The incidence of the Maria da Penha law as a modifying element of criminal jurisdiction in the trial of the crime of ill-treatment: regular justice or special court?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Santos, Vanessa Érica da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1422
Resumo: The objective of the present work was to analyze the possibility of the incidence of Law 11.340/06 in the crime of mistreatment, foreseen in art. 136 of the Penal Code, when it is a female victim, as well as the possibility of changing the jurisdiction for the trial, considering that the mistreatment is a crime of lesser offensive potential, with maximum penalty less than two years, being of original jurisdiction of the Special Criminal Court, admitting all the decriminalizer institutes brought by Law 9.099/95. Moreover, in this work, the deductive method was used, with the research in doctrines, legislation and, mainly, in jurisprudence. Finally, it was concluded that the understanding that should be taken into consideration is that the trial of the crime of ill-treatment perpetrated against a female taxpayer should be carried out by Special Criminal Courts, since, for the characterization of ill-treatment, it is necessary not only the relationship of subordination between agent and victim, but also a special purpose to act on the part of the offender, the content of art. 136 of the Penal Code, in respect of the principle of legality and the principle of subjective responsibility of Criminal Law. This is because the perpetrator can only be punished for what was in his orbit of knowledge and/or intention, as well as for what is expressly provided for by law.
id UNIFEI_24ef450419c75c2ec2e27fcb71117fef
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1422
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The incidence of the Maria da Penha law as a modifying element of criminal jurisdiction in the trial of the crime of ill-treatment: regular justice or special court?La incidencia de la ley Maria da Penha como elemento modificador de la jurisdicción penal en el juicio del delito de malos tratos: ¿justicia ordinaria o tribunal especial?A incidência da lei Maria da Penha como elemento modificativo da competência criminal no julgamento do crime de maus-tratos: justiça comum ou juizado especial?Juizado Especial CriminalCompetênciaJustiça ComumMaus-Tratos.Special Criminal CourtCompetenceCommon JusticeMaltreatment.Tribunal Penal EspecialJurisdicciónJusticia ComúnMaltrato.The objective of the present work was to analyze the possibility of the incidence of Law 11.340/06 in the crime of mistreatment, foreseen in art. 136 of the Penal Code, when it is a female victim, as well as the possibility of changing the jurisdiction for the trial, considering that the mistreatment is a crime of lesser offensive potential, with maximum penalty less than two years, being of original jurisdiction of the Special Criminal Court, admitting all the decriminalizer institutes brought by Law 9.099/95. Moreover, in this work, the deductive method was used, with the research in doctrines, legislation and, mainly, in jurisprudence. Finally, it was concluded that the understanding that should be taken into consideration is that the trial of the crime of ill-treatment perpetrated against a female taxpayer should be carried out by Special Criminal Courts, since, for the characterization of ill-treatment, it is necessary not only the relationship of subordination between agent and victim, but also a special purpose to act on the part of the offender, the content of art. 136 of the Penal Code, in respect of the principle of legality and the principle of subjective responsibility of Criminal Law. This is because the perpetrator can only be punished for what was in his orbit of knowledge and/or intention, as well as for what is expressly provided for by law.El objetivo del presente trabajo fue analizar la posibilidad de la incidencia de la Ley 11.340/06 en el delito de maltrato, previsto en el art. 136 del Código Penal, cuando se trata de una víctima femenina, así como la posibilidad de cambiar la jurisdicción para el juicio, considerando que el maltrato es un delito de menor potencial ofensivo, con pena máxima inferior a dos años, siendo de jurisdicción original del Tribunal Penal Especial, admitiendo a todos los institutos despenalizadores previstos en la Ley 9.099/95. Además, en este trabajo se utilizó el método deductivo, con la investigación en doctrinas, legislación y, principalmente, en jurisprudencia. Por último, se llegó a la conclusión de que se debe tener en cuenta que el enjuiciamiento del delito de maltrato cometido contra una contribuyente femenina debe ser llevado a cabo por los Tribunales Penales Especiales, ya que, para la caracterización de los malos tratos, es necesario no sólo la relación de subordinación entre el agente y la víctima, sino también un propósito especial de actuar por parte del delincuente, el contenido del art. 136 del Código Penal, en relación con el principio de legalidad y el principio de responsabilidad subjetiva del Derecho Penal. Esto se debe a que el autor sólo puede ser castigado por lo que estaba en su órbita de conocimiento y/o intención, así como por lo que está expresamente previsto por la ley.O presente trabalho teve por objetivo analisar a possibilidade da incidência da Lei 11.340/06 no crime de maus-tratos, previsto no art. 136 do Código Penal, quando se tratar de vítima do sexo feminino, como também a possibilidade de mudança da competência para o julgamento, tendo em vista que os maus-tratos são um crime de menor potencial ofensivo, com pena máxima inferior a dois anos, sendo de competência originária do Juizado Especial Criminal, admitindo-se todos os institutos despenalizadores trazidos pela Lei 9.099/95. Ademais, utilizou-se, neste trabalho, o método dedutivo, com a pesquisa em doutrinas, legislações e, principalmente, na jurisprudência. Por fim, concluiu-se que o entendimento que deve ser levado em consideração é o de que o julgamento do crime de maus-tratos perpetrado contra sujeito passivo do sexo feminino deve ser realizado pelos Juizados Especiais Criminais, uma vez que, para a caracterização dos maus-tratos, é necessária não apenas a relação de subordinação entre agente e vítima, mas também um especial fim de agir por parte do autor do crime, a teor do art. 136 do Código Penal, em respeito ao princípio da legalidade e ao princípio da responsabilidade subjetiva do Direito Penal. Isso porque o agente só pode ser punido por aquilo que estava em sua órbita de conhecimento e/ou intenção, bem como por aquilo que está expressamente previsto em lei.Research, Society and Development2019-08-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/142210.33448/rsd-v8i10.1422Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 No. 10; e508101422Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 Núm. 10; e508101422Research, Society and Development; v. 8 n. 10; e5081014222525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1422/1130Copyright (c) 2019 Ozório Nonato de Abrantes Neto, Vanessa Érica da Silva Santosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato deSantos, Vanessa Érica da Silva2020-03-25T16:06:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1422Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:26:27.836236Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The incidence of the Maria da Penha law as a modifying element of criminal jurisdiction in the trial of the crime of ill-treatment: regular justice or special court?
La incidencia de la ley Maria da Penha como elemento modificador de la jurisdicción penal en el juicio del delito de malos tratos: ¿justicia ordinaria o tribunal especial?
A incidência da lei Maria da Penha como elemento modificativo da competência criminal no julgamento do crime de maus-tratos: justiça comum ou juizado especial?
title The incidence of the Maria da Penha law as a modifying element of criminal jurisdiction in the trial of the crime of ill-treatment: regular justice or special court?
spellingShingle The incidence of the Maria da Penha law as a modifying element of criminal jurisdiction in the trial of the crime of ill-treatment: regular justice or special court?
Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato de
Juizado Especial Criminal
Competência
Justiça Comum
Maus-Tratos.
Special Criminal Court
Competence
Common Justice
Maltreatment.
Tribunal Penal Especial
Jurisdicción
Justicia Común
Maltrato.
title_short The incidence of the Maria da Penha law as a modifying element of criminal jurisdiction in the trial of the crime of ill-treatment: regular justice or special court?
title_full The incidence of the Maria da Penha law as a modifying element of criminal jurisdiction in the trial of the crime of ill-treatment: regular justice or special court?
title_fullStr The incidence of the Maria da Penha law as a modifying element of criminal jurisdiction in the trial of the crime of ill-treatment: regular justice or special court?
title_full_unstemmed The incidence of the Maria da Penha law as a modifying element of criminal jurisdiction in the trial of the crime of ill-treatment: regular justice or special court?
title_sort The incidence of the Maria da Penha law as a modifying element of criminal jurisdiction in the trial of the crime of ill-treatment: regular justice or special court?
author Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato de
author_facet Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato de
Santos, Vanessa Érica da Silva
author_role author
author2 Santos, Vanessa Érica da Silva
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato de
Santos, Vanessa Érica da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Juizado Especial Criminal
Competência
Justiça Comum
Maus-Tratos.
Special Criminal Court
Competence
Common Justice
Maltreatment.
Tribunal Penal Especial
Jurisdicción
Justicia Común
Maltrato.
topic Juizado Especial Criminal
Competência
Justiça Comum
Maus-Tratos.
Special Criminal Court
Competence
Common Justice
Maltreatment.
Tribunal Penal Especial
Jurisdicción
Justicia Común
Maltrato.
description The objective of the present work was to analyze the possibility of the incidence of Law 11.340/06 in the crime of mistreatment, foreseen in art. 136 of the Penal Code, when it is a female victim, as well as the possibility of changing the jurisdiction for the trial, considering that the mistreatment is a crime of lesser offensive potential, with maximum penalty less than two years, being of original jurisdiction of the Special Criminal Court, admitting all the decriminalizer institutes brought by Law 9.099/95. Moreover, in this work, the deductive method was used, with the research in doctrines, legislation and, mainly, in jurisprudence. Finally, it was concluded that the understanding that should be taken into consideration is that the trial of the crime of ill-treatment perpetrated against a female taxpayer should be carried out by Special Criminal Courts, since, for the characterization of ill-treatment, it is necessary not only the relationship of subordination between agent and victim, but also a special purpose to act on the part of the offender, the content of art. 136 of the Penal Code, in respect of the principle of legality and the principle of subjective responsibility of Criminal Law. This is because the perpetrator can only be punished for what was in his orbit of knowledge and/or intention, as well as for what is expressly provided for by law.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1422
10.33448/rsd-v8i10.1422
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1422
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v8i10.1422
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1422/1130
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Ozório Nonato de Abrantes Neto, Vanessa Érica da Silva Santos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Ozório Nonato de Abrantes Neto, Vanessa Érica da Silva Santos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 No. 10; e508101422
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 Núm. 10; e508101422
Research, Society and Development; v. 8 n. 10; e508101422
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052815211757568