Comparative study of cutting ability and resistance using Waveone® Gold and Trunatomy® Ni–Ti rotary instruments in root canal preparation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Haddad Filho, Miguel Simão
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Tognetti, Valdinéia Maria, Pedron, Irineu Gregnanin, Godoi, Beatriz Corina, Shitsuka, Caleb, Medeiros, João Marcelo Ferreira de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38653
Resumo: The present study comparatively evaluated the cutting capacity and resistance of two instrumentation sequences considering the difference in weight after preparation of the root canal simulated in transparent acrylic resin blocks with a standardized curvature angle of 45°. Resources have been subjected to a maximum of ten sterilization and use cycles. The blocks were weighed on a maximum precision digital scale before and after preparation, followed by verification of weight loss regarding the cutting capacity of the instruments through the interference of multiple uses and autoclaving, since the resistance analysis can be verified through the amount of blocks used for each protocol, up to a maximum limit of ten blocks per group, except for the occurrence of fracture. It can be concluded that the TruNatomy® system was more effective in terms of resistance, considering its performance in the ten intended blocks, unlike the Proglider® plus WaveOne Gold Primary® protocol, where there was a fracture on the fifth use. As for cutting capacity, the WaveOne Gold Primary® instrument (mean of 4 blocks=3.4629g) presented a slight advantage over TruNatomy® (mean of 4 blocks=3.4506g), but without statistical significance.
id UNIFEI_53e4e26fb5a18a9a4012941a71ca50d8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38653
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative study of cutting ability and resistance using Waveone® Gold and Trunatomy® Ni–Ti rotary instruments in root canal preparationComparación de la capacidad y resistencia de corte de los sistemas Waveone® Gold y Trunatomy® en la preparación de endodonciaEstudo comparativo da capacidade de corte e resistência de instrumentos rotatórios de Ni–Ti Waveone® Gold e Trunatomy® durante o preparo do canal radicularEndodontiaPreparo de canal radicularInstrumentos odontológicosCorteResistência ao corte.EndodonticsRoot canal preparationDental instrumentsCutShear strength.EndodonciaPreparación del conducto radicularInstrumentos dentalesCortaduraResistencia al corte.The present study comparatively evaluated the cutting capacity and resistance of two instrumentation sequences considering the difference in weight after preparation of the root canal simulated in transparent acrylic resin blocks with a standardized curvature angle of 45°. Resources have been subjected to a maximum of ten sterilization and use cycles. The blocks were weighed on a maximum precision digital scale before and after preparation, followed by verification of weight loss regarding the cutting capacity of the instruments through the interference of multiple uses and autoclaving, since the resistance analysis can be verified through the amount of blocks used for each protocol, up to a maximum limit of ten blocks per group, except for the occurrence of fracture. It can be concluded that the TruNatomy® system was more effective in terms of resistance, considering its performance in the ten intended blocks, unlike the Proglider® plus WaveOne Gold Primary® protocol, where there was a fracture on the fifth use. As for cutting capacity, the WaveOne Gold Primary® instrument (mean of 4 blocks=3.4629g) presented a slight advantage over TruNatomy® (mean of 4 blocks=3.4506g), but without statistical significance.El presente estudio evaluó comparativamente la capacidad de corte y la resistencia de dos secuencias de instrumentación considerando la diferencia de peso después de la preparación del conducto radicular simulado en bloques de resina acrílica transparente con un ángulo de curvatura estandarizado de 45°. Los recursos han sido sometidos a un máximo de diez ciclos de esterilización y uso. Los bloques fueron pesados ​​en una balanza digital de máxima precisión antes y después de la preparación, seguido de la verificación de la pérdida de peso en cuanto a la capacidad de corte de los instrumentos a través de la interferencia de usos múltiples y autoclave, ya que el análisis de resistencia se puede verificar a través de la cantidad de bloques utilizados. para cada protocolo, hasta un límite máximo de diez bloques por grupo, salvo la ocurrencia de fractura. Se puede concluir que el sistema TruNatomy® fue más efectivo en términos de resistencia, considerando su desempeño en los diez bloques previstos, a diferencia del protocolo Proglider® más WaveOne Gold Primary®, donde hubo fractura al quinto uso. En cuanto a la capacidad de corte, el instrumento WaveOne Gold Primary® (promedio de 4 bloques=3,4629g) presentó una ligera ventaja sobre el TruNatomy® (promedio de 4 bloques=3,4506g), pero sin significancia estadística.O presente estudo avaliou comparativamente a capacidade de corte e resistência de duas sequências de instrumentação considerando a diferença de peso após o preparo do canal radicular simulado em blocos de resina acrílica transparente com ângulo de curvatura padronizado em 45°. Os recursos foram submetidos ao máximo de dez ciclos de esterilização e uso. Os blocos foram pesados em balança digital de máxima precisão antes e após o preparo, seguido da verificação de perda de peso no tocante a capacidade de corte dos instrumentos mediante interferência de múltiplos usos e autoclavagem, já a análise da resistência pode ser constatada mediante quantidade de blocos utilizados para cada protocolo, até o limite máximo de dez blocos por grupo ressalvado ocorrência de fratura. Pode-se concluir que o sistema TruNatomy® foi mais efetivo no quesito resistência considerando sua atuação nos dez blocos pretendidos, diferente do protocolo Proglider® mais WaveOne Gold Primary® onde houve fratura no quinto uso. Quanto a capacidade de corte apresentou ligeira vantagem do instrumento WaveOne Gold Primary® (média de 4 blocos=3,4629g) em relação ao TruNatomy® (média de 4 blocos=3,4506g), porém sem significado estatístico.Research, Society and Development2023-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3865310.33448/rsd-v12i5.38653Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 No. 5; e21612538653Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 Núm. 5; e21612538653Research, Society and Development; v. 12 n. 5; e216125386532525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38653/33870Copyright (c) 2023 Miguel Simão Haddad Filho; Valdinéia Maria Tognetti; Irineu Gregnanin Pedron; Beatriz Corina Godoi; Caleb Shitsuka; João Marcelo Ferreira de Medeiroshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHaddad Filho, Miguel SimãoTognetti, Valdinéia Maria Pedron, Irineu Gregnanin Godoi, Beatriz Corina Shitsuka, Caleb Medeiros, João Marcelo Ferreira de 2023-05-30T13:24:21Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38653Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2023-05-30T13:24:21Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study of cutting ability and resistance using Waveone® Gold and Trunatomy® Ni–Ti rotary instruments in root canal preparation
Comparación de la capacidad y resistencia de corte de los sistemas Waveone® Gold y Trunatomy® en la preparación de endodoncia
Estudo comparativo da capacidade de corte e resistência de instrumentos rotatórios de Ni–Ti Waveone® Gold e Trunatomy® durante o preparo do canal radicular
title Comparative study of cutting ability and resistance using Waveone® Gold and Trunatomy® Ni–Ti rotary instruments in root canal preparation
spellingShingle Comparative study of cutting ability and resistance using Waveone® Gold and Trunatomy® Ni–Ti rotary instruments in root canal preparation
Haddad Filho, Miguel Simão
Endodontia
Preparo de canal radicular
Instrumentos odontológicos
Corte
Resistência ao corte.
Endodontics
Root canal preparation
Dental instruments
Cut
Shear strength.
Endodoncia
Preparación del conducto radicular
Instrumentos dentales
Cortadura
Resistencia al corte.
title_short Comparative study of cutting ability and resistance using Waveone® Gold and Trunatomy® Ni–Ti rotary instruments in root canal preparation
title_full Comparative study of cutting ability and resistance using Waveone® Gold and Trunatomy® Ni–Ti rotary instruments in root canal preparation
title_fullStr Comparative study of cutting ability and resistance using Waveone® Gold and Trunatomy® Ni–Ti rotary instruments in root canal preparation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of cutting ability and resistance using Waveone® Gold and Trunatomy® Ni–Ti rotary instruments in root canal preparation
title_sort Comparative study of cutting ability and resistance using Waveone® Gold and Trunatomy® Ni–Ti rotary instruments in root canal preparation
author Haddad Filho, Miguel Simão
author_facet Haddad Filho, Miguel Simão
Tognetti, Valdinéia Maria
Pedron, Irineu Gregnanin
Godoi, Beatriz Corina
Shitsuka, Caleb
Medeiros, João Marcelo Ferreira de
author_role author
author2 Tognetti, Valdinéia Maria
Pedron, Irineu Gregnanin
Godoi, Beatriz Corina
Shitsuka, Caleb
Medeiros, João Marcelo Ferreira de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Haddad Filho, Miguel Simão
Tognetti, Valdinéia Maria
Pedron, Irineu Gregnanin
Godoi, Beatriz Corina
Shitsuka, Caleb
Medeiros, João Marcelo Ferreira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endodontia
Preparo de canal radicular
Instrumentos odontológicos
Corte
Resistência ao corte.
Endodontics
Root canal preparation
Dental instruments
Cut
Shear strength.
Endodoncia
Preparación del conducto radicular
Instrumentos dentales
Cortadura
Resistencia al corte.
topic Endodontia
Preparo de canal radicular
Instrumentos odontológicos
Corte
Resistência ao corte.
Endodontics
Root canal preparation
Dental instruments
Cut
Shear strength.
Endodoncia
Preparación del conducto radicular
Instrumentos dentales
Cortadura
Resistencia al corte.
description The present study comparatively evaluated the cutting capacity and resistance of two instrumentation sequences considering the difference in weight after preparation of the root canal simulated in transparent acrylic resin blocks with a standardized curvature angle of 45°. Resources have been subjected to a maximum of ten sterilization and use cycles. The blocks were weighed on a maximum precision digital scale before and after preparation, followed by verification of weight loss regarding the cutting capacity of the instruments through the interference of multiple uses and autoclaving, since the resistance analysis can be verified through the amount of blocks used for each protocol, up to a maximum limit of ten blocks per group, except for the occurrence of fracture. It can be concluded that the TruNatomy® system was more effective in terms of resistance, considering its performance in the ten intended blocks, unlike the Proglider® plus WaveOne Gold Primary® protocol, where there was a fracture on the fifth use. As for cutting capacity, the WaveOne Gold Primary® instrument (mean of 4 blocks=3.4629g) presented a slight advantage over TruNatomy® (mean of 4 blocks=3.4506g), but without statistical significance.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38653
10.33448/rsd-v12i5.38653
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38653
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v12i5.38653
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38653/33870
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 No. 5; e21612538653
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 Núm. 5; e21612538653
Research, Society and Development; v. 12 n. 5; e21612538653
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052613810716672