Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19100 |
Resumo: | Human coronaviruses tend to persist on dry surfaces for 2 to 9 days, necessitating infection control and prevention protocols using biocidal agents. This systematic review aimed to answer the following focused question: What is the effectiveness of disinfectants on inanimate surfaces against the coronavirus? The acronym “PICOS” was used to represent the eligibility of studies: P = population (inanimate surfaces contaminated with coronavirus); I = intervention (disinfectants); C = comparison (studies with any type of control or studies that used a control group); O = outcomes (coronavirus inactivation on different types of inanimate surfaces); and S = study design (in vitro studies). The seven databases used were PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and Cochrane Library. The gray literature was also used as an information source through Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Open Gray. The search resulted in 6639 references, and 21 articles were used in the qualitative analysis. The results showed that all studied biocidal solutions provided some degree of decontamination and inactivation of the coronavirus, depending on the concentration of the disinfectant solution, the time of exposure of the product to the pathogen and the type of surface. |
id |
UNIFEI_330f51c229a3b727c27a18ccbc7d6adc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19100 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic reviewEficacia de la desinfección de superfícies inanimadas contra coronavirus: una revisión sistemáticaEficácia de desinfectar superfícies inanimadas contra coronavirus: uma revisão sistemáticaSARS-CoV-2DesinfectantesSuperficie InanimadaAgente BiocidaCoronavirus.SARS-CoV-2DesinfetantesSuperficie InanimadaAgente BiocidaCoronavírus.SARS-CoV-2DisinfectantsInanimate SurfaceBiocidal AgentCoronavirus.Human coronaviruses tend to persist on dry surfaces for 2 to 9 days, necessitating infection control and prevention protocols using biocidal agents. This systematic review aimed to answer the following focused question: What is the effectiveness of disinfectants on inanimate surfaces against the coronavirus? The acronym “PICOS” was used to represent the eligibility of studies: P = population (inanimate surfaces contaminated with coronavirus); I = intervention (disinfectants); C = comparison (studies with any type of control or studies that used a control group); O = outcomes (coronavirus inactivation on different types of inanimate surfaces); and S = study design (in vitro studies). The seven databases used were PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and Cochrane Library. The gray literature was also used as an information source through Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Open Gray. The search resulted in 6639 references, and 21 articles were used in the qualitative analysis. The results showed that all studied biocidal solutions provided some degree of decontamination and inactivation of the coronavirus, depending on the concentration of the disinfectant solution, the time of exposure of the product to the pathogen and the type of surface.Los coronavirus humanos tienden a persistir en superficies secas durante 2 a 9 días, lo que requiere protocolos de prevención y control de infecciones con agentes biocidas. Esta revisión sistemática tuvo como objetivo responder la siguiente pregunta focalizada: ¿Cuál es la efectividad de los desinfectantes en superficies inanimadas contra el coronavirus? Se utilizó el acrónimo “PICOS” para representar la elegibilidad de los estudios: P = población (superficies inanimadas contaminadas con coronavirus); I = intervención (desinfectantes); C = comparación (estudios con cualquier tipo de control o estudios que utilizaron un grupo de control); O = resultados (inactivación del coronavirus en diferentes tipos de superficies inanimadas); y S = diseño del estudio (estudios in vitro). Las siete bases de datos utilizadas fueron PubMed / Medline, EMBASE, Literatura de Ciencias de la Salud de América Latina y el Caribe (LILACS), Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO y Cochrane Library. La literatura gris también se utilizó como fuente de información a través de Google Scholar, ProQuest y Open Gray. La búsqueda resultó en 6.639 referencias y se utilizaron 21 artículos en el análisis cualitativo. Los resultados mostraron que todas las soluciones biocidas estudiadas proporcionaron algún grado de descontaminación e inactivación del coronavirus, dependiendo de la concentración de la solución desinfectante, el tiempo de exposición del producto al patógeno y el tipo de superficie.Os coronavírus humanos tendem a persistir em superfícies secas por 2 a 9 dias, necessitando de controle de infecção e protocolos de prevenção usando agentes biocidas. Esta revisão sistemática teve como objetivo responder à seguinte questão focada: Qual a eficácia dos desinfetantes em superfícies inanimadas contra o coronavírus? A sigla “PICOS” foi utilizada para representar a elegibilidade dos estudos: P = população (superfícies inanimadas contaminadas com coronavírus); I = intervenção (desinfetantes); C = comparação (estudos com qualquer tipo de controle ou estudos que utilizaram grupo controle); O = desfechos (inativação do coronavírus em diferentes tipos de superfícies inanimadas); e S = desenho do estudo (estudos in vitro). As sete bases de dados utilizadas foram PubMed / Medline, EMBASE, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO e Biblioteca Cochrane. A literatura cinzenta também foi usada como fonte de informação por meio do Google Scholar, ProQuest e Open Gray. A busca resultou em 6.639 referências, e 21 artigos foram utilizados na análise qualitativa. Os resultados mostraram que todas as soluções biocidas estudadas proporcionaram algum grau de descontaminação e inativação do coronavírus, dependendo da concentração da solução desinfetante, do tempo de exposição do produto ao patógeno e do tipo de superfície.Research, Society and Development2021-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1910010.33448/rsd-v10i10.19100Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e452101019100Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e452101019100Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e4521010191002525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19100/17014Copyright (c) 2021 Isabela Bittencourt Basso; Angela Graciela Deliga Schroder; Rosane Sampaio Santos; Glória Cortz Ravazzi; Flavio Magno Gonçalves; José Stechman-Neto; Bianca Simone Zeigelboim; Bruna Povh; Cristiano Miranda de Araujo; Odilon Guariza-Filhohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBasso, Isabela Bittencourt Schroder, Angela Graciela Deliga Santos, Rosane SampaioRavazzi, Glória Cortz Gonçalves, Flavio Magno Stechman-Neto, JoséZeigelboim, Bianca Simone Povh, BrunaAraujo, Cristiano Miranda de Guariza-Filho, Odilon2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19100Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:04.584080Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review Eficacia de la desinfección de superfícies inanimadas contra coronavirus: una revisión sistemática Eficácia de desinfectar superfícies inanimadas contra coronavirus: uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review Basso, Isabela Bittencourt SARS-CoV-2 Desinfectantes Superficie Inanimada Agente Biocida Coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2 Desinfetantes Superficie Inanimada Agente Biocida Coronavírus. SARS-CoV-2 Disinfectants Inanimate Surface Biocidal Agent Coronavirus. |
title_short |
Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review |
title_full |
Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review |
author |
Basso, Isabela Bittencourt |
author_facet |
Basso, Isabela Bittencourt Schroder, Angela Graciela Deliga Santos, Rosane Sampaio Ravazzi, Glória Cortz Gonçalves, Flavio Magno Stechman-Neto, José Zeigelboim, Bianca Simone Povh, Bruna Araujo, Cristiano Miranda de Guariza-Filho, Odilon |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schroder, Angela Graciela Deliga Santos, Rosane Sampaio Ravazzi, Glória Cortz Gonçalves, Flavio Magno Stechman-Neto, José Zeigelboim, Bianca Simone Povh, Bruna Araujo, Cristiano Miranda de Guariza-Filho, Odilon |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Basso, Isabela Bittencourt Schroder, Angela Graciela Deliga Santos, Rosane Sampaio Ravazzi, Glória Cortz Gonçalves, Flavio Magno Stechman-Neto, José Zeigelboim, Bianca Simone Povh, Bruna Araujo, Cristiano Miranda de Guariza-Filho, Odilon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
SARS-CoV-2 Desinfectantes Superficie Inanimada Agente Biocida Coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2 Desinfetantes Superficie Inanimada Agente Biocida Coronavírus. SARS-CoV-2 Disinfectants Inanimate Surface Biocidal Agent Coronavirus. |
topic |
SARS-CoV-2 Desinfectantes Superficie Inanimada Agente Biocida Coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2 Desinfetantes Superficie Inanimada Agente Biocida Coronavírus. SARS-CoV-2 Disinfectants Inanimate Surface Biocidal Agent Coronavirus. |
description |
Human coronaviruses tend to persist on dry surfaces for 2 to 9 days, necessitating infection control and prevention protocols using biocidal agents. This systematic review aimed to answer the following focused question: What is the effectiveness of disinfectants on inanimate surfaces against the coronavirus? The acronym “PICOS” was used to represent the eligibility of studies: P = population (inanimate surfaces contaminated with coronavirus); I = intervention (disinfectants); C = comparison (studies with any type of control or studies that used a control group); O = outcomes (coronavirus inactivation on different types of inanimate surfaces); and S = study design (in vitro studies). The seven databases used were PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and Cochrane Library. The gray literature was also used as an information source through Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Open Gray. The search resulted in 6639 references, and 21 articles were used in the qualitative analysis. The results showed that all studied biocidal solutions provided some degree of decontamination and inactivation of the coronavirus, depending on the concentration of the disinfectant solution, the time of exposure of the product to the pathogen and the type of surface. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19100 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19100 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19100 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19100 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19100/17014 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e452101019100 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e452101019100 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e452101019100 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052686769586176 |