Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Basso, Isabela Bittencourt
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Schroder, Angela Graciela Deliga, Santos, Rosane Sampaio, Ravazzi, Glória Cortz, Gonçalves, Flavio Magno, Stechman-Neto, José, Zeigelboim, Bianca Simone, Povh, Bruna, Araujo, Cristiano Miranda de, Guariza-Filho, Odilon
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19100
Resumo: Human coronaviruses tend to persist on dry surfaces for 2 to 9 days, necessitating infection control and prevention protocols using biocidal agents. This systematic review aimed to answer the following focused question: What is the effectiveness of disinfectants on inanimate surfaces against the coronavirus? The acronym “PICOS” was used to represent the eligibility of studies: P = population (inanimate surfaces contaminated with coronavirus); I = intervention (disinfectants); C = comparison (studies with any type of control or studies that used a control group); O = outcomes (coronavirus inactivation on different types of inanimate surfaces); and S = study design (in vitro studies). The seven databases used were PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and Cochrane Library. The gray literature was also used as an information source through Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Open Gray. The search resulted in 6639 references, and 21 articles were used in the qualitative analysis. The results showed that all studied biocidal solutions provided some degree of decontamination and inactivation of the coronavirus, depending on the concentration of the disinfectant solution, the time of exposure of the product to the pathogen and the type of surface.
id UNIFEI_330f51c229a3b727c27a18ccbc7d6adc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19100
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic reviewEficacia de la desinfección de superfícies inanimadas contra coronavirus: una revisión sistemáticaEficácia de desinfectar superfícies inanimadas contra coronavirus: uma revisão sistemáticaSARS-CoV-2DesinfectantesSuperficie InanimadaAgente BiocidaCoronavirus.SARS-CoV-2DesinfetantesSuperficie InanimadaAgente BiocidaCoronavírus.SARS-CoV-2DisinfectantsInanimate SurfaceBiocidal AgentCoronavirus.Human coronaviruses tend to persist on dry surfaces for 2 to 9 days, necessitating infection control and prevention protocols using biocidal agents. This systematic review aimed to answer the following focused question: What is the effectiveness of disinfectants on inanimate surfaces against the coronavirus? The acronym “PICOS” was used to represent the eligibility of studies: P = population (inanimate surfaces contaminated with coronavirus); I = intervention (disinfectants); C = comparison (studies with any type of control or studies that used a control group); O = outcomes (coronavirus inactivation on different types of inanimate surfaces); and S = study design (in vitro studies). The seven databases used were PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and Cochrane Library. The gray literature was also used as an information source through Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Open Gray. The search resulted in 6639 references, and 21 articles were used in the qualitative analysis. The results showed that all studied biocidal solutions provided some degree of decontamination and inactivation of the coronavirus, depending on the concentration of the disinfectant solution, the time of exposure of the product to the pathogen and the type of surface.Los coronavirus humanos tienden a persistir en superficies secas durante 2 a 9 días, lo que requiere protocolos de prevención y control de infecciones con agentes biocidas. Esta revisión sistemática tuvo como objetivo responder la siguiente pregunta focalizada: ¿Cuál es la efectividad de los desinfectantes en superficies inanimadas contra el coronavirus? Se utilizó el acrónimo “PICOS” para representar la elegibilidad de los estudios: P = población (superficies inanimadas contaminadas con coronavirus); I = intervención (desinfectantes); C = comparación (estudios con cualquier tipo de control o estudios que utilizaron un grupo de control); O = resultados (inactivación del coronavirus en diferentes tipos de superficies inanimadas); y S = diseño del estudio (estudios in vitro). Las siete bases de datos utilizadas fueron PubMed / Medline, EMBASE, Literatura de Ciencias de la Salud de América Latina y el Caribe (LILACS), Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO y Cochrane Library. La literatura gris también se utilizó como fuente de información a través de Google Scholar, ProQuest y Open Gray. La búsqueda resultó en 6.639 referencias y se utilizaron 21 artículos en el análisis cualitativo. Los resultados mostraron que todas las soluciones biocidas estudiadas proporcionaron algún grado de descontaminación e inactivación del coronavirus, dependiendo de la concentración de la solución desinfectante, el tiempo de exposición del producto al patógeno y el tipo de superficie.Os coronavírus humanos tendem a persistir em superfícies secas por 2 a 9 dias, necessitando de controle de infecção e protocolos de prevenção usando agentes biocidas. Esta revisão sistemática teve como objetivo responder à seguinte questão focada: Qual a eficácia dos desinfetantes em superfícies inanimadas contra o coronavírus? A sigla “PICOS” foi utilizada para representar a elegibilidade dos estudos: P = população (superfícies inanimadas contaminadas com coronavírus); I = intervenção (desinfetantes); C = comparação (estudos com qualquer tipo de controle ou estudos que utilizaram grupo controle); O = desfechos (inativação do coronavírus em diferentes tipos de superfícies inanimadas); e S = desenho do estudo (estudos in vitro). As sete bases de dados utilizadas foram PubMed / Medline, EMBASE, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO e Biblioteca Cochrane. A literatura cinzenta também foi usada como fonte de informação por meio do Google Scholar, ProQuest e Open Gray. A busca resultou em 6.639 referências, e 21 artigos foram utilizados na análise qualitativa. Os resultados mostraram que todas as soluções biocidas estudadas proporcionaram algum grau de descontaminação e inativação do coronavírus, dependendo da concentração da solução desinfetante, do tempo de exposição do produto ao patógeno e do tipo de superfície.Research, Society and Development2021-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1910010.33448/rsd-v10i10.19100Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e452101019100Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e452101019100Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e4521010191002525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19100/17014Copyright (c) 2021 Isabela Bittencourt Basso; Angela Graciela Deliga Schroder; Rosane Sampaio Santos; Glória Cortz Ravazzi; Flavio Magno Gonçalves; José Stechman-Neto; Bianca Simone Zeigelboim; Bruna Povh; Cristiano Miranda de Araujo; Odilon Guariza-Filhohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBasso, Isabela Bittencourt Schroder, Angela Graciela Deliga Santos, Rosane SampaioRavazzi, Glória Cortz Gonçalves, Flavio Magno Stechman-Neto, JoséZeigelboim, Bianca Simone Povh, BrunaAraujo, Cristiano Miranda de Guariza-Filho, Odilon2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19100Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:04.584080Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review
Eficacia de la desinfección de superfícies inanimadas contra coronavirus: una revisión sistemática
Eficácia de desinfectar superfícies inanimadas contra coronavirus: uma revisão sistemática
title Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review
spellingShingle Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review
Basso, Isabela Bittencourt
SARS-CoV-2
Desinfectantes
Superficie Inanimada
Agente Biocida
Coronavirus.
SARS-CoV-2
Desinfetantes
Superficie Inanimada
Agente Biocida
Coronavírus.
SARS-CoV-2
Disinfectants
Inanimate Surface
Biocidal Agent
Coronavirus.
title_short Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review
title_full Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review
title_sort Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: a systematic review
author Basso, Isabela Bittencourt
author_facet Basso, Isabela Bittencourt
Schroder, Angela Graciela Deliga
Santos, Rosane Sampaio
Ravazzi, Glória Cortz
Gonçalves, Flavio Magno
Stechman-Neto, José
Zeigelboim, Bianca Simone
Povh, Bruna
Araujo, Cristiano Miranda de
Guariza-Filho, Odilon
author_role author
author2 Schroder, Angela Graciela Deliga
Santos, Rosane Sampaio
Ravazzi, Glória Cortz
Gonçalves, Flavio Magno
Stechman-Neto, José
Zeigelboim, Bianca Simone
Povh, Bruna
Araujo, Cristiano Miranda de
Guariza-Filho, Odilon
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Basso, Isabela Bittencourt
Schroder, Angela Graciela Deliga
Santos, Rosane Sampaio
Ravazzi, Glória Cortz
Gonçalves, Flavio Magno
Stechman-Neto, José
Zeigelboim, Bianca Simone
Povh, Bruna
Araujo, Cristiano Miranda de
Guariza-Filho, Odilon
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv SARS-CoV-2
Desinfectantes
Superficie Inanimada
Agente Biocida
Coronavirus.
SARS-CoV-2
Desinfetantes
Superficie Inanimada
Agente Biocida
Coronavírus.
SARS-CoV-2
Disinfectants
Inanimate Surface
Biocidal Agent
Coronavirus.
topic SARS-CoV-2
Desinfectantes
Superficie Inanimada
Agente Biocida
Coronavirus.
SARS-CoV-2
Desinfetantes
Superficie Inanimada
Agente Biocida
Coronavírus.
SARS-CoV-2
Disinfectants
Inanimate Surface
Biocidal Agent
Coronavirus.
description Human coronaviruses tend to persist on dry surfaces for 2 to 9 days, necessitating infection control and prevention protocols using biocidal agents. This systematic review aimed to answer the following focused question: What is the effectiveness of disinfectants on inanimate surfaces against the coronavirus? The acronym “PICOS” was used to represent the eligibility of studies: P = population (inanimate surfaces contaminated with coronavirus); I = intervention (disinfectants); C = comparison (studies with any type of control or studies that used a control group); O = outcomes (coronavirus inactivation on different types of inanimate surfaces); and S = study design (in vitro studies). The seven databases used were PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and Cochrane Library. The gray literature was also used as an information source through Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Open Gray. The search resulted in 6639 references, and 21 articles were used in the qualitative analysis. The results showed that all studied biocidal solutions provided some degree of decontamination and inactivation of the coronavirus, depending on the concentration of the disinfectant solution, the time of exposure of the product to the pathogen and the type of surface.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19100
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19100
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19100
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19100
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19100/17014
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e452101019100
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e452101019100
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e452101019100
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052686769586176