Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31390 |
Resumo: | Objective: To identify the ideal and/or most suitable masticatory function assessment methodology or treatment for each group of patients. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out in the MEDLINE, Science Direct, and Embase databases for articles published since 1990. The articles were initially selected by their titles and abstracts, and after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, some were selected for full text reading. The studies were submitted to qualitative, quantitative, and bias analysis. Results: Of the 1,514 studies retrieved in the initial search, 51 were selected for complete analysis. Advantages of the test foods Optocal and Optosil included reliability and standardization capacity, while their disadvantages included high processing time and hardness. Wax was mentioned for its ease of chewing and testing speed, with the disadvantages of handling and the influence of temperature, in addition to low palatability. Chewing gum exhibited a speedy and easy way of testing, low cost, and reliability, in addition to commercial availability. Conclusion: Among the existing methodologies, those that were used in few studies or not validated require additional data, and for now, their indication is not recommended. Optocal and Optosil should be indicated for patients who do not have impaired chewing function. Chewing gum is a more suitable test food for patients with impaired chewing. Its practicality in being used in tests and evaluation of results makes it a more comprehensive indicator for different types of patients, treatments, or needs to assess masticatory function. |
id |
UNIFEI_12da2d0ec8091967a6b99e4492a5ceac |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31390 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literatureMétodos de evaluación de la función masticatoria: Análisis crítico de literatura seleccionadaMétodos de avaliação da função mastigatória: Análise crítica da literatura selecionadaHabilidade de misturaFunção oralPerformance mastigatóriaMastigaçãoAlimento teste. Capacidad de mezclaFunción oralRendimiento masticatorioMasticaciónAlimento de prueba.Mixing abilityOral functionMasticatory performanceChewingTest food.Objective: To identify the ideal and/or most suitable masticatory function assessment methodology or treatment for each group of patients. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out in the MEDLINE, Science Direct, and Embase databases for articles published since 1990. The articles were initially selected by their titles and abstracts, and after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, some were selected for full text reading. The studies were submitted to qualitative, quantitative, and bias analysis. Results: Of the 1,514 studies retrieved in the initial search, 51 were selected for complete analysis. Advantages of the test foods Optocal and Optosil included reliability and standardization capacity, while their disadvantages included high processing time and hardness. Wax was mentioned for its ease of chewing and testing speed, with the disadvantages of handling and the influence of temperature, in addition to low palatability. Chewing gum exhibited a speedy and easy way of testing, low cost, and reliability, in addition to commercial availability. Conclusion: Among the existing methodologies, those that were used in few studies or not validated require additional data, and for now, their indication is not recommended. Optocal and Optosil should be indicated for patients who do not have impaired chewing function. Chewing gum is a more suitable test food for patients with impaired chewing. Its practicality in being used in tests and evaluation of results makes it a more comprehensive indicator for different types of patients, treatments, or needs to assess masticatory function.Objetivo: Identificar el método ideal o más adecuado de evaluación de la función masticatoria para un determinado tipo de tratamiento o grupo de pacientes. Metodología: Se realizó una búsqueda en las bases de datos MEDLINE, Science Direct y Embase de artículos publicados desde 1990. Inicialmente se seleccionaron artículos en base a sus títulos y resúmenes, y luego de aplicar criterios de inclusión o exclusión, algunos de ellos fueron seleccionados para lectura completa. Los estudios fueron sometidos a evaluación cuantitativa y cualitativa y análisis/riesgo de sesgo. Resultados: De los 1514 estudios realizados en la búsqueda inicial, 51 fueron seleccionados para un análisis completo. Las ventajas de los alimentos de prueba como Optocal y Optosil incluyeron la confiabilidad y la capacidad de estandarización, mientras que sus desventajas fueron el alto tiempo de procesamiento de datos y la dureza del material. La cera fue mencionada por su facilidad de masticación y rapidez en la realización de la prueba, con los inconvenientes de la necesidad de manipular el material y la influencia de la temperatura, además de la baja palatabilidad o mal sabor. La goma de mascar exhibió en la prueba una rápida y fácil aplicación y manejo, con bajo costo y buena confiabilidad, además de estar comercialmente disponible. Otros, como los ositos de goma, las cápsulas de fucsina y los alimentos naturales, aún necesitan una mayor estandarización para su uso rutinario. Conclusión: Entre las metodologías existentes, aquellas que han sido utilizadas en pocos estudios o no han sido validadas o requieren datos adicionales, por el momento no tienen su indicación recomendada. Optocal y Optosil deben estar indicados para pacientes que no tienen limitación de su función masticatoria, debido a la dureza del material. La goma de mascar es un alimento de prueba más apropiado para pacientes con una función masticatoria deteriorada o limitada. Su practicidad para ser utilizado en pruebas y evaluación de resultados lo hace más comprensible y reproducible para diferentes tipos de pacientes y tratamientos que necesitan evaluar su función masticatoria.Objetivo: Identificar o ideal ou o mais apropriado método de avaliação da função mastigatória para um determinado tipo de tratamento ou grupo de pacientes. Metodologia: Uma pesquisa foi realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE, Science Direct, e Embase para artigos publicados desde 1990. Os artigos foram incialmente selecionados baseados em seus títulos e resumos, e após a aplicação de critérios de inclusão ou exclusão, alguns deles foram selecionados para leitura completa. Os estudos foram submetidos a avaliação quantitativa, qualitativa e análise/risco de viés. Resultados: Dos 1.514 estudos conduzidos na busca inicial, 51 foram selecionados para análise completa. As vantagens de alimentos testem como Optocal e Optosil incluíram confiabilidade e capacidade de padronização, enquanto as suas desvantagens foram um tempo de processamento de dados alto e a dureza do material. A cera foi mencionada por sua facilidade de mastigação, e velocidade na realização do teste, com as desvantagens de necessidade de manuseio do material e a influência da temperatura, além da baixa palatabilidade, ou gosto ruim. A goma de mascar exibiu uma rápida e fácil aplicação e manuseio no teste, com baixo custo e boa confiabilidade, além de ser comercialmente disponível. Outros como as balas de goma, cápsulas de fucsina e alimentos naturais, ainda precisam de maior padronização para utilização rotineira. Conclusão: Dentre as existentes metodologias, aquelas que foram usadas em poucos estudos ou não foram validadas ou requerem dados adicionais, por enquanto não tem a sua indicação recomendada. Optocal e Optosil, devem ser indicados para pacientes que não tem limitação de sua função mastigatória, devido a dureza do material. A goma de mascar é um alimento teste mais apropriado para pacientes com a função mastigatória prejudicada ou limitada. A sua praticidade em ser usada em testes e avaliação dos resultados a torna mais compreensível e reproduzível para diferentes tipos de pacientes e tratamentos que tenham a necessidade de avaliação da sua função mastigatória.Research, Society and Development2022-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3139010.33448/rsd-v11i10.31390Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e372111031390Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e372111031390Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e3721110313902525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31390/27882Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Zetehaku Araujo; Karla Zancopé; Rodrigo Silva Moreira; Flavio Domingues das Neveshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraujo, Rafael Zetehaku Zancopé, Karla Moreira, Rodrigo Silva Neves, Flavio Domingues das 2022-08-12T22:23:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31390Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:47:45.066840Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature Métodos de evaluación de la función masticatoria: Análisis crítico de literatura seleccionada Métodos de avaliação da função mastigatória: Análise crítica da literatura selecionada |
title |
Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature |
spellingShingle |
Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature Araujo, Rafael Zetehaku Habilidade de mistura Função oral Performance mastigatória Mastigação Alimento teste. Capacidad de mezcla Función oral Rendimiento masticatorio Masticación Alimento de prueba. Mixing ability Oral function Masticatory performance Chewing Test food. |
title_short |
Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature |
title_full |
Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature |
title_fullStr |
Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature |
title_sort |
Masticatory function evaluation methods: Critical analysis of selected literature |
author |
Araujo, Rafael Zetehaku |
author_facet |
Araujo, Rafael Zetehaku Zancopé, Karla Moreira, Rodrigo Silva Neves, Flavio Domingues das |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zancopé, Karla Moreira, Rodrigo Silva Neves, Flavio Domingues das |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araujo, Rafael Zetehaku Zancopé, Karla Moreira, Rodrigo Silva Neves, Flavio Domingues das |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Habilidade de mistura Função oral Performance mastigatória Mastigação Alimento teste. Capacidad de mezcla Función oral Rendimiento masticatorio Masticación Alimento de prueba. Mixing ability Oral function Masticatory performance Chewing Test food. |
topic |
Habilidade de mistura Função oral Performance mastigatória Mastigação Alimento teste. Capacidad de mezcla Función oral Rendimiento masticatorio Masticación Alimento de prueba. Mixing ability Oral function Masticatory performance Chewing Test food. |
description |
Objective: To identify the ideal and/or most suitable masticatory function assessment methodology or treatment for each group of patients. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out in the MEDLINE, Science Direct, and Embase databases for articles published since 1990. The articles were initially selected by their titles and abstracts, and after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, some were selected for full text reading. The studies were submitted to qualitative, quantitative, and bias analysis. Results: Of the 1,514 studies retrieved in the initial search, 51 were selected for complete analysis. Advantages of the test foods Optocal and Optosil included reliability and standardization capacity, while their disadvantages included high processing time and hardness. Wax was mentioned for its ease of chewing and testing speed, with the disadvantages of handling and the influence of temperature, in addition to low palatability. Chewing gum exhibited a speedy and easy way of testing, low cost, and reliability, in addition to commercial availability. Conclusion: Among the existing methodologies, those that were used in few studies or not validated require additional data, and for now, their indication is not recommended. Optocal and Optosil should be indicated for patients who do not have impaired chewing function. Chewing gum is a more suitable test food for patients with impaired chewing. Its practicality in being used in tests and evaluation of results makes it a more comprehensive indicator for different types of patients, treatments, or needs to assess masticatory function. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31390 10.33448/rsd-v11i10.31390 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31390 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i10.31390 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31390/27882 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e372111031390 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e372111031390 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e372111031390 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052716167462912 |