Bioethical aspects involved in vaccine testing against SARS-COV-2 virus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10570 |
Resumo: | Objective: to analyze scientific productions that disagree about the relationship between bioethics and vaccine tests' performance against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Methodology: This is an integrative review, where a bibliographic survey was carried out in the MEDLINE, SCIELO, and VHL databases, using two descriptors "bioethics", "COVID" and "vaccine" associated through the Boolean operator "AND". The analysis of two data was performed descriptively from the comprehensive reading of two articles, categorization, sitting, extraction, and interpretation of two data. Result: the research showed that the population used for our studies was: 68.2% of challenge studies with human beings (HCS), 9.1% of research with the general population and 22.7% of studies with specific populations (pregnant women, blacks, incarcerated population and children), Conclusion: not considered and notorious in the absence of consensus among the studies analyzed, two more studies argue in favor of carrying out two challenge studies, others are exhaustive in stating that the tests without bioethical protection . |
id |
UNIFEI_2b7bfabad1e9a184fd89a10a88d5ab7b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10570 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bioethical aspects involved in vaccine testing against SARS-COV-2 virusAspectos bioéticos involucrados en las pruebas de vacunas contra el virus SARS-COV-2Aspectos bioéticos envolvidos nos testes de vacinas contra o vírus SARS-COV-2Infecciones por coronavirusBioéticaEnfermedades prevenibles por vacunación.Coronavirus infectionsBioethicsVaccine-preventable diseases.Infecções por coronavírusBioéticaDoenças preveníveis por vacina.Objective: to analyze scientific productions that disagree about the relationship between bioethics and vaccine tests' performance against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Methodology: This is an integrative review, where a bibliographic survey was carried out in the MEDLINE, SCIELO, and VHL databases, using two descriptors "bioethics", "COVID" and "vaccine" associated through the Boolean operator "AND". The analysis of two data was performed descriptively from the comprehensive reading of two articles, categorization, sitting, extraction, and interpretation of two data. Result: the research showed that the population used for our studies was: 68.2% of challenge studies with human beings (HCS), 9.1% of research with the general population and 22.7% of studies with specific populations (pregnant women, blacks, incarcerated population and children), Conclusion: not considered and notorious in the absence of consensus among the studies analyzed, two more studies argue in favor of carrying out two challenge studies, others are exhaustive in stating that the tests without bioethical protection .Objetivo: analizar las producciones científicas que discrepan sobre la relación entre la bioética y la realización de pruebas de vacunas contra el virus SARS-CoV-2. Metodología: se trata de una revisión integradora, en la que el estudio bibliográfico se realizó en las bases de datos MEDLINE, SCIELO y BVS, utilizando los descriptores "bioethics", "COVID" y "vaccine" asociados a través del operador booleano "AND". El análisis de dos datos se realizó de manera descriptiva, basándose en la lectura completa de los artículos, la categorización, la síntesis, la extracción y la e interpretación de dos datos. Resultado: la investigación demostró que la población utilizada em los estudios fue: 68,2% de estudios de desafío con seres humanos (HCS), 9,1% fueron investigaciones con población general, y 22,7% fueron de estudios con poblaciones específicas (mujeres embarazadas, negros, población encarcelada y niños), Conclusión: en este punto, la falta de consenso entre los estudios analizados es notoria, aunque la mayoría de los estudios argumentan a favor de realizar estudios de desafío, otros son inflexibles en cuanto a que las pruebas no tienen apoyo bioético.Objetivo: analisar as produções científicas que discorrem sobre a relação entre a bioética e a realização de testes de vacinas contra o vírus SARS-CoV-2. Metodologia: trata-se de uma revisão integrativa, onde o levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado nas bases de dados MEDLINE, SCIELO e BVS, através dos descritores “bioethics”, “COVID” e “vacinne” associados por meio do operador booleano “AND”. A análise dos dados foi realizada de forma descritiva com base na leitura integral dos artigos, categorização, síntese, extração e interpretação dos dados. Resultado: a pesquisa mostrou que a população utilizada nos estudos foram: 68,2% estudos de desafio com seres humanos (HCS), 9,1% tratavam-se de pesquisa com a população em geral e 22,7% de pesquisas com populações específicas (gestantes, negros, população encarcerada e crianças). Conclusão: nesse ponto é notório a falta de consenso entre os estudos analisados, embora a maior parte dos estudos argumentem em favor da realização dos estudos de desafio, outros são taxativos em afirmar que os testes não têm amparo bioético.Research, Society and Development2020-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1057010.33448/rsd-v9i12.10570Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e9791210570Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e9791210570Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e97912105702525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10570/9705Copyright (c) 2020 Gabriel Magalhães Cairo; Miucha Muniz Pereira Antonio; Vanessa Almeida Cardoso Silva; Charles Souza Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCairo, Gabriel MagalhãesAntonio, Miucha Muniz PereiraSilva, Vanessa Almeida Cardoso Santos, Charles Souza 2020-12-30T23:32:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10570Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:32:36.874800Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioethical aspects involved in vaccine testing against SARS-COV-2 virus Aspectos bioéticos involucrados en las pruebas de vacunas contra el virus SARS-COV-2 Aspectos bioéticos envolvidos nos testes de vacinas contra o vírus SARS-COV-2 |
title |
Bioethical aspects involved in vaccine testing against SARS-COV-2 virus |
spellingShingle |
Bioethical aspects involved in vaccine testing against SARS-COV-2 virus Cairo, Gabriel Magalhães Infecciones por coronavirus Bioética Enfermedades prevenibles por vacunación. Coronavirus infections Bioethics Vaccine-preventable diseases. Infecções por coronavírus Bioética Doenças preveníveis por vacina. |
title_short |
Bioethical aspects involved in vaccine testing against SARS-COV-2 virus |
title_full |
Bioethical aspects involved in vaccine testing against SARS-COV-2 virus |
title_fullStr |
Bioethical aspects involved in vaccine testing against SARS-COV-2 virus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bioethical aspects involved in vaccine testing against SARS-COV-2 virus |
title_sort |
Bioethical aspects involved in vaccine testing against SARS-COV-2 virus |
author |
Cairo, Gabriel Magalhães |
author_facet |
Cairo, Gabriel Magalhães Antonio, Miucha Muniz Pereira Silva, Vanessa Almeida Cardoso Santos, Charles Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Antonio, Miucha Muniz Pereira Silva, Vanessa Almeida Cardoso Santos, Charles Souza |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cairo, Gabriel Magalhães Antonio, Miucha Muniz Pereira Silva, Vanessa Almeida Cardoso Santos, Charles Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Infecciones por coronavirus Bioética Enfermedades prevenibles por vacunación. Coronavirus infections Bioethics Vaccine-preventable diseases. Infecções por coronavírus Bioética Doenças preveníveis por vacina. |
topic |
Infecciones por coronavirus Bioética Enfermedades prevenibles por vacunación. Coronavirus infections Bioethics Vaccine-preventable diseases. Infecções por coronavírus Bioética Doenças preveníveis por vacina. |
description |
Objective: to analyze scientific productions that disagree about the relationship between bioethics and vaccine tests' performance against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Methodology: This is an integrative review, where a bibliographic survey was carried out in the MEDLINE, SCIELO, and VHL databases, using two descriptors "bioethics", "COVID" and "vaccine" associated through the Boolean operator "AND". The analysis of two data was performed descriptively from the comprehensive reading of two articles, categorization, sitting, extraction, and interpretation of two data. Result: the research showed that the population used for our studies was: 68.2% of challenge studies with human beings (HCS), 9.1% of research with the general population and 22.7% of studies with specific populations (pregnant women, blacks, incarcerated population and children), Conclusion: not considered and notorious in the absence of consensus among the studies analyzed, two more studies argue in favor of carrying out two challenge studies, others are exhaustive in stating that the tests without bioethical protection . |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10570 10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10570 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10570 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10570 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10570/9705 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e9791210570 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e9791210570 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e9791210570 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052782108213248 |