Sources of organic fertilization in the consortium of coriander and arugula in Cruz das Almas-BA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20548 |
Resumo: | Aiming to evaluate the effect of intercropping and organic fertilization on the production of coriander and arugula. The experiment took place at the Experimental Farm of the Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB), in the city of Cruz das Almas-Bahia. The design used was randomized blocks, in split-plots in 3x3 space with five replications. After 33 days of sowing of rocket and 35 of coriander, height, dry and fresh mass of aerial parts of the plants were evaluated. The manure used was cattle and chicken, and the vegetable species were rocket cv. Cultivated and coriander cv. Summer. When the treatments were evaluated individually, the results showed the inefficiency of the intercropping for only the arugula crop. Coriander developed well in the intercropping, showing no difference when compared to the monoculture, but the rocket in the intercropping showed low production when compared to the single crop. As for fertilization, only the single arugula crop showed a difference, with chicken manure being the best for production. For efficient land use (UET) only the intercropping with cattle manure presented an index higher than 1.0; the monoculture of rocket fertilized with chicken manure showed higher gross income and better net income. The operating cost was higher in all treatments involving cattle manure. Considering the economic indices, it is concluded that the intercropping between arugula and coriander is not viable when fertilized with the manure that provided better performance in the intercropping that was the bovine manure. |
id |
UNIFEI_238f4128b3312c4c514fef1bf8bf537d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20548 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sources of organic fertilization in the consortium of coriander and arugula in Cruz das Almas-BAFuentes de fertilización orgánica em el consorcio de cilandro y rúcula en Cruz das Almas-BAFontes de adubação orgânica no consórcio de coentro e rúcula em Cruz das Almas-BAEstiércol de ganadoEstiércol de polloMonocultivo.Cattle manureChicken manureMonoculture.Esterco bovinoEsterco de galinhaMonocultivo.Aiming to evaluate the effect of intercropping and organic fertilization on the production of coriander and arugula. The experiment took place at the Experimental Farm of the Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB), in the city of Cruz das Almas-Bahia. The design used was randomized blocks, in split-plots in 3x3 space with five replications. After 33 days of sowing of rocket and 35 of coriander, height, dry and fresh mass of aerial parts of the plants were evaluated. The manure used was cattle and chicken, and the vegetable species were rocket cv. Cultivated and coriander cv. Summer. When the treatments were evaluated individually, the results showed the inefficiency of the intercropping for only the arugula crop. Coriander developed well in the intercropping, showing no difference when compared to the monoculture, but the rocket in the intercropping showed low production when compared to the single crop. As for fertilization, only the single arugula crop showed a difference, with chicken manure being the best for production. For efficient land use (UET) only the intercropping with cattle manure presented an index higher than 1.0; the monoculture of rocket fertilized with chicken manure showed higher gross income and better net income. The operating cost was higher in all treatments involving cattle manure. Considering the economic indices, it is concluded that the intercropping between arugula and coriander is not viable when fertilized with the manure that provided better performance in the intercropping that was the bovine manure.Con el objetivo de evaluar el efecto de los cultivos intercalados y la fertilización orgánica en la producción de cilantro y rúcula. El experimento se llevó a cabo en la Granja Experimental de la Universidad Federal de Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB), en la ciudad de Cruz das Almas-Bahia. El diseño utilizado fue de bloques al azar, en parcelas divididas en un espacio de 3x3 con cinco repeticiones. Luego de 33 días de siembra de rúcula y 35 de cilantro, se evaluó altura, masa seca y fresca de partes aéreas de las plantas. El estiércol utilizado fue ganado y pollo, y las especies vegetales fueron rúcula cv. Cultivado y cv. De cilantro. El verano. Cuando los tratamientos se evaluaron individualmente, los resultados mostraron la ineficiencia del cultivo intercalado solo para el cultivo de rúcula. El cilantro se desarrolló bien en el cultivo intercalado, sin mostrar diferencias en comparación con el monocultivo, pero la rúcula en el cultivo intercalado mostró una producción baja en comparación con el monocultivo. En cuanto a la fertilización, solo el cultivo de rúcula mostró una diferencia, siendo el estiércol de pollo el mejor para la producción. Para el uso eficiente de la tierra (UET) solo el cultivo intercalado con estiércol de ganado presentó un índice superior a 1.0; el monocultivo de rúcula fertilizada con estiércol de pollo mostró mayores ingresos brutos y mejores ingresos netos. El costo operativo fue mayor en todos los tratamientos que involucraron estiércol de ganado. Considerando los índices económicos, se concluye que el intercalado entre rúcula y cilantro no es viable cuando se fertiliza con el estiércol que mejor desempeño en el intercalado que fue el estiércol bovino.Tendo como objetivo avaliar o efeito do consórcio e adubação orgânica na produção de coentro e rúcula. O experimento ocorreu na Fazenda Experimental da Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB), na cidade de Cruz das Almas- Bahia. O delineamento utilizado foi em blocos ao acaso, em parcelas subdivididas no espaço em 3x3 com cinco repetições. Após 33 dias do semeio da rúcula e 35 do coentro, foram avaliadas a altura, a massa seca e fresca da parte aéreas das plantas. Os estercos utilizados foram o bovino e o de galinha, e as espécies vegetais foram rúcula cv. Cultivada e coentro cv. Verdão. Quando avaliado os tratamentos de forma individual os resultados demonstraram a ineficiência do consórcio para apenas a cultura da rúcula. O coentro se desenvolveu bem no consórcio, não apresentando diferença quando comparado ao monocultivo, mas a rúcula no consórcio apresentou baixa produção quando comparado ao cultivo solteiro. Quanto à adubação, apenas o cultivo solteiro da rúcula apresentou diferença, sendo o esterco de galinha o melhor para produção. Para uso eficiente da terra (UET) apenas o consórcio com esterco de gado apresentou índice superior á 1,0; o monocultivo da rúcula adubada com esterco de galinha apresentou maior receita bruta e melhor renda liquida. O custo operacional foi maior em todos os tratamentos que envolveram o esterco bovino. Considerando os índices econômicos, conclui-se que o consórcio entre rúcula e coentro não é viável quando adubado com o esterco que proporcionou melhor desempenho no consórcio que foi o esterco bovino.Research, Society and Development2021-10-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2054810.33448/rsd-v10i13.20548Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e118101320548Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e118101320548Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e1181013205482525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20548/18729Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Paula da Silva Novaes; Josué Pinheiro Machado; Caliane da Silva Braulio; Lorena da Paixão Oliveira; Ana Carolina da Silva Novaes; Luís Cláudio Vieira Silva; Matheus Pires Quintelahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNovaes, Ana Paula da Silva Machado, Josué PinheiroBraulio, Caliane da Silva Oliveira, Lorena da PaixãoNovaes, Ana Carolina da SilvaSilva, Luís Cláudio Vieira Quintela, Matheus Pires 2021-11-21T18:26:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20548Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:10.143174Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sources of organic fertilization in the consortium of coriander and arugula in Cruz das Almas-BA Fuentes de fertilización orgánica em el consorcio de cilandro y rúcula en Cruz das Almas-BA Fontes de adubação orgânica no consórcio de coentro e rúcula em Cruz das Almas-BA |
title |
Sources of organic fertilization in the consortium of coriander and arugula in Cruz das Almas-BA |
spellingShingle |
Sources of organic fertilization in the consortium of coriander and arugula in Cruz das Almas-BA Novaes, Ana Paula da Silva Estiércol de ganado Estiércol de pollo Monocultivo. Cattle manure Chicken manure Monoculture. Esterco bovino Esterco de galinha Monocultivo. |
title_short |
Sources of organic fertilization in the consortium of coriander and arugula in Cruz das Almas-BA |
title_full |
Sources of organic fertilization in the consortium of coriander and arugula in Cruz das Almas-BA |
title_fullStr |
Sources of organic fertilization in the consortium of coriander and arugula in Cruz das Almas-BA |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sources of organic fertilization in the consortium of coriander and arugula in Cruz das Almas-BA |
title_sort |
Sources of organic fertilization in the consortium of coriander and arugula in Cruz das Almas-BA |
author |
Novaes, Ana Paula da Silva |
author_facet |
Novaes, Ana Paula da Silva Machado, Josué Pinheiro Braulio, Caliane da Silva Oliveira, Lorena da Paixão Novaes, Ana Carolina da Silva Silva, Luís Cláudio Vieira Quintela, Matheus Pires |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Machado, Josué Pinheiro Braulio, Caliane da Silva Oliveira, Lorena da Paixão Novaes, Ana Carolina da Silva Silva, Luís Cláudio Vieira Quintela, Matheus Pires |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Novaes, Ana Paula da Silva Machado, Josué Pinheiro Braulio, Caliane da Silva Oliveira, Lorena da Paixão Novaes, Ana Carolina da Silva Silva, Luís Cláudio Vieira Quintela, Matheus Pires |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Estiércol de ganado Estiércol de pollo Monocultivo. Cattle manure Chicken manure Monoculture. Esterco bovino Esterco de galinha Monocultivo. |
topic |
Estiércol de ganado Estiércol de pollo Monocultivo. Cattle manure Chicken manure Monoculture. Esterco bovino Esterco de galinha Monocultivo. |
description |
Aiming to evaluate the effect of intercropping and organic fertilization on the production of coriander and arugula. The experiment took place at the Experimental Farm of the Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB), in the city of Cruz das Almas-Bahia. The design used was randomized blocks, in split-plots in 3x3 space with five replications. After 33 days of sowing of rocket and 35 of coriander, height, dry and fresh mass of aerial parts of the plants were evaluated. The manure used was cattle and chicken, and the vegetable species were rocket cv. Cultivated and coriander cv. Summer. When the treatments were evaluated individually, the results showed the inefficiency of the intercropping for only the arugula crop. Coriander developed well in the intercropping, showing no difference when compared to the monoculture, but the rocket in the intercropping showed low production when compared to the single crop. As for fertilization, only the single arugula crop showed a difference, with chicken manure being the best for production. For efficient land use (UET) only the intercropping with cattle manure presented an index higher than 1.0; the monoculture of rocket fertilized with chicken manure showed higher gross income and better net income. The operating cost was higher in all treatments involving cattle manure. Considering the economic indices, it is concluded that the intercropping between arugula and coriander is not viable when fertilized with the manure that provided better performance in the intercropping that was the bovine manure. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20548 10.33448/rsd-v10i13.20548 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20548 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i13.20548 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20548/18729 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e118101320548 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e118101320548 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e118101320548 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052789134721024 |