Comparison between in vitro embryo production in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16712 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro embryo production in Bos taurus and Bos indicus donors, evaluating from oocyte recovery to final embryo production. Data were collected during the months of January and February and August to October 2017. Bos taurus cows: Holstein and Senepol and Bos indicus cows: Nelore and Dairy Gir, were used as oocyte donors. In total, 3622 sessions of OPU were performed, divided between: Holstein donors: 925; Senepol donors: 1055; Nelore donors: 1202 and Dairy Gir donors: 440. In total, 103.399 oocytes were recovered, being viable oocytes: 90.807; cleaved: 65.252 and produced embryos: 24216. There was no statistical difference between the genetic groups for the total oocytes recovered (Bos taurus: 25.5 vs. Bos indicus: 30.1; P> 0.05). However, a statistical difference was observed between the cleaved (Bos taurus: 16 vs. Bos indicus: 20.4; P <0.05) and produced embryos (Bos taurus: 4.4 vs. Bos indicus: 8.3; P <0,05). Thus, the conclusion is that Zebu donors perform better in IVEP and the donor breed influences the IVEP results. |
id |
UNIFEI_49c6bf69b7c1387c82dc0a563bd635b7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16712 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between in vitro embryo production in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cowsComparación entre la producción de embriones in vitro en vacas Bos indicus y Bos taurusComparação entre a produção in vitro de embriões em fêmeas Bos indicus e Bos taurusDonorBos taurusBos indicusOocyteEmbryos.DonanteTaurinasGanado cebúOvocitoEmbriones.DoadoraTaurinosZebuínosOócitoEmbriões.The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro embryo production in Bos taurus and Bos indicus donors, evaluating from oocyte recovery to final embryo production. Data were collected during the months of January and February and August to October 2017. Bos taurus cows: Holstein and Senepol and Bos indicus cows: Nelore and Dairy Gir, were used as oocyte donors. In total, 3622 sessions of OPU were performed, divided between: Holstein donors: 925; Senepol donors: 1055; Nelore donors: 1202 and Dairy Gir donors: 440. In total, 103.399 oocytes were recovered, being viable oocytes: 90.807; cleaved: 65.252 and produced embryos: 24216. There was no statistical difference between the genetic groups for the total oocytes recovered (Bos taurus: 25.5 vs. Bos indicus: 30.1; P> 0.05). However, a statistical difference was observed between the cleaved (Bos taurus: 16 vs. Bos indicus: 20.4; P <0.05) and produced embryos (Bos taurus: 4.4 vs. Bos indicus: 8.3; P <0,05). Thus, the conclusion is that Zebu donors perform better in IVEP and the donor breed influences the IVEP results.El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la producción in vitro de embriones en donantes Bos taurus (holandés y Senepol) y Bos indicus (Nelore y Gir), evaluando desde la recuperación de ovocitos hasta la producción embrionaria final. Los datos se recolectaron durante dos períodos: enero y febrero y de agosto a octubre de 2017. Se utilizaron vacas Bos taurus como donantes de ovocitos: Holandesas y Senepol y vacas Bos indicus: Nelore y las razas Gir. En total, se llevaron a cabo 3622 sesiones OPU, divididas entre: donantes holandeses; 925, Senepol; 1055, Nelore; 1202 y Gir; 440. Se recuperaron 103.399 ovocitos totales, con ovocitos viables: 90,807; escindidos: 65,252 y embriones producidos: 24216. No hubo diferencia estadística entre los grupos genéticos para el número total de ovocitos recuperados de vacas (Bos taurus: 25,5 vs Bos indicus: 30,1; P> 0.05). Sin embargo, se observó una diferencia estadística entre los embriones escindidos (Bos taurus: 16 vs Bos indicus: 20,4; P <0,05) y producidos (Bos taurus: 4,4 vs Bos indicus: 8,3; P <0, 05). En las condiciones de este estudio, se puede concluir que los donantes de cebú presentan mejor desempeño en PIVE, y que la raza de donantes puede interferir en el resultado de PIVE.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a produção in vitro de embriões em doadoras Bos taurus (Holandês e Senepol) e Bos indicus (Nelore e Gir), avaliando desde a recuperação oocitária até a produção final de embriões. Os dados foram coletados durante dois períodos, os meses de janeiro e fevereiro e de agosto a outubro de 2017. Foram utilizadas como doadoras de oócitos, fêmeas Bos taurus: das raças Holandês e Senepol e fêmeas Bos indicus: das raças Nelore e Gir. No total foram realizadas 3622 sessões de OPU, divididas entre: doadoras da raça Holandês; 925, Senepol; 1055, Nelore; 1202 e Gir; 440. Foram recuperados 103.399 oócitos totais, sendo, oócitos viáveis: 90,807; clivados: 65,252 e embriões produzidos: 24216. Não houve diferença estatística entre os grupos genéticos para o número total de oócitos recuperados (Bos taurus: 25,5 vs Bos indicus: 30,1; P> 0,05). No entanto, foi observado diferença estatística entre os clivados (Bos taurus: 16 vs Bos indicus: 20,4; P< 0,05) e embriões produzidos (Bos taurus: 4,4 vs Bos indicus: 8,3; P< 0,05). Nas condições desse estudo pode se concluir que, doadoras zebuínas apresentam melhor desempenho na PIVE, e que a raça das doadoras pode interferir no resultado da PIVE.Research, Society and Development2021-06-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1671210.33448/rsd-v10i7.16712Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e38810716712Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e38810716712Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e388107167122525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16712/14927Copyright (c) 2021 Graziela Alves de Lima Moschini ; Douglas Gaitkoski; Ana Beatriz Marques de Almeida; Myrian Megumy Tsunokawa Hidalgo; Maria Isabel Mello Martins; Wanessa Blaschi; Thales Ricardo Rigo Barreiroshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoschini , Graziela Alves de Lima Gaitkoski, Douglas Almeida, Ana Beatriz Marques de Hidalgo, Myrian Megumy Tsunokawa Martins, Maria Isabel MelloBlaschi, WanessaBarreiros, Thales Ricardo Rigo 2021-07-18T21:07:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16712Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:11.570345Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between in vitro embryo production in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows Comparación entre la producción de embriones in vitro en vacas Bos indicus y Bos taurus Comparação entre a produção in vitro de embriões em fêmeas Bos indicus e Bos taurus |
title |
Comparison between in vitro embryo production in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between in vitro embryo production in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows Moschini , Graziela Alves de Lima Donor Bos taurus Bos indicus Oocyte Embryos. Donante Taurinas Ganado cebú Ovocito Embriones. Doadora Taurinos Zebuínos Oócito Embriões. |
title_short |
Comparison between in vitro embryo production in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows |
title_full |
Comparison between in vitro embryo production in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between in vitro embryo production in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between in vitro embryo production in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows |
title_sort |
Comparison between in vitro embryo production in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows |
author |
Moschini , Graziela Alves de Lima |
author_facet |
Moschini , Graziela Alves de Lima Gaitkoski, Douglas Almeida, Ana Beatriz Marques de Hidalgo, Myrian Megumy Tsunokawa Martins, Maria Isabel Mello Blaschi, Wanessa Barreiros, Thales Ricardo Rigo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gaitkoski, Douglas Almeida, Ana Beatriz Marques de Hidalgo, Myrian Megumy Tsunokawa Martins, Maria Isabel Mello Blaschi, Wanessa Barreiros, Thales Ricardo Rigo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moschini , Graziela Alves de Lima Gaitkoski, Douglas Almeida, Ana Beatriz Marques de Hidalgo, Myrian Megumy Tsunokawa Martins, Maria Isabel Mello Blaschi, Wanessa Barreiros, Thales Ricardo Rigo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Donor Bos taurus Bos indicus Oocyte Embryos. Donante Taurinas Ganado cebú Ovocito Embriones. Doadora Taurinos Zebuínos Oócito Embriões. |
topic |
Donor Bos taurus Bos indicus Oocyte Embryos. Donante Taurinas Ganado cebú Ovocito Embriones. Doadora Taurinos Zebuínos Oócito Embriões. |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro embryo production in Bos taurus and Bos indicus donors, evaluating from oocyte recovery to final embryo production. Data were collected during the months of January and February and August to October 2017. Bos taurus cows: Holstein and Senepol and Bos indicus cows: Nelore and Dairy Gir, were used as oocyte donors. In total, 3622 sessions of OPU were performed, divided between: Holstein donors: 925; Senepol donors: 1055; Nelore donors: 1202 and Dairy Gir donors: 440. In total, 103.399 oocytes were recovered, being viable oocytes: 90.807; cleaved: 65.252 and produced embryos: 24216. There was no statistical difference between the genetic groups for the total oocytes recovered (Bos taurus: 25.5 vs. Bos indicus: 30.1; P> 0.05). However, a statistical difference was observed between the cleaved (Bos taurus: 16 vs. Bos indicus: 20.4; P <0.05) and produced embryos (Bos taurus: 4.4 vs. Bos indicus: 8.3; P <0,05). Thus, the conclusion is that Zebu donors perform better in IVEP and the donor breed influences the IVEP results. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16712 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16712 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16712 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16712 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16712/14927 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e38810716712 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e38810716712 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e38810716712 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052786332925952 |