Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8922 |
Resumo: | Objective: This study compared low intensity laser therapy and dry needling, in the short and long term, in the treatment of myofascial pain, from pain to muscle palpation and in mandibular mobility. Methodology: This is a clinical trial in which 28 individuals were recruited to participate in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: GI (laser therapy) and Gll (dry needling). In GI there were 12 applications and in GII, three applications. Patients in both groups underwent nine evaluations (T0-T8). Return visits and new evaluations were carried out sixty days and 18 months after the end of the therapies in order to evaluate their efficacy and possible cumulative effects. To compare the groups in all parameters over time, ANOVA GLM and Multiple Comparison of Tukey were used with a significance level of 5% for all analyzes. Results: In general, the two therapies tested were effective for all parameters evaluated at T7 (2 months after T6). However, at T8, dry needling therapy was found to support the results compared to laser therapy. Conclusion: It is concluded that, although both therapies were effective, for immediate relief of symptoms of myofascial pain, dry needling was more efficient and lasting in the analyzed parameters. |
id |
UNIFEI_1777b4a4f5cc247bbaeba94a41e1c7c2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8922 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative studyLaserterapia y aguja seca en pacientes con dolor miofasial: estudio comparativoLaserterapia e agulhamento seco em pacientes portadores de dor miofascial: estudo comparativoSíndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibularDolor facialConducta terapéutica.Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction SyndromeFacial PainTherapeutic Conduct.Dor FacialSíndrome da Disfunção da Articulação TemporomandibularCondutas Terapêuticas.Objective: This study compared low intensity laser therapy and dry needling, in the short and long term, in the treatment of myofascial pain, from pain to muscle palpation and in mandibular mobility. Methodology: This is a clinical trial in which 28 individuals were recruited to participate in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: GI (laser therapy) and Gll (dry needling). In GI there were 12 applications and in GII, three applications. Patients in both groups underwent nine evaluations (T0-T8). Return visits and new evaluations were carried out sixty days and 18 months after the end of the therapies in order to evaluate their efficacy and possible cumulative effects. To compare the groups in all parameters over time, ANOVA GLM and Multiple Comparison of Tukey were used with a significance level of 5% for all analyzes. Results: In general, the two therapies tested were effective for all parameters evaluated at T7 (2 months after T6). However, at T8, dry needling therapy was found to support the results compared to laser therapy. Conclusion: It is concluded that, although both therapies were effective, for immediate relief of symptoms of myofascial pain, dry needling was more efficient and lasting in the analyzed parameters.Objetivo: Este estudio comparó la terapia con láser de baja intensidad y la punción seca, a corto y largo plazo, en el tratamiento del dolor miofascial, desde el dolor a la palpación muscular y en la movilidad mandibular. Metodología: Se trata de un ensayo clínico en el que se reclutaron 28 personas para participar en el estudio. Los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente a dos grupos: GI (terapia con láser) y Gll (punción seca). En GI hubo 12 aplicaciones y en GII, tres aplicaciones. Los pacientes de ambos grupos se sometieron a nueve evaluaciones (T0-T8). Se realizaron visitas de revisión y nuevas evaluaciones a los sesenta días y 18 meses después de finalizadas las terapias para evaluar su eficacia y posibles efectos acumulativos. Para comparar los grupos en todos los parámetros a lo largo del tiempo, se utilizaron ANOVA GLM y Comparación múltiple de Tukey con un nivel de significancia del 5% para todos los análisis. Resultados: En general, las dos terapias probadas fueron efectivas para todos los parámetros evaluados en T7 (2 meses después de T6). Sin embargo, en T8, se encontró que la terapia de punción seca respalda los resultados en comparación con la terapia con láser. Conclusión: Se concluye que, si bien ambas terapias resultaron efectivas, para el alivio inmediato de los síntomas del dolor miofascial, la punción seca fue más eficiente y duradera en los parámetros analizados.Objetivo: Este estudo comparou a laserterapia de baixa intensidade e o agulhamento seco, em curto e em longo prazos, no tratamento da dor miofascial, da dor a palpação muscular e na mobilidade mandibular. Metodologia: Trata-se de um ensaio clínico em que 28 indivíduos foram recrutados para participar do estudo. Os pacientes foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos: GI (laserterapia) e Gll (agulhamento seco). No GI foi realizado 12 aplicações e no GII, três aplicações. Os pacientes de ambos os grupos foram submetidos a nove avaliações (T0-T8). Foram realizadas consultas de retorno e novas avaliações após sessenta dias e 18 meses do término das terapias para se avaliar a eficácia e os possíveis efeitos cumulativos das mesmas. Para comparar os grupos em todos os parâmetros ao longo dos tempos, empregou-se ANOVA GLM e Comparação Múltipla de Tukey com nível de significância de 5% para todas as análises. Resultados: De um modo geral, as duas terapias testadas demostraram-se efetivas para todos os parâmetros avaliados em T7 (2 meses após T6). Porém em T8, a terapia por agulhamento seco mostrou sustentar os resultados em comparação com laserterapia. Conclusão: Conclui-se que, apesar de ambas as terapias terem sido eficazes, para o alívio imediato dos sintomas da dor miofascial, o agulhamento seco foi mais eficiente e duradouro nos parâmetros analisados.Research, Society and Development2020-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/892210.33448/rsd-v9i10.8922Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e5539108922Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e5539108922Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e55391089222525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8922/7922Copyright (c) 2020 Beatriz de Pedro Netto; Laércio Almeida de Melo; Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leite; Luciana de Castro Braga; Marcelo Lucchesi Teixeira; Camila Moreira Lima; Júlio César Brigolini de Faria; Jéssica Mayara de Figueirêdo Oséas; Rui Barbosa de Brito Júniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNetto, Beatriz de PedroMelo, Laércio Almeida de Leite, Fabíola Pessôa PereiraBraga, Luciana de CastroTeixeira, Marcelo LucchesiLima, Camila MoreiraFaria, Júlio César Brigolini deOséas, Jéssica Mayara de FigueirêdoBrito Júnior, Rui Barbosa de2020-10-31T12:03:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8922Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:17.564891Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study Laserterapia y aguja seca en pacientes con dolor miofasial: estudio comparativo Laserterapia e agulhamento seco em pacientes portadores de dor miofascial: estudo comparativo |
title |
Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study |
spellingShingle |
Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study Netto, Beatriz de Pedro Síndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular Dolor facial Conducta terapéutica. Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome Facial Pain Therapeutic Conduct. Dor Facial Síndrome da Disfunção da Articulação Temporomandibular Condutas Terapêuticas. |
title_short |
Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study |
title_full |
Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study |
title_fullStr |
Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study |
title_sort |
Laser therapy and dry needling in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative study |
author |
Netto, Beatriz de Pedro |
author_facet |
Netto, Beatriz de Pedro Melo, Laércio Almeida de Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Braga, Luciana de Castro Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi Lima, Camila Moreira Faria, Júlio César Brigolini de Oséas, Jéssica Mayara de Figueirêdo Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Melo, Laércio Almeida de Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Braga, Luciana de Castro Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi Lima, Camila Moreira Faria, Júlio César Brigolini de Oséas, Jéssica Mayara de Figueirêdo Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Netto, Beatriz de Pedro Melo, Laércio Almeida de Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Braga, Luciana de Castro Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi Lima, Camila Moreira Faria, Júlio César Brigolini de Oséas, Jéssica Mayara de Figueirêdo Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Síndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular Dolor facial Conducta terapéutica. Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome Facial Pain Therapeutic Conduct. Dor Facial Síndrome da Disfunção da Articulação Temporomandibular Condutas Terapêuticas. |
topic |
Síndrome de disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular Dolor facial Conducta terapéutica. Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome Facial Pain Therapeutic Conduct. Dor Facial Síndrome da Disfunção da Articulação Temporomandibular Condutas Terapêuticas. |
description |
Objective: This study compared low intensity laser therapy and dry needling, in the short and long term, in the treatment of myofascial pain, from pain to muscle palpation and in mandibular mobility. Methodology: This is a clinical trial in which 28 individuals were recruited to participate in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: GI (laser therapy) and Gll (dry needling). In GI there were 12 applications and in GII, three applications. Patients in both groups underwent nine evaluations (T0-T8). Return visits and new evaluations were carried out sixty days and 18 months after the end of the therapies in order to evaluate their efficacy and possible cumulative effects. To compare the groups in all parameters over time, ANOVA GLM and Multiple Comparison of Tukey were used with a significance level of 5% for all analyzes. Results: In general, the two therapies tested were effective for all parameters evaluated at T7 (2 months after T6). However, at T8, dry needling therapy was found to support the results compared to laser therapy. Conclusion: It is concluded that, although both therapies were effective, for immediate relief of symptoms of myofascial pain, dry needling was more efficient and lasting in the analyzed parameters. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8922 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8922 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8922 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8922 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8922/7922 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e5539108922 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e5539108922 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e5539108922 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052816583294976 |