Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform adhesive cementation of fiberglass posts: A bond strength analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barreto, Roberto O.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva, Nascimento, Wayne Martins, Mendes, Vagner, Souza, Caio Cesar, Hilgenberg, Sergio Paulo, Araki, Angela Toshie, Navarro, Ricardo Scarparo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14574
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the use of the microscope on the bond strength of fiberglass posts to dentin in the different root thirds. The crowns of sixty canines were sectioned with a diamond disc, and the roots were instrumented and filled (ProDesign Logic System 30.05 + obturation with AH Plus). Desobturation was performed with a drill corresponding to the pin diameter (DC 2, WhitePost). The roots were divided into six groups (n = 10): ACsm: Allcem and without a microscope; ACcm: Allcem and microscope; ACCsm: Allcem CORE without a microscope; ACCcm: Allcem CORE with microscope; RUsm: RelyX U200 without a microscope; RUcm: RelyX U200 with a microscope. The roots were cross-sectioned into slices of the cervical, middle and apical thirds and subjected to the bond strength test (Kratos- 0.5 mm / min / 100 Kgf). A stereomicroscope (40 x) was used to analyze the failure patterns of the samples. There was no statistically significant difference in the cervical thirds regardless of the cement used (p> 0.05). The apical third showed higher adhesion values in the group using a microscope and the self-adhesive cement (p <0.05). Conventional cement showed similar values in all root thirds (p> 0.05) and lower values compared to self-adhesive cement in the apical third (p <0.05). There was a predominance of the mixed failure pattern in the different groups and thirds. It can be concluded that the clinical microscope, the type of resin cement and the evaluated root third influenced the bond strength of fiberglass pins with the root dentin.
id UNIFEI_290e4170d5b270be81597f4a1499b3e4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14574
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform adhesive cementation of fiberglass posts: A bond strength analysis Influencia del uso del microscopio clínico como auxiliar para realizar la cementación adhesiva del poste de fibra de vidrio: Un análisis de la resistencia de la uniónInfluência do uso do microscópio clínico como auxiliar para realizar a cimentação adesiva de pino de fibra de vidro: Uma análise da resistência de uniãoClinical microscopeResin cementFiberglass postsPush-out test.Microscópio clínicoCimento resinosoPinos de fibra de vidroTeste de push-out. Microscopio clínicoCemento resinosoClavijas de fibra de vidrioPrueba de expulsión.This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the use of the microscope on the bond strength of fiberglass posts to dentin in the different root thirds. The crowns of sixty canines were sectioned with a diamond disc, and the roots were instrumented and filled (ProDesign Logic System 30.05 + obturation with AH Plus). Desobturation was performed with a drill corresponding to the pin diameter (DC 2, WhitePost). The roots were divided into six groups (n = 10): ACsm: Allcem and without a microscope; ACcm: Allcem and microscope; ACCsm: Allcem CORE without a microscope; ACCcm: Allcem CORE with microscope; RUsm: RelyX U200 without a microscope; RUcm: RelyX U200 with a microscope. The roots were cross-sectioned into slices of the cervical, middle and apical thirds and subjected to the bond strength test (Kratos- 0.5 mm / min / 100 Kgf). A stereomicroscope (40 x) was used to analyze the failure patterns of the samples. There was no statistically significant difference in the cervical thirds regardless of the cement used (p> 0.05). The apical third showed higher adhesion values in the group using a microscope and the self-adhesive cement (p <0.05). Conventional cement showed similar values in all root thirds (p> 0.05) and lower values compared to self-adhesive cement in the apical third (p <0.05). There was a predominance of the mixed failure pattern in the different groups and thirds. It can be concluded that the clinical microscope, the type of resin cement and the evaluated root third influenced the bond strength of fiberglass pins with the root dentin.El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la influencia del uso del microscopio en la fuerza de unión de los pines de fibra de vidrio a la dentina en los diferentes tercios radiculares. Se seccionaron las coronas de sesenta caninos con un disco de diamante, se instrumentaron y rellenaron las raíces (ProDesign Logic System 30.05 + obturación con AH Plus). La desobturación se realizó con un taladro correspondiente al diámetro del pin (DC 2, WhitePost). Las raíces se dividieron en seis grupos (n = 10): ACsm: Allcem y sin microscopio; ACcm: Allcem y microscopio; ACCsm: Allcem CORE sin microscopio; ACCcm: Allcem CORE con microscopio; RUsm: RelyX U200 sin microscopio; RUcm: RelyX U200 con microscopio. Las raíces se seccionaron en cortes de los tercios cervical, medio y apical y se sometieron a la prueba de fuerza de unión en la máquina de prueba (Kratos - 0,5 mm / min / 100 Kgf). El análisis de los patrones de falla de las muestras se realizó con un microscopio estereoscópico (40 x). No hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa en los tercios cervicales independientemente del cemento utilizado (p> 0,05). En el tercio apical al microscopio y el cemento autoadhesivo mostró mayores valores de adherencia (p <0.05). Los cementos convencionales mostraron valores similares en todos los tercios radiculares (p> 0.05) y valores menores en comparación con el cemento autoadhesivo en el tercio apical (p <0.05). Predominó el patrón mixto de fallas en los diferentes grupos y tercios. Se puede concluir que el microscopio clínico, el tipo de cemento resinoso y el tercio radicular evaluado influyeron en la fuerza de unión de los pines de fibra de vidrio con la dentina radicular.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência da utilização do microscópio clínico e de cimentos resinosos com diferentes estratégias de adesão na resistência de união de pinos de fibra de vidro a dentina nos diferentes terços radiculares. As coroas de sessenta caninos foram seccionadas com disco diamantado, as raízes foram instrumentadas e obturadas (Sistema ProDesign Logic 30.05 + obturação com AH Plus). A desobturação foi realizada com broca correspondente ao diâmetro do pino (DC 2, WhitePost). As raízes foram divididas em seis grupos (n=10): Allcem sem uso do microscópio; Allcem com uso do microscópio; Allcem CORE sem uso do microscópio; Allcem CORE com uso do microscópio; RelyX U200 sem uso do microscópio; RelyX U200 com uso do microscópio. As raízes foram seccionadas transversalmente em fatias dos terços cervical, médio e apical e submetidos ao teste de resistência de união na máquina de testes (Kratos- 0,5 mm/min/100 Kgf). Foi realizada análise dos padrões de falha das amostras com estereomicroscópio (40 X). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa nos terços cervical independente do tipo de cimento usado (p> 0,05). No terço apical com uso do microscópio, o cimento autoadesivo apresentou valores de adesão superiores (p< 0,05). Os cimentos convencionais apresentaram valores semelhantes em todos os terços radiculares (p > 0,05) e valores inferiores em comparação ao cimento autoadesivo no terço apical (p< 0,05). Houve predomínio do padrão de falha mista nos diferentes grupos e terços. Pode-se concluir que o microscópio clinico, o tipo de cimento resinoso e o terço radicular avaliado influenciaram a resistência de união de pinos de fibra de vidro com a dentina radicular.Research, Society and Development2021-04-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1457410.33448/rsd-v10i5.14574Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e0310514574Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e0310514574Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e03105145742525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14574/13143Copyright (c) 2021 Roberto O. Barreto; Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeiro; Wayne Martins Nascimento; Vagner Mendes; Caio Cesar Souza; Sergio Paulo Hilgenberg; Angela Toshie Araki; Ricardo Scarparo Navarrohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarreto, Roberto O.Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva Nascimento, Wayne MartinsMendes, VagnerSouza, Caio Cesar Hilgenberg, Sergio PauloAraki, Angela Toshie Navarro, Ricardo Scarparo 2021-05-17T18:20:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14574Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:39.403543Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform adhesive cementation of fiberglass posts: A bond strength analysis
Influencia del uso del microscopio clínico como auxiliar para realizar la cementación adhesiva del poste de fibra de vidrio: Un análisis de la resistencia de la unión
Influência do uso do microscópio clínico como auxiliar para realizar a cimentação adesiva de pino de fibra de vidro: Uma análise da resistência de união
title Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform adhesive cementation of fiberglass posts: A bond strength analysis
spellingShingle Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform adhesive cementation of fiberglass posts: A bond strength analysis
Barreto, Roberto O.
Clinical microscope
Resin cement
Fiberglass posts
Push-out test.
Microscópio clínico
Cimento resinoso
Pinos de fibra de vidro
Teste de push-out.
Microscopio clínico
Cemento resinoso
Clavijas de fibra de vidrio
Prueba de expulsión.
title_short Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform adhesive cementation of fiberglass posts: A bond strength analysis
title_full Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform adhesive cementation of fiberglass posts: A bond strength analysis
title_fullStr Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform adhesive cementation of fiberglass posts: A bond strength analysis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform adhesive cementation of fiberglass posts: A bond strength analysis
title_sort Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform adhesive cementation of fiberglass posts: A bond strength analysis
author Barreto, Roberto O.
author_facet Barreto, Roberto O.
Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
Nascimento, Wayne Martins
Mendes, Vagner
Souza, Caio Cesar
Hilgenberg, Sergio Paulo
Araki, Angela Toshie
Navarro, Ricardo Scarparo
author_role author
author2 Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
Nascimento, Wayne Martins
Mendes, Vagner
Souza, Caio Cesar
Hilgenberg, Sergio Paulo
Araki, Angela Toshie
Navarro, Ricardo Scarparo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barreto, Roberto O.
Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
Nascimento, Wayne Martins
Mendes, Vagner
Souza, Caio Cesar
Hilgenberg, Sergio Paulo
Araki, Angela Toshie
Navarro, Ricardo Scarparo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Clinical microscope
Resin cement
Fiberglass posts
Push-out test.
Microscópio clínico
Cimento resinoso
Pinos de fibra de vidro
Teste de push-out.
Microscopio clínico
Cemento resinoso
Clavijas de fibra de vidrio
Prueba de expulsión.
topic Clinical microscope
Resin cement
Fiberglass posts
Push-out test.
Microscópio clínico
Cimento resinoso
Pinos de fibra de vidro
Teste de push-out.
Microscopio clínico
Cemento resinoso
Clavijas de fibra de vidrio
Prueba de expulsión.
description This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the use of the microscope on the bond strength of fiberglass posts to dentin in the different root thirds. The crowns of sixty canines were sectioned with a diamond disc, and the roots were instrumented and filled (ProDesign Logic System 30.05 + obturation with AH Plus). Desobturation was performed with a drill corresponding to the pin diameter (DC 2, WhitePost). The roots were divided into six groups (n = 10): ACsm: Allcem and without a microscope; ACcm: Allcem and microscope; ACCsm: Allcem CORE without a microscope; ACCcm: Allcem CORE with microscope; RUsm: RelyX U200 without a microscope; RUcm: RelyX U200 with a microscope. The roots were cross-sectioned into slices of the cervical, middle and apical thirds and subjected to the bond strength test (Kratos- 0.5 mm / min / 100 Kgf). A stereomicroscope (40 x) was used to analyze the failure patterns of the samples. There was no statistically significant difference in the cervical thirds regardless of the cement used (p> 0.05). The apical third showed higher adhesion values in the group using a microscope and the self-adhesive cement (p <0.05). Conventional cement showed similar values in all root thirds (p> 0.05) and lower values compared to self-adhesive cement in the apical third (p <0.05). There was a predominance of the mixed failure pattern in the different groups and thirds. It can be concluded that the clinical microscope, the type of resin cement and the evaluated root third influenced the bond strength of fiberglass pins with the root dentin.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14574
10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14574
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14574
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14574
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14574/13143
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e0310514574
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e0310514574
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e0310514574
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052806115360768