Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20447 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of five feed restriction programs (FRP) on broiler performance and carcass yield. 425 Cobb 500® broilers were distributed in a completely randomized design with five FRPs and five replicates with 17 broilers. The FRPs were: Program 1 (P1): consumption ad libitum (AL) of control diet from 14 to 42 days; P2: quantitative restriction (QTR) of 10% of AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; P3: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QTR from 29 to 42 days; P4: qualitative restriction (QLR) of 10% of the level of crude protein and essential amino acids from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; and P5: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QLR from 29 to 42 days. The broilers of the AL treatment gained more weight (p≤0.01), but had a similar FCR (P>0.05) compared to broilers submitted to QTR from 29 to 42 days. In addition, broilers fed QTR from 14 to 28 days presented a lower FI and a better FCR (p≤0.01) in relation to broilers fed QLR of 14 to 28 (P4) and 29 to 42 days (P5). The broilers fed QTR of 14 to 28 days diet presented a similar FCR as broilers fed AL. The 10% reduction in AL consumption of 14 to 28 d is a viable economical alternative to feed broilers up to 42 days of age. |
id |
UNIFEI_4599e87179ade07a0cf66e93b602d085 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20447 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilersRestricción cuantitativa y cualitativa de alimento en pollos de engordeRestrição alimentar quantitativa e qualitativa em frangos de corteAminoácidosAnálise econômicaConsumoRealimentação.AminoácidosAnálisis EconómicoConsumoRealimentación.Amino acidsConsumptionEconomic analysisFeedback.The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of five feed restriction programs (FRP) on broiler performance and carcass yield. 425 Cobb 500® broilers were distributed in a completely randomized design with five FRPs and five replicates with 17 broilers. The FRPs were: Program 1 (P1): consumption ad libitum (AL) of control diet from 14 to 42 days; P2: quantitative restriction (QTR) of 10% of AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; P3: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QTR from 29 to 42 days; P4: qualitative restriction (QLR) of 10% of the level of crude protein and essential amino acids from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; and P5: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QLR from 29 to 42 days. The broilers of the AL treatment gained more weight (p≤0.01), but had a similar FCR (P>0.05) compared to broilers submitted to QTR from 29 to 42 days. In addition, broilers fed QTR from 14 to 28 days presented a lower FI and a better FCR (p≤0.01) in relation to broilers fed QLR of 14 to 28 (P4) and 29 to 42 days (P5). The broilers fed QTR of 14 to 28 days diet presented a similar FCR as broilers fed AL. The 10% reduction in AL consumption of 14 to 28 d is a viable economical alternative to feed broilers up to 42 days of age.Se evaluó la influencia de cinco programas de restricción alimenticia (PRA) sobre el rendimiento y las características de la canal de pollos de engorde. Se distribuyeron 425 pollos de engorde (Cobb 500®) en un diseño completamente al azar, con 5 PRA y 5 réplicas con 17 aves cada una. Los PRA fueron: Programa 1 (P1): consumo ad libitum (AL) de la dieta control, de los 14 a los 42 días de edad (d); P2: restricción cuantitativa (RCT) del 10% del consumo AL, de los 14 a los 28 d y consumo AL de los 29 a los 42 d; P3: consumo AL de los 14 a los 28 d y RCT de los 29 a los 42 d; P4: restricción cualitativa (RCL) del 10% en el nivel de proteína cruda y aminoácidos esenciales, de los 14 a los 28 d y consumo AL de los 29 a los 42 d de edad y P5: consumo AL de los 14 a los 28 d y RCL de los 29 a los 42 d. Los pollos del tratamiento AL ganaron más peso (p≤0,01), pero tuvieron una tasa de conversión alimenticia (CA) similar (P>0,05) en comparación con los pollos de engorde sometidos a la RCT de los 29 a los 42 d. Además, los pollos de engorde alimentados con RCT de los 14 a los 28 d tuvieron menor consumo y mejor CA (p≤0,01) en comparación con el grupo de pollos de engorde alimentados con RCL de los 14 a los 28 d (P4) y de los 29 a los 42 días de edad (P5). Los pollos sometidos a la dieta de RCT de los 14 a los 28 d tuvieron una CA similar en comparación con las aves alimentadas AL. Una reducción del 10% en la ingesta AL de los 14 a los 28 d es una alternativa económica viable para alimentar a los pollos de engorde hasta los 42 días de edad.Avaliou-se a influência de cinco programas de restrição alimentar (PRA) sobre o desempenho e características de carcaça de frangos. 425 frangos de corte Cobb 500® foram distribuídos em delineamento inteiramente ao acaso, com 5 PRA e 5 repetições de 17 aves cada. Os PRA foram: Programa 1 (P1): consumo ad libitum (AL) da dieta controle dos 14 aos 42 d de idade; P2: restrição quantitativa (RQT) de 10% do consumo AL no período de 14 a 28 d e consumo AL de 29 a 42 d de idade; P3: consumo AL no período de 14 a 28 d e RQT de 29 a 42 d; P4: restrição qualitativa (RQL) em 10% no nível de proteína bruta e aminoácidos essenciais de 14 a 28 d e consumo AL de 29 a 42 d de idade e P5: consumo AL no período de 14 a 28 d e RQL de 29 aos 42 d de idade. Os Frangos do tratamento AL ganharam mais peso (p≤0,01), mas tiveram conversão alimentar (CA) (P>0,05) semelhante comparados aos frangos submetidos a RQT de 29 a 42 d. Além disso, frangos alimentados com RQT de 14 a 28 d apresentaram menor consumo e melhor CA (p≤0,01) em relação ao grupo de frangos alimentados com RQL de 14 a 28 (P4) e de 29 a 42 dias de idade (P5). Os frangos da dieta de RQT de 14 a 28 d apresentaram semelhante CA em relação as aves alimentadas com a oferta AL. A redução em 10% do consumo AL de 14 a 28 d é uma alternativa econômica viável para alimentar frangos de corte até 42 d de idade.Research, Society and Development2021-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2044710.33448/rsd-v10i12.20447Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e339101220447Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e339101220447Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e3391012204472525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20447/18299Copyright (c) 2021 Thiago de Sousa Melo; José Humberto Vilar da Silva; José Jordão Filho; Fernando Guilherme Perazzo Costa; Patrícia Emília Naves Givisiez; José Andrew de Lira Barbosa; Natalí Estevão da Cruz; Laryssa Querino da Silva Duarte; Janiele Ferreira da Silva; Veruska Dilyanne Silva Gomeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Thiago de Sousa Silva, José Humberto Vilar daJordão Filho, JoséCosta, Fernando Guilherme Perazzo Givisiez, Patrícia Emília Naves Barbosa, José Andrew de Lira Cruz, Natalí Estevão da Duarte, Laryssa Querino da Silva Silva, Janiele Ferreira daGomes, Veruska Dilyanne Silva 2021-11-14T20:26:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20447Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:05.524296Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers Restricción cuantitativa y cualitativa de alimento en pollos de engorde Restrição alimentar quantitativa e qualitativa em frangos de corte |
title |
Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers |
spellingShingle |
Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers Melo, Thiago de Sousa Aminoácidos Análise econômica Consumo Realimentação. Aminoácidos Análisis Económico Consumo Realimentación. Amino acids Consumption Economic analysis Feedback. |
title_short |
Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers |
title_full |
Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers |
title_fullStr |
Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers |
title_sort |
Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction for broilers |
author |
Melo, Thiago de Sousa |
author_facet |
Melo, Thiago de Sousa Silva, José Humberto Vilar da Jordão Filho, José Costa, Fernando Guilherme Perazzo Givisiez, Patrícia Emília Naves Barbosa, José Andrew de Lira Cruz, Natalí Estevão da Duarte, Laryssa Querino da Silva Silva, Janiele Ferreira da Gomes, Veruska Dilyanne Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, José Humberto Vilar da Jordão Filho, José Costa, Fernando Guilherme Perazzo Givisiez, Patrícia Emília Naves Barbosa, José Andrew de Lira Cruz, Natalí Estevão da Duarte, Laryssa Querino da Silva Silva, Janiele Ferreira da Gomes, Veruska Dilyanne Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, Thiago de Sousa Silva, José Humberto Vilar da Jordão Filho, José Costa, Fernando Guilherme Perazzo Givisiez, Patrícia Emília Naves Barbosa, José Andrew de Lira Cruz, Natalí Estevão da Duarte, Laryssa Querino da Silva Silva, Janiele Ferreira da Gomes, Veruska Dilyanne Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aminoácidos Análise econômica Consumo Realimentação. Aminoácidos Análisis Económico Consumo Realimentación. Amino acids Consumption Economic analysis Feedback. |
topic |
Aminoácidos Análise econômica Consumo Realimentação. Aminoácidos Análisis Económico Consumo Realimentación. Amino acids Consumption Economic analysis Feedback. |
description |
The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of five feed restriction programs (FRP) on broiler performance and carcass yield. 425 Cobb 500® broilers were distributed in a completely randomized design with five FRPs and five replicates with 17 broilers. The FRPs were: Program 1 (P1): consumption ad libitum (AL) of control diet from 14 to 42 days; P2: quantitative restriction (QTR) of 10% of AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; P3: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QTR from 29 to 42 days; P4: qualitative restriction (QLR) of 10% of the level of crude protein and essential amino acids from 14 to 28 days and AL consumption from 29 to 42 days; and P5: AL consumption from 14 to 28 days and QLR from 29 to 42 days. The broilers of the AL treatment gained more weight (p≤0.01), but had a similar FCR (P>0.05) compared to broilers submitted to QTR from 29 to 42 days. In addition, broilers fed QTR from 14 to 28 days presented a lower FI and a better FCR (p≤0.01) in relation to broilers fed QLR of 14 to 28 (P4) and 29 to 42 days (P5). The broilers fed QTR of 14 to 28 days diet presented a similar FCR as broilers fed AL. The 10% reduction in AL consumption of 14 to 28 d is a viable economical alternative to feed broilers up to 42 days of age. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20447 10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20447 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20447 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20447 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20447/18299 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e339101220447 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e339101220447 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e339101220447 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052690054774784 |