Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo, Thiago de Sousa
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva, José Humberto Vilar da, Jordão Filho, José, Costa, Fernando Guilherme Perazzo, Givisiez, Patrícia Emília Naves, Barbosa, José Andrew de Lira, Cruz, Natalí Estevão da, Duarte, Laryssa Querino da Silva, Silva, Janiele Ferreira da, Gomes, Veruska Dilyanne Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20447
Resumo: The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of five feed restriction programs (FRP) on broiler performance and carcass yield. 425 Cobb 500® broilers were distributed in a completely randomized design with five FRPs and five replicates with 17 broilers. The FRPs were: Program 1 (P1): consumption ad libitum (AL) of control diet from 14 to 42 days; P2: quantitative restriction (QTR) of 10% of AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; P3: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QTR from 29 to 42 days; P4: qualitative restriction (QLR) of 10% of the level of crude protein and essential amino acids from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; and P5: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QLR from 29 to 42 days. The broilers of the AL treatment gained more weight (p≤0.01), but had a similar FCR (P>0.05) compared to broilers submitted to QTR from 29 to 42 days. In addition, broilers fed QTR from 14 to 28 days presented a lower FI and a better FCR (p≤0.01) in relation to broilers fed QLR of 14 to 28 (P4) and 29 to 42 days (P5). The broilers fed QTR of 14 to 28 days diet presented a similar FCR as broilers fed AL. The 10% reduction in AL consumption of 14 to 28 d is a viable economical alternative to feed broilers up to 42 days of age.
id UNIFEI_4599e87179ade07a0cf66e93b602d085
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20447
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilersRestricción cuantitativa y cualitativa de alimento en pollos de engordeRestrição alimentar quantitativa e qualitativa em frangos de corteAminoácidosAnálise econômicaConsumoRealimentação.AminoácidosAnálisis EconómicoConsumoRealimentación.Amino acidsConsumptionEconomic analysisFeedback.The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of five feed restriction programs (FRP) on broiler performance and carcass yield. 425 Cobb 500® broilers were distributed in a completely randomized design with five FRPs and five replicates with 17 broilers. The FRPs were: Program 1 (P1): consumption ad libitum (AL) of control diet from 14 to 42 days; P2: quantitative restriction (QTR) of 10% of AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; P3: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QTR from 29 to 42 days; P4: qualitative restriction (QLR) of 10% of the level of crude protein and essential amino acids from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; and P5: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QLR from 29 to 42 days. The broilers of the AL treatment gained more weight (p≤0.01), but had a similar FCR (P>0.05) compared to broilers submitted to QTR from 29 to 42 days. In addition, broilers fed QTR from 14 to 28 days presented a lower FI and a better FCR (p≤0.01) in relation to broilers fed QLR of 14 to 28 (P4) and 29 to 42 days (P5). The broilers fed QTR of 14 to 28 days diet presented a similar FCR as broilers fed AL. The 10% reduction in AL consumption of 14 to 28 d is a viable economical alternative to feed broilers up to 42 days of age.Se evaluó la influencia de cinco programas de restricción alimenticia (PRA) sobre el rendimiento y las características de la canal de pollos de engorde. Se distribuyeron 425 pollos de engorde (Cobb 500®) en un diseño completamente al azar, con 5 PRA y 5 réplicas con 17 aves cada una. Los PRA fueron: Programa 1 (P1): consumo ad libitum (AL) de la dieta control, de los 14 a los 42 días de edad (d); P2: restricción cuantitativa (RCT) del 10% del consumo AL, de los 14 a los 28 d y consumo AL de los 29 a los 42 d; P3: consumo AL de los 14 a los 28 d y RCT de los 29 a los 42 d; P4: restricción cualitativa (RCL) del 10% en el nivel de proteína cruda y aminoácidos esenciales, de los 14 a los 28 d y consumo AL de los 29 a los 42 d de edad y P5: consumo AL de los 14 a los 28 d y RCL de los 29 a los 42 d. Los pollos del tratamiento AL ganaron más peso (p≤0,01), pero tuvieron una tasa de conversión alimenticia (CA) similar (P>0,05) en comparación con los pollos de engorde sometidos a la RCT de los 29 a los 42 d. Además, los pollos de engorde alimentados con RCT de los 14 a los 28 d tuvieron menor consumo y mejor CA (p≤0,01) en comparación con el grupo de pollos de engorde alimentados con RCL de los 14 a los 28 d (P4) y de los 29 a los 42 días de edad (P5). Los pollos sometidos a la dieta de RCT de los 14 a los 28 d tuvieron una CA similar en comparación con las aves alimentadas AL. Una reducción del 10% en la ingesta AL de los 14 a los 28 d es una alternativa económica viable para alimentar a los pollos de engorde hasta los 42 días de edad.Avaliou-se a influência de cinco programas de restrição alimentar (PRA) sobre o desempenho e características de carcaça de frangos. 425 frangos de corte Cobb 500® foram distribuídos em delineamento inteiramente ao acaso, com 5 PRA e 5 repetições de 17 aves cada. Os PRA foram: Programa 1 (P1): consumo ad libitum (AL) da dieta controle dos 14 aos 42 d de idade; P2: restrição quantitativa (RQT) de 10% do consumo AL no período de 14 a 28 d e consumo AL de 29 a 42 d de idade; P3: consumo AL no período de 14 a 28 d e RQT de 29 a 42 d; P4: restrição qualitativa (RQL) em 10% no nível de proteína bruta e aminoácidos essenciais de 14 a 28 d e consumo AL de 29 a 42 d de idade e P5: consumo AL no período de 14 a 28 d e RQL de 29 aos 42 d de idade. Os Frangos do tratamento AL ganharam mais peso (p≤0,01), mas tiveram conversão alimentar (CA) (P>0,05) semelhante comparados aos frangos submetidos a RQT de 29 a 42 d. Além disso, frangos alimentados com RQT de 14 a 28 d apresentaram menor consumo e melhor CA (p≤0,01) em relação ao grupo de frangos alimentados com RQL de 14 a 28 (P4) e de 29 a 42 dias de idade (P5). Os frangos da dieta de RQT de 14 a 28 d apresentaram semelhante CA em relação as aves alimentadas com a oferta AL. A redução em 10% do consumo AL de 14 a 28 d é uma alternativa econômica viável para alimentar frangos de corte até 42 d de idade.Research, Society and Development2021-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2044710.33448/rsd-v10i12.20447Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e339101220447Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e339101220447Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e3391012204472525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20447/18299Copyright (c) 2021 Thiago de Sousa Melo; José Humberto Vilar da Silva; José Jordão Filho; Fernando Guilherme Perazzo Costa; Patrícia Emília Naves Givisiez; José Andrew de Lira Barbosa; Natalí Estevão da Cruz; Laryssa Querino da Silva Duarte; Janiele Ferreira da Silva; Veruska Dilyanne Silva Gomeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Thiago de Sousa Silva, José Humberto Vilar daJordão Filho, JoséCosta, Fernando Guilherme Perazzo Givisiez, Patrícia Emília Naves Barbosa, José Andrew de Lira Cruz, Natalí Estevão da Duarte, Laryssa Querino da Silva Silva, Janiele Ferreira daGomes, Veruska Dilyanne Silva 2021-11-14T20:26:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20447Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:05.524296Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers
Restricción cuantitativa y cualitativa de alimento en pollos de engorde
Restrição alimentar quantitativa e qualitativa em frangos de corte
title Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers
spellingShingle Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers
Melo, Thiago de Sousa
Aminoácidos
Análise econômica
Consumo
Realimentação.
Aminoácidos
Análisis Económico
Consumo
Realimentación.
Amino acids
Consumption
Economic analysis
Feedback.
title_short Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers
title_full Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers
title_fullStr Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers
title_sort Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers
author Melo, Thiago de Sousa
author_facet Melo, Thiago de Sousa
Silva, José Humberto Vilar da
Jordão Filho, José
Costa, Fernando Guilherme Perazzo
Givisiez, Patrícia Emília Naves
Barbosa, José Andrew de Lira
Cruz, Natalí Estevão da
Duarte, Laryssa Querino da Silva
Silva, Janiele Ferreira da
Gomes, Veruska Dilyanne Silva
author_role author
author2 Silva, José Humberto Vilar da
Jordão Filho, José
Costa, Fernando Guilherme Perazzo
Givisiez, Patrícia Emília Naves
Barbosa, José Andrew de Lira
Cruz, Natalí Estevão da
Duarte, Laryssa Querino da Silva
Silva, Janiele Ferreira da
Gomes, Veruska Dilyanne Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo, Thiago de Sousa
Silva, José Humberto Vilar da
Jordão Filho, José
Costa, Fernando Guilherme Perazzo
Givisiez, Patrícia Emília Naves
Barbosa, José Andrew de Lira
Cruz, Natalí Estevão da
Duarte, Laryssa Querino da Silva
Silva, Janiele Ferreira da
Gomes, Veruska Dilyanne Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aminoácidos
Análise econômica
Consumo
Realimentação.
Aminoácidos
Análisis Económico
Consumo
Realimentación.
Amino acids
Consumption
Economic analysis
Feedback.
topic Aminoácidos
Análise econômica
Consumo
Realimentação.
Aminoácidos
Análisis Económico
Consumo
Realimentación.
Amino acids
Consumption
Economic analysis
Feedback.
description The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of five feed restriction programs (FRP) on broiler performance and carcass yield. 425 Cobb 500® broilers were distributed in a completely randomized design with five FRPs and five replicates with 17 broilers. The FRPs were: Program 1 (P1): consumption ad libitum (AL) of control diet from 14 to 42 days; P2: quantitative restriction (QTR) of 10% of AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; P3: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QTR from 29 to 42 days; P4: qualitative restriction (QLR) of 10% of the level of crude protein and essential amino acids from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; and P5: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QLR from 29 to 42 days. The broilers of the AL treatment gained more weight (p≤0.01), but had a similar FCR (P>0.05) compared to broilers submitted to QTR from 29 to 42 days. In addition, broilers fed QTR from 14 to 28 days presented a lower FI and a better FCR (p≤0.01) in relation to broilers fed QLR of 14 to 28 (P4) and 29 to 42 days (P5). The broilers fed QTR of 14 to 28 days diet presented a similar FCR as broilers fed AL. The 10% reduction in AL consumption of 14 to 28 d is a viable economical alternative to feed broilers up to 42 days of age.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20447
10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20447
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20447
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20447
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20447/18299
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e339101220447
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e339101220447
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e339101220447
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052690054774784