Non-invasive versus invasive method to measure blood pressure in rodents: an integrative literature review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30789 |
Resumo: | Blood pressure (BP) measurement is the main monitoring parameter related to the cardiac system, and the use of animals is vital for understanding the physiological mechanism and studying pathologies related to this system. The most recommended measurement procedures in rodents in the literature are: The non-invasive method (tail cuff) and the invasive methods (catheter with fluid and telemetry). The objective of this study was to verify the main arterial measurement techniques in rodents, evaluate their positive and negative points and classify which is the most viable and effective technique for initial experimental tests. An integrative literature review was carried out using the descriptors and their respective synonyms, “real time device”, “blood pressure measurements”, “rats” using the Boolean “AND” in PubMed, Scielo and Medline databases. As inclusion criteria, articles that addressed the aforementioned theme, in Portuguese, English or Spanish, complete, from experimental trials on rodents, published within the last 21 years were adopted. As exclusion criteria were articles that were not available for full reading and studies that did not use rodents as a sample. Thirteen articles were selected that met the criteria. The results demonstrate that invasive methods can be advantageous for continuous measurements, but that it would be preferable to use the non-invasive method as it is safer and easier to perform. It is concluded that for initial experimental trials, the procedure to be chosen would be the non-invasive method, tail cuff. |
id |
UNIFEI_323c372b857743595fdf0c5c9687e888 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30789 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Non-invasive versus invasive method to measure blood pressure in rodents: an integrative literature reviewMétodo no invasivo versus método invasivo para medir la presión arterial en roedores: una revisión bibliográfica integradoraMétodo não invasivo versus método invasivo para medição de pressão arterial em roedores: uma revisão integrativa da literaturaMedição de pressão arterialRoedoresMétodos invasivosMétodos não invasivos.Medición de la presión arterialRoedoresMétodos invasivosMétodos no invasivos.Blood pressure measurementRodentsInvasive methodsNon-Invasive methods.Blood pressure (BP) measurement is the main monitoring parameter related to the cardiac system, and the use of animals is vital for understanding the physiological mechanism and studying pathologies related to this system. The most recommended measurement procedures in rodents in the literature are: The non-invasive method (tail cuff) and the invasive methods (catheter with fluid and telemetry). The objective of this study was to verify the main arterial measurement techniques in rodents, evaluate their positive and negative points and classify which is the most viable and effective technique for initial experimental tests. An integrative literature review was carried out using the descriptors and their respective synonyms, “real time device”, “blood pressure measurements”, “rats” using the Boolean “AND” in PubMed, Scielo and Medline databases. As inclusion criteria, articles that addressed the aforementioned theme, in Portuguese, English or Spanish, complete, from experimental trials on rodents, published within the last 21 years were adopted. As exclusion criteria were articles that were not available for full reading and studies that did not use rodents as a sample. Thirteen articles were selected that met the criteria. The results demonstrate that invasive methods can be advantageous for continuous measurements, but that it would be preferable to use the non-invasive method as it is safer and easier to perform. It is concluded that for initial experimental trials, the procedure to be chosen would be the non-invasive method, tail cuff.La medición de la presión arterial (PA) es el principal parámetro de monitorización relacionado con el sistema cardíaco, y el uso de animales es vital para comprender el mecanismo fisiológico y estudiar las patologías relacionadas con este sistema. Los procedimientos de calibración en roedores más recomendados por la literatura son: El método no invasivo (manguito de cola) y los métodos invasivos (catéter de fluidos y telemetría). El objetivo de este estudio fue verificar las principales técnicas de medición arterial en roedores, evaluar sus puntos positivos y negativos y clasificar qué técnica es la más viable y eficaz para los ensayos experimentales iniciales. Se llevó a cabo una revisión bibliográfica integradora utilizando los descriptores y sus respectivos sinónimos, “real time device”, “blood pressure measurements”, “rats” utilizando el booleano "AND" en las bases de datos PubMed, Scielo y Medline. Los criterios de inclusión fueron artículos que abordaran el tema mencionado, en portugués, inglés o español, completos, de ensayos experimentales en roedores, publicados en los últimos 21 años. Los criterios de exclusión fueron los artículos que no estaban disponibles para la lectura del texto completo y los estudios que no utilizaban roedores como muestra. Se seleccionaron trece artículos que cumplían los criterios. Los resultados muestran que los métodos invasivos pueden ser ventajosos para las mediciones continuas, pero que sería preferible utilizar el método no invasivo porque es más seguro y fácil de realizar. Se concluye que para los primeros ensayos experimentales, el procedimiento a elegir sería el método no invasivo, el manguito de cola.A aferição da pressão arterial (PA) é o principal parâmetro de monitoramento relacionado ao sistema cardíaco, e o uso de animais é vital para a compreensão do mecanismo fisiológico e estudo de patologias relacionadas a esse sistema. Os procedimentos de aferição em roedores mais recomendados pela literatura são: O método não invasivo (punho de cauda) e os métodos invasivos (cateter com fluido e telemetria). O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar as principais técnicas de medição arterial em roedores, avaliar seus pontos positivos, negativos e classificar qual a técnica mais viável e eficaz para ensaios experimentais iniciais. Foi realizado uma revisão integrativa da literatura utilizando os descritores e seus respectivos sinônimos, “real time device”, “blood pressure measurements”, “rats” fazendo o uso do booleano “AND” nas bases de dados PubMed, Scielo e Medline. Como critérios de inclusão foram adotados artigos que abordassem a temática supracitada, em português, inglês ou espanhol, completos, de ensaios experimentais em roedores, publicados com no máximo nos últimos 21 anos. Os critérios de exclusão foram artigos não disponíveis para leitura na integra e estudos que não utilizassem roedores como amostra. Foram selecionados 13 artigos que atendiam aos critérios. Os resultados demonstram que os métodos invasivos podem ser vantajosos para medições contínuas, mas que preferencialmente seria recomendado utilizar o método não invasivo por ser mais seguro e de fácil execução. Conclui-se que para ensaios experimentais iniciais, o procedimento a ser escolhido seria o método não invasivo, punho de cauda.Research, Society and Development2022-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3078910.33448/rsd-v11i8.30789Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e4911830789Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e4911830789Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e49118307892525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30789/26259Copyright (c) 2022 Mariana da Palma Valério; Silvia Cristina Martini; Silvia Regina Matos da Silva Boschi; Terigi Augusto Scardovelli; Alessandro Pereira da Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessValério, Mariana da PalmaMartini, Silvia Cristina Boschi, Silvia Regina Matos da Silva Scardovelli, Terigi Augusto Silva, Alessandro Pereira da 2022-07-01T13:34:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30789Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:47:25.303982Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Non-invasive versus invasive method to measure blood pressure in rodents: an integrative literature review Método no invasivo versus método invasivo para medir la presión arterial en roedores: una revisión bibliográfica integradora Método não invasivo versus método invasivo para medição de pressão arterial em roedores: uma revisão integrativa da literatura |
title |
Non-invasive versus invasive method to measure blood pressure in rodents: an integrative literature review |
spellingShingle |
Non-invasive versus invasive method to measure blood pressure in rodents: an integrative literature review Valério, Mariana da Palma Medição de pressão arterial Roedores Métodos invasivos Métodos não invasivos. Medición de la presión arterial Roedores Métodos invasivos Métodos no invasivos. Blood pressure measurement Rodents Invasive methods Non-Invasive methods. |
title_short |
Non-invasive versus invasive method to measure blood pressure in rodents: an integrative literature review |
title_full |
Non-invasive versus invasive method to measure blood pressure in rodents: an integrative literature review |
title_fullStr |
Non-invasive versus invasive method to measure blood pressure in rodents: an integrative literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-invasive versus invasive method to measure blood pressure in rodents: an integrative literature review |
title_sort |
Non-invasive versus invasive method to measure blood pressure in rodents: an integrative literature review |
author |
Valério, Mariana da Palma |
author_facet |
Valério, Mariana da Palma Martini, Silvia Cristina Boschi, Silvia Regina Matos da Silva Scardovelli, Terigi Augusto Silva, Alessandro Pereira da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martini, Silvia Cristina Boschi, Silvia Regina Matos da Silva Scardovelli, Terigi Augusto Silva, Alessandro Pereira da |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Valério, Mariana da Palma Martini, Silvia Cristina Boschi, Silvia Regina Matos da Silva Scardovelli, Terigi Augusto Silva, Alessandro Pereira da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Medição de pressão arterial Roedores Métodos invasivos Métodos não invasivos. Medición de la presión arterial Roedores Métodos invasivos Métodos no invasivos. Blood pressure measurement Rodents Invasive methods Non-Invasive methods. |
topic |
Medição de pressão arterial Roedores Métodos invasivos Métodos não invasivos. Medición de la presión arterial Roedores Métodos invasivos Métodos no invasivos. Blood pressure measurement Rodents Invasive methods Non-Invasive methods. |
description |
Blood pressure (BP) measurement is the main monitoring parameter related to the cardiac system, and the use of animals is vital for understanding the physiological mechanism and studying pathologies related to this system. The most recommended measurement procedures in rodents in the literature are: The non-invasive method (tail cuff) and the invasive methods (catheter with fluid and telemetry). The objective of this study was to verify the main arterial measurement techniques in rodents, evaluate their positive and negative points and classify which is the most viable and effective technique for initial experimental tests. An integrative literature review was carried out using the descriptors and their respective synonyms, “real time device”, “blood pressure measurements”, “rats” using the Boolean “AND” in PubMed, Scielo and Medline databases. As inclusion criteria, articles that addressed the aforementioned theme, in Portuguese, English or Spanish, complete, from experimental trials on rodents, published within the last 21 years were adopted. As exclusion criteria were articles that were not available for full reading and studies that did not use rodents as a sample. Thirteen articles were selected that met the criteria. The results demonstrate that invasive methods can be advantageous for continuous measurements, but that it would be preferable to use the non-invasive method as it is safer and easier to perform. It is concluded that for initial experimental trials, the procedure to be chosen would be the non-invasive method, tail cuff. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30789 10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30789 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30789 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30789 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30789/26259 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e4911830789 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e4911830789 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e4911830789 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052767697633280 |