Analysis of methods of evaluation of the workload of human resources in health: an integrative literature review
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
| Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12400 |
Resumo: | The present study aimed to characterize the workload assessment methods aimed at dimensioning human resources in health. It is an integrative literature review, carried out through an advanced search in the database of the Virtual Health Library, with the inclusion of studies from PubMed Central and SciELO. The descriptors, workload, health manpower, health assessment and health care evaluation mechanisms were used in the languages, Portuguese, English and Spanish. The time frame was from 2015 to 2019, and the data were analyzed using the workload assessment methods presented in the studies. Results: 268 studies were identified in the databases, which after using the PRISMA strategy, 13 were included. These were evaluated for the level of evidence, based on the definition of the Oxford Center Evidence Based Medicine, where 9 (69%) were classified at level 2c, 3 at level 5 and 1 at level 2b. Regarding the methods of assessing the workload and staffing, the Nursing Activies Score and the Workload Indicators of Staffing Needs prevailed, respectively, covered in 3 (26%) studies each. Defining a method and / or tool for assessing the workload in health, demonstrated a very important strategy for the dimensioning of human resources, despite the diversity. This diversity was demonstrated in the studies included in this IR, where a standard for assessing the workload was not observed. |
| id |
UNIFEI_45d17fe4afa4c42f3012b4758601b2be |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12400 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
| network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Analysis of methods of evaluation of the workload of human resources in health: an integrative literature reviewAnálisis de métodos de evaluación de la carga de trabajo de los recursos humanos en salud: una revisión integrativa de la literaturaAnálise dos métodos de avaliação da carga de trabalho de recursos humanos em saúde: revisão integrativa da literaturaCarga de trabalhoRecursos humanos em saúdeAvaliação em saúdeMecanismos de avaliação dos cuidados de saúde.WorkloadHealth manpowerHealth evaluationHealth care evaluation mechanisms.Carga de trabajoRecursos humanos en saludEvaluación de la saludMecanismos de Evaluación de la Atención de Salud.The present study aimed to characterize the workload assessment methods aimed at dimensioning human resources in health. It is an integrative literature review, carried out through an advanced search in the database of the Virtual Health Library, with the inclusion of studies from PubMed Central and SciELO. The descriptors, workload, health manpower, health assessment and health care evaluation mechanisms were used in the languages, Portuguese, English and Spanish. The time frame was from 2015 to 2019, and the data were analyzed using the workload assessment methods presented in the studies. Results: 268 studies were identified in the databases, which after using the PRISMA strategy, 13 were included. These were evaluated for the level of evidence, based on the definition of the Oxford Center Evidence Based Medicine, where 9 (69%) were classified at level 2c, 3 at level 5 and 1 at level 2b. Regarding the methods of assessing the workload and staffing, the Nursing Activies Score and the Workload Indicators of Staffing Needs prevailed, respectively, covered in 3 (26%) studies each. Defining a method and / or tool for assessing the workload in health, demonstrated a very important strategy for the dimensioning of human resources, despite the diversity. This diversity was demonstrated in the studies included in this IR, where a standard for assessing the workload was not observed.El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo caracterizar los métodos de evaluación de la carga de trabajo destinados a dimensionar los recursos humanos en salud. Se trata de una revisión integradora de la literatura, realizada a través de una búsqueda avanzada en la base de datos de la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud, con inclusión de estudios de PubMed Central y SciELO. Se utilizaron los descriptores, carga de trabajo, recursos humanos en salud, evaluación de la salud y mecanismos de evaluación asistencial en los idiomas portugués, inglés y español. El período de tiempo fue de 2015 a 2019, y los datos se analizaron utilizando los métodos de evaluación de la carga de trabajo presentados en los estudios. Resultados: Se identificaron 268 estudios en las bases de datos, que luego de utilizar la estrategia PRISMA, se incluyeron 13. Estos fueron evaluados para el nivel de evidencia, según la definición del Oxford Center Evidence Based Medicine, donde 9 (69%) se clasificaron en el nivel 2c, 3 en el nivel 5 y 1 en el nivel 2b. En cuanto a los métodos de evaluación de la carga de trabajo y dotación de personal, predominaron el Puntaje de Actividades de Enfermería y los Indicadores de Carga de Trabajo de Necesidades de Dotación de Personal, respectivamente, cubiertos en 3 (26%) estudios cada uno. Definir un método y / o herramienta para evaluar la carga de trabajo en salud, demostró una estrategia muy importante para el dimensionamiento de los recursos humanos, a pesar de la diversidad. Esta diversidad se demostró en los estudios incluidos en este RI, donde no se observó un estándar para evaluar la carga de trabajo.O presente estudo objetivou caracterizar os métodos de avaliação de carga de trabalho direcionados ao dimensionamento de recursos humanos em saúde. Trata-se de revisão integrativa da literatura, realizada através de busca avançada na base de dados da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, com inclusão de estudos da PubMed Central e SciELO. Foram utilizados os descritores, carga de trabalho, recursos humanos em saúde, avaliação em saúde e mecanismos de avaliação dos cuidados de saúde, nos idiomas, Português, Inglês e Espanhol. O recorte temporal foi de 2015 a 2019, e os dados foram analisados a partir dos métodos de avaliação de carga de trabalho apresentados nos estudos. Foram identificados nas bases de dados 268 estudos, que após empregar a estratégia PRISMA, 13 foram incluídos. Estes foram avaliados quanto ao nível de evidência, baseados na definição do Oxford Centre Evidence Based Medicine, onde 9 (69%) foram classificados no nível 2c, 3 no nível 5 e 1 no nível 2b. Com relação aos métodos de avaliação da carga de trabalho e dimensionamento de pessoal, prevaleceram o Nursing Activies Score e o Workload Indicators of Staffing Needs, respectivamente, contemplados em 3 (26%) estudos cada. Definir um método e/ou ferramenta de avaliação da carga de trabalho em saúde, demonstrou uma estratégia importantíssima para o dimensionamento de recursos humanos, apesar da diversidade. Essa diversidade foi demonstrada nos estudos incluídos nesta RI, onde não foi observado um padrão para avaliação da carga de trabalho.Research, Society and Development2021-02-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1240010.33448/rsd-v10i2.12400Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 2; e39010212400Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 2; e39010212400Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 2; e390102124002525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12400/11395Copyright (c) 2021 Jorge Leandro do Souto Monteiro; Mario Roberto Dal Poz; Gabriel Antonio Meireles; Viviane Saraiva de Almeida; Marilda Andrade; Danielle Lemos Querido; Marialda Moreira Christoffel; Ana Paula Silva Antunes Figueiredohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMonteiro, Jorge Leandro do SoutoPoz, Mario Roberto Dal Meireles, Gabriel Antonio Almeida, Viviane Saraiva deAndrade, MarildaQuerido, Danielle LemosChristoffel, Marialda MoreiraFigueiredo, Ana Paula Silva Antunes2021-03-02T09:32:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12400Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:33:59.296967Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of methods of evaluation of the workload of human resources in health: an integrative literature review Análisis de métodos de evaluación de la carga de trabajo de los recursos humanos en salud: una revisión integrativa de la literatura Análise dos métodos de avaliação da carga de trabalho de recursos humanos em saúde: revisão integrativa da literatura |
| title |
Analysis of methods of evaluation of the workload of human resources in health: an integrative literature review |
| spellingShingle |
Analysis of methods of evaluation of the workload of human resources in health: an integrative literature review Monteiro, Jorge Leandro do Souto Carga de trabalho Recursos humanos em saúde Avaliação em saúde Mecanismos de avaliação dos cuidados de saúde. Workload Health manpower Health evaluation Health care evaluation mechanisms. Carga de trabajo Recursos humanos en salud Evaluación de la salud Mecanismos de Evaluación de la Atención de Salud. |
| title_short |
Analysis of methods of evaluation of the workload of human resources in health: an integrative literature review |
| title_full |
Analysis of methods of evaluation of the workload of human resources in health: an integrative literature review |
| title_fullStr |
Analysis of methods of evaluation of the workload of human resources in health: an integrative literature review |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of methods of evaluation of the workload of human resources in health: an integrative literature review |
| title_sort |
Analysis of methods of evaluation of the workload of human resources in health: an integrative literature review |
| author |
Monteiro, Jorge Leandro do Souto |
| author_facet |
Monteiro, Jorge Leandro do Souto Poz, Mario Roberto Dal Meireles, Gabriel Antonio Almeida, Viviane Saraiva de Andrade, Marilda Querido, Danielle Lemos Christoffel, Marialda Moreira Figueiredo, Ana Paula Silva Antunes |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Poz, Mario Roberto Dal Meireles, Gabriel Antonio Almeida, Viviane Saraiva de Andrade, Marilda Querido, Danielle Lemos Christoffel, Marialda Moreira Figueiredo, Ana Paula Silva Antunes |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Monteiro, Jorge Leandro do Souto Poz, Mario Roberto Dal Meireles, Gabriel Antonio Almeida, Viviane Saraiva de Andrade, Marilda Querido, Danielle Lemos Christoffel, Marialda Moreira Figueiredo, Ana Paula Silva Antunes |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carga de trabalho Recursos humanos em saúde Avaliação em saúde Mecanismos de avaliação dos cuidados de saúde. Workload Health manpower Health evaluation Health care evaluation mechanisms. Carga de trabajo Recursos humanos en salud Evaluación de la salud Mecanismos de Evaluación de la Atención de Salud. |
| topic |
Carga de trabalho Recursos humanos em saúde Avaliação em saúde Mecanismos de avaliação dos cuidados de saúde. Workload Health manpower Health evaluation Health care evaluation mechanisms. Carga de trabajo Recursos humanos en salud Evaluación de la salud Mecanismos de Evaluación de la Atención de Salud. |
| description |
The present study aimed to characterize the workload assessment methods aimed at dimensioning human resources in health. It is an integrative literature review, carried out through an advanced search in the database of the Virtual Health Library, with the inclusion of studies from PubMed Central and SciELO. The descriptors, workload, health manpower, health assessment and health care evaluation mechanisms were used in the languages, Portuguese, English and Spanish. The time frame was from 2015 to 2019, and the data were analyzed using the workload assessment methods presented in the studies. Results: 268 studies were identified in the databases, which after using the PRISMA strategy, 13 were included. These were evaluated for the level of evidence, based on the definition of the Oxford Center Evidence Based Medicine, where 9 (69%) were classified at level 2c, 3 at level 5 and 1 at level 2b. Regarding the methods of assessing the workload and staffing, the Nursing Activies Score and the Workload Indicators of Staffing Needs prevailed, respectively, covered in 3 (26%) studies each. Defining a method and / or tool for assessing the workload in health, demonstrated a very important strategy for the dimensioning of human resources, despite the diversity. This diversity was demonstrated in the studies included in this IR, where a standard for assessing the workload was not observed. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-20 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12400 10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12400 |
| url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12400 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12400 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12400/11395 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 2; e39010212400 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 2; e39010212400 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 2; e39010212400 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
| institution |
UNIFEI |
| reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| collection |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1797052745571631104 |