Surface roughness of composite resins submitted to three different finish and polish systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14194 |
Resumo: | Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro performance of three different finishing and polishing systems, concerning providing better surface smoothness. Materials and methods: 2x4 mm specimens were made with 6 composites: Filtek Z250, Classic Herculite, Opalis, Filtek Z350, Zirconfilll and Estelite Omega, which were subsequently divided into four groups according to a different finishing system (Sof-Lex, OptiDisc, Praxis and Control). After polishing, twelve specimens were distributed to each of the six resins studied, making a total of 72 samples (n = 3), which had their roughness evaluated by a contact roughnessmeter. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-test with Bonferroni adjustment were used to search for significant differences. Values were considered significant when p <0.05. Results: The roughness values for finishing systems showed statistical differences between OpiDisc x Praxis (p = 1,000), OpiDisc and Sof-lex (p = 0.605) and Control and all systems (p <0.0001). There was no statistical difference when analyzing the combination of resin x system. The Mylar strip provided surface quality. Conclusions: The size, composition and shape of the filler influenced the surface. Sof-lex and Praxis showed similar results, thus being a good choice for polishing. Clinical Relevance: This study aimed to help the professional in the choice of a better material in the polishing step. |
id |
UNIFEI_03f31d880dddea7d81aaef394e6ed067 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14194 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Surface roughness of composite resins submitted to three different finish and polish systemsRugosidad superficial en resinas compuestas sometidas a tres diferentes sistemas de acabado y pulidoRugosidade superficial de resinas compostas submetidas à três diferentes sistemas de acabamento e polimentoEstética dentáriaResinas compostasPolimento dentárioDentística operatória.Dental aestheticsComposite resinsDental polishingOperative dentistry.Estética dentalResinas compuestasPulido dentalOperatoria dental.Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro performance of three different finishing and polishing systems, concerning providing better surface smoothness. Materials and methods: 2x4 mm specimens were made with 6 composites: Filtek Z250, Classic Herculite, Opalis, Filtek Z350, Zirconfilll and Estelite Omega, which were subsequently divided into four groups according to a different finishing system (Sof-Lex, OptiDisc, Praxis and Control). After polishing, twelve specimens were distributed to each of the six resins studied, making a total of 72 samples (n = 3), which had their roughness evaluated by a contact roughnessmeter. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-test with Bonferroni adjustment were used to search for significant differences. Values were considered significant when p <0.05. Results: The roughness values for finishing systems showed statistical differences between OpiDisc x Praxis (p = 1,000), OpiDisc and Sof-lex (p = 0.605) and Control and all systems (p <0.0001). There was no statistical difference when analyzing the combination of resin x system. The Mylar strip provided surface quality. Conclusions: The size, composition and shape of the filler influenced the surface. Sof-lex and Praxis showed similar results, thus being a good choice for polishing. Clinical Relevance: This study aimed to help the professional in the choice of a better material in the polishing step.Objetivo: El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar el desempeño in vitro de tres sistemas diferentes de acabado y pulido, considerando su capacidad para proveer una mejor suavidad. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizaron muestras de 2x4 mm con 6 composites: Filtek Z250, Classic Herculite, Opalis, Filtek Z350, Zirconfilll y Estelite Omega, que posteriormente se dividieron en cuatro grupos según un sistema de acabado diferente (Sof-Lex, OptiDisc, Praxis y control). Después del pulido, se distribuyeron doce muestras a cada una de las seis resinas estudiadas, haciendo un total de 72 muestras (n = 3), a las que se les evaluó la rugosidad mediante un rugosímetro de contacto. Se utilizaron la prueba de Kruskal-Wallis y la posprueba de Dunn con ajuste de Bonferroni para buscar diferencias significativas. Los valores se consideraron significativos cuando p <0,05. Resultados: Los valores de rugosidad de los sistemas de acabado mostraron diferencias estadísticas entre OpiDisc x Praxis (p = 1,000), OpiDisc y Sof-lex (p = 0,605) y Control y todos los sistemas (p <0,0001). No hubo diferencia estadística al analizar la combinación resina x sistema. La tira de Mylar proporcionó calidad de superficie. Conclusiones: El tamaño, la composición y la forma del relleno influyeron en la superficie. Sof-lex y Praxis mostraron resultados similares, siendo, por tanto, una buena opción para el pulido. Relevancia clínica: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo ayudar al profesional a elegir el mejor material en el paso de pulido.Objetivo: O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o desempenho in vitro de três diferentes sistemas de acabamento e polimento, considerando sua capacidade de proporcionar melhor lisura. Materiais e Métodos: Espécimes de 2x4 mm foram confeccionados com 6 compósitos: Filtek Z250, Classic Herculite, Opalis, Filtek Z350, Zirconfilll e Estelite Omega, que foram posteriormente divididos em quatro grupos de acordo com um sistema de acabamento diferente (Sof-Lex, OptiDisc, Praxis e controle). Após o polimento, doze corpos de prova foram distribuídos para cada uma das seis resinas estudadas, perfazendo um total de 72 amostras (n = 3), as quais tiveram sua rugosidade avaliada por um rugosímetro de contato. O teste de Kruskal-Wallis e o pós-teste de Dunn com ajuste de Bonferroni foram usados para buscar diferenças significativas. Os valores foram considerados significativos quando p <0,05. Resultados: Os valores de rugosidade dos sistemas de acabamento apresentaram diferenças estatísticas entre OpiDisc x Praxis (p = 1.000), OpiDisc e Sof-lex (p = 0,605) e Controle e todos os sistemas (p <0,0001). Não houve diferença estatística ao analisar a combinação resina x sistema. A tira de Mylar forneceu qualidade de superfície. Conclusões: O tamanho, composição e forma do filler influenciaram a superfície. Sof-lex e Praxis apresentaram resultados semelhantes, sendo, portanto, uma boa escolha para polimento. Relevância Clínica: Este estudo teve como objetivo auxiliar o profissional na escolha do melhor material na etapa de polimento.Research, Society and Development2021-04-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1419410.33448/rsd-v10i4.14194Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e52510414194Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e52510414194Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e525104141942525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14194/12962Copyright (c) 2021 Lorem Krsna de Morais-Sousa; Isabela Pinheiro Cavalcanti Lima; Francisco de Assis do Nascimento-Júnior; Adrielly Fonseca Mendes; Taynara de Araújo Ribeiro Tabosahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorais-Sousa, Lorem Krsna deLima, Isabela Pinheiro Cavalcanti Nascimento-Júnior, Francisco de Assis do Mendes, Adrielly Fonseca Tabosa, Taynara de Araújo Ribeiro 2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14194Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:22.445081Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Surface roughness of composite resins submitted to three different finish and polish systems Rugosidad superficial en resinas compuestas sometidas a tres diferentes sistemas de acabado y pulido Rugosidade superficial de resinas compostas submetidas à três diferentes sistemas de acabamento e polimento |
title |
Surface roughness of composite resins submitted to three different finish and polish systems |
spellingShingle |
Surface roughness of composite resins submitted to three different finish and polish systems Morais-Sousa, Lorem Krsna de Estética dentária Resinas compostas Polimento dentário Dentística operatória. Dental aesthetics Composite resins Dental polishing Operative dentistry. Estética dental Resinas compuestas Pulido dental Operatoria dental. |
title_short |
Surface roughness of composite resins submitted to three different finish and polish systems |
title_full |
Surface roughness of composite resins submitted to three different finish and polish systems |
title_fullStr |
Surface roughness of composite resins submitted to three different finish and polish systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surface roughness of composite resins submitted to three different finish and polish systems |
title_sort |
Surface roughness of composite resins submitted to three different finish and polish systems |
author |
Morais-Sousa, Lorem Krsna de |
author_facet |
Morais-Sousa, Lorem Krsna de Lima, Isabela Pinheiro Cavalcanti Nascimento-Júnior, Francisco de Assis do Mendes, Adrielly Fonseca Tabosa, Taynara de Araújo Ribeiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima, Isabela Pinheiro Cavalcanti Nascimento-Júnior, Francisco de Assis do Mendes, Adrielly Fonseca Tabosa, Taynara de Araújo Ribeiro |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Morais-Sousa, Lorem Krsna de Lima, Isabela Pinheiro Cavalcanti Nascimento-Júnior, Francisco de Assis do Mendes, Adrielly Fonseca Tabosa, Taynara de Araújo Ribeiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Estética dentária Resinas compostas Polimento dentário Dentística operatória. Dental aesthetics Composite resins Dental polishing Operative dentistry. Estética dental Resinas compuestas Pulido dental Operatoria dental. |
topic |
Estética dentária Resinas compostas Polimento dentário Dentística operatória. Dental aesthetics Composite resins Dental polishing Operative dentistry. Estética dental Resinas compuestas Pulido dental Operatoria dental. |
description |
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro performance of three different finishing and polishing systems, concerning providing better surface smoothness. Materials and methods: 2x4 mm specimens were made with 6 composites: Filtek Z250, Classic Herculite, Opalis, Filtek Z350, Zirconfilll and Estelite Omega, which were subsequently divided into four groups according to a different finishing system (Sof-Lex, OptiDisc, Praxis and Control). After polishing, twelve specimens were distributed to each of the six resins studied, making a total of 72 samples (n = 3), which had their roughness evaluated by a contact roughnessmeter. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-test with Bonferroni adjustment were used to search for significant differences. Values were considered significant when p <0.05. Results: The roughness values for finishing systems showed statistical differences between OpiDisc x Praxis (p = 1,000), OpiDisc and Sof-lex (p = 0.605) and Control and all systems (p <0.0001). There was no statistical difference when analyzing the combination of resin x system. The Mylar strip provided surface quality. Conclusions: The size, composition and shape of the filler influenced the surface. Sof-lex and Praxis showed similar results, thus being a good choice for polishing. Clinical Relevance: This study aimed to help the professional in the choice of a better material in the polishing step. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14194 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14194 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14194 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14194 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14194/12962 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e52510414194 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e52510414194 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e52510414194 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052674674262016 |