Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14231 |
Resumo: | The establishment of adequate standards and principles for the application of norms for the protection of intellectual property rights over cultivars is a fundamental measure for any country, essentially Brazil, one of the richest countries in biodiversity in the world. Thus, the objective of this work was to carry out a systematic review to analyze the scientific production of protection of the main cultivars, to identify existing parameters and methods for the definition of royalty rates and the collection mechanisms adopted. A systematic review was carried out based on articles published in the period of 10 years, from 2009 to 2019, in the scientific bases Scopus and Web of Science. The Boolean terms and operators: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” were explored in the title or summary of scientific articles. 83 documents indexed in the Scopus (37) and Web of Science (46) databases were searched. After processing the data and removing duplicate documents, 43 scientific articles remained. With an average publication of 6.7 publications per year. Average of 10 citations per document. A total of 171 authors and 271 co-authors, with five documents having single authorship and an average of 3.1 authors per article. Thus, a study sample of 17 articles was obtained. the journals analyzed did not provide information on how royalties are taxed, they only reported the type of protection and the cultivars studied. |
id |
UNIFEI_2c52f269e6143087bdb1172c07d63c06 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14231 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysisRegalías para las cultivares, legislación y regulación: Un metaanálisisRoyalties para cultivares, legislação e regulação: Uma meta-análise Systematic reviewIntellectual propertyProtection of cultivars.Revisión sistemáticaPropiedad intelectualProtección de cultivares.Revisão sistemáticaPropriedade intelectualProteção de cultivares.The establishment of adequate standards and principles for the application of norms for the protection of intellectual property rights over cultivars is a fundamental measure for any country, essentially Brazil, one of the richest countries in biodiversity in the world. Thus, the objective of this work was to carry out a systematic review to analyze the scientific production of protection of the main cultivars, to identify existing parameters and methods for the definition of royalty rates and the collection mechanisms adopted. A systematic review was carried out based on articles published in the period of 10 years, from 2009 to 2019, in the scientific bases Scopus and Web of Science. The Boolean terms and operators: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” were explored in the title or summary of scientific articles. 83 documents indexed in the Scopus (37) and Web of Science (46) databases were searched. After processing the data and removing duplicate documents, 43 scientific articles remained. With an average publication of 6.7 publications per year. Average of 10 citations per document. A total of 171 authors and 271 co-authors, with five documents having single authorship and an average of 3.1 authors per article. Thus, a study sample of 17 articles was obtained. the journals analyzed did not provide information on how royalties are taxed, they only reported the type of protection and the cultivars studied.El establecimiento de estándares y principios adecuados para la aplicación de normas de protección de derechos de propiedad intelectual sobre cultivares es una medida fundamental para cualquier país, fundamentalmente Brasil, uno de los países más ricos en biodiversidad del mundo. Así, el objetivo de este trabajo fue realizar una revisión sistemática para analizar la producción científica de protección de los principales cultivares, para identificar los parámetros y métodos existentes para la definición de tasas de regalías y los mecanismos de recaudación adoptados. Se realizó una revisión sistemática a partir de artículos publicados en el período de 10 años, de 2009 a 2019, en las bases científicas Scopus y Web of Science. Los términos y operadores booleanos: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” se analizaron en el título o resumen de los artículos científicos. Se realizaron búsquedas en 83 documentos indexados en las bases Scopus (37) y Web of Science (46). Después de procesar los datos y eliminar documentos duplicados, quedaron 43 artículos científicos. Con una publicación media de 6,7 publicaciones al año. Promedio de 10 citas por documento. Un total de 171 autores y 271 coautores, con cinco documentos de una sola autoría y una media de 3,1 autores por artículo. Así, se obtuvo una muestra de estudio de 17 artículos. las revistas analizadas no proporcionaron información sobre cómo se gravan las regalías, solo informaron el tipo de protección y los cultivares estudiados.O estabelecimento de padrões e princípios para aplicação de normas de proteção de direitos de propriedade intelectual sobre as cultivares é uma medida fundamental a qualquer país, essencialmente ao Brasil, um dos países mais ricos em biodiversidade do mundo. Dessa forma, é objetivo desse trabalho realizar uma revisão sistemática para analisar a produção científica em proteção das principais cultivares protegidas, identificar parâmetros e métodos existentes para definição das taxas de royalties e os mecanismos de cobrança adotados. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática a partir de artigos publicados no período de 10 anos, de 2009 até 2019, nas bases científicas Scopus e Web of Science. Os termos e operadores booleanos: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” foram prospectados em título ou resumo de artigos científicos. Foram prospectados 83 documentos indexados nas bases Scopus (37) e Web of Science (46). Após o tratamento dos dados e remoção de documentos duplicados restaram 43 artigos científicos. Com uma publicação média de 6,7 publicações por ano. Média de 10 citações por documento. Um total 171 autores e 271 co-autores foram elencados, sendo cinco documentos de autoria única e em média de 3,1 autores por artigo. Após o processo de refinamento, obteve-se uma amostra de estudo de 17 artigos. Os periódicos analisados não forneceram informações de como são taxados os royalties, apenas relataram o tipo de proteção e as cultivares estudadas.Research, Society and Development2021-04-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1423110.33448/rsd-v10i4.14231Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e31710414231Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e31710414231Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e317104142312525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14231/12727Copyright (c) 2021 Eduardo José de Souza Silva; Renata Silva-Mann; Crislaine Costa Calazanshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Eduardo José de Souza Silva-Mann, Renata Calazans, Crislaine Costa 2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14231Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:24.200209Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis Regalías para las cultivares, legislación y regulación: Un metaanálisis Royalties para cultivares, legislação e regulação: Uma meta-análise |
title |
Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis Silva, Eduardo José de Souza Systematic review Intellectual property Protection of cultivars. Revisión sistemática Propiedad intelectual Protección de cultivares. Revisão sistemática Propriedade intelectual Proteção de cultivares. |
title_short |
Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis |
title_full |
Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis |
author |
Silva, Eduardo José de Souza |
author_facet |
Silva, Eduardo José de Souza Silva-Mann, Renata Calazans, Crislaine Costa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva-Mann, Renata Calazans, Crislaine Costa |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Eduardo José de Souza Silva-Mann, Renata Calazans, Crislaine Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Systematic review Intellectual property Protection of cultivars. Revisión sistemática Propiedad intelectual Protección de cultivares. Revisão sistemática Propriedade intelectual Proteção de cultivares. |
topic |
Systematic review Intellectual property Protection of cultivars. Revisión sistemática Propiedad intelectual Protección de cultivares. Revisão sistemática Propriedade intelectual Proteção de cultivares. |
description |
The establishment of adequate standards and principles for the application of norms for the protection of intellectual property rights over cultivars is a fundamental measure for any country, essentially Brazil, one of the richest countries in biodiversity in the world. Thus, the objective of this work was to carry out a systematic review to analyze the scientific production of protection of the main cultivars, to identify existing parameters and methods for the definition of royalty rates and the collection mechanisms adopted. A systematic review was carried out based on articles published in the period of 10 years, from 2009 to 2019, in the scientific bases Scopus and Web of Science. The Boolean terms and operators: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” were explored in the title or summary of scientific articles. 83 documents indexed in the Scopus (37) and Web of Science (46) databases were searched. After processing the data and removing duplicate documents, 43 scientific articles remained. With an average publication of 6.7 publications per year. Average of 10 citations per document. A total of 171 authors and 271 co-authors, with five documents having single authorship and an average of 3.1 authors per article. Thus, a study sample of 17 articles was obtained. the journals analyzed did not provide information on how royalties are taxed, they only reported the type of protection and the cultivars studied. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14231 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14231 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14231 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14231 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14231/12727 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Eduardo José de Souza Silva; Renata Silva-Mann; Crislaine Costa Calazans https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Eduardo José de Souza Silva; Renata Silva-Mann; Crislaine Costa Calazans https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e31710414231 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e31710414231 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e31710414231 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052674728787968 |