The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26877 |
Resumo: | The aim of this review was to analyze the therapeutic effectiveness of convalescent plasma used in patients with diagnosis confirmed of COVID-19. Methods: This is a systematic literature review propose in the Cochrane Collaboration Manual, with the elaboration of the PICO strategy, in which the Pubmed/Medline, BVS, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were used. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews were selected. We found 1249 articles, applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 articles were selected. AMSTAR-2 was used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of the evidence from the studies included in the systematic review was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Regarding the results, studies with a low level of Oxford evidence predominated (75%). Four studies (50%) showed evidence level 2B. However, one response to this analysis was the low quality of the evidence and little confidence in the results of the studies. The qualitative synthesis revealed that although it was able to reduce the viral load, the use of convalescent plasma does not contribute in isolation to the reduction of the load. Conclusion: It is concluded that convalescent plasma is effective for reducing viral load and that many studies are still lacking, particularly economic analysis of effectiveness, as it is a cheap technology with potential for incorporation into the SUS. |
id |
UNIFEI_0f7894f5cc44614138cf54730760d3b0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26877 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic reviewLa efectividad del plasma convaleciente en el tratamiento de la COVID-19: una revision sitematicaA efetividade do plasma convalescente no tratamento da COVID-19: revisão sistemáticaCOVID-19Convalescent plasmaSARS-CoV-2.COVID-19Plasma convalecienteSARS-CoV-2.COVID-19Plasma convalescenteSARS-CoV-2.The aim of this review was to analyze the therapeutic effectiveness of convalescent plasma used in patients with diagnosis confirmed of COVID-19. Methods: This is a systematic literature review propose in the Cochrane Collaboration Manual, with the elaboration of the PICO strategy, in which the Pubmed/Medline, BVS, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were used. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews were selected. We found 1249 articles, applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 articles were selected. AMSTAR-2 was used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of the evidence from the studies included in the systematic review was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Regarding the results, studies with a low level of Oxford evidence predominated (75%). Four studies (50%) showed evidence level 2B. However, one response to this analysis was the low quality of the evidence and little confidence in the results of the studies. The qualitative synthesis revealed that although it was able to reduce the viral load, the use of convalescent plasma does not contribute in isolation to the reduction of the load. Conclusion: It is concluded that convalescent plasma is effective for reducing viral load and that many studies are still lacking, particularly economic analysis of effectiveness, as it is a cheap technology with potential for incorporation into the SUS.El objetivo de esta revisión fue analizar la efectividad terapéutica del plasma convaleciente utilizado en pacientes con diagnóstico confirmado de COVID-19. Métodos: Se trata de una revisión sistemática de la literatura, propuesta en el Manual de la Cochrane Collaboration, con elaboración de la estrategia PICO, en la que se utilizaron las bases de datos Pubmed/Medline, BVS, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane y Google Scholar. Se seleccionaron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y revisiones sistemáticas. Se encontraron 1249 artículos, aplicando los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, se seleccionaron 8 artículos. Se utilizó AMSTAR-2 para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo y la calidad de la evidencia de los estudios incluidos en la revisión sistemática se evaluó mediante Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Resultados: En cuanto a los resultados, predominaron los estudios con bajo nivel de evidencia Oxford (75%). Cuatro estudios (50%) mostraron nivel de evidencia 2B. Sin embargo, una respuesta a este análisis fue la baja calidad de la evidencia y la poca confianza en los resultados de los estudios. La síntesis cualitativa reveló que si bien logró reducir la carga viral, el uso de plasma convaleciente no contribuye aisladamente a la reducción de la carga. Conclusión: Se concluye que el plasma de convaleciente es efectivo para la reducción de la carga viral y que aún faltan muchos estudios, en particular análisis económicos de efectividad, por ser una tecnología barata y con potencial de incorporación al SUS.O objetivo desta revisão foi analisar a efetividade terapêutica do plasma convalescente utilizado em pacientes com confirmação de diagnóstico de COVID-19. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática de literatura, proposta no Manual da Cochrane Collaboration, com elaboração da estratégia PICO, na qual se utilizou as bases de dados Pubmed/Medline, BVS, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane e Google Scholar. Foram selecionados estudos do tipo ensaio clínico randomizado e revisões sistemáticas. Encontrou-se 1249 artigos, aplicando os critérios de inclusão e exclusão, selecionou-se 8 artigos. Para avaliação do risco de viés foi utilizado o AMSTAR-2 e para qualidade do conjunto da evidência dos estudos incluídos na revisão sistemática foi avaliada pelo Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Resultados: Quanto aos resultados, predominaram estudos com baixo nível de evidência Oxford (75%). Quatro estudos (50%) apresentaram nível de evidência 2B. Uma resposta para essa análise foi a baixa qualidade da evidência e pouca confiança nos resultados dos estudos. A síntese qualitativa revelou que embora fosse capaz de reduzir a carga viral o uso do plasma convalescente não contribui isoladamente para a redução da carga. Conclusão: Verificou-se que o plasma convalescente é efetivo para a redução da carga viral, todavia são necessários mais estudos, particularmente análise custo-efetividade (ACE), por se tratar de uma tecnologia barata e com potencial de incorporação no SUS.Research, Society and Development2022-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2687710.33448/rsd-v11i4.26877Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e21811426877Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e21811426877Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e218114268772525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26877/23844Copyright (c) 2022 Marcia Rodrigues dos Santos; Adriana Carla Bridi; Thiago Quinellato Louro; Márglory Fraga de Carvalho; Tatiana Santos de Carvalho; Roberto Carlos Lyra da Silva; Carlos Roberto Lyra da Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Marcia Rodrigues dos Bridi, Adriana Carla Louro, Thiago Quinellato Carvalho, Márglory Fraga de Carvalho, Tatiana Santos de Silva, Roberto Carlos Lyra da Silva, Carlos Roberto Lyra da 2022-03-27T17:17:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26877Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:44:47.998889Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review La efectividad del plasma convaleciente en el tratamiento de la COVID-19: una revision sitematica A efetividade do plasma convalescente no tratamento da COVID-19: revisão sistemática |
title |
The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review Santos, Marcia Rodrigues dos COVID-19 Convalescent plasma SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 Plasma convaleciente SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 Plasma convalescente SARS-CoV-2. |
title_short |
The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_full |
The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_sort |
The effectiveness of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review |
author |
Santos, Marcia Rodrigues dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Marcia Rodrigues dos Bridi, Adriana Carla Louro, Thiago Quinellato Carvalho, Márglory Fraga de Carvalho, Tatiana Santos de Silva, Roberto Carlos Lyra da Silva, Carlos Roberto Lyra da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bridi, Adriana Carla Louro, Thiago Quinellato Carvalho, Márglory Fraga de Carvalho, Tatiana Santos de Silva, Roberto Carlos Lyra da Silva, Carlos Roberto Lyra da |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Marcia Rodrigues dos Bridi, Adriana Carla Louro, Thiago Quinellato Carvalho, Márglory Fraga de Carvalho, Tatiana Santos de Silva, Roberto Carlos Lyra da Silva, Carlos Roberto Lyra da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
COVID-19 Convalescent plasma SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 Plasma convaleciente SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 Plasma convalescente SARS-CoV-2. |
topic |
COVID-19 Convalescent plasma SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 Plasma convaleciente SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 Plasma convalescente SARS-CoV-2. |
description |
The aim of this review was to analyze the therapeutic effectiveness of convalescent plasma used in patients with diagnosis confirmed of COVID-19. Methods: This is a systematic literature review propose in the Cochrane Collaboration Manual, with the elaboration of the PICO strategy, in which the Pubmed/Medline, BVS, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were used. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews were selected. We found 1249 articles, applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 articles were selected. AMSTAR-2 was used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of the evidence from the studies included in the systematic review was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Regarding the results, studies with a low level of Oxford evidence predominated (75%). Four studies (50%) showed evidence level 2B. However, one response to this analysis was the low quality of the evidence and little confidence in the results of the studies. The qualitative synthesis revealed that although it was able to reduce the viral load, the use of convalescent plasma does not contribute in isolation to the reduction of the load. Conclusion: It is concluded that convalescent plasma is effective for reducing viral load and that many studies are still lacking, particularly economic analysis of effectiveness, as it is a cheap technology with potential for incorporation into the SUS. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26877 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.26877 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26877 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i4.26877 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26877/23844 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e21811426877 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e21811426877 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e21811426877 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052793348947968 |