ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva Ferreira, Dayse Swélen
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Campos, Carlos Eduardo Costa, Araujo, Andrea Soares
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biota Amazônia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/417
Resumo: This article aims to show the activity of hunting in a rural settlement in the municipality of Porto Grande, Amapá State, from October 2005 to November 2006. The hunt was evaluated by means of open interviews and semi-structured using the questionnaire as a tool and through participant observation of 17 settlers. In total, 261 mammals belonging to 17 species were killed. Of these, 189 (72.4%) were killed for subsistence (food) and 72 (27.6%) for predator control. Among the species reported, five are listed as vulnerable: Myrmecophaga tridactyla, Priodontes maximus, Panthera onca, Puma concolor and Leopardus wiedii. Among the interviewed, the ambush technique (12) is the most widely used, followed by hunting with dogs (4) and trails (1). In the ambush technique is common to capture Agouti paca, Tayassu pecari, Pecari tajacu, Tapirus terrestris, Mazama americana and M. gouazoupira. Knowledge of the local perception on the use of wildlife is critical to decision making in developing projects for the conservation and management of local wildlife in order to maintain as much continuity of access to this natural resource.Keywords: Hunting; Eastern Amazonia; Mammals.
id UNIFAP-3_fb8ec9c8f9f32b6f41745ce323406dc6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/417
network_acronym_str UNIFAP-3
network_name_str Biota Amazônia
repository_id_str
spelling ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁASPECTOS DA ATIVIDADE DE CAÇA NO ASSENTAMENTO RURAL NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICÍPIO DE PORTO GRANDE, ESTADO DO AMAPÁThis article aims to show the activity of hunting in a rural settlement in the municipality of Porto Grande, Amapá State, from October 2005 to November 2006. The hunt was evaluated by means of open interviews and semi-structured using the questionnaire as a tool and through participant observation of 17 settlers. In total, 261 mammals belonging to 17 species were killed. Of these, 189 (72.4%) were killed for subsistence (food) and 72 (27.6%) for predator control. Among the species reported, five are listed as vulnerable: Myrmecophaga tridactyla, Priodontes maximus, Panthera onca, Puma concolor and Leopardus wiedii. Among the interviewed, the ambush technique (12) is the most widely used, followed by hunting with dogs (4) and trails (1). In the ambush technique is common to capture Agouti paca, Tayassu pecari, Pecari tajacu, Tapirus terrestris, Mazama americana and M. gouazoupira. Knowledge of the local perception on the use of wildlife is critical to decision making in developing projects for the conservation and management of local wildlife in order to maintain as much continuity of access to this natural resource.Keywords: Hunting; Eastern Amazonia; Mammals.Este artigo teve como objetivo apresentar a atividade de caça em um assentamento rural no município de Porto Grande, Estado do Amapá, entre outubro de 2005 a novembro de 2006. A caça foi avaliada por meio de entrevistas abertas e semi-estruturadas, utilizando como ferramenta o formulário e através da observação participante com 17 assentados. No total, foram abatidos 261 mamíferos pertencentes a 17 espécies. Destes, 189 (72,4%) foram abatidos para subsistência (alimentação) e 72 (27,6%) para caça controle. Dentre as espécies registradas, cinco estão listadas como vulneráveis: Myrmecophaga tridactyla, Priodontes maximus, Panthera onca, Puma concolor e Leopardus wiedii. Entre os entrevistados, a caça de espera (12) é a mais praticada, seguida pela caça com cachorros (4) e de trilhas (1). Na caça de espera é comum a captura de Agouti paca, Tayassu pecari, Pecari tajacu, Tapirus terrestris, Mazama americana e M. gouazoupira. O conhecimento da percepção local sobre a utilização da fauna silvestre é fundamental para a tomada de decisão na elaboração de projetos para a conservação e manejo da fauna local, visando tanto a manutenção como a continuidade do acesso a esse recurso natural.Palavras-chave: Caça, Amazônia Oriental, mamíferos.Universidade Federal do AmapáSilva Ferreira, Dayse SwélenCampos, Carlos Eduardo CostaAraujo, Andrea Soares2012-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/41710.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v2n1p22-31Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota); v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 22-312179-5746reponame:Biota Amazôniainstname:Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)instacron:UNIFAPporhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/417/v2n1p22-31.pdfDireitos autorais 2012 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-04-18T20:33:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/417Revistahttp://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biotaONGhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/oai||juliosa@unifap.br2179-57462179-5746opendoar:2016-04-18T20:33:22Biota Amazônia - Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ
ASPECTOS DA ATIVIDADE DE CAÇA NO ASSENTAMENTO RURAL NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICÍPIO DE PORTO GRANDE, ESTADO DO AMAPÁ
title ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ
spellingShingle ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ
Silva Ferreira, Dayse Swélen
title_short ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ
title_full ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ
title_fullStr ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ
title_full_unstemmed ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ
title_sort ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ
author Silva Ferreira, Dayse Swélen
author_facet Silva Ferreira, Dayse Swélen
Campos, Carlos Eduardo Costa
Araujo, Andrea Soares
author_role author
author2 Campos, Carlos Eduardo Costa
Araujo, Andrea Soares
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva Ferreira, Dayse Swélen
Campos, Carlos Eduardo Costa
Araujo, Andrea Soares
description This article aims to show the activity of hunting in a rural settlement in the municipality of Porto Grande, Amapá State, from October 2005 to November 2006. The hunt was evaluated by means of open interviews and semi-structured using the questionnaire as a tool and through participant observation of 17 settlers. In total, 261 mammals belonging to 17 species were killed. Of these, 189 (72.4%) were killed for subsistence (food) and 72 (27.6%) for predator control. Among the species reported, five are listed as vulnerable: Myrmecophaga tridactyla, Priodontes maximus, Panthera onca, Puma concolor and Leopardus wiedii. Among the interviewed, the ambush technique (12) is the most widely used, followed by hunting with dogs (4) and trails (1). In the ambush technique is common to capture Agouti paca, Tayassu pecari, Pecari tajacu, Tapirus terrestris, Mazama americana and M. gouazoupira. Knowledge of the local perception on the use of wildlife is critical to decision making in developing projects for the conservation and management of local wildlife in order to maintain as much continuity of access to this natural resource.Keywords: Hunting; Eastern Amazonia; Mammals.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-07-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/417
10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v2n1p22-31
url https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/417
identifier_str_mv 10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v2n1p22-31
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/417/v2n1p22-31.pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2012 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2012 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv





dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Amapá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Amapá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota); v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 22-31
2179-5746
reponame:Biota Amazônia
instname:Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)
instacron:UNIFAP
instname_str Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)
instacron_str UNIFAP
institution UNIFAP
reponame_str Biota Amazônia
collection Biota Amazônia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biota Amazônia - Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||juliosa@unifap.br
_version_ 1800218371703177216