Randomized block design in agricultural Science research: An integrative literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moraes, Wendel dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Barros, Octávio Henrique Bernardes, Freitas, Hellen Cristina de, Carneiro, Ana Clara, Oliveira, Gabriella Rayssa Antunes da Silva, Luciano, Daniela de Oliveira, Portella, Augustus Caeser Franke
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17616
Resumo: In the development process of research in agricultural sciences, there are different factors that influence crop management. The randomized block design (DBC) is a technique used to analyze experiments with a set of non-analogous factors in a given location and their impact on the experiment. Treatments are randomized over the experimental units within each block, so this method is used to check for interference between treatments and between blocks. Thus, the present work aimed to carry out an integrative literature review on the applications of the DBC in research in the field of agricultural sciences. The methodology applied was an integrative literature review. The choice of articles to compose the sample was made through journals published from 2010 to 2020, from the Scielo, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases. And later, the findings were separated into branches of the agricultural sciences area according to the CAPES classification. 41 studies that met the established inclusion criteria were obtained. Of the works acquired, 22 (53.6%) from the Scielo database, 19 (46.3%) from Google Scholar, and 1 (2.4%) from Science Direct. 23 (56.0%) fall into the area of ​​Agronomy, and 18 (43.9%) fall into the area of ​​Forest Resources and Forest Engineering. The results of this study show that the DBC has contributed to the advancement of different fields in the areas of Agrarian Sciences, enabling a better tabulation of acquired data, and facilitating the analysis of experimental units.
id UNIFEI_207d66426f1e0d95c0c0563027185661
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17616
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Randomized block design in agricultural Science research: An integrative literature reviewDiseño de bloques aleatórios en la investigación en ciencias agrícolas: Uma revisión integradora de la literaturaDelineamento em blocos casualizados nas pesquisas em ciências agrárias: Uma revisão integrativa de literaturaFactorsAnalyzeExperimental units.FactoresAnalizarUnidades experimentales.FatoresAnáliseUnidades experimentais.In the development process of research in agricultural sciences, there are different factors that influence crop management. The randomized block design (DBC) is a technique used to analyze experiments with a set of non-analogous factors in a given location and their impact on the experiment. Treatments are randomized over the experimental units within each block, so this method is used to check for interference between treatments and between blocks. Thus, the present work aimed to carry out an integrative literature review on the applications of the DBC in research in the field of agricultural sciences. The methodology applied was an integrative literature review. The choice of articles to compose the sample was made through journals published from 2010 to 2020, from the Scielo, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases. And later, the findings were separated into branches of the agricultural sciences area according to the CAPES classification. 41 studies that met the established inclusion criteria were obtained. Of the works acquired, 22 (53.6%) from the Scielo database, 19 (46.3%) from Google Scholar, and 1 (2.4%) from Science Direct. 23 (56.0%) fall into the area of ​​Agronomy, and 18 (43.9%) fall into the area of ​​Forest Resources and Forest Engineering. The results of this study show that the DBC has contributed to the advancement of different fields in the areas of Agrarian Sciences, enabling a better tabulation of acquired data, and facilitating the analysis of experimental units.En el proceso de desarrollo de la investigación en ciencias agrícolas, existen diferentes factores que influyen en el manejo de los cultivos. El diseño de bloques aleatorios (DBC) es una técnica utilizada para analizar experimentos con un conjunto de factores no análogos en una ubicación determinada y su impacto en el experimento. Los tratamientos se asignan al azar en las unidades experimentales dentro de cada bloque, por lo que este método se utiliza para verificar la interferencia entre tratamientos y entre bloques. Así, el presente trabajo tuvo como objetivo realizar una revisión bibliográfica integradora sobre las aplicaciones del DBC en la investigación en el campo de las ciencias agrícolas. La metodología aplicada fue una revisión integradora de la literatura. La elección de los artículos para componer la muestra se realizó a través de revistas publicadas de 2010 a 2020, de las bases de datos Scielo, Google Scholar y Science Direct. Y posteriormente, los hallazgos se separaron en ramas del área de ciencias agrícolas según la clasificación CAPES. Se obtuvieron 41 estudios que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión establecidos. De los trabajos adquiridos, 22 (53,6%) de la base de datos Scielo, 19 (46,3%) de Google Scholar y 1 (2,4%) de Science Direct. 23 (56,0%) corresponden al área de Agronomía y 18 (43,9%) al área de Recursos Forestales e Ingeniería Forestal. Los resultados de este estudio muestran que el DBC ha contribuido al avance de diferentes campos en las áreas de las Ciencias Agrarias, permitiendo una mejor tabulación de los datos adquiridos y facilitando el análisis de unidades experimentales.No processo de desenvolvimento das pesquisas em ciências agrárias existem diferentes fatores que influem no manejo das culturas. O delineamento em blocos casualizados (DBC) é uma técnica utilizada para analisar experimentos com um conjunto de fatores não análogas em uma determinada localidade e seu impacto no experimento. Os tratamentos são ao acaso sobre as unidades experimentais dentro de cada bloco, com isso, esse método é usado para verificar se há interferência entre os tratamentos e entre os blocos. Desta forma, o presente trabalho teve como objetivo realizar uma revisão integrativa de literatura sobre as aplicações do DBC nas pesquisas da área de ciências agrárias. A metodologia aplicada foi a de revisão integrativa de literatura. A escolha dos artigos para composição da amostra se deu por intermédio de periódicos publicado de 2010 a 2020, das bases de dados Scielo, Google Scholar, e Science Direct. E posteriormente, os achados foram separados nos ramos da área de ciências agrárias conforme a classificação da CAPES. Obteve-se 41 estudos que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão estabelecidos. Dos trabalhos adquiridos 22 (53,6%) da base de dados da Scielo, 19 (46,3%) do Google Scholar, e 1 (2,4%) da Science Direct. 23 (56,0%) se enquadram na área de Agronomia, e 18 (43,9%) a área de Recursos florestais e engenharia florestal. Os resultados deste estudo demostram que o DBC tem contribuído para o avanço dos diferentes campos das áreas da Ciências Agrárias, possibilitando uma melhor tabulação dos dados adquiridos, e facilitando na análise das unidades experimentais.Research, Society and Development2021-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1761610.33448/rsd-v10i8.17616Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e53510817616Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e53510817616Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e535108176162525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17616/15747Copyright (c) 2021 Wendel dos Santos Moraes; Octávio Henrique Bernardes Barros; Hellen Cristina de Freitas; Ana Clara Carneiro; Gabriella Rayssa Antunes da Silva Oliveira; Daniela de Oliveira Luciano; Augustus Caeser Franke Portellahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes, Wendel dos Santos Barros, Octávio Henrique Bernardes Freitas, Hellen Cristina de Carneiro, Ana Clara Oliveira, Gabriella Rayssa Antunes da Silva Luciano, Daniela de Oliveira Portella, Augustus Caeser Franke 2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17616Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:55.350670Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Randomized block design in agricultural Science research: An integrative literature review
Diseño de bloques aleatórios en la investigación en ciencias agrícolas: Uma revisión integradora de la literatura
Delineamento em blocos casualizados nas pesquisas em ciências agrárias: Uma revisão integrativa de literatura
title Randomized block design in agricultural Science research: An integrative literature review
spellingShingle Randomized block design in agricultural Science research: An integrative literature review
Moraes, Wendel dos Santos
Factors
Analyze
Experimental units.
Factores
Analizar
Unidades experimentales.
Fatores
Análise
Unidades experimentais.
title_short Randomized block design in agricultural Science research: An integrative literature review
title_full Randomized block design in agricultural Science research: An integrative literature review
title_fullStr Randomized block design in agricultural Science research: An integrative literature review
title_full_unstemmed Randomized block design in agricultural Science research: An integrative literature review
title_sort Randomized block design in agricultural Science research: An integrative literature review
author Moraes, Wendel dos Santos
author_facet Moraes, Wendel dos Santos
Barros, Octávio Henrique Bernardes
Freitas, Hellen Cristina de
Carneiro, Ana Clara
Oliveira, Gabriella Rayssa Antunes da Silva
Luciano, Daniela de Oliveira
Portella, Augustus Caeser Franke
author_role author
author2 Barros, Octávio Henrique Bernardes
Freitas, Hellen Cristina de
Carneiro, Ana Clara
Oliveira, Gabriella Rayssa Antunes da Silva
Luciano, Daniela de Oliveira
Portella, Augustus Caeser Franke
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moraes, Wendel dos Santos
Barros, Octávio Henrique Bernardes
Freitas, Hellen Cristina de
Carneiro, Ana Clara
Oliveira, Gabriella Rayssa Antunes da Silva
Luciano, Daniela de Oliveira
Portella, Augustus Caeser Franke
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Factors
Analyze
Experimental units.
Factores
Analizar
Unidades experimentales.
Fatores
Análise
Unidades experimentais.
topic Factors
Analyze
Experimental units.
Factores
Analizar
Unidades experimentales.
Fatores
Análise
Unidades experimentais.
description In the development process of research in agricultural sciences, there are different factors that influence crop management. The randomized block design (DBC) is a technique used to analyze experiments with a set of non-analogous factors in a given location and their impact on the experiment. Treatments are randomized over the experimental units within each block, so this method is used to check for interference between treatments and between blocks. Thus, the present work aimed to carry out an integrative literature review on the applications of the DBC in research in the field of agricultural sciences. The methodology applied was an integrative literature review. The choice of articles to compose the sample was made through journals published from 2010 to 2020, from the Scielo, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases. And later, the findings were separated into branches of the agricultural sciences area according to the CAPES classification. 41 studies that met the established inclusion criteria were obtained. Of the works acquired, 22 (53.6%) from the Scielo database, 19 (46.3%) from Google Scholar, and 1 (2.4%) from Science Direct. 23 (56.0%) fall into the area of ​​Agronomy, and 18 (43.9%) fall into the area of ​​Forest Resources and Forest Engineering. The results of this study show that the DBC has contributed to the advancement of different fields in the areas of Agrarian Sciences, enabling a better tabulation of acquired data, and facilitating the analysis of experimental units.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17616
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17616
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17616
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17616
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17616/15747
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e53510817616
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e53510817616
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e53510817616
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052752155639808