Geosynthetic design for reinforcement of embankment on soft soil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Magalhães, Diogo Fellipe Vênus
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Bello, Maria Isabela Marques da Cunha Vieira, Norberto, Alison de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5323
Resumo: Constructions on soft soil deposits are cause for concern due to the high compressibility and low resistance of these soils, and it is necessary to know their geomechanical properties and improvement techniques. In the alternative of soil reinforcement, geosynthetics can be used at the base of the landfill, allowing for increased stability, faster construction and use of steeper slopes. This article presents the geosynthetic design for reinforcement of a soft soil embankment located in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. The objective was to carry out the landfill stability analysis without the reinforcement and with the geosynthetic reinforcement, obtaining the respective values of the safety factors, and therefore, verify the efficiency of this material to reinforce the studied area. The instability mechanisms for expelling soft soil from the foundation and generalized rupture involving embankment, reinforcement and foundation soil were considered. A computer program was used to perform the stability analyzes. The safety factor against expulsion from the soft soil and the minimum safety factor were very close, around 1.3. The use of geosynthetics as reinforcement for the case studied proved to be efficient, with a significant increase in the safety factor from 0.98 to 1.32. The safety factor for the combined use of reinforcement geosynthetics and the construction of a shoulder was 2.37, with the highest value of the three landfill stabilization options. The solution adopted in the project will depend on the value of the minimum safety factor determined by the designer. Several factors such as the size of the work, cost and time, as well as the construction logistics can interfere in the choice of the most appropriate solution. This article seeks a better understanding of the topic, and as a result, to design safer and more economical landfills.
id UNIFEI_49ff55f7ef6ceea9654eaf4b5f5ff6b3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5323
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Geosynthetic design for reinforcement of embankment on soft soilDimensionamiento de geosintético para el refuerzo de vertedeiro en suelo blandoDimensionamento de geossintético para reforço de aterro sobre solo moleImprovementSafe factorCompressibilityStability.MejoraFactor de seguridadCompresibilidadEstabilidad.MelhoramentoFator de segurançaCompressibilidadeEstabilidade.Constructions on soft soil deposits are cause for concern due to the high compressibility and low resistance of these soils, and it is necessary to know their geomechanical properties and improvement techniques. In the alternative of soil reinforcement, geosynthetics can be used at the base of the landfill, allowing for increased stability, faster construction and use of steeper slopes. This article presents the geosynthetic design for reinforcement of a soft soil embankment located in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. The objective was to carry out the landfill stability analysis without the reinforcement and with the geosynthetic reinforcement, obtaining the respective values of the safety factors, and therefore, verify the efficiency of this material to reinforce the studied area. The instability mechanisms for expelling soft soil from the foundation and generalized rupture involving embankment, reinforcement and foundation soil were considered. A computer program was used to perform the stability analyzes. The safety factor against expulsion from the soft soil and the minimum safety factor were very close, around 1.3. The use of geosynthetics as reinforcement for the case studied proved to be efficient, with a significant increase in the safety factor from 0.98 to 1.32. The safety factor for the combined use of reinforcement geosynthetics and the construction of a shoulder was 2.37, with the highest value of the three landfill stabilization options. The solution adopted in the project will depend on the value of the minimum safety factor determined by the designer. Several factors such as the size of the work, cost and time, as well as the construction logistics can interfere in the choice of the most appropriate solution. This article seeks a better understanding of the topic, and as a result, to design safer and more economical landfills.Las construcciones en depósitos de suelos blandos son motivo de preocupación debido a la alta compresibilidad y baja resistencia de estos suelos, y es necesario conocer sus propiedades geomecánicas y técnicas de mejora. En la alternativa del refuerzo del suelo, se pueden usar geosintéticos en la base del relleno sanitario, lo que permite una mayor estabilidad, una construcción más rápida y el uso de pendientes más pronunciadas. Este artículo presenta el diseño geosintético para el refuerzo de un terraplén de suelo blando ubicado en Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. El objetivo fue llevar a cabo el análisis de estabilidad del relleno sin el refuerzo y con el refuerzo geosintético, obteniendo los valores respectivos de los factores de seguridad y, por lo tanto, verificar la eficiencia de este material para reforzar el área estudiada. Se consideraron los mecanismos de inestabilidad para expulsar el suelo blando de los cimientos y la ruptura generalizada que implica el terraplén, el refuerzo y el suelo de los cimientos. Se utilizó un programa de computadora para realizar los análisis de estabilidad. El factor de seguridad contra la expulsión del suelo blando y el factor de seguridad mínimo estaban muy cerca, alrededor de 1,3. El uso de geosintéticos como refuerzo para el caso estudiado demostró ser eficiente, con un aumento significativo en el factor de seguridad de 0,98 a 1,32. El factor de seguridad para el uso combinado de geosintéticos de refuerzo y la construcción de un hombro fue 2,37, el valor más alto de las tres opciones de estabilización de vertederos. La solución adoptada en el proyecto dependerá del valor del factor de seguridad mínimo determinado por el diseñador. Varios factores, como el tamaño del trabajo, el costo y el tiempo, así como la logística de la construcción pueden interferir en la elección de la solución más adecuada. Este artículo busca una mejor comprensión del tema y, como resultado, diseñar vertederos más seguros y económicos.Construções sobre depósitos de solos moles são motivos de preocupação devido à alta compressibilidade e baixa resistência desses solos, sendo necessário conhecer suas propriedades geomecânicas e as técnicas de melhoramento. Na alternativa de reforço do solo, pode-se empregar geossintéticos na base do aterro, permitindo aumento da sua estabilidade, construção mais rápida e utilização de taludes mais íngremes. Este artigo apresenta o dimensionamento de geossintético para reforço de um aterro de solo mole localizado em Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. O objetivo foi realizar a análise de estabilidade do aterro sem o reforço e com o reforço de geossintético, obtendo os respectivos valores dos fatores de segurança, e portanto, verificar a eficiência desse material para reforço da área estudada. Foram considerados os mecanismos de instabilidade de expulsão de solo mole de fundação e de ruptura generalizada envolvendo aterro, reforço e solo de fundação. Utilizou-se um programa computacional para realizar as análises de estabilidade. O fator de segurança contra expulsão do solo mole e o fator de segurança mínimo foram bem próximos, em torno de 1,3. O uso de geossintético como reforço para o caso estudado mostrou-se eficiente, com significante elevação do fator de segurança de 0,98 para 1,32. O fator de segurança para o uso combinado de geossintético de reforço e a construção de uma berma foi de 2,37, sendo o maior valor das três opções de estabilização do aterro. A solução adotada em projeto dependerá do valor do fator de segurança mínimo determinado pelo projetista. Diversos fatores como porte da obra, custo e prazo, assim como a logística da construção podem interferir na escolha da solução mais adequada. Esse artigo busca melhor entendimento do tema, e em consequência, projetar aterros mais seguros e econômicos.Research, Society and Development2020-07-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/532310.33448/rsd-v9i8.5323Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e355985323Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e355985323Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e3559853232525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5323/4895Copyright (c) 2020 Alison de Souza Norberto, maria isabela Marques da Cunha bello, Diogo Fellipe Vênus Magalhãesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMagalhães, Diogo Fellipe VênusBello, Maria Isabela Marques da Cunha VieiraNorberto, Alison de Souza2020-08-20T18:00:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5323Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:28:52.276083Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Geosynthetic design for reinforcement of embankment on soft soil
Dimensionamiento de geosintético para el refuerzo de vertedeiro en suelo blando
Dimensionamento de geossintético para reforço de aterro sobre solo mole
title Geosynthetic design for reinforcement of embankment on soft soil
spellingShingle Geosynthetic design for reinforcement of embankment on soft soil
Magalhães, Diogo Fellipe Vênus
Improvement
Safe factor
Compressibility
Stability.
Mejora
Factor de seguridad
Compresibilidad
Estabilidad.
Melhoramento
Fator de segurança
Compressibilidade
Estabilidade.
title_short Geosynthetic design for reinforcement of embankment on soft soil
title_full Geosynthetic design for reinforcement of embankment on soft soil
title_fullStr Geosynthetic design for reinforcement of embankment on soft soil
title_full_unstemmed Geosynthetic design for reinforcement of embankment on soft soil
title_sort Geosynthetic design for reinforcement of embankment on soft soil
author Magalhães, Diogo Fellipe Vênus
author_facet Magalhães, Diogo Fellipe Vênus
Bello, Maria Isabela Marques da Cunha Vieira
Norberto, Alison de Souza
author_role author
author2 Bello, Maria Isabela Marques da Cunha Vieira
Norberto, Alison de Souza
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magalhães, Diogo Fellipe Vênus
Bello, Maria Isabela Marques da Cunha Vieira
Norberto, Alison de Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Improvement
Safe factor
Compressibility
Stability.
Mejora
Factor de seguridad
Compresibilidad
Estabilidad.
Melhoramento
Fator de segurança
Compressibilidade
Estabilidade.
topic Improvement
Safe factor
Compressibility
Stability.
Mejora
Factor de seguridad
Compresibilidad
Estabilidad.
Melhoramento
Fator de segurança
Compressibilidade
Estabilidade.
description Constructions on soft soil deposits are cause for concern due to the high compressibility and low resistance of these soils, and it is necessary to know their geomechanical properties and improvement techniques. In the alternative of soil reinforcement, geosynthetics can be used at the base of the landfill, allowing for increased stability, faster construction and use of steeper slopes. This article presents the geosynthetic design for reinforcement of a soft soil embankment located in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. The objective was to carry out the landfill stability analysis without the reinforcement and with the geosynthetic reinforcement, obtaining the respective values of the safety factors, and therefore, verify the efficiency of this material to reinforce the studied area. The instability mechanisms for expelling soft soil from the foundation and generalized rupture involving embankment, reinforcement and foundation soil were considered. A computer program was used to perform the stability analyzes. The safety factor against expulsion from the soft soil and the minimum safety factor were very close, around 1.3. The use of geosynthetics as reinforcement for the case studied proved to be efficient, with a significant increase in the safety factor from 0.98 to 1.32. The safety factor for the combined use of reinforcement geosynthetics and the construction of a shoulder was 2.37, with the highest value of the three landfill stabilization options. The solution adopted in the project will depend on the value of the minimum safety factor determined by the designer. Several factors such as the size of the work, cost and time, as well as the construction logistics can interfere in the choice of the most appropriate solution. This article seeks a better understanding of the topic, and as a result, to design safer and more economical landfills.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5323
10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5323
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5323
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5323
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5323/4895
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e355985323
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e355985323
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e355985323
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052737061388288