Evidence on neuroethics and neuroeducation: An integrative review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4276 |
Resumo: | Objective: To identify the characteristics and evidence of studies on neuroethics and neuroeducation in the scientific literature. Method: Integrative review held in the SCOPUS, PUBMED and Web of Science databases. From the analysis of 613 papers, we selected 25 for analysis according to established criteria. Results: From the analysis of the evidence, its results were presented in three main groups: 1) Increased performance and perception through training; 2) Increased performance through medicalization and interventions; and 3) Discussion and criticism on neuroethics and neuroeducation. Conclusion: Both neuroeducation and neuroethics have the potential to benefit society, in future theoretical and technological developments on health and education. Their repercussions and translations achieve the professional field of Nursing, which requires a critical appropriation of their foundations, in such a way as to preserve general principles of their application, such as justice and equity in the enjoyment of their benefits, control of interests and respect for cultural and moral plurality and individuality. |
id |
UNIFEI_185a8de8926f6aadad69591ca1d2d6e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4276 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evidence on neuroethics and neuroeducation: An integrative reviewEvidencia sobre neuroética y neuroeducación: Una revisión integradoraEvidências sobre neuroética e neuroeducação: Uma revisão integrativaÉticaEducaçãoNeurociênciasBioéticaRevisãoCiências da saúde.ÉticaEducaciónNeurocienciasBioéticaRevisiónCiencias de la salud.EthicsEducationNeurosciencesBioethicsReviewHealth sciences.Objective: To identify the characteristics and evidence of studies on neuroethics and neuroeducation in the scientific literature. Method: Integrative review held in the SCOPUS, PUBMED and Web of Science databases. From the analysis of 613 papers, we selected 25 for analysis according to established criteria. Results: From the analysis of the evidence, its results were presented in three main groups: 1) Increased performance and perception through training; 2) Increased performance through medicalization and interventions; and 3) Discussion and criticism on neuroethics and neuroeducation. Conclusion: Both neuroeducation and neuroethics have the potential to benefit society, in future theoretical and technological developments on health and education. Their repercussions and translations achieve the professional field of Nursing, which requires a critical appropriation of their foundations, in such a way as to preserve general principles of their application, such as justice and equity in the enjoyment of their benefits, control of interests and respect for cultural and moral plurality and individuality.Objetivo: Identificar las características y la evidencia de los estudios sobre neuroética y neuroeducación en la literatura científica. Método: Revisión integradora llevada a cabo en las bases de datos SCOPUS, PUBMED y Web of Science. A partir del análisis de 613 artículos, se seleccionaron 25 para análisis de acuerdo con los criterios establecidos. Resultados: A partir del análisis de la evidencia, sus resultados se presentaron en tres grupos principales: 1) Incremento del rendimiento y de la percepción mediante la capacitación; 2) Incremento del rendimento mediante la medicalización e intervenciones; y 3) Discusión y crítica sobre neuroética y neuroeducación. Conclusión: Tanto la neuroeducación como la neuroética tienen el potencial de beneficiar a la sociedad, en futuros desarrollos teóricos y tecnológicos sobre salud y educación. Sus repercusiones y traslaciones alcanzan el campo profesional de la Enfermería, lo que requiere una apropiación crítica de sus fundamentos, con el fin de preservar los principios generales de su aplicación, como la justicia y la equidad en el disfrute de sus beneficios, el control de intereses y el respeto por la pluralidad y individualidad cultural y moral.Objetivo: Identificar as características e evidências dos estudos sobre neuroética e neuroeducação na literatura científica. Métodologia: Revisão integrativa realizada nas bases de dados SCOPUS, PUBMED e Web of Science. A partir da análise de 613 artigos, foram selecionados 25 para análise conforme critérios estabelecidos. Resultados: A partir da análise das evidências, seus resultados foram apresentados em três grupos principais: 1) Aumento da performance e da percepção pelo treinamento; 2) Aumento da performance pela medicalização e intervenções; e 3) Debate e crítica sobre a neuroética e neuroeducação Conclusão: Tanto a neuroeducação quanto a neuroética têm potencial para beneficiar a sociedade, em futuros desdobramentos teóricos e tecnológicos sobre a saúde e a educação. Suas repercussões e translações atingem o campo profissional da Enfermagem, o que requer uma apropriação crítica de suas bases, de modo a preservar princípios gerais de sua aplicação, como a justiça e equidade no usufruto de seus benefícios, controle de interesses e respeito à pluralidade e individualidade cultural e moral.Research, Society and Development2020-05-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/427610.33448/rsd-v9i7.4276Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 7; e410974276Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 7; e410974276Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 7; e4109742762525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4276/3560Copyright (c) 2020 Isabela Saioron, Graziele de Lima Dalmolin, Flávia Regina Souza Ramos, Dulcinéia Ghizoni Schneiderinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSaioron, IsabelaDalmolin, Graziele de LimaRamos, Flávia Regina SouzaSchneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni2020-08-20T18:05:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4276Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:28:11.031895Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evidence on neuroethics and neuroeducation: An integrative review Evidencia sobre neuroética y neuroeducación: Una revisión integradora Evidências sobre neuroética e neuroeducação: Uma revisão integrativa |
title |
Evidence on neuroethics and neuroeducation: An integrative review |
spellingShingle |
Evidence on neuroethics and neuroeducation: An integrative review Saioron, Isabela Ética Educação Neurociências Bioética Revisão Ciências da saúde. Ética Educación Neurociencias Bioética Revisión Ciencias de la salud. Ethics Education Neurosciences Bioethics Review Health sciences. |
title_short |
Evidence on neuroethics and neuroeducation: An integrative review |
title_full |
Evidence on neuroethics and neuroeducation: An integrative review |
title_fullStr |
Evidence on neuroethics and neuroeducation: An integrative review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evidence on neuroethics and neuroeducation: An integrative review |
title_sort |
Evidence on neuroethics and neuroeducation: An integrative review |
author |
Saioron, Isabela |
author_facet |
Saioron, Isabela Dalmolin, Graziele de Lima Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dalmolin, Graziele de Lima Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Saioron, Isabela Dalmolin, Graziele de Lima Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ética Educação Neurociências Bioética Revisão Ciências da saúde. Ética Educación Neurociencias Bioética Revisión Ciencias de la salud. Ethics Education Neurosciences Bioethics Review Health sciences. |
topic |
Ética Educação Neurociências Bioética Revisão Ciências da saúde. Ética Educación Neurociencias Bioética Revisión Ciencias de la salud. Ethics Education Neurosciences Bioethics Review Health sciences. |
description |
Objective: To identify the characteristics and evidence of studies on neuroethics and neuroeducation in the scientific literature. Method: Integrative review held in the SCOPUS, PUBMED and Web of Science databases. From the analysis of 613 papers, we selected 25 for analysis according to established criteria. Results: From the analysis of the evidence, its results were presented in three main groups: 1) Increased performance and perception through training; 2) Increased performance through medicalization and interventions; and 3) Discussion and criticism on neuroethics and neuroeducation. Conclusion: Both neuroeducation and neuroethics have the potential to benefit society, in future theoretical and technological developments on health and education. Their repercussions and translations achieve the professional field of Nursing, which requires a critical appropriation of their foundations, in such a way as to preserve general principles of their application, such as justice and equity in the enjoyment of their benefits, control of interests and respect for cultural and moral plurality and individuality. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4276 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4276 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4276 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4276 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4276/3560 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 7; e410974276 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 7; e410974276 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 7; e410974276 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052649811476480 |