Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Rosal, Marta Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25454
Resumo: Diagnostic hysteroscopy is the gold standard method in endometrial evaluation, allowing direct visualization of the entire uterine cavity, besides the identification of pathologies and biopsy of suspicious lesions. To evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. An analytical cross-sectional study, developed in a university hospital. The sample consisted of 188 patients who underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy from September 2014 to September 2017. Hysteroscopy was compared with ultrasonography and anatomopathological results. Univariate and bivariate statistics were calculated. The mean age of the patients was 59.6±7.7 years and the mean time of menopause was 11.2±8 years. Hysteroscopy showed a higher sensitivity for detection of endometrial polyp (91.8%) and greater specificity in the exclusion of hyperplasia (61.4%). The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening (72.3%) and the main finding was polypoid formation (45.7%). For asymptomatic patients, ultrasonography showed 100% and 100% of sensitivity and 10.6% and 36.2% of specificity using 5 to 9 mm as cutoff, respectively, for the diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrial cancer. Patients with atypical hyperplasia or cancer had a greater thickness (p=0.012). There was no correlation between bleeding time and endometrial cancer. Hysteroscopy was effective in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening and the main hysteroscopic finding was endometrial polyp. Greater limit of endometrial echo thickness can be proposed in asymptomatic postmenopausal women for the indication of hysteroscopy.
id UNIFEI_4ef39d6a5638e8835ccac9559b646c5a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25454
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal womenEficacia de la histeroscopia diagnóstica en mujeres en post menopausiaEficácia da histeroscopia diagnóstica em mulheres na pós menopausa UltrasonographyHysteroscopyMenopause.EcografíaHisteroscopiaMenopausia.UltrassonografiaHisteroscopiaMenopausa.Diagnostic hysteroscopy is the gold standard method in endometrial evaluation, allowing direct visualization of the entire uterine cavity, besides the identification of pathologies and biopsy of suspicious lesions. To evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. An analytical cross-sectional study, developed in a university hospital. The sample consisted of 188 patients who underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy from September 2014 to September 2017. Hysteroscopy was compared with ultrasonography and anatomopathological results. Univariate and bivariate statistics were calculated. The mean age of the patients was 59.6±7.7 years and the mean time of menopause was 11.2±8 years. Hysteroscopy showed a higher sensitivity for detection of endometrial polyp (91.8%) and greater specificity in the exclusion of hyperplasia (61.4%). The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening (72.3%) and the main finding was polypoid formation (45.7%). For asymptomatic patients, ultrasonography showed 100% and 100% of sensitivity and 10.6% and 36.2% of specificity using 5 to 9 mm as cutoff, respectively, for the diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrial cancer. Patients with atypical hyperplasia or cancer had a greater thickness (p=0.012). There was no correlation between bleeding time and endometrial cancer. Hysteroscopy was effective in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening and the main hysteroscopic finding was endometrial polyp. Greater limit of endometrial echo thickness can be proposed in asymptomatic postmenopausal women for the indication of hysteroscopy.La histeroscopia diagnóstica es el método de referencia en la valoración del endometrio, ya que permite la visualización directa de toda la cavidad uterina, lo que permite la identificación de patologías y la biopsia de lesiones sospechosas. Evaluar la efectividad de la histeroscopia diagnóstica en mujeres posmenopáusicas. Estudio analítico transversal, desarrollado en el Hospital Universitario de la UFPI. La muestra estuvo constituida por 188 pacientes que fueron sometidas a histeroscopia diagnóstica desde septiembre de 2014 a septiembre de 2017. Se comparó la histeroscopia con la ecografía y el examen patológico. Se calcularon estadísticas uni y bivariadas. La edad media de las pacientes fue de 59,6 ± 7,7 años, con un tiempo medio desde la menopausia de 11,2 ± 8 años. La histeroscopia mostró mayor sensibilidad para detectar pólipos endometriales (91,8%) y mayor especificidad para excluir hiperplasia (61,4%). La principal indicación para la exploración fue el engrosamiento endometrial (72,3%) y el hallazgo más frecuente fue la formación de polipoides (45,7%). Para los pacientes asintomáticos, la ecografía tuvo una sensibilidad del 100% y el 100% y una especificidad del 10,6% y el 36,2% utilizando 5 y 9 mm como punto de corte, respectivamente, para el diagnóstico de hiperplasia atípica / cáncer de endometrio. Los pacientes con hiperplasia atípica o cáncer tenían mayor grosor del eco endometrial que los demás (p = 0,012). No hubo correlación entre el tiempo de sangrado y el cáncer de endometrio. La histeroscopia fue eficaz en el diagnóstico de pólipos endometriales. La principal indicación para la exploración fue el engrosamiento endometrial, siendo el principal hallazgo histeroscópico el pólipo endometrial. Se puede proponer un límite de espesor del eco endometrial más alto en pacientes posmenopáusicas asintomáticas para la indicación de histeroscopia diagnóstica.A histeroscopia diagnóstica é o método padrão-ouro na avaliação endometrial, pois permite visualização direta de toda cavidade uterina, possibilitando a identificação de patologias e biópsia de lesões suspeitas. Avaliar a eficácia da histeroscopia diagnóstica em mulheres na pós-menopausa. Estudo transversal analítico, desenvolvido no Hospital Universitário da UFPI. A amostra foi constituída por 188 pacientes que realizaram histeroscopia diagnóstica no período de setembro de 2014 a setembro de 2017. A histeroscopia foi comparada com a ultrassonografia e anatomopatológico. Foram calculadas estatísticas uni e bivariadas. A idade média das pacientes foi 59,6 ±7,7 anos, com tempo de menopausa médio de 11,2 ± 8 anos. A histeroscopia apresentou maior sensibilidade para detecção de pólipo endometrial (91,8%) e maior especificidade na exclusão de hiperplasia (61,4%). A principal indicação do exame foi espessamento endometrial (72,3%) e o achado mais encontrado foi formação polipoide (45,7%). Para as pacientes assintomáticas, a ultrassonografia apresentou sensibilidade de 100% e 100% e especificidade de 10,6% e 36,2% utilizando 5 e 9 mm como cutoff, respectivamente, para o diagnóstico de hiperplasia atípica/câncer de endométrio. Pacientes com hiperplasia atípica ou câncer apresentaram maior espessura do eco endometrial que as demais (p=0,012). Não houve correlação entre tempo de sangramento e câncer de endométrio. A histeroscopia foi eficaz no diagnóstico de pólipos endometriais. A principal indicação do exame foi espessamento endometrial, sendo o principal achado histeroscópico o pólipo endometrial. Um maior limite de espessura do eco endometrial pode ser proposto em pacientes menopausadas assintomáticas para a indicação da histeroscopia diagnóstica.Research, Society and Development2022-01-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2545410.33448/rsd-v11i1.25454Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e54811125454Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e54811125454Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e548111254542525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25454/22172Copyright (c) 2022 Monalisa Cavalcante de Carvalho; Marta Alves Rosalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de Rosal, Marta Alves2022-01-16T18:08:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25454Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:43.704206Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
Eficacia de la histeroscopia diagnóstica en mujeres en post menopausia
Eficácia da histeroscopia diagnóstica em mulheres na pós menopausa
title Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
spellingShingle Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
Carvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de
Ultrasonography
Hysteroscopy
Menopause.
Ecografía
Histeroscopia
Menopausia.
Ultrassonografia
Histeroscopia
Menopausa.
title_short Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
title_full Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
title_fullStr Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
title_sort Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
author Carvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de
author_facet Carvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de
Rosal, Marta Alves
author_role author
author2 Rosal, Marta Alves
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de
Rosal, Marta Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ultrasonography
Hysteroscopy
Menopause.
Ecografía
Histeroscopia
Menopausia.
Ultrassonografia
Histeroscopia
Menopausa.
topic Ultrasonography
Hysteroscopy
Menopause.
Ecografía
Histeroscopia
Menopausia.
Ultrassonografia
Histeroscopia
Menopausa.
description Diagnostic hysteroscopy is the gold standard method in endometrial evaluation, allowing direct visualization of the entire uterine cavity, besides the identification of pathologies and biopsy of suspicious lesions. To evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. An analytical cross-sectional study, developed in a university hospital. The sample consisted of 188 patients who underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy from September 2014 to September 2017. Hysteroscopy was compared with ultrasonography and anatomopathological results. Univariate and bivariate statistics were calculated. The mean age of the patients was 59.6±7.7 years and the mean time of menopause was 11.2±8 years. Hysteroscopy showed a higher sensitivity for detection of endometrial polyp (91.8%) and greater specificity in the exclusion of hyperplasia (61.4%). The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening (72.3%) and the main finding was polypoid formation (45.7%). For asymptomatic patients, ultrasonography showed 100% and 100% of sensitivity and 10.6% and 36.2% of specificity using 5 to 9 mm as cutoff, respectively, for the diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrial cancer. Patients with atypical hyperplasia or cancer had a greater thickness (p=0.012). There was no correlation between bleeding time and endometrial cancer. Hysteroscopy was effective in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening and the main hysteroscopic finding was endometrial polyp. Greater limit of endometrial echo thickness can be proposed in asymptomatic postmenopausal women for the indication of hysteroscopy.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25454
10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25454
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25454
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25454
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25454/22172
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Monalisa Cavalcante de Carvalho; Marta Alves Rosal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Monalisa Cavalcante de Carvalho; Marta Alves Rosal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e54811125454
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e54811125454
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e54811125454
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052761549832192