Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Netto, Beatriz de Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Melo, Laércio Almeida de, Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira, Braga, Luciana de Castro, Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi, Lima, Camila Moreira, Faria, Júlio César Brigolini de, Oséas, Jéssica Mayara de Figueirêdo, Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8922
Resumo: Objective: This study compared low intensity laser therapy and dry needling, in the short and long term, in the treatment of myofascial pain, from pain to muscle palpation and in mandibular mobility. Methodology: This is a clinical trial in which 28 individuals were recruited to participate in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: GI (laser therapy) and Gll (dry needling). In GI there were 12 applications and in GII, three applications. Patients in both groups underwent nine evaluations (T0-T8). Return visits and new evaluations were carried out sixty days and 18 months after the end of the therapies in order to evaluate their efficacy and possible cumulative effects. To compare the groups in all parameters over time, ANOVA GLM and Multiple Comparison of Tukey were used with a significance level of 5% for all analyzes. Results: In general, the two therapies tested were effective for all parameters evaluated at T7 (2 months after T6). However, at T8, dry needling therapy was found to support the results compared to laser therapy. Conclusion: It is concluded that, although both therapies were effective, for immediate relief of symptoms of myofascial pain, dry needling was more efficient and lasting in the analyzed parameters.
id UNIFEI_1777b4a4f5cc247bbaeba94a41e1c7c2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8922
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative studyLaserterapia y aguja seca en pacientes con dolor miofasial: estudio comparativoLaserterapia e agulhamento seco em pacientes portadores de dor miofascial: estudo comparativoSíndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibularDolor facialConducta terapéutica.Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction SyndromeFacial PainTherapeutic Conduct.Dor FacialSíndrome da Disfunção da Articulação TemporomandibularCondutas Terapêuticas.Objective: This study compared low intensity laser therapy and dry needling, in the short and long term, in the treatment of myofascial pain, from pain to muscle palpation and in mandibular mobility. Methodology: This is a clinical trial in which 28 individuals were recruited to participate in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: GI (laser therapy) and Gll (dry needling). In GI there were 12 applications and in GII, three applications. Patients in both groups underwent nine evaluations (T0-T8). Return visits and new evaluations were carried out sixty days and 18 months after the end of the therapies in order to evaluate their efficacy and possible cumulative effects. To compare the groups in all parameters over time, ANOVA GLM and Multiple Comparison of Tukey were used with a significance level of 5% for all analyzes. Results: In general, the two therapies tested were effective for all parameters evaluated at T7 (2 months after T6). However, at T8, dry needling therapy was found to support the results compared to laser therapy. Conclusion: It is concluded that, although both therapies were effective, for immediate relief of symptoms of myofascial pain, dry needling was more efficient and lasting in the analyzed parameters.Objetivo: Este estudio comparó la terapia con láser de baja intensidad y la punción seca, a corto y largo plazo, en el tratamiento del dolor miofascial, desde el dolor a la palpación muscular y en la movilidad mandibular. Metodología: Se trata de un ensayo clínico en el que se reclutaron 28 personas para participar en el estudio. Los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente a dos grupos: GI (terapia con láser) y Gll (punción seca). En GI hubo 12 aplicaciones y en GII, tres aplicaciones. Los pacientes de ambos grupos se sometieron a nueve evaluaciones (T0-T8). Se realizaron visitas de revisión y nuevas evaluaciones a los sesenta días y 18 meses después de finalizadas las terapias para evaluar su eficacia y posibles efectos acumulativos. Para comparar los grupos en todos los parámetros a lo largo del tiempo, se utilizaron ANOVA GLM y Comparación múltiple de Tukey con un nivel de significancia del 5% para todos los análisis. Resultados: En general, las dos terapias probadas fueron efectivas para todos los parámetros evaluados en T7 (2 meses después de T6). Sin embargo, en T8, se encontró que la terapia de punción seca respalda los resultados en comparación con la terapia con láser. Conclusión: Se concluye que, si bien ambas terapias resultaron efectivas, para el alivio inmediato de los síntomas del dolor miofascial, la punción seca fue más eficiente y duradera en los parámetros analizados.Objetivo: Este estudo comparou a laserterapia de baixa intensidade e o agulhamento seco, em curto e em longo prazos, no tratamento da dor miofascial, da dor a palpação muscular e na mobilidade mandibular. Metodologia: Trata-se de um ensaio clínico em que 28 indivíduos foram recrutados para participar do estudo. Os pacientes foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos: GI (laserterapia) e Gll (agulhamento seco). No GI foi realizado 12 aplicações e no GII, três aplicações. Os pacientes de ambos os grupos foram submetidos a nove avaliações (T0-T8). Foram realizadas consultas de retorno e novas avaliações após sessenta dias e 18 meses do término das terapias para se avaliar a eficácia e os possíveis efeitos cumulativos das mesmas. Para comparar os grupos em todos os parâmetros ao longo dos tempos, empregou-se ANOVA GLM e Comparação Múltipla de Tukey com nível de significância de 5% para todas as análises. Resultados: De um modo geral, as duas terapias testadas demostraram-se efetivas para todos os parâmetros avaliados em T7 (2 meses após T6). Porém em T8, a terapia por agulhamento seco mostrou sustentar os resultados em comparação com laserterapia. Conclusão: Conclui-se que, apesar de ambas as terapias terem sido eficazes, para o alívio imediato dos sintomas da dor miofascial, o agulhamento seco foi mais eficiente e duradouro nos parâmetros analisados.Research, Society and Development2020-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/892210.33448/rsd-v9i10.8922Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e5539108922Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e5539108922Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e55391089222525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8922/7922Copyright (c) 2020 Beatriz de Pedro Netto; Laércio Almeida de Melo; Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leite; Luciana de Castro Braga; Marcelo Lucchesi Teixeira; Camila Moreira Lima; Júlio César Brigolini de Faria; Jéssica Mayara de Figueirêdo Oséas; Rui Barbosa de Brito Júniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNetto, Beatriz de PedroMelo, Laércio Almeida de Leite, Fabíola Pessôa PereiraBraga, Luciana de CastroTeixeira, Marcelo LucchesiLima, Camila MoreiraFaria, Júlio César Brigolini deOséas, Jéssica Mayara de FigueirêdoBrito Júnior, Rui Barbosa de2020-10-31T12:03:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8922Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:17.564891Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study
Laserterapia y aguja seca en pacientes con dolor miofasial: estudio comparativo
Laserterapia e agulhamento seco em pacientes portadores de dor miofascial: estudo comparativo
title Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study
spellingShingle Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study
Netto, Beatriz de Pedro
Síndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular
Dolor facial
Conducta terapéutica.
Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome
Facial Pain
Therapeutic Conduct.
Dor Facial
Síndrome da Disfunção da Articulação Temporomandibular
Condutas Terapêuticas.
title_short Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study
title_full Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study
title_fullStr Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study
title_sort Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study
author Netto, Beatriz de Pedro
author_facet Netto, Beatriz de Pedro
Melo, Laércio Almeida de
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
Braga, Luciana de Castro
Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi
Lima, Camila Moreira
Faria, Júlio César Brigolini de
Oséas, Jéssica Mayara de Figueirêdo
Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa de
author_role author
author2 Melo, Laércio Almeida de
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
Braga, Luciana de Castro
Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi
Lima, Camila Moreira
Faria, Júlio César Brigolini de
Oséas, Jéssica Mayara de Figueirêdo
Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Netto, Beatriz de Pedro
Melo, Laércio Almeida de
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
Braga, Luciana de Castro
Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi
Lima, Camila Moreira
Faria, Júlio César Brigolini de
Oséas, Jéssica Mayara de Figueirêdo
Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Síndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular
Dolor facial
Conducta terapéutica.
Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome
Facial Pain
Therapeutic Conduct.
Dor Facial
Síndrome da Disfunção da Articulação Temporomandibular
Condutas Terapêuticas.
topic Síndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular
Dolor facial
Conducta terapéutica.
Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome
Facial Pain
Therapeutic Conduct.
Dor Facial
Síndrome da Disfunção da Articulação Temporomandibular
Condutas Terapêuticas.
description Objective: This study compared low intensity laser therapy and dry needling, in the short and long term, in the treatment of myofascial pain, from pain to muscle palpation and in mandibular mobility. Methodology: This is a clinical trial in which 28 individuals were recruited to participate in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: GI (laser therapy) and Gll (dry needling). In GI there were 12 applications and in GII, three applications. Patients in both groups underwent nine evaluations (T0-T8). Return visits and new evaluations were carried out sixty days and 18 months after the end of the therapies in order to evaluate their efficacy and possible cumulative effects. To compare the groups in all parameters over time, ANOVA GLM and Multiple Comparison of Tukey were used with a significance level of 5% for all analyzes. Results: In general, the two therapies tested were effective for all parameters evaluated at T7 (2 months after T6). However, at T8, dry needling therapy was found to support the results compared to laser therapy. Conclusion: It is concluded that, although both therapies were effective, for immediate relief of symptoms of myofascial pain, dry needling was more efficient and lasting in the analyzed parameters.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8922
10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8922
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8922
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8922
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8922/7922
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e5539108922
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e5539108922
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e5539108922
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052816583294976