Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Eduardo José de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva-Mann, Renata, Calazans, Crislaine Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14231
Resumo: The establishment of adequate standards and principles for the application of norms for the protection of intellectual property rights over cultivars is a fundamental measure for any country, essentially Brazil, one of the richest countries in biodiversity in the world. Thus, the objective of this work was to carry out a systematic review to analyze the scientific production of protection of the main cultivars, to identify existing parameters and methods for the definition of royalty rates and the collection mechanisms adopted. A systematic review was carried out based on articles published in the period of 10 years, from 2009 to 2019, in the scientific bases Scopus and Web of Science. The Boolean terms and operators: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” were explored in the title or summary of scientific articles. 83 documents indexed in the Scopus (37) and Web of Science (46) databases were searched. After processing the data and removing duplicate documents, 43 scientific articles remained. With an average publication of 6.7 publications per year. Average of 10 citations per document. A total of 171 authors and 271 co-authors, with five documents having single authorship and an average of 3.1 authors per article. Thus, a study sample of 17 articles was obtained. the journals analyzed did not provide information on how royalties are taxed, they only reported the type of protection and the cultivars studied.
id UNIFEI_2c52f269e6143087bdb1172c07d63c06
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14231
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysisRegalías para las cultivares, legislación y regulación: Un metaanálisisRoyalties para cultivares, legislação e regulação: Uma meta-análise Systematic reviewIntellectual propertyProtection of cultivars.Revisión sistemáticaPropiedad intelectualProtección de cultivares.Revisão sistemáticaPropriedade intelectualProteção de cultivares.The establishment of adequate standards and principles for the application of norms for the protection of intellectual property rights over cultivars is a fundamental measure for any country, essentially Brazil, one of the richest countries in biodiversity in the world. Thus, the objective of this work was to carry out a systematic review to analyze the scientific production of protection of the main cultivars, to identify existing parameters and methods for the definition of royalty rates and the collection mechanisms adopted. A systematic review was carried out based on articles published in the period of 10 years, from 2009 to 2019, in the scientific bases Scopus and Web of Science. The Boolean terms and operators: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” were explored in the title or summary of scientific articles. 83 documents indexed in the Scopus (37) and Web of Science (46) databases were searched. After processing the data and removing duplicate documents, 43 scientific articles remained. With an average publication of 6.7 publications per year. Average of 10 citations per document. A total of 171 authors and 271 co-authors, with five documents having single authorship and an average of 3.1 authors per article. Thus, a study sample of 17 articles was obtained. the journals analyzed did not provide information on how royalties are taxed, they only reported the type of protection and the cultivars studied.El establecimiento de estándares y principios adecuados para la aplicación de normas de protección de derechos de propiedad intelectual sobre cultivares es una medida fundamental para cualquier país, fundamentalmente Brasil, uno de los países más ricos en biodiversidad del mundo. Así, el objetivo de este trabajo fue realizar una revisión sistemática para analizar la producción científica de protección de los principales cultivares, para identificar los parámetros y métodos existentes para la definición de tasas de regalías y los mecanismos de recaudación adoptados. Se realizó una revisión sistemática a partir de artículos publicados en el período de 10 años, de 2009 a 2019, en las bases científicas Scopus y Web of Science. Los términos y operadores booleanos: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” se analizaron en el título o resumen de los artículos científicos. Se realizaron búsquedas en 83 documentos indexados en las bases Scopus (37) y Web of Science (46). Después de procesar los datos y eliminar documentos duplicados, quedaron 43 artículos científicos. Con una publicación media de 6,7 publicaciones al año. Promedio de 10 citas por documento. Un total de 171 autores y 271 coautores, con cinco documentos de una sola autoría y una media de 3,1 autores por artículo. Así, se obtuvo una muestra de estudio de 17 artículos. las revistas analizadas no proporcionaron información sobre cómo se gravan las regalías, solo informaron el tipo de protección y los cultivares estudiados.O estabelecimento de padrões e princípios para aplicação de normas de proteção de direitos de propriedade intelectual sobre as cultivares é uma medida fundamental a qualquer país, essencialmente ao Brasil, um dos países mais ricos em biodiversidade do mundo. Dessa forma, é objetivo desse trabalho realizar uma revisão sistemática para analisar a produção científica em proteção das principais cultivares protegidas, identificar parâmetros e métodos existentes para definição das taxas de royalties e os mecanismos de cobrança adotados. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática a partir de artigos publicados no período de 10 anos, de 2009 até 2019, nas bases científicas Scopus e Web of Science. Os termos e operadores booleanos: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” foram prospectados em título ou resumo de artigos científicos.  Foram prospectados 83 documentos indexados nas bases Scopus (37) e Web of Science (46). Após o tratamento dos dados e remoção de documentos duplicados restaram 43 artigos científicos. Com uma publicação média de 6,7 publicações por ano. Média de 10 citações por documento. Um total 171 autores e 271 co-autores foram elencados, sendo cinco documentos de autoria única e em média de 3,1 autores por artigo. Após o processo de refinamento, obteve-se uma amostra de estudo de 17 artigos. Os periódicos analisados não forneceram informações de como são taxados os royalties, apenas relataram o tipo de proteção e as cultivares estudadas.Research, Society and Development2021-04-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1423110.33448/rsd-v10i4.14231Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e31710414231Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e31710414231Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e317104142312525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14231/12727Copyright (c) 2021 Eduardo José de Souza Silva; Renata Silva-Mann; Crislaine Costa Calazanshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Eduardo José de Souza Silva-Mann, Renata Calazans, Crislaine Costa 2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14231Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:24.200209Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis
Regalías para las cultivares, legislación y regulación: Un metaanálisis
Royalties para cultivares, legislação e regulação: Uma meta-análise
title Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis
spellingShingle Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis
Silva, Eduardo José de Souza
Systematic review
Intellectual property
Protection of cultivars.
Revisión sistemática
Propiedad intelectual
Protección de cultivares.
Revisão sistemática
Propriedade intelectual
Proteção de cultivares.
title_short Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis
title_full Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis
title_sort Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis
author Silva, Eduardo José de Souza
author_facet Silva, Eduardo José de Souza
Silva-Mann, Renata
Calazans, Crislaine Costa
author_role author
author2 Silva-Mann, Renata
Calazans, Crislaine Costa
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Eduardo José de Souza
Silva-Mann, Renata
Calazans, Crislaine Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Systematic review
Intellectual property
Protection of cultivars.
Revisión sistemática
Propiedad intelectual
Protección de cultivares.
Revisão sistemática
Propriedade intelectual
Proteção de cultivares.
topic Systematic review
Intellectual property
Protection of cultivars.
Revisión sistemática
Propiedad intelectual
Protección de cultivares.
Revisão sistemática
Propriedade intelectual
Proteção de cultivares.
description The establishment of adequate standards and principles for the application of norms for the protection of intellectual property rights over cultivars is a fundamental measure for any country, essentially Brazil, one of the richest countries in biodiversity in the world. Thus, the objective of this work was to carry out a systematic review to analyze the scientific production of protection of the main cultivars, to identify existing parameters and methods for the definition of royalty rates and the collection mechanisms adopted. A systematic review was carried out based on articles published in the period of 10 years, from 2009 to 2019, in the scientific bases Scopus and Web of Science. The Boolean terms and operators: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” were explored in the title or summary of scientific articles. 83 documents indexed in the Scopus (37) and Web of Science (46) databases were searched. After processing the data and removing duplicate documents, 43 scientific articles remained. With an average publication of 6.7 publications per year. Average of 10 citations per document. A total of 171 authors and 271 co-authors, with five documents having single authorship and an average of 3.1 authors per article. Thus, a study sample of 17 articles was obtained. the journals analyzed did not provide information on how royalties are taxed, they only reported the type of protection and the cultivars studied.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14231
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14231
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14231
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14231
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14231/12727
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Eduardo José de Souza Silva; Renata Silva-Mann; Crislaine Costa Calazans
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Eduardo José de Souza Silva; Renata Silva-Mann; Crislaine Costa Calazans
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e31710414231
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e31710414231
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e31710414231
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052674728787968