Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25113 |
Resumo: | Validate an adapted checklist for counting surgical material. This is a methodological study developed using face and content validation, and the integrative review was used as a search method that supported the adaptation of the proposed checklist and strengthened the relevance of the research for the safety of surgical patients. For this purpose, seven expert judges participated in the validation of the checklist instrument. And the Content Validity Index (CVI) was adopted as an agreement rate equal to or greater than 0.80. The results show that the instrument under analysis obtained a score of 0.95 in its overall assessment in relation to content validation, and the CVI found was 0.97 in relation to apparent validation, which reveals the approval of the instrument in relation to the content and appearance. Thus, the need for instruments and actions that promote the safety of patients and professionals related to the surgical environment is perceived, as patient safety is an essential dimension of the quality of health care. The correct use and understanding by professionals of this instruments important to solidify the centrality of patient care, providing more effective communication between professionals in the multidisciplinary teams, thus ensuring the practice of safe surgery. |
id |
UNIFEI_2500b347f33c8125202e2d8ae201d15c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25113 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count Validación de contenido y lista de verificación aparente adaptada para el recuento de material quirúrgico Validação de conteúdo e aparente de check list adaptado para contagem de material cirúrgico Lista de checagemSegurança do pacienteValidação de dados.Lista de verificaciónSeguridad del pacienteValidación de datos.ChecklistPatient safetyData validation.Validate an adapted checklist for counting surgical material. This is a methodological study developed using face and content validation, and the integrative review was used as a search method that supported the adaptation of the proposed checklist and strengthened the relevance of the research for the safety of surgical patients. For this purpose, seven expert judges participated in the validation of the checklist instrument. And the Content Validity Index (CVI) was adopted as an agreement rate equal to or greater than 0.80. The results show that the instrument under analysis obtained a score of 0.95 in its overall assessment in relation to content validation, and the CVI found was 0.97 in relation to apparent validation, which reveals the approval of the instrument in relation to the content and appearance. Thus, the need for instruments and actions that promote the safety of patients and professionals related to the surgical environment is perceived, as patient safety is an essential dimension of the quality of health care. The correct use and understanding by professionals of this instruments important to solidify the centrality of patient care, providing more effective communication between professionals in the multidisciplinary teams, thus ensuring the practice of safe surgery.Validar una lista de verificación adaptada para contar material quirúrgico. Se trata de un estudio metodológico desarrollado mediante validación facial y de contenido, y se utilizó la revisión integradora como método de búsqueda que apoyó la adecuación del checklist propuesto y fortaleció la relevancia de la investigación para la seguridad de los pacientes quirúrgicos. Para ello, siete jueces expertos participaron en la validación del instrumento de checklist. Y se adoptó el Índice de Validez de Contenido (IVC) como tasa de acuerdo igual o superior a 0,80. Los resultados muestran que el instrumento analizado obtuvo una puntuación de 0,95 en su valoración global en relación a la validación de contenido, y el IVC encontrado fue de 0,97 en relación a la validación aparente, lo que revela la aprobación del instrumento en relación al contenido y apariencia. Así, se percibe la necesidad de instrumentos y acciones que promuevan la seguridad de los pacientes y profesionales relacionados con el entorno quirúrgico, ya que la seguridad del paciente es una dimensión esencial de la calidad de la atención en salud. El correcto uso y comprensión por parte de los profesionales de este instrumento es importante para solidificar la centralidad de la atención al paciente, proporcionando una comunicación más efectiva entre los profesionales de los equipos multidisciplinares, garantizando así la práctica de una cirugía segura.Validar um checklist adaptado para contagem de material cirúrgico. Trata-se de um estudo metodológico desenvolvido utilizando a validação de conteúdo e aparente onde a revisão integrativa foi utilizada como método de busca que subsidiou a adaptação do checklist proposto e fortaleceu a relevância da pesquisa para a segurança do paciente cirúrgico. Para tanto, participaram sete juízes especialistas para a validação do instrumento do checklist. E o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo (IVC) foi adotado como a taxa de concordância de igual ou superior a 0,80. Os resultados demonstram que o instrumento em análise obteve nota 0,95 na sua avaliação global em relação à validação de conteúdo, e o IVC encontrado foi de 0,97 no que concerne à validação aparente, o que revela a aprovação do instrumento em relação ao conteúdo e aparência. Com isso, percebe-se a necessidade de instrumentos e ações que proporcionem a promoção da segurança do paciente e dos profissionais relacionados ao ambiente cirúrgico, visto que a segurança do paciente é uma dimensão essencial da qualidade do cuidado em saúde. A utilização e entendimento corretos por parte dos profissionais acerca desse instrumento é importante para solidificar a centralidade do cuidado no paciente, propiciando uma comunicação mais eficaz entre os profissionais das equipes multiprofissionais, garantindo assim a prática de uma cirurgia segura.Research, Society and Development2022-01-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2511310.33448/rsd-v11i2.25113Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e21911225113Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e21911225113Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e219112251132525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25113/22483Copyright (c) 2022 Antonia Abigail do Nascimento Cavalcante; Maria Salete Bessa Jorgehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCavalcante, Antonia Abigail do NascimentoJorge, Maria Salete Bessa 2022-02-07T01:42:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25113Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:28.652626Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count Validación de contenido y lista de verificación aparente adaptada para el recuento de material quirúrgico Validação de conteúdo e aparente de check list adaptado para contagem de material cirúrgico |
title |
Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count |
spellingShingle |
Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count Cavalcante, Antonia Abigail do Nascimento Lista de checagem Segurança do paciente Validação de dados. Lista de verificación Seguridad del paciente Validación de datos. Checklist Patient safety Data validation. |
title_short |
Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count |
title_full |
Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count |
title_fullStr |
Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count |
title_full_unstemmed |
Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count |
title_sort |
Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count |
author |
Cavalcante, Antonia Abigail do Nascimento |
author_facet |
Cavalcante, Antonia Abigail do Nascimento Jorge, Maria Salete Bessa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jorge, Maria Salete Bessa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cavalcante, Antonia Abigail do Nascimento Jorge, Maria Salete Bessa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lista de checagem Segurança do paciente Validação de dados. Lista de verificación Seguridad del paciente Validación de datos. Checklist Patient safety Data validation. |
topic |
Lista de checagem Segurança do paciente Validação de dados. Lista de verificación Seguridad del paciente Validación de datos. Checklist Patient safety Data validation. |
description |
Validate an adapted checklist for counting surgical material. This is a methodological study developed using face and content validation, and the integrative review was used as a search method that supported the adaptation of the proposed checklist and strengthened the relevance of the research for the safety of surgical patients. For this purpose, seven expert judges participated in the validation of the checklist instrument. And the Content Validity Index (CVI) was adopted as an agreement rate equal to or greater than 0.80. The results show that the instrument under analysis obtained a score of 0.95 in its overall assessment in relation to content validation, and the CVI found was 0.97 in relation to apparent validation, which reveals the approval of the instrument in relation to the content and appearance. Thus, the need for instruments and actions that promote the safety of patients and professionals related to the surgical environment is perceived, as patient safety is an essential dimension of the quality of health care. The correct use and understanding by professionals of this instruments important to solidify the centrality of patient care, providing more effective communication between professionals in the multidisciplinary teams, thus ensuring the practice of safe surgery. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25113 10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25113 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25113 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25113 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25113/22483 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Antonia Abigail do Nascimento Cavalcante; Maria Salete Bessa Jorge https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Antonia Abigail do Nascimento Cavalcante; Maria Salete Bessa Jorge https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e21911225113 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e21911225113 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e21911225113 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052701751640064 |