Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25454 |
Resumo: | Diagnostic hysteroscopy is the gold standard method in endometrial evaluation, allowing direct visualization of the entire uterine cavity, besides the identification of pathologies and biopsy of suspicious lesions. To evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. An analytical cross-sectional study, developed in a university hospital. The sample consisted of 188 patients who underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy from September 2014 to September 2017. Hysteroscopy was compared with ultrasonography and anatomopathological results. Univariate and bivariate statistics were calculated. The mean age of the patients was 59.6±7.7 years and the mean time of menopause was 11.2±8 years. Hysteroscopy showed a higher sensitivity for detection of endometrial polyp (91.8%) and greater specificity in the exclusion of hyperplasia (61.4%). The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening (72.3%) and the main finding was polypoid formation (45.7%). For asymptomatic patients, ultrasonography showed 100% and 100% of sensitivity and 10.6% and 36.2% of specificity using 5 to 9 mm as cutoff, respectively, for the diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrial cancer. Patients with atypical hyperplasia or cancer had a greater thickness (p=0.012). There was no correlation between bleeding time and endometrial cancer. Hysteroscopy was effective in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening and the main hysteroscopic finding was endometrial polyp. Greater limit of endometrial echo thickness can be proposed in asymptomatic postmenopausal women for the indication of hysteroscopy. |
id |
UNIFEI_4ef39d6a5638e8835ccac9559b646c5a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25454 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal womenEficacia de la histeroscopia diagnóstica en mujeres en post menopausiaEficácia da histeroscopia diagnóstica em mulheres na pós menopausa UltrasonographyHysteroscopyMenopause.EcografíaHisteroscopiaMenopausia.UltrassonografiaHisteroscopiaMenopausa.Diagnostic hysteroscopy is the gold standard method in endometrial evaluation, allowing direct visualization of the entire uterine cavity, besides the identification of pathologies and biopsy of suspicious lesions. To evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. An analytical cross-sectional study, developed in a university hospital. The sample consisted of 188 patients who underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy from September 2014 to September 2017. Hysteroscopy was compared with ultrasonography and anatomopathological results. Univariate and bivariate statistics were calculated. The mean age of the patients was 59.6±7.7 years and the mean time of menopause was 11.2±8 years. Hysteroscopy showed a higher sensitivity for detection of endometrial polyp (91.8%) and greater specificity in the exclusion of hyperplasia (61.4%). The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening (72.3%) and the main finding was polypoid formation (45.7%). For asymptomatic patients, ultrasonography showed 100% and 100% of sensitivity and 10.6% and 36.2% of specificity using 5 to 9 mm as cutoff, respectively, for the diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrial cancer. Patients with atypical hyperplasia or cancer had a greater thickness (p=0.012). There was no correlation between bleeding time and endometrial cancer. Hysteroscopy was effective in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening and the main hysteroscopic finding was endometrial polyp. Greater limit of endometrial echo thickness can be proposed in asymptomatic postmenopausal women for the indication of hysteroscopy.La histeroscopia diagnóstica es el método de referencia en la valoración del endometrio, ya que permite la visualización directa de toda la cavidad uterina, lo que permite la identificación de patologías y la biopsia de lesiones sospechosas. Evaluar la efectividad de la histeroscopia diagnóstica en mujeres posmenopáusicas. Estudio analítico transversal, desarrollado en el Hospital Universitario de la UFPI. La muestra estuvo constituida por 188 pacientes que fueron sometidas a histeroscopia diagnóstica desde septiembre de 2014 a septiembre de 2017. Se comparó la histeroscopia con la ecografía y el examen patológico. Se calcularon estadísticas uni y bivariadas. La edad media de las pacientes fue de 59,6 ± 7,7 años, con un tiempo medio desde la menopausia de 11,2 ± 8 años. La histeroscopia mostró mayor sensibilidad para detectar pólipos endometriales (91,8%) y mayor especificidad para excluir hiperplasia (61,4%). La principal indicación para la exploración fue el engrosamiento endometrial (72,3%) y el hallazgo más frecuente fue la formación de polipoides (45,7%). Para los pacientes asintomáticos, la ecografía tuvo una sensibilidad del 100% y el 100% y una especificidad del 10,6% y el 36,2% utilizando 5 y 9 mm como punto de corte, respectivamente, para el diagnóstico de hiperplasia atípica / cáncer de endometrio. Los pacientes con hiperplasia atípica o cáncer tenían mayor grosor del eco endometrial que los demás (p = 0,012). No hubo correlación entre el tiempo de sangrado y el cáncer de endometrio. La histeroscopia fue eficaz en el diagnóstico de pólipos endometriales. La principal indicación para la exploración fue el engrosamiento endometrial, siendo el principal hallazgo histeroscópico el pólipo endometrial. Se puede proponer un límite de espesor del eco endometrial más alto en pacientes posmenopáusicas asintomáticas para la indicación de histeroscopia diagnóstica.A histeroscopia diagnóstica é o método padrão-ouro na avaliação endometrial, pois permite visualização direta de toda cavidade uterina, possibilitando a identificação de patologias e biópsia de lesões suspeitas. Avaliar a eficácia da histeroscopia diagnóstica em mulheres na pós-menopausa. Estudo transversal analítico, desenvolvido no Hospital Universitário da UFPI. A amostra foi constituída por 188 pacientes que realizaram histeroscopia diagnóstica no período de setembro de 2014 a setembro de 2017. A histeroscopia foi comparada com a ultrassonografia e anatomopatológico. Foram calculadas estatísticas uni e bivariadas. A idade média das pacientes foi 59,6 ±7,7 anos, com tempo de menopausa médio de 11,2 ± 8 anos. A histeroscopia apresentou maior sensibilidade para detecção de pólipo endometrial (91,8%) e maior especificidade na exclusão de hiperplasia (61,4%). A principal indicação do exame foi espessamento endometrial (72,3%) e o achado mais encontrado foi formação polipoide (45,7%). Para as pacientes assintomáticas, a ultrassonografia apresentou sensibilidade de 100% e 100% e especificidade de 10,6% e 36,2% utilizando 5 e 9 mm como cutoff, respectivamente, para o diagnóstico de hiperplasia atípica/câncer de endométrio. Pacientes com hiperplasia atípica ou câncer apresentaram maior espessura do eco endometrial que as demais (p=0,012). Não houve correlação entre tempo de sangramento e câncer de endométrio. A histeroscopia foi eficaz no diagnóstico de pólipos endometriais. A principal indicação do exame foi espessamento endometrial, sendo o principal achado histeroscópico o pólipo endometrial. Um maior limite de espessura do eco endometrial pode ser proposto em pacientes menopausadas assintomáticas para a indicação da histeroscopia diagnóstica.Research, Society and Development2022-01-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2545410.33448/rsd-v11i1.25454Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e54811125454Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e54811125454Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e548111254542525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25454/22172Copyright (c) 2022 Monalisa Cavalcante de Carvalho; Marta Alves Rosalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de Rosal, Marta Alves2022-01-16T18:08:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25454Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:43.704206Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women Eficacia de la histeroscopia diagnóstica en mujeres en post menopausia Eficácia da histeroscopia diagnóstica em mulheres na pós menopausa |
title |
Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
spellingShingle |
Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women Carvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de Ultrasonography Hysteroscopy Menopause. Ecografía Histeroscopia Menopausia. Ultrassonografia Histeroscopia Menopausa. |
title_short |
Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
title_full |
Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
title_sort |
Efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women |
author |
Carvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de Rosal, Marta Alves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rosal, Marta Alves |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Monalisa Cavalcante de Rosal, Marta Alves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ultrasonography Hysteroscopy Menopause. Ecografía Histeroscopia Menopausia. Ultrassonografia Histeroscopia Menopausa. |
topic |
Ultrasonography Hysteroscopy Menopause. Ecografía Histeroscopia Menopausia. Ultrassonografia Histeroscopia Menopausa. |
description |
Diagnostic hysteroscopy is the gold standard method in endometrial evaluation, allowing direct visualization of the entire uterine cavity, besides the identification of pathologies and biopsy of suspicious lesions. To evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. An analytical cross-sectional study, developed in a university hospital. The sample consisted of 188 patients who underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy from September 2014 to September 2017. Hysteroscopy was compared with ultrasonography and anatomopathological results. Univariate and bivariate statistics were calculated. The mean age of the patients was 59.6±7.7 years and the mean time of menopause was 11.2±8 years. Hysteroscopy showed a higher sensitivity for detection of endometrial polyp (91.8%) and greater specificity in the exclusion of hyperplasia (61.4%). The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening (72.3%) and the main finding was polypoid formation (45.7%). For asymptomatic patients, ultrasonography showed 100% and 100% of sensitivity and 10.6% and 36.2% of specificity using 5 to 9 mm as cutoff, respectively, for the diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrial cancer. Patients with atypical hyperplasia or cancer had a greater thickness (p=0.012). There was no correlation between bleeding time and endometrial cancer. Hysteroscopy was effective in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. The main indication of the examination was endometrial thickening and the main hysteroscopic finding was endometrial polyp. Greater limit of endometrial echo thickness can be proposed in asymptomatic postmenopausal women for the indication of hysteroscopy. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25454 10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25454 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25454 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25454 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25454/22172 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Monalisa Cavalcante de Carvalho; Marta Alves Rosal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Monalisa Cavalcante de Carvalho; Marta Alves Rosal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e54811125454 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e54811125454 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e54811125454 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052761549832192 |