Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Drei, Samuel Martins
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Eric Bremm de, Mello, João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de, Angulo-Meza, Lidia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19785
Resumo: The h-index was presented by the scientific community to measure researchers' contribution quantitatively. Given its wide existence, the objective of this article is to analyze the panorama of the most influential works that use the h-index in its approach, published throughout the decade from 2011 to 2020. The proposed methodology consisted of a selection, in Scopus, highlighting the author with the highest h-index and then selecting the most cited article in the database annually. As a result, it was possible to observe some patterns in the authors' publications that remained relevant, as well as the nature of journals in the health area. As conclusions, it is noteworthy that the authors that stand out over the years do not work with the h-index, and thus, the themes of the highlighted works also do not prioritize the index, they only use it for application in your area of research.
id UNIFEI_1483fcc30015d25ebebb45c90a72ff06
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19785
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020Evaluación del panorama de los trabajos sobre índice h durante la década de 2011 a 2020Avaliação do panorama dos trabalhos que utilizam índice-h ao longo da década de 2011 a 2020Índice-hPanorama da DécadaAvaliaçãoScopus.H-indexPanorama of the decadeEvaluationScopus.Índice hPanorama de la décadaEvaluaciónScopus.The h-index was presented by the scientific community to measure researchers' contribution quantitatively. Given its wide existence, the objective of this article is to analyze the panorama of the most influential works that use the h-index in its approach, published throughout the decade from 2011 to 2020. The proposed methodology consisted of a selection, in Scopus, highlighting the author with the highest h-index and then selecting the most cited article in the database annually. As a result, it was possible to observe some patterns in the authors' publications that remained relevant, as well as the nature of journals in the health area. As conclusions, it is noteworthy that the authors that stand out over the years do not work with the h-index, and thus, the themes of the highlighted works also do not prioritize the index, they only use it for application in your area of research.El índice h fue presentado por la comunidad científica para medir cuantitativamente la contribución de los investigadores. Dada su amplia existencia, el objetivo de este artículo es analizar el panorama de los trabajos más influyentes que utilizan el índice h en su enfoque, publicados a lo largo de la década de 2011 a 2020. La metodología propuesta consistió en una selección, en Scopus, destacando al autor con el índice h más alto y luego seleccionando el artículo más citado en la base de datos anualmente. Como resultado, fue posible observar algunos patrones en las publicaciones de los autores que se mantuvieron relevantes, así como la naturaleza de las revistas en el área de la salud. Como conclusiones, es de destacar que los autores que se destacan a lo largo de los años no trabajan con el índice h, por lo que las temáticas de los trabajos resaltados tampoco priorizan el índice, solo lo utilizan para su aplicación en su área de investigar.O índice-h foi apresentado pela comunidade científica para mensurar a contribuição dos pesquisadores quantitativamente. Dada sua ampla existência, o objetivo deste artigo é analisar o panorama dos trabalhos mais influentes que utilizam o índice-h em sua abordagem, publicados ao longo da década de 2011 a 2020. A metodologia proposta consistiu em uma seleção, no Scopus, destacando o autor com maior índice-h e, em seguida, selecionando o artigo mais citado na base, anualmente. Como resultados, foi possível observar alguns padrões nas publicações dos autores que se mantiveram relevantes, bem como o cunho de revistas na área de saúde. Como conclusões, destaca-se que os autores que se sobressaem ao longo dos anos não trabalham com o índice-h e, assim, as temáticas dos trabalhos destaque também não priorizam o índice, apenas o usam para aplicação em sua área de pesquisa.Research, Society and Development2021-09-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1978510.33448/rsd-v10i11.19785Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 11; e360101119785Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 11; e360101119785Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 11; e3601011197852525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19785/17617Copyright (c) 2021 Samuel Martins Drei; Eric Bremm de Carvalho; João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de Mello; Lidia Angulo-Mezahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDrei, Samuel Martins Carvalho, Eric Bremm de Mello, João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de Angulo-Meza, Lidia2021-10-23T19:01:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19785Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:36.820160Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020
Evaluación del panorama de los trabajos sobre índice h durante la década de 2011 a 2020
Avaliação do panorama dos trabalhos que utilizam índice-h ao longo da década de 2011 a 2020
title Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020
spellingShingle Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020
Drei, Samuel Martins
Índice-h
Panorama da Década
Avaliação
Scopus.
H-index
Panorama of the decade
Evaluation
Scopus.
Índice h
Panorama de la década
Evaluación
Scopus.
title_short Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020
title_full Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020
title_fullStr Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020
title_sort Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020
author Drei, Samuel Martins
author_facet Drei, Samuel Martins
Carvalho, Eric Bremm de
Mello, João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de
Angulo-Meza, Lidia
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Eric Bremm de
Mello, João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de
Angulo-Meza, Lidia
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Drei, Samuel Martins
Carvalho, Eric Bremm de
Mello, João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de
Angulo-Meza, Lidia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Índice-h
Panorama da Década
Avaliação
Scopus.
H-index
Panorama of the decade
Evaluation
Scopus.
Índice h
Panorama de la década
Evaluación
Scopus.
topic Índice-h
Panorama da Década
Avaliação
Scopus.
H-index
Panorama of the decade
Evaluation
Scopus.
Índice h
Panorama de la década
Evaluación
Scopus.
description The h-index was presented by the scientific community to measure researchers' contribution quantitatively. Given its wide existence, the objective of this article is to analyze the panorama of the most influential works that use the h-index in its approach, published throughout the decade from 2011 to 2020. The proposed methodology consisted of a selection, in Scopus, highlighting the author with the highest h-index and then selecting the most cited article in the database annually. As a result, it was possible to observe some patterns in the authors' publications that remained relevant, as well as the nature of journals in the health area. As conclusions, it is noteworthy that the authors that stand out over the years do not work with the h-index, and thus, the themes of the highlighted works also do not prioritize the index, they only use it for application in your area of research.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19785
10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19785
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19785
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19785
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19785/17617
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 11; e360101119785
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 11; e360101119785
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 11; e360101119785
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052788518158336