Epidemiological profile of types of delivery performed in Brazil: temporal, regional and factorial analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29678 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The delivery routes usually seen are cesarean delivery and normal delivery and, in Brazil, the cesarean rate shows an increasing trend, increasing from 38% to 57% between 2001 and 2014. Despite the contribution of this intervention to better health care, it is efficient that its indication is clinically justified, minimizing risks and adding benefits. Objective: to describe the historical behavior in the last 10 years of the type of delivery and its associated factors in Brazil and by regions according to data available in DATASUS. Results and discussion: From 2010 to 2020, a total number of 31887329 deliveries were recorded, represented by approximately 55% by the cesarean type. This amplitude was accentuated, observing a decline in the performance of vaginal delivery. Of the regions, only in the Northeast there was a predominance of the number of vaginal deliveries, in the period from 2010 to 2013, and in 2018, the number of cesarean sections exceeds, becoming similar to the other regions. It was found that there was no significant difference in the variation between the type of delivery and the year of delivery (p<0.08), but there was a significant correlation between gestational age, mother’s age and number of visits (p<0.008). Conclusion: there is prevalence of absolute and relative number of cesarean deliveries over vaginal deliveries, influenced by factors such as gestational age of delivery, mother’s age, purchasing and socioeconomic power, schooling, marital security, the number of prenatal consultations and prior access to information. Therefore, there is statistical analysis with significant difference that justifies the figures presented. |
id |
UNIFEI_185342be887158ea7f6ce8b77b934055 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29678 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Epidemiological profile of types of delivery performed in Brazil: temporal, regional and factorial analysisPerfil epidemiológico de los tipos de parto realizados en Brasil: análisis temporal, regional y factorialPerfil epidemiológico dos tipos de parto realizados no Brasil: análise temporal, regional e fatorialParto cesáreaParto vaginalEpidemiologíaPrenatal.Cesarean sectionVaginal deliveryEpidemiologyPrenatal care.Parto cesáreaParto vaginalEpidemiologiaPré-natal.Introduction: The delivery routes usually seen are cesarean delivery and normal delivery and, in Brazil, the cesarean rate shows an increasing trend, increasing from 38% to 57% between 2001 and 2014. Despite the contribution of this intervention to better health care, it is efficient that its indication is clinically justified, minimizing risks and adding benefits. Objective: to describe the historical behavior in the last 10 years of the type of delivery and its associated factors in Brazil and by regions according to data available in DATASUS. Results and discussion: From 2010 to 2020, a total number of 31887329 deliveries were recorded, represented by approximately 55% by the cesarean type. This amplitude was accentuated, observing a decline in the performance of vaginal delivery. Of the regions, only in the Northeast there was a predominance of the number of vaginal deliveries, in the period from 2010 to 2013, and in 2018, the number of cesarean sections exceeds, becoming similar to the other regions. It was found that there was no significant difference in the variation between the type of delivery and the year of delivery (p<0.08), but there was a significant correlation between gestational age, mother’s age and number of visits (p<0.008). Conclusion: there is prevalence of absolute and relative number of cesarean deliveries over vaginal deliveries, influenced by factors such as gestational age of delivery, mother’s age, purchasing and socioeconomic power, schooling, marital security, the number of prenatal consultations and prior access to information. Therefore, there is statistical analysis with significant difference that justifies the figures presented.Introducción: Las vías de parto usualmente vistas son el parto cesáreo y el parto normal y, en Brasil, la tasa de cesárea presenta tendencia creciente, con aumento de 38% para 57% entre 2001 y 2014. A pesar de la contribución de esta intervención para una mejor asistencia a la salud, es eficiente que su indicación sea con justificación clínica, minimizando riesgos y agregando beneficios. Objetivo: describir el comportamiento histórico en los últimos 10 años del tipo de parto y sus factores asociados en Brasil y por regiones según datos disponibles en DATASUS. Resultados y discusión: Se registraron de 2010 a 2020 un número total de 31887329 partos, representado aproximadamente en un 55% por el tipo cesárea. Esta amplitud se acentuó, observando una disminución de la realización del parto vaginal. De las regiones, solo en el Nordeste hubo predominio del número de partos vaginales, en el período de 2010 a 2013, y en 2018, el número de cesáreas supera, tornándose similar a las demás regiones. Se constató que no hubo diferencia significativa de la variación entre el tipo de parto y el año de realización (p<0,08), pero hubo correlación significativa entre edad gestacional, edad de la madre y número de consultas realizadas (p<0,008). Conclusión: existe prevalencia del número absoluto y relativo de partos cesárea sobre partos vaginales, influenciada por factores como la edad gestacional de la realización del parto, la edad de la madre, el poder adquisitivo y socioeconómico, la escolaridad, la seguridad conyugal, el número de consultas prenatales y el acceso previo a la información. Por lo tanto, existe análisis estadístico con diferencia significativa que justifique los números presentados.Introdução: As vias de parto usualmente vistas são o parto cesáreo e o parto normal e, no Brasil, a taxa de cesariana apresenta tendência crescente, com aumento de 38% para 57% entre 2001 e 2014. Apesar da contribuição dessa intervenção para uma melhor assistência à saúde, é eficiente que sua indicação seja com justificativa clínica, minimizando riscos e agregando benefícios. Objetivo: descrever o comportamento histórico nos últimos 10 anos do tipo de parto e seus fatores associados no Brasil e por regiões segundo dados disponíveis no DATASUS. Resultados e discussão: Foram registrados de 2010 a 2020 um número total de 31887329 partos, representado aproximadamente em 55% pelo tipo cesárea. Essa amplitude acentuou-se, observando um declínio da realização do parto vaginal. Das regiões, apenas no Nordeste houve predomínio do número de partos vaginais, no período de 2010 a 2013, e em 2018, o número de cesáreas supera, tornando-se semelhante às demais regiões. Foi constatado que não houve diferença significativa da variação entre o tipo de parto e o ano de realização (p<0,08), mas houve correlação significativa entre idade gestacional, idade da mãe e número de consultas realizadas (p<0,008). Conclusão: existe prevalência do número absoluto e relativo de partos cesárea sobre partos vaginais, influenciada por fatores como a idade gestacional da realização do parto, a idade da mãe, o poder aquisitivo e socioeconômico, a escolaridade, a segurança conjugal, o número de consultas de pré-natal e acesso prévio à informação. Portanto, existe análise estatística com diferença significativa que justifique os números apresentados.Research, Society and Development2022-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2967810.33448/rsd-v11i7.29678Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 7; e0211729678Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 7; e0211729678Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 7; e02117296782525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29678/25651Copyright (c) 2022 Amabille Dellalibera Simões; Bruna Cristine Ulhoa Carvalho; Carlos Antônio da Silva Júnior; Cynthia Moraes Alvim; Francisco Edes da Silva Pinheiro; Giselle de Abreu Ferreira; Janine Castilho Andrade; Iara Guimarães Rodrigueshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSimões, Amabille DellaliberaCarvalho, Bruna Cristine UlhoaSilva Júnior, Carlos Antônio da Alvim, Cynthia MoraesPinheiro, Francisco Edes da SilvaFerreira, Giselle de AbreuAndrade, Janine CastilhoRodrigues, Iara Guimarães2022-06-06T15:12:05Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29678Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:46:41.413145Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Epidemiological profile of types of delivery performed in Brazil: temporal, regional and factorial analysis Perfil epidemiológico de los tipos de parto realizados en Brasil: análisis temporal, regional y factorial Perfil epidemiológico dos tipos de parto realizados no Brasil: análise temporal, regional e fatorial |
title |
Epidemiological profile of types of delivery performed in Brazil: temporal, regional and factorial analysis |
spellingShingle |
Epidemiological profile of types of delivery performed in Brazil: temporal, regional and factorial analysis Simões, Amabille Dellalibera Parto cesárea Parto vaginal Epidemiología Prenatal. Cesarean section Vaginal delivery Epidemiology Prenatal care. Parto cesárea Parto vaginal Epidemiologia Pré-natal. |
title_short |
Epidemiological profile of types of delivery performed in Brazil: temporal, regional and factorial analysis |
title_full |
Epidemiological profile of types of delivery performed in Brazil: temporal, regional and factorial analysis |
title_fullStr |
Epidemiological profile of types of delivery performed in Brazil: temporal, regional and factorial analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epidemiological profile of types of delivery performed in Brazil: temporal, regional and factorial analysis |
title_sort |
Epidemiological profile of types of delivery performed in Brazil: temporal, regional and factorial analysis |
author |
Simões, Amabille Dellalibera |
author_facet |
Simões, Amabille Dellalibera Carvalho, Bruna Cristine Ulhoa Silva Júnior, Carlos Antônio da Alvim, Cynthia Moraes Pinheiro, Francisco Edes da Silva Ferreira, Giselle de Abreu Andrade, Janine Castilho Rodrigues, Iara Guimarães |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carvalho, Bruna Cristine Ulhoa Silva Júnior, Carlos Antônio da Alvim, Cynthia Moraes Pinheiro, Francisco Edes da Silva Ferreira, Giselle de Abreu Andrade, Janine Castilho Rodrigues, Iara Guimarães |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Simões, Amabille Dellalibera Carvalho, Bruna Cristine Ulhoa Silva Júnior, Carlos Antônio da Alvim, Cynthia Moraes Pinheiro, Francisco Edes da Silva Ferreira, Giselle de Abreu Andrade, Janine Castilho Rodrigues, Iara Guimarães |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Parto cesárea Parto vaginal Epidemiología Prenatal. Cesarean section Vaginal delivery Epidemiology Prenatal care. Parto cesárea Parto vaginal Epidemiologia Pré-natal. |
topic |
Parto cesárea Parto vaginal Epidemiología Prenatal. Cesarean section Vaginal delivery Epidemiology Prenatal care. Parto cesárea Parto vaginal Epidemiologia Pré-natal. |
description |
Introduction: The delivery routes usually seen are cesarean delivery and normal delivery and, in Brazil, the cesarean rate shows an increasing trend, increasing from 38% to 57% between 2001 and 2014. Despite the contribution of this intervention to better health care, it is efficient that its indication is clinically justified, minimizing risks and adding benefits. Objective: to describe the historical behavior in the last 10 years of the type of delivery and its associated factors in Brazil and by regions according to data available in DATASUS. Results and discussion: From 2010 to 2020, a total number of 31887329 deliveries were recorded, represented by approximately 55% by the cesarean type. This amplitude was accentuated, observing a decline in the performance of vaginal delivery. Of the regions, only in the Northeast there was a predominance of the number of vaginal deliveries, in the period from 2010 to 2013, and in 2018, the number of cesarean sections exceeds, becoming similar to the other regions. It was found that there was no significant difference in the variation between the type of delivery and the year of delivery (p<0.08), but there was a significant correlation between gestational age, mother’s age and number of visits (p<0.008). Conclusion: there is prevalence of absolute and relative number of cesarean deliveries over vaginal deliveries, influenced by factors such as gestational age of delivery, mother’s age, purchasing and socioeconomic power, schooling, marital security, the number of prenatal consultations and prior access to information. Therefore, there is statistical analysis with significant difference that justifies the figures presented. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29678 10.33448/rsd-v11i7.29678 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29678 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i7.29678 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29678/25651 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 7; e0211729678 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 7; e0211729678 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 7; e0211729678 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052821051277312 |