ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biota Amazônia |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/417 |
Resumo: | This article aims to show the activity of hunting in a rural settlement in the municipality of Porto Grande, Amapá State, from October 2005 to November 2006. The hunt was evaluated by means of open interviews and semi-structured using the questionnaire as a tool and through participant observation of 17 settlers. In total, 261 mammals belonging to 17 species were killed. Of these, 189 (72.4%) were killed for subsistence (food) and 72 (27.6%) for predator control. Among the species reported, five are listed as vulnerable: Myrmecophaga tridactyla, Priodontes maximus, Panthera onca, Puma concolor and Leopardus wiedii. Among the interviewed, the ambush technique (12) is the most widely used, followed by hunting with dogs (4) and trails (1). In the ambush technique is common to capture Agouti paca, Tayassu pecari, Pecari tajacu, Tapirus terrestris, Mazama americana and M. gouazoupira. Knowledge of the local perception on the use of wildlife is critical to decision making in developing projects for the conservation and management of local wildlife in order to maintain as much continuity of access to this natural resource.Keywords: Hunting; Eastern Amazonia; Mammals. |
id |
UNIFAP-3_fb8ec9c8f9f32b6f41745ce323406dc6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/417 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFAP-3 |
network_name_str |
Biota Amazônia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁASPECTOS DA ATIVIDADE DE CAÇA NO ASSENTAMENTO RURAL NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICÍPIO DE PORTO GRANDE, ESTADO DO AMAPÁThis article aims to show the activity of hunting in a rural settlement in the municipality of Porto Grande, Amapá State, from October 2005 to November 2006. The hunt was evaluated by means of open interviews and semi-structured using the questionnaire as a tool and through participant observation of 17 settlers. In total, 261 mammals belonging to 17 species were killed. Of these, 189 (72.4%) were killed for subsistence (food) and 72 (27.6%) for predator control. Among the species reported, five are listed as vulnerable: Myrmecophaga tridactyla, Priodontes maximus, Panthera onca, Puma concolor and Leopardus wiedii. Among the interviewed, the ambush technique (12) is the most widely used, followed by hunting with dogs (4) and trails (1). In the ambush technique is common to capture Agouti paca, Tayassu pecari, Pecari tajacu, Tapirus terrestris, Mazama americana and M. gouazoupira. Knowledge of the local perception on the use of wildlife is critical to decision making in developing projects for the conservation and management of local wildlife in order to maintain as much continuity of access to this natural resource.Keywords: Hunting; Eastern Amazonia; Mammals.Este artigo teve como objetivo apresentar a atividade de caça em um assentamento rural no município de Porto Grande, Estado do Amapá, entre outubro de 2005 a novembro de 2006. A caça foi avaliada por meio de entrevistas abertas e semi-estruturadas, utilizando como ferramenta o formulário e através da observação participante com 17 assentados. No total, foram abatidos 261 mamíferos pertencentes a 17 espécies. Destes, 189 (72,4%) foram abatidos para subsistência (alimentação) e 72 (27,6%) para caça controle. Dentre as espécies registradas, cinco estão listadas como vulneráveis: Myrmecophaga tridactyla, Priodontes maximus, Panthera onca, Puma concolor e Leopardus wiedii. Entre os entrevistados, a caça de espera (12) é a mais praticada, seguida pela caça com cachorros (4) e de trilhas (1). Na caça de espera é comum a captura de Agouti paca, Tayassu pecari, Pecari tajacu, Tapirus terrestris, Mazama americana e M. gouazoupira. O conhecimento da percepção local sobre a utilização da fauna silvestre é fundamental para a tomada de decisão na elaboração de projetos para a conservação e manejo da fauna local, visando tanto a manutenção como a continuidade do acesso a esse recurso natural.Palavras-chave: Caça, Amazônia Oriental, mamíferos.Universidade Federal do AmapáSilva Ferreira, Dayse SwélenCampos, Carlos Eduardo CostaAraujo, Andrea Soares2012-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/41710.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v2n1p22-31Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota); v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 22-312179-5746reponame:Biota Amazôniainstname:Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)instacron:UNIFAPporhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/417/v2n1p22-31.pdfDireitos autorais 2012 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-04-18T20:33:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/417Revistahttp://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biotaONGhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/oai||juliosa@unifap.br2179-57462179-5746opendoar:2016-04-18T20:33:22Biota Amazônia - Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ ASPECTOS DA ATIVIDADE DE CAÇA NO ASSENTAMENTO RURAL NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICÍPIO DE PORTO GRANDE, ESTADO DO AMAPÁ |
title |
ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ |
spellingShingle |
ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ Silva Ferreira, Dayse Swélen |
title_short |
ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ |
title_full |
ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ |
title_fullStr |
ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ |
title_full_unstemmed |
ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ |
title_sort |
ASPECTS OF HUNTING ACTIVITY IN RURAL SETTLEMENT NOVA CANAÃ, MUNICIPALITY OF PORTO GRANDE, STATE OF AMAPÁ |
author |
Silva Ferreira, Dayse Swélen |
author_facet |
Silva Ferreira, Dayse Swélen Campos, Carlos Eduardo Costa Araujo, Andrea Soares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos, Carlos Eduardo Costa Araujo, Andrea Soares |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva Ferreira, Dayse Swélen Campos, Carlos Eduardo Costa Araujo, Andrea Soares |
description |
This article aims to show the activity of hunting in a rural settlement in the municipality of Porto Grande, Amapá State, from October 2005 to November 2006. The hunt was evaluated by means of open interviews and semi-structured using the questionnaire as a tool and through participant observation of 17 settlers. In total, 261 mammals belonging to 17 species were killed. Of these, 189 (72.4%) were killed for subsistence (food) and 72 (27.6%) for predator control. Among the species reported, five are listed as vulnerable: Myrmecophaga tridactyla, Priodontes maximus, Panthera onca, Puma concolor and Leopardus wiedii. Among the interviewed, the ambush technique (12) is the most widely used, followed by hunting with dogs (4) and trails (1). In the ambush technique is common to capture Agouti paca, Tayassu pecari, Pecari tajacu, Tapirus terrestris, Mazama americana and M. gouazoupira. Knowledge of the local perception on the use of wildlife is critical to decision making in developing projects for the conservation and management of local wildlife in order to maintain as much continuity of access to this natural resource.Keywords: Hunting; Eastern Amazonia; Mammals. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-07-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/417 10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v2n1p22-31 |
url |
https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/417 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v2n1p22-31 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/417/v2n1p22-31.pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2012 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2012 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Amapá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Amapá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota); v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 22-31 2179-5746 reponame:Biota Amazônia instname:Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP) instacron:UNIFAP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFAP |
institution |
UNIFAP |
reponame_str |
Biota Amazônia |
collection |
Biota Amazônia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biota Amazônia - Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||juliosa@unifap.br |
_version_ |
1800218371703177216 |