Quality of life and social distancing: systematic review of literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Ana Karoline Brito de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Araújo, Matheus Sodré de, Alves, Samuel Filipe Lopes, Rocha, Letícia de Barros, da Silva, Marianne Lucena, Rocha, Rodrigo Santiago Barbosa, Cunha, Katiane da Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5885
Resumo: The city of Wuhan, capital of China's Hubei province, was the scene of an outbreak of a new coronavirus called the SARS-CoV-2 by the World Health Organization (WHO). Gradually, several countries developed strategies to reduce community contamination, including social isolation and lockdown. The purpose of this study is carry out a systematic review of studies that assessed quality of life in social distance during pandemics. A high sensitivity search was carried out in the main scientific databases associated with quality of life (MEDLINE via PUBMED, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo, PsycoInfo, Pepsic, Scopus e Cochrane Library).  The full-text versions were analyzed for methodological quality by two researchers independently and disagreement between reviewers was resolved by discussion or arbitration by the other researcher. Only cross-sectional studies that assessed health-related quality of life during SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks were included. Editorial, letter to the editor, point of view, case presentation or brief communication were excluded. 1072 studies were identified, of which 1067 were excluded following the PRISMA protocol, with 5 articles remaining at the end. Patients affected by SARS, MERS and COVID-19 had reduced quality of life and social distancing make it worse.
id UNIFEI_286fab18be750a6954c7f2a976038b27
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5885
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of life and social distancing: systematic review of literatureCalidad de vida y distanciamiento social: revisión sistemática de la literaturaQualidade de vida e distanciamento social: revisão sistemática da literaturaCoronavirus infectionsQuality of lifePandemicsSocial isolation.Infecções por coronavírusQualidade de vidaPandemiasIsolamento social.Infecciones por coronavirusCalidad de vidaPandemiasAislamiento social.The city of Wuhan, capital of China's Hubei province, was the scene of an outbreak of a new coronavirus called the SARS-CoV-2 by the World Health Organization (WHO). Gradually, several countries developed strategies to reduce community contamination, including social isolation and lockdown. The purpose of this study is carry out a systematic review of studies that assessed quality of life in social distance during pandemics. A high sensitivity search was carried out in the main scientific databases associated with quality of life (MEDLINE via PUBMED, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo, PsycoInfo, Pepsic, Scopus e Cochrane Library).  The full-text versions were analyzed for methodological quality by two researchers independently and disagreement between reviewers was resolved by discussion or arbitration by the other researcher. Only cross-sectional studies that assessed health-related quality of life during SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks were included. Editorial, letter to the editor, point of view, case presentation or brief communication were excluded. 1072 studies were identified, of which 1067 were excluded following the PRISMA protocol, with 5 articles remaining at the end. Patients affected by SARS, MERS and COVID-19 had reduced quality of life and social distancing make it worse.La ciudad de Wuhan, capital de la provincia china de Hubei, fue escenario de un brote de un nuevo coronavirus llamado SARS-CoV-2 por la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Gradualmente, varios países desarrollaron estrategias para reducir la contaminación de la comunidad, como el aislamiento social y el bloqueo. El objetivo de este estudio es realizar una revisión sistemática de estudios que evaluaron la calidad de vida em el período del distaciamiento social en pandemias. Se llevó a cabo una investigación de alta sensibilidad en las principales bases de datos científicas asociadas con la calidad de vida (MEDLINE a través de PUBMED, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo, PsycoInfo, Pepsic, Scopus y Cochrane Library). Las versiones de texto completo fueron analizadas para la calidad metodológica por dos investigadores de forma independiente y el desacuerdo entre los revisores se resolvió mediante discusión o arbitraje del otro investigador. Sólo se incluyeron estudios transversales que evaluaron la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud durante los brotes de SARS-cov, MERS-CoV y SARS-CoV-2. Se excluyeron la editorial, la carta al editor, el punto de vista, la presentación del caso o la comunicación breve. Se identificaron un total de 1.072 estudios, de los cuales 1067 fueron excluidos siguiendo el protocolo PRISMA, quedando 5 artículos al final. Los pacientes afectados por SARS, MERS y COVID-19 tuvieron menor calidad de vida y el distanciamiento social empeoró las cosas.A cidade de Wuhan, capital da província chinesa de Hubei, foi palco de um surto de um novo coronavírus chamado SARS-CoV-2 pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Gradualmente, vários países desenvolveram estratégias para reduzir a contaminação da comunidade, incluindo isolamento social e bloqueio. O objetivo deste estudo é realizar uma revisão sistemática de estudos que avaliaram a qualidade de vida durante o distanciamento social nas pandemias. Uma pesquisa de alta sensibilidade foi realizada nas principais bases de dados científicas associadas à qualidade de vida (MEDLINE via PUBMED, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo, PsycoInfo, Pepsic, Scopus e Cochrane Library). As versões de texto integral foram analisadas para qualidade metodológica por dois pesquisadores de forma independente e a discordância entre revisores foi resolvida por discussão ou arbitragem pelo outro pesquisador. Foram incluídos apenas estudos transversais que avaliaram a qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde durante os surtos de SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV e SARS-CoV-2. Foram excluídos editorial, carta ao editor, ponto de vista, apresentação de caso ou breve comunicação. Foram identificados 1072 estudos, dos quais 1067 foram excluídos seguindo o protocolo PRISMA, restando 5 artigos no final. Os pacientes afetados pelo SARS, MERS e COVID-19 apresentaram menor qualidade de vida e o distanciamento social piorou as coisas.Research, Society and Development2020-07-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/588510.33448/rsd-v9i8.5885Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e318985885Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e318985885Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e3189858852525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5885/5108Copyright (c) 2020 Ana Karoline Brito de Oliveira, Matheus Sodré de Araújo, Samuel Filipe Lopes Alves, Letícia de Barros Rocha, Marianne Lucena da Silva, Rodrigo Santiago Barbosa Rocha, Katiane da Costa Cunhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Ana Karoline Brito deAraújo, Matheus Sodré deAlves, Samuel Filipe LopesRocha, Letícia de Barrosda Silva, Marianne LucenaRocha, Rodrigo Santiago BarbosaCunha, Katiane da Costa2020-08-20T18:00:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5885Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:29:15.142235Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of life and social distancing: systematic review of literature
Calidad de vida y distanciamiento social: revisión sistemática de la literatura
Qualidade de vida e distanciamento social: revisão sistemática da literatura
title Quality of life and social distancing: systematic review of literature
spellingShingle Quality of life and social distancing: systematic review of literature
Oliveira, Ana Karoline Brito de
Coronavirus infections
Quality of life
Pandemics
Social isolation.
Infecções por coronavírus
Qualidade de vida
Pandemias
Isolamento social.
Infecciones por coronavirus
Calidad de vida
Pandemias
Aislamiento social.
title_short Quality of life and social distancing: systematic review of literature
title_full Quality of life and social distancing: systematic review of literature
title_fullStr Quality of life and social distancing: systematic review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life and social distancing: systematic review of literature
title_sort Quality of life and social distancing: systematic review of literature
author Oliveira, Ana Karoline Brito de
author_facet Oliveira, Ana Karoline Brito de
Araújo, Matheus Sodré de
Alves, Samuel Filipe Lopes
Rocha, Letícia de Barros
da Silva, Marianne Lucena
Rocha, Rodrigo Santiago Barbosa
Cunha, Katiane da Costa
author_role author
author2 Araújo, Matheus Sodré de
Alves, Samuel Filipe Lopes
Rocha, Letícia de Barros
da Silva, Marianne Lucena
Rocha, Rodrigo Santiago Barbosa
Cunha, Katiane da Costa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Ana Karoline Brito de
Araújo, Matheus Sodré de
Alves, Samuel Filipe Lopes
Rocha, Letícia de Barros
da Silva, Marianne Lucena
Rocha, Rodrigo Santiago Barbosa
Cunha, Katiane da Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Coronavirus infections
Quality of life
Pandemics
Social isolation.
Infecções por coronavírus
Qualidade de vida
Pandemias
Isolamento social.
Infecciones por coronavirus
Calidad de vida
Pandemias
Aislamiento social.
topic Coronavirus infections
Quality of life
Pandemics
Social isolation.
Infecções por coronavírus
Qualidade de vida
Pandemias
Isolamento social.
Infecciones por coronavirus
Calidad de vida
Pandemias
Aislamiento social.
description The city of Wuhan, capital of China's Hubei province, was the scene of an outbreak of a new coronavirus called the SARS-CoV-2 by the World Health Organization (WHO). Gradually, several countries developed strategies to reduce community contamination, including social isolation and lockdown. The purpose of this study is carry out a systematic review of studies that assessed quality of life in social distance during pandemics. A high sensitivity search was carried out in the main scientific databases associated with quality of life (MEDLINE via PUBMED, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo, PsycoInfo, Pepsic, Scopus e Cochrane Library).  The full-text versions were analyzed for methodological quality by two researchers independently and disagreement between reviewers was resolved by discussion or arbitration by the other researcher. Only cross-sectional studies that assessed health-related quality of life during SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks were included. Editorial, letter to the editor, point of view, case presentation or brief communication were excluded. 1072 studies were identified, of which 1067 were excluded following the PRISMA protocol, with 5 articles remaining at the end. Patients affected by SARS, MERS and COVID-19 had reduced quality of life and social distancing make it worse.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5885
10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5885
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5885
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5885
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5885/5108
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e318985885
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e318985885
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e318985885
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052737769177088