Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29608 |
Resumo: | The present study assesses the shear strength of Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Zantex to thermopolymerizable acrylic resin (TAR) with different surface treatments. To this end, 100 test specimens were produced and divided into two groups: G1(PEEK + TAR) and G2 (Zantex + TAR). Each group was subdivided into the subgroups A, B, C, D and E (n=10) according to surface pre-treatment: A: TAR + PEEK/Zantex without surface treatment (control); B: TAR + PEEK/Zantex treated with Palabond; C: TAR + PEEK/Zantex blasted with aluminum oxide (Al2O3) of 125 µm; D: TAR + PEEK /Zantex treated with Al2O3 of 125 µm + Palabond; and E: TAR + PEEK/Zantex prepared with groove-shaped retentions. The structures were tested in a Universal testing machine EMIC DL2000. Two-way variance analysis showed significant difference between materials and surface treatments (p < 0.001). Multiple comparisons were done with Tukey’s test and failure modes were analyzed with the G test. Statistical analysis showed that Zantex outperformed PEEK for most treatments and showed similar performance in the subgroups treated with Al2O3. Within the PEEK group, the use of grooves and Palabond combined with blasting showed the best results; in the Zantex group, the best results were obtained with Palabond and Palabond combined with blasting. Regarding failure modes, PEEK showed only adhesive failures and Zantex’s failures were dependent on treatment. Therefore, the surface treatment method applied to the polymers studied here contribute to the material’s adhesion to acrylic resin. |
id |
UNIFEI_14f29924240c7ca7ffa4a29e09a9770f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29608 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXRLa influencia de diferentes tratamientos superficiales en la resistencia al corte entre la resina acrílica y dos materiales: poli éter éter cetona (PEEK) / ZANTEXRA influência de diferentes tratamentos de superfície na resistência ao cisalhamento entre resina acrílica e dois materiais: Poli éter éter cetona (PEEK) / ZANTEXRPolymerShear strengthDental prosthesisHealth teaching.Resistencia al cortePrótesis dentalPolímeroEnseñanza en salud.Resistência ao cisalhamentoPrótese dentáriaPolímeroEnsino em saúde.The present study assesses the shear strength of Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Zantex to thermopolymerizable acrylic resin (TAR) with different surface treatments. To this end, 100 test specimens were produced and divided into two groups: G1(PEEK + TAR) and G2 (Zantex + TAR). Each group was subdivided into the subgroups A, B, C, D and E (n=10) according to surface pre-treatment: A: TAR + PEEK/Zantex without surface treatment (control); B: TAR + PEEK/Zantex treated with Palabond; C: TAR + PEEK/Zantex blasted with aluminum oxide (Al2O3) of 125 µm; D: TAR + PEEK /Zantex treated with Al2O3 of 125 µm + Palabond; and E: TAR + PEEK/Zantex prepared with groove-shaped retentions. The structures were tested in a Universal testing machine EMIC DL2000. Two-way variance analysis showed significant difference between materials and surface treatments (p < 0.001). Multiple comparisons were done with Tukey’s test and failure modes were analyzed with the G test. Statistical analysis showed that Zantex outperformed PEEK for most treatments and showed similar performance in the subgroups treated with Al2O3. Within the PEEK group, the use of grooves and Palabond combined with blasting showed the best results; in the Zantex group, the best results were obtained with Palabond and Palabond combined with blasting. Regarding failure modes, PEEK showed only adhesive failures and Zantex’s failures were dependent on treatment. Therefore, the surface treatment method applied to the polymers studied here contribute to the material’s adhesion to acrylic resin.Este estudio evaluó la resistencia al corte de la poliéter cetona (PEEK) y Zantex a la resina de recubrimiento termopolimerizable acrílica (RAT) para evaluar la influencia de diferentes tratamientos superficiales en estos materiales. Para ello se utilizaron 100 especímenes, divididos en 02 grupos: G1 (PEEK+RAT) y G2 (Zantex+RAT). Cada grupo se dividió en subgrupos A, B, C, D y E con n=10, que se distinguen por el tratamiento superficial dado a PEEK y Zantex antes de prensar el RAT. El subgrupo A consistió en (RAT) + PEEK/Zantex sin tratamiento superficial (control); B: RAT + PEEK/Zantex tratado con Palabond; C: RAT + PEEK/Zantex arenado con óxido de aluminio (Al2O3) a 125 µm; D: RAT + PEEK/Zantex Al2O3 a 125 µm + Palabond; y E: RAT + PEEK/Zantex preparado con retenciones en forma de canal. Las estructuras se ensayaron en la máquina de ensayo universal EMIC DL2000. El análisis de varianza de dos vías mostró significación entre los materiales y los tratamientos superficiales aplicados (p < 0,001). Para las comparaciones múltiples se utilizó la prueba de Tukey y para los modos de falla la prueba G. El análisis estadístico mostró que el material Zantex superó al PEEK para la mayoría de los tratamientos, siendo similar solo para las preparaciones con Al2O3 específicamente. En la evaluación interna de los grupos, el uso de canales y arenado + Palabond representó los valores más altos para el material PEEK; y para Zantex, Palabond y arenado + Palabond. En cuanto a los modos de falla, para 100% PEEK fueron del tipo adhesivo, y para Zantex hubo una variación dependiente del tratamiento. Por lo tanto, la aplicación de diferentes métodos de tratamientos superficiales sobre los respectivos polímeros abordados en este estudio, contribuye a una mayor adherencia de estos materiales al recubrimiento de resina acrílica.Este estudo avaliou a resistência ao cisalhamento do Poli éter éter cetona (PEEK) e do Zantex à resina acrílica termopolimerizável de recobrimento (RAT) com o objetivo de avaliar a influência de diferentes tratamentos de superfície nestes materiais. Para isso, utilizou-se 100 corpos de prova divididos em 02 grupos: G1(PEEK + RAT) e G2 (Zantex + RAT). Cada grupo foi dividido nos subgrupos A, B, C, D e E com n=10, distintos pelo tratamento de superfície dado ao PEEK e ao Zantex previamente à prensagem da RAT. O subgrupo A foi composto por (RAT) + PEEK/Zantex sem tratamento de superfície (controle); B: RAT + PEEK/Zantex tratados com Palabond; C: RAT + PEEK/Zantex jateados com óxido de alumínio (Al2O3) a 125 µm; D: RAT + PEEK /Zantex Al2O3 a 125 µm + Palabond; e E: RAT + PEEK/Zantex preparados com retenções em forma de canaletas. As estruturas foram testadas na máquina de ensaios Universais EMIC DL2000. A análise de variância a dois critérios demonstrou significância entre os materiais e os tratamentos de superfície aplicados (p < 0,001). Para as comparações múltiplas empregou-se o teste de Tukey e para os modos de falha o teste G. A análise estatística mostrou que o material Zantex superou o PEEK para a maioria dos tratamentos, assemelhando-se somente para os preparos com Al2O3 especificamente. Na avaliação interna dos grupos, o emprego de canaletas e jateamento + Palabond representaram os maiores valores para o material PEEK; e para o Zantex, Palabond e jateamento + Palabond. Quanto aos modos de falha, para o PEEK 100% foram do tipo adesiva, e para o Zantex, houve variação dependente do tratamento. Portanto a aplicação de diferentes métodos de tramentos de superfície sobre os respectivos polímeros abordados neste estudo,contribui para maior adesão desses materiais à resina acrílica de recobrimento.Research, Society and Development2022-05-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2960810.33448/rsd-v11i6.29608Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 6; e51811629608Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 6; e51811629608Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 6; e518116296082525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29608/25462Copyright (c) 2022 Tácio Gonçalves Nogueira Fonseca; Amanda Gonçalves Franco; Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho; Caio Marques Martins; Silvio Mecca Junior; Fabiano Perez; Elimario Venturin Ramos ; Sérgio Candido Dias; Reyler Bueno Faria; Aline Batista Gonçalves Francohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFonseca, Tácio Gonçalves Nogueira Franco, Amanda Gonçalves Carvalho, Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Martins, Caio Marques Mecca Junior, SilvioPerez, FabianoRamos , Elimario Venturin Dias, Sérgio Candido Faria, Reyler Bueno Franco, Aline Batista Gonçalves 2022-05-13T18:04:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29608Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:46:38.009719Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR La influencia de diferentes tratamientos superficiales en la resistencia al corte entre la resina acrílica y dos materiales: poli éter éter cetona (PEEK) / ZANTEXR A influência de diferentes tratamentos de superfície na resistência ao cisalhamento entre resina acrílica e dois materiais: Poli éter éter cetona (PEEK) / ZANTEXR |
title |
Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR |
spellingShingle |
Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR Fonseca, Tácio Gonçalves Nogueira Polymer Shear strength Dental prosthesis Health teaching. Resistencia al corte Prótesis dental Polímero Enseñanza en salud. Resistência ao cisalhamento Prótese dentária Polímero Ensino em saúde. |
title_short |
Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR |
title_full |
Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR |
title_fullStr |
Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR |
title_sort |
Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR |
author |
Fonseca, Tácio Gonçalves Nogueira |
author_facet |
Fonseca, Tácio Gonçalves Nogueira Franco, Amanda Gonçalves Carvalho, Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Martins, Caio Marques Mecca Junior, Silvio Perez, Fabiano Ramos , Elimario Venturin Dias, Sérgio Candido Faria, Reyler Bueno Franco, Aline Batista Gonçalves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Franco, Amanda Gonçalves Carvalho, Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Martins, Caio Marques Mecca Junior, Silvio Perez, Fabiano Ramos , Elimario Venturin Dias, Sérgio Candido Faria, Reyler Bueno Franco, Aline Batista Gonçalves |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fonseca, Tácio Gonçalves Nogueira Franco, Amanda Gonçalves Carvalho, Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Martins, Caio Marques Mecca Junior, Silvio Perez, Fabiano Ramos , Elimario Venturin Dias, Sérgio Candido Faria, Reyler Bueno Franco, Aline Batista Gonçalves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Polymer Shear strength Dental prosthesis Health teaching. Resistencia al corte Prótesis dental Polímero Enseñanza en salud. Resistência ao cisalhamento Prótese dentária Polímero Ensino em saúde. |
topic |
Polymer Shear strength Dental prosthesis Health teaching. Resistencia al corte Prótesis dental Polímero Enseñanza en salud. Resistência ao cisalhamento Prótese dentária Polímero Ensino em saúde. |
description |
The present study assesses the shear strength of Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Zantex to thermopolymerizable acrylic resin (TAR) with different surface treatments. To this end, 100 test specimens were produced and divided into two groups: G1(PEEK + TAR) and G2 (Zantex + TAR). Each group was subdivided into the subgroups A, B, C, D and E (n=10) according to surface pre-treatment: A: TAR + PEEK/Zantex without surface treatment (control); B: TAR + PEEK/Zantex treated with Palabond; C: TAR + PEEK/Zantex blasted with aluminum oxide (Al2O3) of 125 µm; D: TAR + PEEK /Zantex treated with Al2O3 of 125 µm + Palabond; and E: TAR + PEEK/Zantex prepared with groove-shaped retentions. The structures were tested in a Universal testing machine EMIC DL2000. Two-way variance analysis showed significant difference between materials and surface treatments (p < 0.001). Multiple comparisons were done with Tukey’s test and failure modes were analyzed with the G test. Statistical analysis showed that Zantex outperformed PEEK for most treatments and showed similar performance in the subgroups treated with Al2O3. Within the PEEK group, the use of grooves and Palabond combined with blasting showed the best results; in the Zantex group, the best results were obtained with Palabond and Palabond combined with blasting. Regarding failure modes, PEEK showed only adhesive failures and Zantex’s failures were dependent on treatment. Therefore, the surface treatment method applied to the polymers studied here contribute to the material’s adhesion to acrylic resin. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29608 10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29608 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29608 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29608 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29608/25462 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 6; e51811629608 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 6; e51811629608 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 6; e51811629608 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052795318173696 |