Analysis of buccal gingival thickness in maxillary implants and its relation to gingival biotype
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28472 |
Resumo: | Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate vestibular gingival thickness in unitary implants located in the anterior maxilla through a cone beam tomography. Material and methods: After visual classification of the gingival biotype of the 32 patients selected for this study (16 patients with thin biotype and 16 patients with thick biotype) measurements of the vestibular tissue thickness were made at 2, 4 and 6 mm from the gingival margin in the apical direction in the most longitudinal transverse cut of the implant and the contralateral tooth through tomographic cone beam examination for soft tissue. The data of age and gender of the patients, mean buccal wall thickness of the implants and contralateral natural teeth, and the use of connective tissue graft (CTG) were tabulated for descriptive analysis. Results: For thin gingival biotype, mean vestibular gingival thickness varied between 1.26 ± 0.31 mm (teeth) and 2.65 ± 0.93 mm (implant), and for thick biotype varied from 1.77 ± 0.58 mm (teeth) and 3.01 ± 0.96 mm (implant). The use of CTG increased the buccal thickness of thick biotype when compared to thin biotype without CTG. Conclusions: It was not possible to establish a direct relationship between the classification of the gingival biotype of the contralateral teeth and the gingival biotype of the implants installed in the anterior region of the maxilla, but CTG was shown to be efficient in increasing gingival tissue thickness. |
id |
UNIFEI_29cb4405f2a0696629335e2ff6b18c60 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28472 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of buccal gingival thickness in maxillary implants and its relation to gingival biotypeAnálisis del espesor gingival vestibular en implantes en el maxilar anterior y su relación con el biotipo gingivalAnálise da espessura gengival vestibular em implantes na maxila anterior e sua relação com o biotipo gengival Implante dentalFenotipo gingivalEncía.Dental ImplantGingival PhenotypeGum.Implante dentárioFenótipo gengivalGengiva.Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate vestibular gingival thickness in unitary implants located in the anterior maxilla through a cone beam tomography. Material and methods: After visual classification of the gingival biotype of the 32 patients selected for this study (16 patients with thin biotype and 16 patients with thick biotype) measurements of the vestibular tissue thickness were made at 2, 4 and 6 mm from the gingival margin in the apical direction in the most longitudinal transverse cut of the implant and the contralateral tooth through tomographic cone beam examination for soft tissue. The data of age and gender of the patients, mean buccal wall thickness of the implants and contralateral natural teeth, and the use of connective tissue graft (CTG) were tabulated for descriptive analysis. Results: For thin gingival biotype, mean vestibular gingival thickness varied between 1.26 ± 0.31 mm (teeth) and 2.65 ± 0.93 mm (implant), and for thick biotype varied from 1.77 ± 0.58 mm (teeth) and 3.01 ± 0.96 mm (implant). The use of CTG increased the buccal thickness of thick biotype when compared to thin biotype without CTG. Conclusions: It was not possible to establish a direct relationship between the classification of the gingival biotype of the contralateral teeth and the gingival biotype of the implants installed in the anterior region of the maxilla, but CTG was shown to be efficient in increasing gingival tissue thickness.La identificación del biotipo gingival es importante y debe ser tenida en cuenta durante el plan de tratamiento, de manera que se puedan predecir estrategias de manipulación tisular para mejorar los resultados estéticos. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar el espesor gingival vestibular en implantes unitarios ubicados en la maxilar anterior, mediante examen tomográfico de haz cónico para tejidos blandos. Después de la clasificación visual del biotipo gingival de los 32 pacientes seleccionados para este estudio (16 pacientes con biotipo delgado y 16 pacientes con biotipo grueso), se realizaron mediciones del espesor del tejido bucal a 2, 4 y 6 mm del margen gingival. en dirección apical en el corte transversal longitudinal del implante y el diente contralateral, mediante examen tomográfico de haz cónico para tejidos blandos. Los resultados mostraron medidas promedio de espesor gingival bucal a los dientes de 1,26 ± 0,31 mm en pacientes con biotipo gingival delgado y 1,77 ± 0,58 mm en pacientes con biotipo gingival grueso; y medidas promedio de 2,65 ± 0,93 mm y 3,01 ± 0,96 mm de espesor gingival en vestibular de los implantes analizados, para el biotipo delgado y biotipo grueso, respectivamente. Además, se destacó la importancia de utilizar un injerto de tejido conectivo, el cual, al ser utilizado, los pacientes presentaban un espesor de tejido vestibular promedio de 2,85 ± 0,93 mm y de 3,19 ± 1,08 mm para biotipo delgado y grueso. No fue posible establecer una relación directa entre la clasificación del biotipo gingival de los dientes contralaterales y el biotipo gingival de los implantes instalados en la región anterior del maxilar.A identificação do biotipo gengival é importante e deve ser levada em consideração durante o plano de tratamento, para que estratégias de manipulação tecidual possam ser previstas, a fim de melhorar os resultados estéticos.Este estudo objetivou avaliar a espessura gengival vestibular em implantes unitários localizados na maxila anterior, através de exame tomográfico cone beam para tecido mole. Após classificação visual do biotipo gengival dos 32 pacientes selecionados para este estudo (sendo 16 pacientes de biotipo fino e 16 pacientes de biotipo espesso), foram feitas medidas da espessura tecidualvestibular a2, 4 e 6 mm a partir da margem gengival em direção apical no corte transversal mais longitudinal do implante e do dente contralateral, através de exame tomográfico cone beam para tecido mole. Os resultados apresentaram medidas médias de espessura gengival vestibular aos dentes de 1,26 ± 0,31mm em pacientes de biotipo gengival fino e de 1,77 ± 0,58mm em pacientes de biotipo gengival espesso; e medidas médias 2,65 ± 0,93mm e de 3,01 ± 0,96mm de espessura gengival na vestibular dos implantes analisados, para o biotipo fino e biotipo espesso, respectivamente. Além disso, evidenciou-se a importância da utilização do enxerto de tecido conjuntivo, que quando utilizado, os pacientes apresentaram uma média de espessura tecidual vestibular de 2,85 ± 0,93 mm e de 3,19 ± 1,08 mm para biotipo fino e espesso. Não foi possível estabelecer uma relação direta entre a classificação do biotipo gengival dos dentes contralaterais com o biotipo gengival dos implantes instalados na região anterior da maxila.Research, Society and Development2022-04-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2847210.33448/rsd-v11i5.28472Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 5; e46411528472Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 5; e46411528472Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 5; e464115284722525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28472/25604Copyright (c) 2022 Fernando Rodrigo Policarpo Matosinhos; Frederico Nigro; Bruno Aiello Barbosa; Amanda Gonçalves Franco; Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior; Carlos Eduardo Francischonehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMatosinhos, Fernando Rodrigo Policarpo Nigro, Frederico Barbosa, Bruno Aiello Franco, Amanda Gonçalves Francischone, Carlos Eduardo Sotto-Maior, Bruno Salles2022-04-17T18:18:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28472Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:45:51.694755Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of buccal gingival thickness in maxillary implants and its relation to gingival biotype Análisis del espesor gingival vestibular en implantes en el maxilar anterior y su relación con el biotipo gingival Análise da espessura gengival vestibular em implantes na maxila anterior e sua relação com o biotipo gengival |
title |
Analysis of buccal gingival thickness in maxillary implants and its relation to gingival biotype |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of buccal gingival thickness in maxillary implants and its relation to gingival biotype Matosinhos, Fernando Rodrigo Policarpo Implante dental Fenotipo gingival Encía. Dental Implant Gingival Phenotype Gum. Implante dentário Fenótipo gengival Gengiva. |
title_short |
Analysis of buccal gingival thickness in maxillary implants and its relation to gingival biotype |
title_full |
Analysis of buccal gingival thickness in maxillary implants and its relation to gingival biotype |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of buccal gingival thickness in maxillary implants and its relation to gingival biotype |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of buccal gingival thickness in maxillary implants and its relation to gingival biotype |
title_sort |
Analysis of buccal gingival thickness in maxillary implants and its relation to gingival biotype |
author |
Matosinhos, Fernando Rodrigo Policarpo |
author_facet |
Matosinhos, Fernando Rodrigo Policarpo Nigro, Frederico Barbosa, Bruno Aiello Franco, Amanda Gonçalves Francischone, Carlos Eduardo Sotto-Maior, Bruno Salles |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nigro, Frederico Barbosa, Bruno Aiello Franco, Amanda Gonçalves Francischone, Carlos Eduardo Sotto-Maior, Bruno Salles |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Matosinhos, Fernando Rodrigo Policarpo Nigro, Frederico Barbosa, Bruno Aiello Franco, Amanda Gonçalves Francischone, Carlos Eduardo Sotto-Maior, Bruno Salles |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Implante dental Fenotipo gingival Encía. Dental Implant Gingival Phenotype Gum. Implante dentário Fenótipo gengival Gengiva. |
topic |
Implante dental Fenotipo gingival Encía. Dental Implant Gingival Phenotype Gum. Implante dentário Fenótipo gengival Gengiva. |
description |
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate vestibular gingival thickness in unitary implants located in the anterior maxilla through a cone beam tomography. Material and methods: After visual classification of the gingival biotype of the 32 patients selected for this study (16 patients with thin biotype and 16 patients with thick biotype) measurements of the vestibular tissue thickness were made at 2, 4 and 6 mm from the gingival margin in the apical direction in the most longitudinal transverse cut of the implant and the contralateral tooth through tomographic cone beam examination for soft tissue. The data of age and gender of the patients, mean buccal wall thickness of the implants and contralateral natural teeth, and the use of connective tissue graft (CTG) were tabulated for descriptive analysis. Results: For thin gingival biotype, mean vestibular gingival thickness varied between 1.26 ± 0.31 mm (teeth) and 2.65 ± 0.93 mm (implant), and for thick biotype varied from 1.77 ± 0.58 mm (teeth) and 3.01 ± 0.96 mm (implant). The use of CTG increased the buccal thickness of thick biotype when compared to thin biotype without CTG. Conclusions: It was not possible to establish a direct relationship between the classification of the gingival biotype of the contralateral teeth and the gingival biotype of the implants installed in the anterior region of the maxilla, but CTG was shown to be efficient in increasing gingival tissue thickness. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28472 10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28472 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28472 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28472 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28472/25604 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 5; e46411528472 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 5; e46411528472 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 5; e46411528472 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052765067804672 |