Administrative improbity law: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araújo, Juliana Maria Fernandes Correia de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Moraes, Ionete Cavalcanti de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9560
Resumo: The Administrative Improbity Law represents a milestone in Brazilian legislation with regard to combating corruption. By establishing limits on the role of public agents, a Law sanctions conduct that undermines the treasury and the principles of Public Administration. However, after two decades in force, the application of this standard still permeates dialogues in the field of legal science. Thus, this article aims to conduct a systematic literature review in order to investigate the scientific production of articles dealing with this matter. It is understood that this review will allow the identification of existing gaps, thus guiding future studies on the topic. The database chosen was the CAPES Periodical where 11 studies were selected. When analyzing the results, it is possible to notice a large time lag between the law and the publication of the researched articles. This shows that, despite 28 years in force, the Improbity Law continues to be the subject of discussion. There was an inevitable association between research and corrupt conduct and administrative improbity in conduct offensive to the environment. Another highlight is the use of qualitative methodology, by most researchers.
id UNIFEI_047eff32517dba604a5ab4597ba4aa49
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9560
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Administrative improbity law: a systematic reviewLey administrativa de improbidad: una revisión sistemáticaLei de improbidade administrativa: uma revisão sistemática Improbidade AdministrativaCorrupçãoAdministração pública.Improbidad administrativaCorrupciónAdministración pública.Administrative ImprobityCorruptionPublic administration.The Administrative Improbity Law represents a milestone in Brazilian legislation with regard to combating corruption. By establishing limits on the role of public agents, a Law sanctions conduct that undermines the treasury and the principles of Public Administration. However, after two decades in force, the application of this standard still permeates dialogues in the field of legal science. Thus, this article aims to conduct a systematic literature review in order to investigate the scientific production of articles dealing with this matter. It is understood that this review will allow the identification of existing gaps, thus guiding future studies on the topic. The database chosen was the CAPES Periodical where 11 studies were selected. When analyzing the results, it is possible to notice a large time lag between the law and the publication of the researched articles. This shows that, despite 28 years in force, the Improbity Law continues to be the subject of discussion. There was an inevitable association between research and corrupt conduct and administrative improbity in conduct offensive to the environment. Another highlight is the use of qualitative methodology, by most researchers.La Ley de Improbidad Administrativa representa un hito en la legislación brasileña en materia de lucha contra la corrupción. Al establecer límites al rol de los agentes públicos, la Ley sanciona conductas que atenten contra la tesorería y los principios de la Administración Pública. Sin embargo, después de dos décadas de vigencia, la aplicación de esta norma aún impregna los diálogos en el campo de las ciencias jurídicas. Por lo tanto, este artículo tiene como objetivo realizar una revisión sistemática de la literatura con el fin de investigar la producción científica de los artículos que abordan este asunto. Se entiende que esta revisión permitirá identificar las brechas existentes, orientando así futuros estudios sobre el tema. La base de datos elegida fue la Revista CAPES donde se seleccionaron 11 estudios. Al analizar los resultados, es posible notar un gran desfase entre la ley y la publicación de los artículos investigados. Esto muestra que, a pesar de 28 años de vigencia, la Ley de Improbidad continúa siendo objeto de discusión. Había una asociación inevitable entre la investigación y la conducta corrupta y la improbidad administrativa en la conducta ofensiva para el medio ambiente. Otro punto a destacar es el uso de metodología cualitativa, por la mayoría de investigadores.A Lei de Improbidade Administrativa representa um marco na legislação brasileira no que concerne o combate à corrupção. Ao estabelecer limites no rol de atuação dos agentes públicos, a Lei sanciona condutas atentatórias ao erário e aos princípios da Administração Pública. Porém, após duas décadas de vigência, a aplicação dessa norma ainda permeia diálogos no campo da ciência jurídica. Dessa forma, esse artigo tem o objetivo de realizar uma revisão sistemática de literatura com o intuito de investigar a produção científica de artigos que versem sobre essa matéria. Entende-se que essa revisão permitirá identificar as lacunas existentes, orientando assim, futuros estudos sobre o tema. A base de dados escolhida foi o Periódico CAPES onde foram selecionados 11 estudos. Ao analisar os resultados pode-se constatar um grande lapso temporal entre a vigência da lei e a publicação dos artigos pesquisados. Isto demonstra que, apesar de 28 anos de vigência, a Lei de Improbidade continua sendo alvo de discussão. Observou-se a inevitável associação das pesquisas a condutas corruptas e a improbidade administrativa nas condutas ofensivas ao meio ambiente. Outro ponto de destaque é a utilização da metodologia qualitativa, pela maioria dos pesquisadores. Research, Society and Development2020-11-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/956010.33448/rsd-v9i11.9560Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e199119560Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e199119560Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e1991195602525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9560/8487Copyright (c) 2020 Juliana Maria Fernandes Correia de Araújo; Ionete Cavalcanti de Moraeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Juliana Maria Fernandes Correia deMoraes, Ionete Cavalcanti de 2020-12-10T23:37:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9560Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:48.482794Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Administrative improbity law: a systematic review
Ley administrativa de improbidad: una revisión sistemática
Lei de improbidade administrativa: uma revisão sistemática
title Administrative improbity law: a systematic review
spellingShingle Administrative improbity law: a systematic review
Araújo, Juliana Maria Fernandes Correia de
Improbidade Administrativa
Corrupção
Administração pública.
Improbidad administrativa
Corrupción
Administración pública.
Administrative Improbity
Corruption
Public administration.
title_short Administrative improbity law: a systematic review
title_full Administrative improbity law: a systematic review
title_fullStr Administrative improbity law: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Administrative improbity law: a systematic review
title_sort Administrative improbity law: a systematic review
author Araújo, Juliana Maria Fernandes Correia de
author_facet Araújo, Juliana Maria Fernandes Correia de
Moraes, Ionete Cavalcanti de
author_role author
author2 Moraes, Ionete Cavalcanti de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo, Juliana Maria Fernandes Correia de
Moraes, Ionete Cavalcanti de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Improbidade Administrativa
Corrupção
Administração pública.
Improbidad administrativa
Corrupción
Administración pública.
Administrative Improbity
Corruption
Public administration.
topic Improbidade Administrativa
Corrupção
Administração pública.
Improbidad administrativa
Corrupción
Administración pública.
Administrative Improbity
Corruption
Public administration.
description The Administrative Improbity Law represents a milestone in Brazilian legislation with regard to combating corruption. By establishing limits on the role of public agents, a Law sanctions conduct that undermines the treasury and the principles of Public Administration. However, after two decades in force, the application of this standard still permeates dialogues in the field of legal science. Thus, this article aims to conduct a systematic literature review in order to investigate the scientific production of articles dealing with this matter. It is understood that this review will allow the identification of existing gaps, thus guiding future studies on the topic. The database chosen was the CAPES Periodical where 11 studies were selected. When analyzing the results, it is possible to notice a large time lag between the law and the publication of the researched articles. This shows that, despite 28 years in force, the Improbity Law continues to be the subject of discussion. There was an inevitable association between research and corrupt conduct and administrative improbity in conduct offensive to the environment. Another highlight is the use of qualitative methodology, by most researchers.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9560
10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9560
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9560
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9560
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9560/8487
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Juliana Maria Fernandes Correia de Araújo; Ionete Cavalcanti de Moraes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Juliana Maria Fernandes Correia de Araújo; Ionete Cavalcanti de Moraes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e199119560
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e199119560
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e199119560
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052804343267328