. 14, of March 15, 2012, oriented towards the discussion about Anvisa's regulatory capacity versus the limits of its competency established by primary standards issued by the National Congress. We conclude that Anvisa has issued Resolution RDC No. 14, of 2012, which contains sufficient legal characteristics to authorize its impugnation before the Constitution.UniCEUBDelgado, Joedson de SouzaGico Júnior, Ivo Teixeira2018-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/524910.5102/rbpp.v8i3.5249Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 8, n. 3 (2018): Políticas Públicas e o Direito à Saúde no BrasilRevista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 8, n. 3 (2018): Políticas Públicas e o Direito à Saúde no BrasilRevista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 8, n. 3 (2018): Políticas Públicas e o Direito à Saúde no Brasil2236-16772179-8338reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBenghttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/5249/pdfDireitos autorais 2019 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-02-20T13:31:44Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/5249Revistahttp://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/index.php/RBPPPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/oaiatendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com2236-16772179-8338opendoar:2019-02-20T13:31:44Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prohibition to add aroma and flavor to smoking products : what is the limit of the regulatory power of the brazilian health regulatory agency ? |
title |
Prohibition to add aroma and flavor to smoking products : what is the limit of the regulatory power of the brazilian health regulatory agency ? |
spellingShingle |
Prohibition to add aroma and flavor to smoking products : what is the limit of the regulatory power of the brazilian health regulatory agency ? Delgado, Joedson de Souza Law; Economic law; Regulatory Law; Health law; Health Surveillance; Public health Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency; Jurisprudence; Government Regulation. Smoke-Free Policy; Tobacco Products; Flavoring Agents |
title_short |
Prohibition to add aroma and flavor to smoking products : what is the limit of the regulatory power of the brazilian health regulatory agency ? |
title_full |
Prohibition to add aroma and flavor to smoking products : what is the limit of the regulatory power of the brazilian health regulatory agency ? |
title_fullStr |
Prohibition to add aroma and flavor to smoking products : what is the limit of the regulatory power of the brazilian health regulatory agency ? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prohibition to add aroma and flavor to smoking products : what is the limit of the regulatory power of the brazilian health regulatory agency ? |
title_sort |
Prohibition to add aroma and flavor to smoking products : what is the limit of the regulatory power of the brazilian health regulatory agency ? |
author |
Delgado, Joedson de Souza |
author_facet |
Delgado, Joedson de Souza Gico Júnior, Ivo Teixeira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gico Júnior, Ivo Teixeira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Delgado, Joedson de Souza Gico Júnior, Ivo Teixeira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Law; Economic law; Regulatory Law; Health law; Health Surveillance; Public health Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency; Jurisprudence; Government Regulation. Smoke-Free Policy; Tobacco Products; Flavoring Agents |
topic |
Law; Economic law; Regulatory Law; Health law; Health Surveillance; Public health Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency; Jurisprudence; Government Regulation. Smoke-Free Policy; Tobacco Products; Flavoring Agents |
description |
In this study, we investigate whether the regulatory power of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) has violated the law and the Federal Constitution. We demonstrate this with the (in)decision of the Plenary of the Federal Supreme Court concerning the (in)validity of the sanitary regulation which has prohibited the tobacco industry in the country from adding essences of flavor and aroma to tobacco smoke products. As a problem, we see the limited regulatory function of Anvisa, which, by taking into account the conflicting interests of the market, includes the identification of problems with regulatory elements involving technical and legal requirements as well as political regulation. We will use the deductive method with a qualitative approach of the case study referent to the (un)constitutionality of the Resolution of the Board of Directors, RDC No. 14, of March 15, 2012, oriented towards the discussion about Anvisa's regulatory capacity versus the limits of its competency established by primary standards issued by the National Congress. We conclude that Anvisa has issued Resolution RDC No. 14, of 2012, which contains sufficient legal characteristics to authorize its impugnation before the Constitution. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-20 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/5249 10.5102/rbpp.v8i3.5249 |
url |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/5249 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5102/rbpp.v8i3.5249 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/5249/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2019 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2019 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UniCEUB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UniCEUB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 8, n. 3 (2018): Políticas Públicas e o Direito à Saúde no Brasil Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 8, n. 3 (2018): Políticas Públicas e o Direito à Saúde no Brasil Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 8, n. 3 (2018): Políticas Públicas e o Direito à Saúde no Brasil 2236-1677 2179-8338 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) instacron:UNICEUB |
instname_str |
Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
instacron_str |
UNICEUB |
institution |
UNICEUB |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798328491754651648 |