Aristotle and the Enlightenment in the History of Science: possible relationship?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29299 |
Resumo: | Aristotelian metaphysics, in its propositions for the study of being, aims at a wide spectrum of areas of knowledge that are not closed in themselves. It builds a hermeneutics of knowledge and helps to understand the Enlightenment movement, in addition to highlighting the Sciences more than empirical propositions, but also as a form and method for philosophical structuring. What we know is deeply marked by the way in which we get to know something, there being two main sources of knowledge in the subject: sensitivity, through which objects are given in intuition, and understanding, through which objects are thought in concepts. What defines objects is sensitivity, as the receptive/passive way in which we are affected by objects, and intuition is the direct way of referring to objects. The study of Being as Being, called First Philosophy, later, in the modern era, called pure reason, brings with it a proposal of science, and on this you will make the relationship with the Kantian proposal. This study consists of the analysis of separate forms of material aspects. In Aristotle, metaphysics can already be considered as a knowledge that maintains proximity to the idea of mereology, that is, the relationship of the whole with the parts. We will see the Kantian categories above, thought in the light of the Aristotelian categories, will provide Kant's critical philosophy with basic conditions to impose on reason the limits of possible experience. He intends, with this, to provide methodological rigor to metaphysics, freeing it from any dogmatic character and bringing it to the path of science, in which no questioning could occur. In this article, we aim, through Kantian prepositions, to establish Aristotelian metaphysics as the philosophical basis of the Enlightenment. |
id |
UNIFEI_203b414f17713ca7ccbc1301ffbaee0c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29299 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Aristotle and the Enlightenment in the History of Science: possible relationship?Aristóteles y la Ilustración en la Historia de la Ciencia: ¿relación posible?Aristóteles e o Iluminismo na História das Ciências: relação possível?AristotleEnlightenmentHistory of sciencesKantTeaching.AristótelesIluminismoHistória das ciênciasKantEnsino.AristótelesIluminaciónHistoria de las cienciasKantEnseñanza.Aristotelian metaphysics, in its propositions for the study of being, aims at a wide spectrum of areas of knowledge that are not closed in themselves. It builds a hermeneutics of knowledge and helps to understand the Enlightenment movement, in addition to highlighting the Sciences more than empirical propositions, but also as a form and method for philosophical structuring. What we know is deeply marked by the way in which we get to know something, there being two main sources of knowledge in the subject: sensitivity, through which objects are given in intuition, and understanding, through which objects are thought in concepts. What defines objects is sensitivity, as the receptive/passive way in which we are affected by objects, and intuition is the direct way of referring to objects. The study of Being as Being, called First Philosophy, later, in the modern era, called pure reason, brings with it a proposal of science, and on this you will make the relationship with the Kantian proposal. This study consists of the analysis of separate forms of material aspects. In Aristotle, metaphysics can already be considered as a knowledge that maintains proximity to the idea of mereology, that is, the relationship of the whole with the parts. We will see the Kantian categories above, thought in the light of the Aristotelian categories, will provide Kant's critical philosophy with basic conditions to impose on reason the limits of possible experience. He intends, with this, to provide methodological rigor to metaphysics, freeing it from any dogmatic character and bringing it to the path of science, in which no questioning could occur. In this article, we aim, through Kantian prepositions, to establish Aristotelian metaphysics as the philosophical basis of the Enlightenment.La metafísica aristotélica, en sus proposiciones para el estudio del ser, apunta a un amplio espectro de áreas de conocimiento que no son cerradas en sí mismas. Construye una hermenéutica del conocimiento y ayuda a comprender el movimiento de la Ilustración, además de resaltar las Ciencias más que proposiciones empíricas, pero también como forma y método para la estructuración filosófica. Lo que sabemos está profundamente marcado por la forma en que llegamos a conocer algo, existiendo dos fuentes principales de conocimiento en el sujeto: la sensibilidad, a través de la cual se dan los objetos en la intuición, y el entendimiento, a través del cual se piensan los objetos en los conceptos. Lo que define a los objetos es la sensibilidad, como la forma receptiva/pasiva en la que somos afectados por los objetos, y la intuición es la forma directa de referirnos a los objetos. El estudio del Ser en cuanto Ser, llamado Filosofía Primera, posteriormente, en la época moderna, llamada razón pura, trae consigo una propuesta de la ciencia, y sobre esto harás la relación con la propuesta kantiana. Este estudio consiste en el análisis de formas separadas de aspectos materiales. En Aristóteles, la metafísica ya puede ser considerada como un saber que mantiene proximidad a la idea de la mereología, es decir, la relación del todo con las partes. Veremos más arriba que las categorías kantianas, pensadas a la luz de las categorías aristotélicas, dotarán a la filosofía crítica de Kant de las condiciones básicas para imponer a la razón los límites de la experiencia posible. Pretende, con ello, dotar de rigor metodológico a la metafísica, liberándola de todo carácter dogmático y llevándola al camino de la ciencia, en el que no puede haber cuestionamientos. En este artículo pretendemos, a través de las preposiciones kantianas, establecer la metafísica aristotélica como base filosófica de la Ilustración.A metafisica aristotélica, em suas proposições para o estudo do ser, almeja amplo espectro de áreas do conhecimento que não são fechadas em si mesmas. Ela constrói uma hermenêutica do conhecimento e ajuda a entender o movimento iluminista, além de evidenciar as Ciências mais do que proposições empíricas, mas também enquanto forma e método para estruturação filosófica. O que conhecemos é profundamente marcado pela maneira pela qual conseguimos conhecer algo, existindo duas principais fontes de conhecimento no sujeito: a sensibilidade, por meio da qual os objetos são dados na intuição, e o entendimento, pelo qual os objetos são pensados nos conceitos. O que define os objetos é a sensibilidade, como o modo receptivo/passivo pelo qual somos afetados pelos objetos, e intuição é a maneira direta de nos referirmos aos objetos. O estudo do Ser enquanto Ser, denominado de Filosofia Primeira, posteriormente, na época moderna, denominado como razão pura, traz consigo uma proposta de ciência, e sobre isso fares a relação com a proposta kantiana. Este estudo consiste na análise das formas separadas dos aspectos materiais. Em Aristóteles, a metafísica já pode ser considerada como um saber que mantém proximidade com a ideia de mereologia, ou seja, a relação do todo com as partes. Veremos as categorias kantianas acima, pensadas à luz das categorias aristotélicas, irão fornecer à filosofia crítica de Kant condições básicas de impor à razão os limites da experiência possível. Ele pretende, com isso, fornecer rigor metodológico à metafísica, livrando-a de qualquer caráter dogmático e trazendo-a para o rumo da ciência, no qual não poderiam ocorrer questionamentos. No presente artigo objetivamos, por meio das preposições kantianas, estabelecer a metafisica aristotélica como base filosófica do iluminismo.Research, Society and Development2022-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2929910.33448/rsd-v11i6.29299Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 6; e35811629299Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 6; e35811629299Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 6; e358116292992525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29299/25291Copyright (c) 2022 Adílio Jorge Marques; André Vinícius Dias Senrahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, Adílio JorgeSenra, André Vinícius Dias 2022-05-13T18:04:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29299Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:46:25.653821Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Aristotle and the Enlightenment in the History of Science: possible relationship? Aristóteles y la Ilustración en la Historia de la Ciencia: ¿relación posible? Aristóteles e o Iluminismo na História das Ciências: relação possível? |
title |
Aristotle and the Enlightenment in the History of Science: possible relationship? |
spellingShingle |
Aristotle and the Enlightenment in the History of Science: possible relationship? Marques, Adílio Jorge Aristotle Enlightenment History of sciences Kant Teaching. Aristóteles Iluminismo História das ciências Kant Ensino. Aristóteles Iluminación Historia de las ciencias Kant Enseñanza. |
title_short |
Aristotle and the Enlightenment in the History of Science: possible relationship? |
title_full |
Aristotle and the Enlightenment in the History of Science: possible relationship? |
title_fullStr |
Aristotle and the Enlightenment in the History of Science: possible relationship? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aristotle and the Enlightenment in the History of Science: possible relationship? |
title_sort |
Aristotle and the Enlightenment in the History of Science: possible relationship? |
author |
Marques, Adílio Jorge |
author_facet |
Marques, Adílio Jorge Senra, André Vinícius Dias |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Senra, André Vinícius Dias |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Adílio Jorge Senra, André Vinícius Dias |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aristotle Enlightenment History of sciences Kant Teaching. Aristóteles Iluminismo História das ciências Kant Ensino. Aristóteles Iluminación Historia de las ciencias Kant Enseñanza. |
topic |
Aristotle Enlightenment History of sciences Kant Teaching. Aristóteles Iluminismo História das ciências Kant Ensino. Aristóteles Iluminación Historia de las ciencias Kant Enseñanza. |
description |
Aristotelian metaphysics, in its propositions for the study of being, aims at a wide spectrum of areas of knowledge that are not closed in themselves. It builds a hermeneutics of knowledge and helps to understand the Enlightenment movement, in addition to highlighting the Sciences more than empirical propositions, but also as a form and method for philosophical structuring. What we know is deeply marked by the way in which we get to know something, there being two main sources of knowledge in the subject: sensitivity, through which objects are given in intuition, and understanding, through which objects are thought in concepts. What defines objects is sensitivity, as the receptive/passive way in which we are affected by objects, and intuition is the direct way of referring to objects. The study of Being as Being, called First Philosophy, later, in the modern era, called pure reason, brings with it a proposal of science, and on this you will make the relationship with the Kantian proposal. This study consists of the analysis of separate forms of material aspects. In Aristotle, metaphysics can already be considered as a knowledge that maintains proximity to the idea of mereology, that is, the relationship of the whole with the parts. We will see the Kantian categories above, thought in the light of the Aristotelian categories, will provide Kant's critical philosophy with basic conditions to impose on reason the limits of possible experience. He intends, with this, to provide methodological rigor to metaphysics, freeing it from any dogmatic character and bringing it to the path of science, in which no questioning could occur. In this article, we aim, through Kantian prepositions, to establish Aristotelian metaphysics as the philosophical basis of the Enlightenment. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29299 10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29299 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29299 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29299 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29299/25291 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Adílio Jorge Marques; André Vinícius Dias Senra https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Adílio Jorge Marques; André Vinícius Dias Senra https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 6; e35811629299 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 6; e35811629299 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 6; e35811629299 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052765824876544 |