Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araujo, Rafael Zetehaku
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Zancopé, Karla, Moreira, Rodrigo Silva, Neves, Flavio Domingues das
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31390
Resumo: Objective: To identify the ideal and/or most suitable masticatory function assessment methodology or treatment for each group of patients. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out in the MEDLINE, Science Direct, and Embase databases for articles published since 1990. The articles were initially selected by their titles and abstracts, and after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, some were selected for full text reading. The studies were submitted to qualitative, quantitative, and bias analysis. Results: Of the 1,514 studies retrieved in the initial search, 51 were selected for complete analysis. Advantages of the test foods Optocal and Optosil included reliability and standardization capacity, while their disadvantages included high processing time and hardness. Wax was mentioned for its ease of chewing and testing speed, with the disadvantages of handling and the influence of temperature, in addition to low palatability. Chewing gum exhibited a speedy and easy way of testing, low cost, and reliability, in addition to commercial availability. Conclusion: Among the existing methodologies, those that were used in few studies or not validated require additional data, and for now, their indication is not recommended. Optocal and Optosil should be indicated for patients who do not have impaired chewing function. Chewing gum is a more suitable test food for patients with impaired chewing. Its practicality in being used in tests and evaluation of results makes it a more comprehensive indicator for different types of patients, treatments, or needs to assess masticatory function.
id UNIFEI_12da2d0ec8091967a6b99e4492a5ceac
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31390
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literatureMétodos de evaluación de la función masticatoria: Análisis crítico de literatura seleccionadaMétodos de avaliação da função mastigatória: Análise crítica da literatura selecionadaHabilidade de misturaFunção oralPerformance mastigatóriaMastigaçãoAlimento teste. Capacidad de mezclaFunción oralRendimiento masticatorioMasticaciónAlimento de prueba.Mixing abilityOral functionMasticatory performanceChewingTest food.Objective: To identify the ideal and/or most suitable masticatory function assessment methodology or treatment for each group of patients. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out in the MEDLINE, Science Direct, and Embase databases for articles published since 1990. The articles were initially selected by their titles and abstracts, and after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, some were selected for full text reading. The studies were submitted to qualitative, quantitative, and bias analysis. Results: Of the 1,514 studies retrieved in the initial search, 51 were selected for complete analysis. Advantages of the test foods Optocal and Optosil included reliability and standardization capacity, while their disadvantages included high processing time and hardness. Wax was mentioned for its ease of chewing and testing speed, with the disadvantages of handling and the influence of temperature, in addition to low palatability. Chewing gum exhibited a speedy and easy way of testing, low cost, and reliability, in addition to commercial availability. Conclusion: Among the existing methodologies, those that were used in few studies or not validated require additional data, and for now, their indication is not recommended. Optocal and Optosil should be indicated for patients who do not have impaired chewing function. Chewing gum is a more suitable test food for patients with impaired chewing. Its practicality in being used in tests and evaluation of results makes it a more comprehensive indicator for different types of patients, treatments, or needs to assess masticatory function.Objetivo: Identificar el método ideal o más adecuado de evaluación de la función masticatoria para un determinado tipo de tratamiento o grupo de pacientes. Metodología: Se realizó una búsqueda en las bases de datos MEDLINE, Science Direct y Embase de artículos publicados desde 1990. Inicialmente se seleccionaron artículos en base a sus títulos y resúmenes, y luego de aplicar criterios de inclusión o exclusión, algunos de ellos fueron seleccionados para lectura completa. Los estudios fueron sometidos a evaluación cuantitativa y cualitativa y análisis/riesgo de sesgo. Resultados: De los 1514 estudios realizados en la búsqueda inicial, 51 fueron seleccionados para un análisis completo. Las ventajas de los alimentos de prueba como Optocal y Optosil incluyeron la confiabilidad y la capacidad de estandarización, mientras que sus desventajas fueron el alto tiempo de procesamiento de datos y la dureza del material. La cera fue mencionada por su facilidad de masticación y rapidez en la realización de la prueba, con los inconvenientes de la necesidad de manipular el material y la influencia de la temperatura, además de la baja palatabilidad o mal sabor. La goma de mascar exhibió en la prueba una rápida y fácil aplicación y manejo, con bajo costo y buena confiabilidad, además de estar comercialmente disponible. Otros, como los ositos de goma, las cápsulas de fucsina y los alimentos naturales, aún necesitan una mayor estandarización para su uso rutinario. Conclusión: Entre las metodologías existentes, aquellas que han sido utilizadas en pocos estudios o no han sido validadas o requieren datos adicionales, por el momento no tienen su indicación recomendada. Optocal y Optosil deben estar indicados para pacientes que no tienen limitación de su función masticatoria, debido a la dureza del material. La goma de mascar es un alimento de prueba más apropiado para pacientes con una función masticatoria deteriorada o limitada. Su practicidad para ser utilizado en pruebas y evaluación de resultados lo hace más comprensible y reproducible para diferentes tipos de pacientes y tratamientos que necesitan evaluar su función masticatoria.Objetivo: Identificar o ideal ou o mais apropriado método de avaliação da função mastigatória para um determinado tipo de tratamento ou grupo de pacientes. Metodologia: Uma pesquisa foi realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE, Science Direct, e Embase para artigos publicados desde 1990. Os artigos foram incialmente selecionados baseados em seus títulos e resumos, e após a aplicação de critérios de inclusão ou exclusão, alguns deles foram selecionados para leitura completa. Os estudos foram submetidos a avaliação quantitativa, qualitativa e análise/risco de viés. Resultados: Dos 1.514 estudos conduzidos na busca inicial, 51 foram selecionados para análise completa. As vantagens de alimentos testem como Optocal e Optosil incluíram confiabilidade e capacidade de padronização, enquanto as suas desvantagens foram um tempo de processamento de dados alto e a dureza do material. A cera foi mencionada por sua facilidade de mastigação, e velocidade na realização do teste, com as desvantagens de necessidade de manuseio do material e a influência da temperatura, além da baixa palatabilidade, ou gosto ruim. A goma de mascar exibiu uma rápida e fácil aplicação e manuseio no teste, com baixo custo e boa confiabilidade, além de ser comercialmente disponível. Outros como as balas de goma, cápsulas de fucsina e alimentos naturais, ainda precisam de maior padronização para utilização rotineira. Conclusão: Dentre as existentes metodologias, aquelas que foram usadas em poucos estudos ou não foram validadas ou requerem dados adicionais, por enquanto não tem a sua indicação recomendada. Optocal e Optosil, devem ser indicados para pacientes que não tem limitação de sua função mastigatória, devido a dureza do material. A goma de mascar é um alimento teste mais apropriado para pacientes com a função mastigatória prejudicada ou limitada. A sua praticidade em ser usada em testes e avaliação dos resultados a torna mais compreensível e reproduzível para diferentes tipos de pacientes e tratamentos que tenham a necessidade de avaliação da sua função mastigatória.Research, Society and Development2022-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3139010.33448/rsd-v11i10.31390Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e372111031390Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e372111031390Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e3721110313902525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31390/27882Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Zetehaku Araujo; Karla Zancopé; Rodrigo Silva Moreira; Flavio Domingues das Neveshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraujo, Rafael Zetehaku Zancopé, Karla Moreira, Rodrigo Silva Neves, Flavio Domingues das 2022-08-12T22:23:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31390Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:47:45.066840Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature
Métodos de evaluación de la función masticatoria: Análisis crítico de literatura seleccionada
Métodos de avaliação da função mastigatória: Análise crítica da literatura selecionada
title Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature
spellingShingle Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature
Araujo, Rafael Zetehaku
Habilidade de mistura
Função oral
Performance mastigatória
Mastigação
Alimento teste.
Capacidad de mezcla
Función oral
Rendimiento masticatorio
Masticación
Alimento de prueba.
Mixing ability
Oral function
Masticatory performance
Chewing
Test food.
title_short Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature
title_full Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature
title_fullStr Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature
title_full_unstemmed Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature
title_sort Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature
author Araujo, Rafael Zetehaku
author_facet Araujo, Rafael Zetehaku
Zancopé, Karla
Moreira, Rodrigo Silva
Neves, Flavio Domingues das
author_role author
author2 Zancopé, Karla
Moreira, Rodrigo Silva
Neves, Flavio Domingues das
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araujo, Rafael Zetehaku
Zancopé, Karla
Moreira, Rodrigo Silva
Neves, Flavio Domingues das
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Habilidade de mistura
Função oral
Performance mastigatória
Mastigação
Alimento teste.
Capacidad de mezcla
Función oral
Rendimiento masticatorio
Masticación
Alimento de prueba.
Mixing ability
Oral function
Masticatory performance
Chewing
Test food.
topic Habilidade de mistura
Função oral
Performance mastigatória
Mastigação
Alimento teste.
Capacidad de mezcla
Función oral
Rendimiento masticatorio
Masticación
Alimento de prueba.
Mixing ability
Oral function
Masticatory performance
Chewing
Test food.
description Objective: To identify the ideal and/or most suitable masticatory function assessment methodology or treatment for each group of patients. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out in the MEDLINE, Science Direct, and Embase databases for articles published since 1990. The articles were initially selected by their titles and abstracts, and after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, some were selected for full text reading. The studies were submitted to qualitative, quantitative, and bias analysis. Results: Of the 1,514 studies retrieved in the initial search, 51 were selected for complete analysis. Advantages of the test foods Optocal and Optosil included reliability and standardization capacity, while their disadvantages included high processing time and hardness. Wax was mentioned for its ease of chewing and testing speed, with the disadvantages of handling and the influence of temperature, in addition to low palatability. Chewing gum exhibited a speedy and easy way of testing, low cost, and reliability, in addition to commercial availability. Conclusion: Among the existing methodologies, those that were used in few studies or not validated require additional data, and for now, their indication is not recommended. Optocal and Optosil should be indicated for patients who do not have impaired chewing function. Chewing gum is a more suitable test food for patients with impaired chewing. Its practicality in being used in tests and evaluation of results makes it a more comprehensive indicator for different types of patients, treatments, or needs to assess masticatory function.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31390
10.33448/rsd-v11i10.31390
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31390
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i10.31390
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31390/27882
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e372111031390
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e372111031390
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e372111031390
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052716167462912