Bioethical conflicts in perinatal care: integrative literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lôbo, Ana Luiza Souza de Faria
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Farias, Mariana Maria Pereira Cintra, Silva, Nathalia Lima da, Almeida, Taysa Vieira de, Comassetto, Isabel, Santos, Regina, Santos, Amuzza Aylla Pereira dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25177
Resumo: Objective: to analyze the findings available in the literature about bioethical conflicts experienced by women  during the birth context. Methods: This is an integrative review research, in which a search was performed in the following databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) via PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) and Database in Nursing (BDENF), the last two being via the Virtual Health Library (VHL). The inclusion criteria were articles in the languages- Portuguese, English and Spanish, and time frame in the last ten years. Results: After searching and analyzing the articles, three articles were selected that made up the sample of this research. In these, the bioethical conflicts of Autonomy were identified; Beneficiency and Non-maleficence in perinatal care. Conclusion: The bioethical principle that is most in conflict in this context is that of Autonomy, followed by beneficence and non-maleficence.
id UNIFEI_01c93db84811956560c690a4bbaef022
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25177
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Bioethical conflicts in perinatal care: integrative literature review Conflictos bioéticos en el cuidado perinatal: revisión integradora de la literaturaConflitos bioéticos na assistência perinatal: revisão integrativa da literaturaEmbarazoPartoBioética.PregnancyChildbirthBioethics.GestaçãoPartoBioética.Objective: to analyze the findings available in the literature about bioethical conflicts experienced by women  during the birth context. Methods: This is an integrative review research, in which a search was performed in the following databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) via PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) and Database in Nursing (BDENF), the last two being via the Virtual Health Library (VHL). The inclusion criteria were articles in the languages- Portuguese, English and Spanish, and time frame in the last ten years. Results: After searching and analyzing the articles, three articles were selected that made up the sample of this research. In these, the bioethical conflicts of Autonomy were identified; Beneficiency and Non-maleficence in perinatal care. Conclusion: The bioethical principle that is most in conflict in this context is that of Autonomy, followed by beneficence and non-maleficence.Objectivo: analizar los hallazgos disponibles en la literatura sobre los conflictos bioéticos vividos por las mujeres durante el contexto del parto. Métodos Esta es una investigación de revisión integradora , en la que se realizó una búsqueda en las siguientes bases de datos: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) vía PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) y Database in Nursing (BDENF). ), siendo los dos últimos a través de la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (BVS). El criterio de inclusión utilizado fueron los artículos en los idiomas portugués, inglés y español, y en el marco temporal de los últimos diez años. Resultados: Luego de la búsqueda y análisis de los artículos, se seleccionaron tres artículos que conformaron la muestra de esta investigación. En estos, se identificaron los conflictos bioéticos de la Autonomía; Beneficio y No Maleficencia en la atención perinatal. Conclusión: El principio bioético más conflictivo en este contexto es el de la autonomía, seguido de la beneficencia y la no maleficencia.Objetivo: analisar os achados disponíveis na literatura acerca dos conflitos bioéticos vivenciados pelas mulheres durante o contexto parturitivo. Métodos: Trata-se de uma pesquisa de revisão integrativa, na qual foi realizado uma busca nas seguintes bases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) via PubMed, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) e Base de Dados em Enfermagem (BDENF), sendo as duas últimas via Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS). Utilizou-se como critério de inclusão artigos nos idiomas - português, inglês e espanhol, e recorte temporal nos últimos dez anos. Resultados: Após a busca e análise dos artigos, foram selecionados três artigos que compuseram a amostra desta pesquisa. Nestes foram identificados os conflitos bioéticos da Autonomia; Beneficência e Não-maleficência, na assistência perinatal. Conclusão:  O princípio biótico que mais se apresenta em conflito nesse contexto é o da Autonomia, seguido da beneficência e não-maleficência.Research, Society and Development2022-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2517710.33448/rsd-v11i1.25177Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e46011125177Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e46011125177Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e460111251772525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25177/22071Copyright (c) 2022 Ana Luiza Souza de Faria Lôbo; Mariana Maria Pereira Cintra Farias; Nathalia Lima da Silva; Taysa Vieira de Almeida; Isabel Comassetto; Regina Santos; Amuzza Aylla Pereira dos Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLôbo, Ana Luiza Souza de Faria Farias, Mariana Maria Pereira Cintra Silva, Nathalia Lima da Almeida, Taysa Vieira de Comassetto, Isabel Santos, Regina Santos, Amuzza Aylla Pereira dos 2022-01-16T18:08:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25177Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:31.384802Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bioethical conflicts in perinatal care: integrative literature review
Conflictos bioéticos en el cuidado perinatal: revisión integradora de la literatura
Conflitos bioéticos na assistência perinatal: revisão integrativa da literatura
title Bioethical conflicts in perinatal care: integrative literature review
spellingShingle Bioethical conflicts in perinatal care: integrative literature review
Lôbo, Ana Luiza Souza de Faria
Embarazo
Parto
Bioética.
Pregnancy
Childbirth
Bioethics.
Gestação
Parto
Bioética.
title_short Bioethical conflicts in perinatal care: integrative literature review
title_full Bioethical conflicts in perinatal care: integrative literature review
title_fullStr Bioethical conflicts in perinatal care: integrative literature review
title_full_unstemmed Bioethical conflicts in perinatal care: integrative literature review
title_sort Bioethical conflicts in perinatal care: integrative literature review
author Lôbo, Ana Luiza Souza de Faria
author_facet Lôbo, Ana Luiza Souza de Faria
Farias, Mariana Maria Pereira Cintra
Silva, Nathalia Lima da
Almeida, Taysa Vieira de
Comassetto, Isabel
Santos, Regina
Santos, Amuzza Aylla Pereira dos
author_role author
author2 Farias, Mariana Maria Pereira Cintra
Silva, Nathalia Lima da
Almeida, Taysa Vieira de
Comassetto, Isabel
Santos, Regina
Santos, Amuzza Aylla Pereira dos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lôbo, Ana Luiza Souza de Faria
Farias, Mariana Maria Pereira Cintra
Silva, Nathalia Lima da
Almeida, Taysa Vieira de
Comassetto, Isabel
Santos, Regina
Santos, Amuzza Aylla Pereira dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Embarazo
Parto
Bioética.
Pregnancy
Childbirth
Bioethics.
Gestação
Parto
Bioética.
topic Embarazo
Parto
Bioética.
Pregnancy
Childbirth
Bioethics.
Gestação
Parto
Bioética.
description Objective: to analyze the findings available in the literature about bioethical conflicts experienced by women  during the birth context. Methods: This is an integrative review research, in which a search was performed in the following databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) via PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) and Database in Nursing (BDENF), the last two being via the Virtual Health Library (VHL). The inclusion criteria were articles in the languages- Portuguese, English and Spanish, and time frame in the last ten years. Results: After searching and analyzing the articles, three articles were selected that made up the sample of this research. In these, the bioethical conflicts of Autonomy were identified; Beneficiency and Non-maleficence in perinatal care. Conclusion: The bioethical principle that is most in conflict in this context is that of Autonomy, followed by beneficence and non-maleficence.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25177
10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25177
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25177
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25177
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25177/22071
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e46011125177
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e46011125177
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e46011125177
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052810423959552

Registros relacionados