The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Marcia Rodrigues dos
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bridi, Adriana Carla, Louro, Thiago Quinellato, Carvalho, Márglory Fraga de, Carvalho, Tatiana Santos de, Silva, Roberto Carlos Lyra da, Silva, Carlos Roberto Lyra da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26877
Resumo: The aim of this review was to analyze the therapeutic effectiveness of convalescent plasma used in patients with diagnosis confirmed of COVID-19. Methods: This is a systematic literature review propose in the Cochrane Collaboration Manual, with the elaboration of the PICO strategy, in which the Pubmed/Medline, BVS, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were used. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews were selected. We found 1249 articles, applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 articles were selected. AMSTAR-2 was used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of the evidence from the studies included in the systematic review was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Regarding the results, studies with a low level of Oxford evidence predominated (75%). Four studies (50%) showed evidence level 2B. However, one response to this analysis was the low quality of the evidence and little confidence in the results of the studies. The qualitative synthesis revealed that although it was able to reduce the viral load, the use of convalescent plasma does not contribute in isolation to the reduction of the load. Conclusion: It is concluded that convalescent plasma is effective for reducing viral load and that many studies are still lacking, particularly economic analysis of effectiveness, as it is a cheap technology with potential for incorporation into the SUS.
id UNIFEI_0f7894f5cc44614138cf54730760d3b0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26877
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic reviewLa efectividad del plasma convaleciente en el tratamiento de la COVID-19: una revision sitematicaA efetividade do plasma convalescente no tratamento da COVID-19: revisão sistemáticaCOVID-19Convalescent plasmaSARS-CoV-2.COVID-19Plasma convalecienteSARS-CoV-2.COVID-19Plasma convalescenteSARS-CoV-2.The aim of this review was to analyze the therapeutic effectiveness of convalescent plasma used in patients with diagnosis confirmed of COVID-19. Methods: This is a systematic literature review propose in the Cochrane Collaboration Manual, with the elaboration of the PICO strategy, in which the Pubmed/Medline, BVS, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were used. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews were selected. We found 1249 articles, applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 articles were selected. AMSTAR-2 was used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of the evidence from the studies included in the systematic review was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Regarding the results, studies with a low level of Oxford evidence predominated (75%). Four studies (50%) showed evidence level 2B. However, one response to this analysis was the low quality of the evidence and little confidence in the results of the studies. The qualitative synthesis revealed that although it was able to reduce the viral load, the use of convalescent plasma does not contribute in isolation to the reduction of the load. Conclusion: It is concluded that convalescent plasma is effective for reducing viral load and that many studies are still lacking, particularly economic analysis of effectiveness, as it is a cheap technology with potential for incorporation into the SUS.El objetivo de esta revisión fue analizar la efectividad terapéutica del plasma convaleciente utilizado en pacientes con diagnóstico confirmado de COVID-19. Métodos: Se trata de una revisión sistemática de la literatura, propuesta en el Manual de la Cochrane Collaboration, con elaboración de la estrategia PICO, en la que se utilizaron las bases de datos Pubmed/Medline, BVS, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane y Google Scholar. Se seleccionaron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y revisiones sistemáticas. Se encontraron 1249 artículos, aplicando los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, se seleccionaron 8 artículos. Se utilizó AMSTAR-2 para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo y la calidad de la evidencia de los estudios incluidos en la revisión sistemática se evaluó mediante Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Resultados: En cuanto a los resultados, predominaron los estudios con bajo nivel de evidencia Oxford (75%). Cuatro estudios (50%) mostraron nivel de evidencia 2B. Sin embargo, una respuesta a este análisis fue la baja calidad de la evidencia y la poca confianza en los resultados de los estudios. La síntesis cualitativa reveló que si bien logró reducir la carga viral, el uso de plasma convaleciente no contribuye aisladamente a la reducción de la carga. Conclusión: Se concluye que el plasma de convaleciente es efectivo para la reducción de la carga viral y que aún faltan muchos estudios, en particular análisis económicos de efectividad, por ser una tecnología barata y con potencial de incorporación al SUS.O objetivo desta revisão foi analisar a efetividade terapêutica do plasma convalescente utilizado em pacientes com confirmação de diagnóstico de COVID-19. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática de literatura, proposta no Manual da Cochrane Collaboration, com elaboração da estratégia PICO, na qual se utilizou as bases de dados Pubmed/Medline, BVS, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane e Google Scholar. Foram selecionados estudos do tipo ensaio clínico randomizado e revisões sistemáticas. Encontrou-se 1249 artigos, aplicando os critérios de inclusão e exclusão, selecionou-se 8 artigos. Para avaliação do risco de viés foi utilizado o AMSTAR-2 e para qualidade do conjunto da evidência dos estudos incluídos na revisão sistemática foi avaliada pelo Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Resultados: Quanto aos resultados, predominaram estudos com baixo nível de evidência Oxford (75%). Quatro estudos (50%) apresentaram nível de evidência 2B.  Uma resposta para essa análise foi a baixa qualidade da evidência e pouca confiança nos resultados dos estudos. A síntese qualitativa revelou que embora fosse capaz de reduzir a carga viral o uso do plasma convalescente não contribui isoladamente para a redução da carga. Conclusão: Verificou-se que o plasma convalescente é efetivo para a redução da carga viral, todavia são necessários mais estudos, particularmente análise custo-efetividade (ACE), por se tratar de uma tecnologia barata e com potencial de incorporação no SUS.Research, Society and Development2022-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2687710.33448/rsd-v11i4.26877Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e21811426877Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e21811426877Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e218114268772525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26877/23844Copyright (c) 2022 Marcia Rodrigues dos Santos; Adriana Carla Bridi; Thiago Quinellato Louro; Márglory Fraga de Carvalho; Tatiana Santos de Carvalho; Roberto Carlos Lyra da Silva; Carlos Roberto Lyra da Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Marcia Rodrigues dos Bridi, Adriana Carla Louro, Thiago Quinellato Carvalho, Márglory Fraga de Carvalho, Tatiana Santos de Silva, Roberto Carlos Lyra da Silva, Carlos Roberto Lyra da 2022-03-27T17:17:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26877Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:44:47.998889Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review
La efectividad del plasma convaleciente en el tratamiento de la COVID-19: una revision sitematica
A efetividade do plasma convalescente no tratamento da COVID-19: revisão sistemática
title The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review
spellingShingle The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review
Santos, Marcia Rodrigues dos
COVID-19
Convalescent plasma
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Plasma convaleciente
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Plasma convalescente
SARS-CoV-2.
title_short The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review
title_full The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review
title_fullStr The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review
title_sort The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review
author Santos, Marcia Rodrigues dos
author_facet Santos, Marcia Rodrigues dos
Bridi, Adriana Carla
Louro, Thiago Quinellato
Carvalho, Márglory Fraga de
Carvalho, Tatiana Santos de
Silva, Roberto Carlos Lyra da
Silva, Carlos Roberto Lyra da
author_role author
author2 Bridi, Adriana Carla
Louro, Thiago Quinellato
Carvalho, Márglory Fraga de
Carvalho, Tatiana Santos de
Silva, Roberto Carlos Lyra da
Silva, Carlos Roberto Lyra da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Marcia Rodrigues dos
Bridi, Adriana Carla
Louro, Thiago Quinellato
Carvalho, Márglory Fraga de
Carvalho, Tatiana Santos de
Silva, Roberto Carlos Lyra da
Silva, Carlos Roberto Lyra da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Convalescent plasma
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Plasma convaleciente
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Plasma convalescente
SARS-CoV-2.
topic COVID-19
Convalescent plasma
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Plasma convaleciente
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Plasma convalescente
SARS-CoV-2.
description The aim of this review was to analyze the therapeutic effectiveness of convalescent plasma used in patients with diagnosis confirmed of COVID-19. Methods: This is a systematic literature review propose in the Cochrane Collaboration Manual, with the elaboration of the PICO strategy, in which the Pubmed/Medline, BVS, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were used. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews were selected. We found 1249 articles, applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 articles were selected. AMSTAR-2 was used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of the evidence from the studies included in the systematic review was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Regarding the results, studies with a low level of Oxford evidence predominated (75%). Four studies (50%) showed evidence level 2B. However, one response to this analysis was the low quality of the evidence and little confidence in the results of the studies. The qualitative synthesis revealed that although it was able to reduce the viral load, the use of convalescent plasma does not contribute in isolation to the reduction of the load. Conclusion: It is concluded that convalescent plasma is effective for reducing viral load and that many studies are still lacking, particularly economic analysis of effectiveness, as it is a cheap technology with potential for incorporation into the SUS.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26877
10.33448/rsd-v11i4.26877
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26877
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.26877
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26877/23844
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e21811426877
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e21811426877
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e21811426877
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052793348947968