The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Pádua, Thiago Santos Aguiar
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
DOI: 10.5102/rbpp.v5i2.3024
Texto Completo: https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3024
Resumo: The main purpose of this article is to make a critical approach to the ideas of the Justice Roberto Barroso, from the Brazilian Supreme Court, about the use of the expression Judicial Activism. This paper aims to conduct a brief analysis of the problems inherent in academic discussion of the expression Judicial Activism, since its birth in 1947 in Fortune Magazine with the famous Arthur Schlesinger Jr. article. We observe the uncritical importation of the expression (Judicial Activism) by the Brazilian doctrine, and we observed that this expression became a Constitutional Cliché. We analyzed the use of the term Judicial Activism by the Justice Roberto Barroso, especially in his confirmation hearings before the Brazilian Federal Senate, analyzing primary research sources (shorthand notes, articles, interviews), discovering that there was a trivialization of the term Judicial Activism.
id UNICEUB-3_e1b01098eb01919ebcd1fbe2f1c4a343
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/3024
network_acronym_str UNICEUB-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
spelling The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysisA expressão "ativismo judicial", como um "cliché constitucional", deve ser abandonada: uma análise críticaDireito Constitucional;Ativismo Judicial; Cliché Constitucional; Crítica ao Ministro Luís Roberto Barroso;The main purpose of this article is to make a critical approach to the ideas of the Justice Roberto Barroso, from the Brazilian Supreme Court, about the use of the expression Judicial Activism. This paper aims to conduct a brief analysis of the problems inherent in academic discussion of the expression Judicial Activism, since its birth in 1947 in Fortune Magazine with the famous Arthur Schlesinger Jr. article. We observe the uncritical importation of the expression (Judicial Activism) by the Brazilian doctrine, and we observed that this expression became a Constitutional Cliché. We analyzed the use of the term Judicial Activism by the Justice Roberto Barroso, especially in his confirmation hearings before the Brazilian Federal Senate, analyzing primary research sources (shorthand notes, articles, interviews), discovering that there was a trivialization of the term Judicial Activism.A finalidade principal deste artigo é realizar uma abordagem crítica sobre as ideias do Ministro Luís Roberto Barroso, do Supremo Tribunal Federal, acerca da utilização da expressão Ativismo Judicial. O presente artigo objetiva realizar uma breve análise sobre os problemas inerentes à discussão acadêmica da expressão Ativismo Judicial, desde o nascimento da expressão em 1947 na Revista Fortune com o famoso artigo de Arthur Schlesinger Jr., até a importação acrítica da expressão por parte da doutrina brasileira, observando-se que a expressão se tornou um “cliché constitucional”. Analisa-se a utilização da expressão Ativismo Judicial por parte do Ministro Luís Roberto Barroso, especialmente em sua sabatina perante o Senado Federal brasileiro, a partir de uma análise de fontes primárias de pesquisa (notas taquigráficas, artigos, entrevistas) descobrindo-se que houve uma banalização da expressão Ativismo Judicial. ABSTRACT: The main purpose of this article is to make a critical approach to the ideas of the Justice Roberto Barroso, from the Brazilian Supreme Court, about the use of the expression Judicial Activism. This paper aims to conduct a brief analysis of the problems inherent in academic discussion of the expression Judicial Activism, since its birth in 1947 in Fortune Magazine with the famous Arthur Schlesinger Jr. article. We observe the uncritical importation of the expression (Judicial Activism) by the Brazilian doctrine, and we observed that this expression became a Constitutional Cliché. We analyzed the use of the term Judicial Activism by the Justice Roberto Barroso, especially in his confirmation hearings before the Brazilian Federal Senate, analyzing primary research sources (shorthand notes, articles, interviews), discovering that there was a trivialization of the term Judicial Activism.UniCEUBde Pádua, Thiago Santos Aguiar2015-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/302410.5102/rbpp.v5i2.3024Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 134-168Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 134-168Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 134-1682236-16772179-8338reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBporhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3024/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-11T21:14:03Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/3024Revistahttp://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/index.php/RBPPPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/oaiatendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com2236-16772179-8338opendoar:2018-12-11T21:14:03Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
A expressão "ativismo judicial", como um "cliché constitucional", deve ser abandonada: uma análise crítica
title The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
spellingShingle The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
de Pádua, Thiago Santos Aguiar
Direito Constitucional;
Ativismo Judicial; Cliché Constitucional; Crítica ao Ministro Luís Roberto Barroso;
de Pádua, Thiago Santos Aguiar
Direito Constitucional;
Ativismo Judicial; Cliché Constitucional; Crítica ao Ministro Luís Roberto Barroso;
title_short The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
title_full The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
title_fullStr The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
title_full_unstemmed The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
title_sort The expression “judicial activism”, as a “constitutional cliché”, must be abandoned: a critical analysis
author de Pádua, Thiago Santos Aguiar
author_facet de Pádua, Thiago Santos Aguiar
de Pádua, Thiago Santos Aguiar
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Pádua, Thiago Santos Aguiar
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito Constitucional;
Ativismo Judicial; Cliché Constitucional; Crítica ao Ministro Luís Roberto Barroso;
topic Direito Constitucional;
Ativismo Judicial; Cliché Constitucional; Crítica ao Ministro Luís Roberto Barroso;
description The main purpose of this article is to make a critical approach to the ideas of the Justice Roberto Barroso, from the Brazilian Supreme Court, about the use of the expression Judicial Activism. This paper aims to conduct a brief analysis of the problems inherent in academic discussion of the expression Judicial Activism, since its birth in 1947 in Fortune Magazine with the famous Arthur Schlesinger Jr. article. We observe the uncritical importation of the expression (Judicial Activism) by the Brazilian doctrine, and we observed that this expression became a Constitutional Cliché. We analyzed the use of the term Judicial Activism by the Justice Roberto Barroso, especially in his confirmation hearings before the Brazilian Federal Senate, analyzing primary research sources (shorthand notes, articles, interviews), discovering that there was a trivialization of the term Judicial Activism.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3024
10.5102/rbpp.v5i2.3024
url https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3024
identifier_str_mv 10.5102/rbpp.v5i2.3024
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3024/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UniCEUB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UniCEUB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 134-168
Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 134-168
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 134-168
2236-1677
2179-8338
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
instacron:UNICEUB
instname_str Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
instacron_str UNICEUB
institution UNICEUB
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com
_version_ 1822180567582507008
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5102/rbpp.v5i2.3024

Registros relacionados