Argumentation in high school from inquiry-based experimentation in Chemistry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23540 |
Resumo: | Research in Science Education has been recommending attention to argumentative practices. The challenge is to look for activities that can stimulate this type of practice so that the students talk science, since it is considered to be beneficial to conceptual understanding and provide students with the ability to think critically in a scientific context. In this paper, it is discussed how 20 activities with inquiry-type experiments in chemistry can promote argumentation in high school students in the chemistry laboratory. This kind of experimentation approach give the students the opportunity to learn and appreciate the process of science. The activities were categorized according to the level of proximity to an investigative activity and also their degree of openness. The discourses during the activities were analyzed in order to identify arguments, according to Toulmin's argument pattern. The study showed that inquiry experimentation can be an effective platform to stimulate the production of arguments. Activities with a higher level of inquiry and openness had a greater impact on the production of arguments, especially those richer, according to the analysis tool chosen in the study. |
id |
UNIFEI_444ee13c81de50e3ff81d5b37f3c236c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23540 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Argumentation in high school from inquiry-based experimentation in ChemistryArgumentación en la escuela secundaria basada en la experimentación investigadora en QuímicaArgumentação no ensino médio a partir da experimentação investigativa em QuímicaInquiry ExperimentationArgumentationHigh SchoolTeaching Chemistry.ArgumentaciónEscuela secundariaExperimentación investigativaEnseñanza de la química.Experimentação InvestigativaArgumentaçãoEnsino MédioEnsino de Química.Research in Science Education has been recommending attention to argumentative practices. The challenge is to look for activities that can stimulate this type of practice so that the students talk science, since it is considered to be beneficial to conceptual understanding and provide students with the ability to think critically in a scientific context. In this paper, it is discussed how 20 activities with inquiry-type experiments in chemistry can promote argumentation in high school students in the chemistry laboratory. This kind of experimentation approach give the students the opportunity to learn and appreciate the process of science. The activities were categorized according to the level of proximity to an investigative activity and also their degree of openness. The discourses during the activities were analyzed in order to identify arguments, according to Toulmin's argument pattern. The study showed that inquiry experimentation can be an effective platform to stimulate the production of arguments. Activities with a higher level of inquiry and openness had a greater impact on the production of arguments, especially those richer, according to the analysis tool chosen in the study.La investigación en educación científica ha estado recomendando atención a las prácticas argumentativas. El desafío es buscar actividades que incentiven este tipo de práctica para que los estudiantes hablen ciencia, ya que se considera beneficiosa para la comprensión conceptual y brinda a los estudiantes la capacidad de pensar críticamente en un contexto científico. En este artículo se discute cómo 20 actividades con experimentos de investigación en química pueden promover la argumentación en estudiantes de secundaria en el laboratorio de química. Este tipo de enfoque experimental brinda a los estudiantes la oportunidad de aprender y apreciar el proceso de la ciencia. Las actividades se categorizaron según el nivel de proximidad a una actividad de investigación y también su grado de apertura. Los discursos durante las actividades fueron analizados con el fin de identificar argumentos, de acuerdo con el patrón de argumentación de Toulmin. El estudio mostró que la experimentación investigativa puede ser una plataforma eficaz para estimular la producción de argumentos. Las actividades con mayor nivel de investigación y apertura tuvieron un mayor impacto en la producción de argumentos, especialmente los más ricos, según la herramienta de análisis elegida en el estudio.A pesquisa em educação em ciências vem recomendando atenção às práticas argumentativas. O desafio é buscar atividades que estimulem esse tipo de prática para que os alunos falem ciência, pois isso é considerado benéfico à compreensão conceitual e proporciona aos alunos a capacidade de pensar criticamente em um contexto científico. Neste artigo, é discutido como 20 atividades com experimentos investigativos em química podem promover a argumentação em alunos do ensino médio no laboratório de química. Esse tipo de abordagem experimental oferece aos alunos a oportunidade de aprender e apreciar o processo da ciência. As atividades foram categorizadas de acordo com o nível de proximidade à uma atividade investigativa e também com seu grau de abertura. Os discursos durante as atividades foram analisados a fim de identificar argumentos, segundo o padrão de argumentação de Toulmin. O estudo mostrou que a experimentação investigativa pode ser uma plataforma eficaz para estimular a produção de argumentos. Atividades com maior nível de investigação e abertura tiveram um impacto maior na produção de argumentos, especialmente os mais ricos, de acordo com a ferramenta de análise escolhida no estudo.Research, Society and Development2021-12-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2354010.33448/rsd-v10i16.23540Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 16; e166101623540Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 16; e166101623540Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 16; e1661016235402525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23540/20834Copyright (c) 2021 Rodrigo Rozado Leal; Maria Rosa Chitolina Schetingerhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeal, Rodrigo RozadoSchetinger, Maria Rosa Chitolina2021-12-20T11:03:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23540Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:42:22.780190Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentation in high school from inquiry-based experimentation in Chemistry Argumentación en la escuela secundaria basada en la experimentación investigadora en Química Argumentação no ensino médio a partir da experimentação investigativa em Química |
title |
Argumentation in high school from inquiry-based experimentation in Chemistry |
spellingShingle |
Argumentation in high school from inquiry-based experimentation in Chemistry Leal, Rodrigo Rozado Inquiry Experimentation Argumentation High School Teaching Chemistry. Argumentación Escuela secundaria Experimentación investigativa Enseñanza de la química. Experimentação Investigativa Argumentação Ensino Médio Ensino de Química. |
title_short |
Argumentation in high school from inquiry-based experimentation in Chemistry |
title_full |
Argumentation in high school from inquiry-based experimentation in Chemistry |
title_fullStr |
Argumentation in high school from inquiry-based experimentation in Chemistry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Argumentation in high school from inquiry-based experimentation in Chemistry |
title_sort |
Argumentation in high school from inquiry-based experimentation in Chemistry |
author |
Leal, Rodrigo Rozado |
author_facet |
Leal, Rodrigo Rozado Schetinger, Maria Rosa Chitolina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schetinger, Maria Rosa Chitolina |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leal, Rodrigo Rozado Schetinger, Maria Rosa Chitolina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Inquiry Experimentation Argumentation High School Teaching Chemistry. Argumentación Escuela secundaria Experimentación investigativa Enseñanza de la química. Experimentação Investigativa Argumentação Ensino Médio Ensino de Química. |
topic |
Inquiry Experimentation Argumentation High School Teaching Chemistry. Argumentación Escuela secundaria Experimentación investigativa Enseñanza de la química. Experimentação Investigativa Argumentação Ensino Médio Ensino de Química. |
description |
Research in Science Education has been recommending attention to argumentative practices. The challenge is to look for activities that can stimulate this type of practice so that the students talk science, since it is considered to be beneficial to conceptual understanding and provide students with the ability to think critically in a scientific context. In this paper, it is discussed how 20 activities with inquiry-type experiments in chemistry can promote argumentation in high school students in the chemistry laboratory. This kind of experimentation approach give the students the opportunity to learn and appreciate the process of science. The activities were categorized according to the level of proximity to an investigative activity and also their degree of openness. The discourses during the activities were analyzed in order to identify arguments, according to Toulmin's argument pattern. The study showed that inquiry experimentation can be an effective platform to stimulate the production of arguments. Activities with a higher level of inquiry and openness had a greater impact on the production of arguments, especially those richer, according to the analysis tool chosen in the study. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23540 10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23540 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23540 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23540 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23540/20834 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Rodrigo Rozado Leal; Maria Rosa Chitolina Schetinger https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Rodrigo Rozado Leal; Maria Rosa Chitolina Schetinger https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 16; e166101623540 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 16; e166101623540 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 16; e166101623540 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052698075332608 |