Analysis of biosafety practices of professionals working in the intensive care unit: Cross-sectional study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14613 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study is to investigate the use of biosafety practices by health professionals working in an ICU of a public hospital in Teresina-PI. This is a cross-sectional study, approved by the ethics committee (2,583,723), conducted at a state hospital in Teresina-PI, using questionnaires to ICU health professionals. The data were analyzed using the SPSS 17.0 and BioEstat 5.0 programs, using the Chi-square, Wilcoxon and Kruskal Wallis tests. Values with p <0.05 were considered significant. 26 professionals were interviewed, with a predominance of those with more than 10 years of training (53.8%, p <0.006, n = 14), with more than 3 years of professional experience (76.9%, n=20, p=0.001***) and older than 3 years working at the referred hospital (76.9%, n = 20, p <0.001***). 96.2% reported using PPE, with use restrictions for propes (92.3%) and goggles (84.6%). 18 (69.2%) reported that they were charged with the knowledge of biosafety standards by the hospital, differing with the perception of knowledge and updating of them. There is a deficiency in the knowledge of professionals in the knowledge and rigor of biosafety practices. |
id |
UNIFEI_108aa9eddefff69716db3895f21666b9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14613 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of biosafety practices of professionals working in the intensive care unit: Cross-sectional studyAnálisis de prácticas de bioseguridad de profesionales que actúan en unidad de cuidados intensivos: Estudio cruzadoAnálise das práticas de biossegurança dos profissionais atuantes em unidade de terapia intensiva: Estudo transversalIntensive care unitInfectionBiosafety.Unidad de cuidados intensivosInfecciónBioseguridad.Unidade de terapia intensivaInfecçãoBiossegurança.The aim of this study is to investigate the use of biosafety practices by health professionals working in an ICU of a public hospital in Teresina-PI. This is a cross-sectional study, approved by the ethics committee (2,583,723), conducted at a state hospital in Teresina-PI, using questionnaires to ICU health professionals. The data were analyzed using the SPSS 17.0 and BioEstat 5.0 programs, using the Chi-square, Wilcoxon and Kruskal Wallis tests. Values with p <0.05 were considered significant. 26 professionals were interviewed, with a predominance of those with more than 10 years of training (53.8%, p <0.006, n = 14), with more than 3 years of professional experience (76.9%, n=20, p=0.001***) and older than 3 years working at the referred hospital (76.9%, n = 20, p <0.001***). 96.2% reported using PPE, with use restrictions for propes (92.3%) and goggles (84.6%). 18 (69.2%) reported that they were charged with the knowledge of biosafety standards by the hospital, differing with the perception of knowledge and updating of them. There is a deficiency in the knowledge of professionals in the knowledge and rigor of biosafety practices.El objetivo de este estudio es investigar el uso de prácticas de bioseguridad por profesionales de la salud que trabajan en una UCI de un hospital público de Teresina-PI. Se trata de un estudio transversal, aprobado por el comité de ética (2,583,723), realizado en un hospital estatal de Teresina-PI, mediante cuestionarios a profesionales de la salud de UCI. Los datos se analizaron mediante los programas SPSS 17.0 y BioEstat 5.0, utilizando las pruebas Chi-cuadrado, Wilcoxon y Kruskal Wallis. Los valores con p <0,05 se consideraron significativos. Se entrevistaron 26 profesionales, con predominio de aquellos con más de 10 años de formación (53,8%, p <0,006, n=14), con más de 3 años de experiencia profesional (76,9%, n=20, p=0,001***) y mayores de 3 años laborando en el hospital de referencia (76,9%, n=20, p <0,001 ***). El 96,2% reportó usar EPP, con restricciones de uso de propes (92,3%) y gafas (84,6%). 18 (69,2%) refirieron estar a cargo del conocimiento de los estándares de bioseguridad por parte del hospital, diferenciándose en la percepción del conocimiento y actualización de los mismos. Existe una deficiencia en el conocimiento de los profesionales en el conocimiento y rigor de las prácticas de bioseguridad.O objetivo deste estudo é investigar o emprego das práticas de biossegurança pelos profissionais de saúde atuantes em uma UTI de um hospital público de Teresina-PI. Trata-se de um estudo transversal, aprovado pelo comitê de ética (2.583.723), realizado em um hospital estadual de Teresina-PI, mediante aplicação de questionários aos profissionais de saúde da UTI. Os dados foram analisados através dos programas SPSS 17.0 e BioEstat 5.0, com aplicação dos testes Qui-quadrado, Wilcoxon e Kruskal Wallis. Foram considerados significativos valores com p<0,05. Foram entrevistados 26 profissionais, com predomínio dos que possuíam acima de 10 anos de formados (53,8%, p<0,006, n=14), com mais de 3 anos de experiência profissional (76,9%, n=20, p=0,001***) e acima de 3 anos atuando no referido hospital (76,9%, n=20, p<0,001***). 96,2% relatam usar os EPIs, com restrição de uso para propés (92,3%) e óculos de proteção (84,6%). 18 (69,2%) referem serem cobrados o conhecimento das normas de biossegurança pelo hospital, divergindo com a percepção de conhecimento e atualização dos mesmos. Há uma deficiência do conhecimento dos profissionais no conhecimento e no rigor das práticas de biossegurança.Research, Society and Development2021-04-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1461310.33448/rsd-v10i5.14613Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e1010514613Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e1010514613Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e10105146132525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14613/13063Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Thaíris Barroso de Oliveira; Klégea Maria Câncio Ramos Cantinho; Guilherme Pertinni de Morais Gouveia; Gabriela Dantas Carvalhohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Maria Thaíris Barroso de Cantinho, Klégea Maria Câncio Ramos Gouveia, Guilherme Pertinni de Morais Carvalho, Gabriela Dantas 2021-05-17T18:20:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14613Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:41.379213Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of biosafety practices of professionals working in the intensive care unit: Cross-sectional study Análisis de prácticas de bioseguridad de profesionales que actúan en unidad de cuidados intensivos: Estudio cruzado Análise das práticas de biossegurança dos profissionais atuantes em unidade de terapia intensiva: Estudo transversal |
title |
Analysis of biosafety practices of professionals working in the intensive care unit: Cross-sectional study |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of biosafety practices of professionals working in the intensive care unit: Cross-sectional study Oliveira, Maria Thaíris Barroso de Intensive care unit Infection Biosafety. Unidad de cuidados intensivos Infección Bioseguridad. Unidade de terapia intensiva Infecção Biossegurança. |
title_short |
Analysis of biosafety practices of professionals working in the intensive care unit: Cross-sectional study |
title_full |
Analysis of biosafety practices of professionals working in the intensive care unit: Cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of biosafety practices of professionals working in the intensive care unit: Cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of biosafety practices of professionals working in the intensive care unit: Cross-sectional study |
title_sort |
Analysis of biosafety practices of professionals working in the intensive care unit: Cross-sectional study |
author |
Oliveira, Maria Thaíris Barroso de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Maria Thaíris Barroso de Cantinho, Klégea Maria Câncio Ramos Gouveia, Guilherme Pertinni de Morais Carvalho, Gabriela Dantas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cantinho, Klégea Maria Câncio Ramos Gouveia, Guilherme Pertinni de Morais Carvalho, Gabriela Dantas |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Maria Thaíris Barroso de Cantinho, Klégea Maria Câncio Ramos Gouveia, Guilherme Pertinni de Morais Carvalho, Gabriela Dantas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Intensive care unit Infection Biosafety. Unidad de cuidados intensivos Infección Bioseguridad. Unidade de terapia intensiva Infecção Biossegurança. |
topic |
Intensive care unit Infection Biosafety. Unidad de cuidados intensivos Infección Bioseguridad. Unidade de terapia intensiva Infecção Biossegurança. |
description |
The aim of this study is to investigate the use of biosafety practices by health professionals working in an ICU of a public hospital in Teresina-PI. This is a cross-sectional study, approved by the ethics committee (2,583,723), conducted at a state hospital in Teresina-PI, using questionnaires to ICU health professionals. The data were analyzed using the SPSS 17.0 and BioEstat 5.0 programs, using the Chi-square, Wilcoxon and Kruskal Wallis tests. Values with p <0.05 were considered significant. 26 professionals were interviewed, with a predominance of those with more than 10 years of training (53.8%, p <0.006, n = 14), with more than 3 years of professional experience (76.9%, n=20, p=0.001***) and older than 3 years working at the referred hospital (76.9%, n = 20, p <0.001***). 96.2% reported using PPE, with use restrictions for propes (92.3%) and goggles (84.6%). 18 (69.2%) reported that they were charged with the knowledge of biosafety standards by the hospital, differing with the perception of knowledge and updating of them. There is a deficiency in the knowledge of professionals in the knowledge and rigor of biosafety practices. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14613 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14613 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14613 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14613 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14613/13063 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e1010514613 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e1010514613 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e1010514613 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052748501352448 |