Arbitration as a means of social pacification of conflicts
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21541 |
Resumo: | This article aims to analyze the institutes of the appropriate means of conflict resolution provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure 2015, especially arbitration. Through a technical approach, it is intended to demonstrate that arbitration has existed in the legal system since 1996, but only with the advent of the new Code of Civil Procedure has become more relevant adoption of the institute. Its applicability is verified in complex cases, besides demonstrating its importance with regard to the scope of social pacification because it is a method of heterocomposition of conflicts, in order to analyze the benefits of its use and its efficiency applied to the specific case. It analyses the issue of the full arbitration clause and the empty arbitration clause and its differences is addressed. It is also aimed at studying the appropriate means of resolving conflicts in the face of social problems today and their importance with regard to the contribution to a reduction of processes within the judiciary. It was opted for the deductive methodology based on bibliographic research through doctrine as well as infraconstitutional legislation. |
id |
UNIFEI_4427d5661b7257da5585801f82894234 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21541 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Arbitration as a means of social pacification of conflictsArbitraje como medio de pacificación social de los conflictosArbitragem como meio de pacificação social dos conflitosArbitrageSocial pacificationMediación.ArbitragemPacificação socialMediação.ArbitrationSocial pacificationMediation.This article aims to analyze the institutes of the appropriate means of conflict resolution provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure 2015, especially arbitration. Through a technical approach, it is intended to demonstrate that arbitration has existed in the legal system since 1996, but only with the advent of the new Code of Civil Procedure has become more relevant adoption of the institute. Its applicability is verified in complex cases, besides demonstrating its importance with regard to the scope of social pacification because it is a method of heterocomposition of conflicts, in order to analyze the benefits of its use and its efficiency applied to the specific case. It analyses the issue of the full arbitration clause and the empty arbitration clause and its differences is addressed. It is also aimed at studying the appropriate means of resolving conflicts in the face of social problems today and their importance with regard to the contribution to a reduction of processes within the judiciary. It was opted for the deductive methodology based on bibliographic research through doctrine as well as infraconstitutional legislation.Este artículo busca analizar los institutos de los medios adecuados de resolución de conflictos previstos en el Código procesal civil de 2015, especialmente el arbitraje. A través de un enfoque técnico, se pretende demostrar que la arbitraje ha existido en el sistema legal desde 1996, pero solo con el advenimiento del nuevo Código de Procedimiento Civil se ha vuelto más relevante la adopción del instituto. Su aplicabilidad se verifica en casos complejos, además de demostrar su importancia con respecto al alcance de la pacificación social porque es un método de heterocomposición de conflictos, con el fin de analizar los beneficios de su uso y su eficiencia aplicada al caso específico. Analiza la cuestión de la cláusula de arbitraje completa y la cláusula de arbitraje vacía, así como sus diferencias. También tiene como objetivo estudiar los medios adecuados para resolver los conflictos frente a los problemas sociales actuales y su importancia con respecto a la contribución a una reducción de los procesos dentro del poder judicial. Se optó por la metodología deductiva basada en la investigación bibliográfica a través de la doctrina así como de la legislación infraconstitucional.O presente artigo busca analisar os institutos dos meios adequados de solução de conflitos previstos no Código de Processo Civil de 2015, especialmente a arbitragem. Através de uma abordagem técnica, pretende-se demonstrar que a arbitragem existe no ordenamento jurídico desde 1996, porém apenas com o advento do novo Código de Processo Civil é que se tornou mais relevante adoção do instituto. Verifica-se a sua aplicabilidade a casos complexos, além de demonstrar sua importância no que diz respeito ao alcance da pacificação social porquanto trata-se de método de heterocomposição dos conflitos, de modo a analisar os benefícios de sua utilização e a sua eficiência aplicada ao caso concreto. Analisa-se a questão da cláusula arbitral cheia e da cláusula arbitral vazia bem como suas diferenças. Também se objetiva o estudo dos meios adequados de solução de conflitos diante dos problemas sociais da atualidade e a sua importância no que diz respeito à contribuição para uma diminuição de processos no âmbito do poder judiciário. Optou-se pela metodologia dedutiva com base em pesquisa bibliográfica através de doutrina bem como de legislação infraconstitucional.Research, Society and Development2021-10-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2154110.33448/rsd-v10i13.21541Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e462101321541Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e462101321541Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e4621013215412525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21541/19105Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandra Frei Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Alessandra Frei 2021-11-21T18:26:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21541Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:56.215902Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Arbitration as a means of social pacification of conflicts Arbitraje como medio de pacificación social de los conflictos Arbitragem como meio de pacificação social dos conflitos |
title |
Arbitration as a means of social pacification of conflicts |
spellingShingle |
Arbitration as a means of social pacification of conflicts Silva, Alessandra Frei Arbitrage Social pacification Mediación. Arbitragem Pacificação social Mediação. Arbitration Social pacification Mediation. |
title_short |
Arbitration as a means of social pacification of conflicts |
title_full |
Arbitration as a means of social pacification of conflicts |
title_fullStr |
Arbitration as a means of social pacification of conflicts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Arbitration as a means of social pacification of conflicts |
title_sort |
Arbitration as a means of social pacification of conflicts |
author |
Silva, Alessandra Frei |
author_facet |
Silva, Alessandra Frei |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Alessandra Frei |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arbitrage Social pacification Mediación. Arbitragem Pacificação social Mediação. Arbitration Social pacification Mediation. |
topic |
Arbitrage Social pacification Mediación. Arbitragem Pacificação social Mediação. Arbitration Social pacification Mediation. |
description |
This article aims to analyze the institutes of the appropriate means of conflict resolution provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure 2015, especially arbitration. Through a technical approach, it is intended to demonstrate that arbitration has existed in the legal system since 1996, but only with the advent of the new Code of Civil Procedure has become more relevant adoption of the institute. Its applicability is verified in complex cases, besides demonstrating its importance with regard to the scope of social pacification because it is a method of heterocomposition of conflicts, in order to analyze the benefits of its use and its efficiency applied to the specific case. It analyses the issue of the full arbitration clause and the empty arbitration clause and its differences is addressed. It is also aimed at studying the appropriate means of resolving conflicts in the face of social problems today and their importance with regard to the contribution to a reduction of processes within the judiciary. It was opted for the deductive methodology based on bibliographic research through doctrine as well as infraconstitutional legislation. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21541 10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21541 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21541 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21541 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21541/19105 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandra Frei Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandra Frei Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e462101321541 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e462101321541 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e462101321541 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052809026207744 |