Processual Business: a brief analysis on the aspects
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21649 |
Resumo: | With the advent of the Civil Procedure Code 2015, several provisions have emerged with the intention of authorizing the parties to enter into procedural conventions with each other that bind all members of a procedural relationship. Among them, article 190 stands out, which establishes in its wording that, in the case of available rights, the parties may agree on procedural issues, burdens, powers, faculties and procedural duties, before or during the process, subject to the control of validity of the judge and binding all those involved in the procedural relationship. The objective of this work is to carry out an analysis of typical and atypical procedural businesses, their appropriateness and rules. The methodology used was the bibliographic analysis of current doctrine and legislation on the subject. After conducting the survey, we can realize that it is understood that the legislator's intention, when creating such a device, was to honor the principle of autonomy of the parties' will, in order to achieve the main objective of a judicial demand, which is to protect the rights of the parties seeking the judiciary, to the detriment of religious proceduralism. However, the celebration of procedural transactions, especially atypical, must be accompanied with great care, considering that these do not have explicit rules. |
id |
UNIFEI_0cffa5ee73f63fc72f7afebcc58ba2b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21649 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Processual Business: a brief analysis on the aspectsNegocio Procesal: breve análisis de aspectosNegócios Processuais: uma breve análise sobre os aspectosProcedimiento civilAutonomíaNegocios legales.Civil procedureAutonomyProcedural business.Processo CivilAutonomiaNegócios jurídicos.With the advent of the Civil Procedure Code 2015, several provisions have emerged with the intention of authorizing the parties to enter into procedural conventions with each other that bind all members of a procedural relationship. Among them, article 190 stands out, which establishes in its wording that, in the case of available rights, the parties may agree on procedural issues, burdens, powers, faculties and procedural duties, before or during the process, subject to the control of validity of the judge and binding all those involved in the procedural relationship. The objective of this work is to carry out an analysis of typical and atypical procedural businesses, their appropriateness and rules. The methodology used was the bibliographic analysis of current doctrine and legislation on the subject. After conducting the survey, we can realize that it is understood that the legislator's intention, when creating such a device, was to honor the principle of autonomy of the parties' will, in order to achieve the main objective of a judicial demand, which is to protect the rights of the parties seeking the judiciary, to the detriment of religious proceduralism. However, the celebration of procedural transactions, especially atypical, must be accompanied with great care, considering that these do not have explicit rules.Con la llegada del Código de Procedimiento Civil de 2015, surgieron várias disposiciones con la intención de autorizar a las partes a celebrar acuerdos procesales entre ellas que obliguen a todos los miembros de una relación procesal. Entre ellos, se destaca el artículo 190, que establece en su redacción que, en el caso de los derechos disponibles, las partes podrán acordar en cuestiones procesales, carga, atribuciones, facultades y deberes procesales, antes o durante el proceso, sujeto al control de validez del juez y vinculante para todos los involucrados en la relación procesal. El objetivo de este trabajo es realizar un análisis de los negocios procesales típicos y atípicos, su adecuación y normativa. La metodología utilizada fue el análisis bibliográfico de la doctrina y legislación vigente en la materia. Luego de realizar la investigación, podemos ver que la intención del legislador, al crear tal disposición, fue honrar el principio de autonomía de la voluntad de las partes, con el fin de lograr el objetivo principal de un juicio, que es sustentar Los derechos de las partes que buscan el Poder Judicial, en detrimento del procesalismo religioso, sin embargo, la celebración de los negocios procesales, especialmente atípicos, debe ir acompañada con mucho cuidado, considerando que estos no tienen reglas explícitas.Com o advento do Código de Processo Civil 2015, diversos dispositivos surgiram com a intenção de autorizar que as partes celebrem convenções processuais entre si que vinculem a todos os integrantes de uma relação processual. Dentre eles, toma destaque o artigo 190, que estabelece em sua redação que, em se tratando de direitos disponíveis, as partes podem pactuar sobre questões procedimentais, ônus, poderes, faculdades e deveres processuais, antes ou durante o processo, sujeitos ao controle de validade do juiz e vinculando todos os envolvidos na relação processual. O objetivo do presente trabalho é realizar uma análise sobre os negócios processuais típicos e atípicos, seu cabimento e regramento. A metodologia utilizada foi a analise bibliográfica de doutrina e legislação vigente sobre o assunto. Após a realização da pesquisa, podemos perceber que a intenção do legislador, ao criar tal dispositivo, foi a de prestigiar o princípio da autonomia da vontade das partes, de maneira a alcançar o principal objetivo de uma demanda judicial, que é o de amparar os direitos das partes que procuram o poder judiciário, em detrimento do processualismo religioso, entretanto, a celebração dos negócios processuais, especialmente atípicos, deve ser acompanhada de muito cuidado, considerando que estes não possuem regramento explicito.Research, Society and Development2021-10-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2164910.33448/rsd-v10i14.21649Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 14; e124101421649Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 14; e124101421649Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 14; e1241014216492525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21649/19427Copyright (c) 2021 Heloisa Cristina Luiz Cappellari; kamila Rezendehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Cappellari, Heloisa Cristina LuizRezende, kamila2021-12-04T11:48:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21649Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:41:01.625100Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Processual Business: a brief analysis on the aspects Negocio Procesal: breve análisis de aspectos Negócios Processuais: uma breve análise sobre os aspectos |
title |
Processual Business: a brief analysis on the aspects |
spellingShingle |
Processual Business: a brief analysis on the aspects Cappellari, Heloisa Cristina Luiz Procedimiento civil Autonomía Negocios legales. Civil procedure Autonomy Procedural business. Processo Civil Autonomia Negócios jurídicos. |
title_short |
Processual Business: a brief analysis on the aspects |
title_full |
Processual Business: a brief analysis on the aspects |
title_fullStr |
Processual Business: a brief analysis on the aspects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Processual Business: a brief analysis on the aspects |
title_sort |
Processual Business: a brief analysis on the aspects |
author |
Cappellari, Heloisa Cristina Luiz |
author_facet |
Cappellari, Heloisa Cristina Luiz Rezende, kamila |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rezende, kamila |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cappellari, Heloisa Cristina Luiz Rezende, kamila |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Procedimiento civil Autonomía Negocios legales. Civil procedure Autonomy Procedural business. Processo Civil Autonomia Negócios jurídicos. |
topic |
Procedimiento civil Autonomía Negocios legales. Civil procedure Autonomy Procedural business. Processo Civil Autonomia Negócios jurídicos. |
description |
With the advent of the Civil Procedure Code 2015, several provisions have emerged with the intention of authorizing the parties to enter into procedural conventions with each other that bind all members of a procedural relationship. Among them, article 190 stands out, which establishes in its wording that, in the case of available rights, the parties may agree on procedural issues, burdens, powers, faculties and procedural duties, before or during the process, subject to the control of validity of the judge and binding all those involved in the procedural relationship. The objective of this work is to carry out an analysis of typical and atypical procedural businesses, their appropriateness and rules. The methodology used was the bibliographic analysis of current doctrine and legislation on the subject. After conducting the survey, we can realize that it is understood that the legislator's intention, when creating such a device, was to honor the principle of autonomy of the parties' will, in order to achieve the main objective of a judicial demand, which is to protect the rights of the parties seeking the judiciary, to the detriment of religious proceduralism. However, the celebration of procedural transactions, especially atypical, must be accompanied with great care, considering that these do not have explicit rules. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21649 10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21649 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21649 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21649 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21649/19427 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Heloisa Cristina Luiz Cappellari; kamila Rezende https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Heloisa Cristina Luiz Cappellari; kamila Rezende https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 14; e124101421649 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 14; e124101421649 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 14; e124101421649 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052809046130688 |