Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
DOI: | 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7301 |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7301 |
Resumo: | The objective was to evaluate the morphological components of white oats grown in soil management systems. The work was developed at the Experimental Farm of Agricultural Sciences at UFGD, in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. The treatments consisted of the managements: EC = cross chiseling followed by harrowing; E = a scarification; EG = scarification followed by harrowing; GR = a harrowing; SM = without mobilization; PC = plowing followed by two harrows. In the white oat culture, stand, height, number of tillers, biomass, dry leaf biomass, dry shoot biomass, leaf area index, specific leaf area, leaf mass ratio and leaf area ratio were evaluated. Data analysis was performed by analysis of variance and, when significant, the Tukey test was applied at 5% probability. The white oat stand is uniform in the area and is not affected by soil management systems. The height of the oats and the number of tillers are affected by the treatments that the scarifier contains. The systems without mobilization and scarifier benefited the production of white oat biomass, as well as the dry biomass of the leaves and shoots and the leaf area index. The leaf area ratio and specific leaf area were influenced by the systems with scarifier and conventional preparation, and the leaf mass ratio by the cross scarification systems, without mobilization and conventional preparation. |
id |
UNIFEI_55f5ffb4f928c02eaa54b266cd56ccd4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7301 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
spelling |
Morphological components of white oats in soil management systemsComponentes morfológicos de la avena blanca en los sistemas de manejo del sueloComponentes morfológicos da aveia branca em sistemas de manejo de soloÁrea foliarÍndice del área foliarMecanizaciónLabranza ceroPreparación convencional.Área foliarÍndice de área foliarMecanizaçãoPlantio diretoPreparo convencional.Leaf areaLeaf area indexMechanizationNo-tillageConventional preparation.The objective was to evaluate the morphological components of white oats grown in soil management systems. The work was developed at the Experimental Farm of Agricultural Sciences at UFGD, in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. The treatments consisted of the managements: EC = cross chiseling followed by harrowing; E = a scarification; EG = scarification followed by harrowing; GR = a harrowing; SM = without mobilization; PC = plowing followed by two harrows. In the white oat culture, stand, height, number of tillers, biomass, dry leaf biomass, dry shoot biomass, leaf area index, specific leaf area, leaf mass ratio and leaf area ratio were evaluated. Data analysis was performed by analysis of variance and, when significant, the Tukey test was applied at 5% probability. The white oat stand is uniform in the area and is not affected by soil management systems. The height of the oats and the number of tillers are affected by the treatments that the scarifier contains. The systems without mobilization and scarifier benefited the production of white oat biomass, as well as the dry biomass of the leaves and shoots and the leaf area index. The leaf area ratio and specific leaf area were influenced by the systems with scarifier and conventional preparation, and the leaf mass ratio by the cross scarification systems, without mobilization and conventional preparation.El objetivo fue evaluar los componentes morfológicos de la avena blanca cultivada en sistemas de manejo de suelos. El trabajo se desarrolló en la Granja Experimental de Ciencias Agrícolas en UFGD, en un diseño de bloques al azar, con cuatro repeticiones. Los tratamientos consistieron en el manejo: CE = cincelado cruzado seguido de desgarrado; E = una escarificación; EG = escarificación seguida de desgarrador; GR = un desgarrador; SM = sin movilización; PC = arado seguido de dos gradas. En el cultivo de avena blanca, se evaluaron el soporte, la altura, el número de macollos, la biomasa, la biomasa de la hoja seca, la biomasa del brote seco, el índice de área de la hoja, el área específica de la hoja, la relación de masa de la hoja y la relación del área de la hoja. El análisis de datos se realizó mediante análisis de varianza y, cuando fue significativo, se aplico la prueba de Tukey con una probabilidad del 5%. El soporte de avena blanca es uniforme en el área y no se ve afectado por los sistemas de manejo del suelo. La altura de la avena y el número de macollos se ven afectados por los tratamientos que contiene el escarificador. Los sistemas sin movilización y escarificador beneficiaron la producción de biomasa de avena blanca, así como la biomasa seca de las hojas y brotes y el índice de área foliar. La relación del área foliar y el área foliar específica fueron influenciadas por los sistemas con escarificador y preparación convencional, y la relación de masa foliar por los sistemas de escarificación cruzada, sin movilización y preparación convencional.Objetivou-se avaliar os componentes morfológicos da aveia branca cultivada em sistemas de manejo de solo. O trabalho foi desenvolvido na Fazenda Experimental de Ciências Agrárias da UFGD, em delineamento de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições. Os tratamentos consistiram dos manejos: EC = escarificação cruzada seguida de uma gradagem; E = um escarificação; EG = uma escarificação seguida de uma gradagem; GR = uma gradagem; SM = sem mobilização; PC = uma aração seguida de duas gradagens. Na cultura da aveia branca foram avaliados: estande, altura, número de perfilhos, biomassa, biomassa seca das folhas, biomassa seca da parte aérea, índice de área foliar, área foliar específica, razão de massa foliar e razão de área foliar. A análise dos dados foi realizada pela análise de variância e, quando significativo, aplicado o teste de Tukey a 5% de probabilidade. O estande da aveia branca é uniforme na área e não sendo afetado pelos sistemas de manejos do solo. A altura da aveia e o número de perfilhos são afetados pelos tratamentos que contém o escarificador. Os sistemas sem mobilização e escarificador beneficiaram a produção de biomassa da aveia branca, bem como a biomassa seca das folhas e da parte aérea e o índice de área foliar. A razão de área foliar e área foliar específica foram influenciadas pelos sistemas com escarificador e preparo convencional, e a razão de massa foliar pelos sistemas de escarificação cruzada, sem mobilização e preparo convencional.Research, Society and Development2020-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/730110.33448/rsd-v9i9.7301Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e275997301Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e275997301Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e2759973012525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7301/6420Copyright (c) 2020 Diandra Pinto Della Flora; Jorge Wilson Cortez; Nayra Fernandes Aguero; Nilsa Maria León López; Lucas de Oliveira Donaire; Delíbio Bastos Fagundes Neto; Gabriel Irala Mariano; Matheus Schiavoni dos Santoshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFlora, Diandra Pinto DellaCortez, Jorge WilsonAguero, Nayra FernandesLópez, Nilsa Maria LeónDonaire, Lucas de OliveiraFagundes Neto, Delíbio BastosMariano, Gabriel IralaSantos, Matheus Schiavoni dos2020-09-18T01:42:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7301Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:30:04.037221Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems Componentes morfológicos de la avena blanca en los sistemas de manejo del suelo Componentes morfológicos da aveia branca em sistemas de manejo de solo |
title |
Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems |
spellingShingle |
Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems Flora, Diandra Pinto Della Área foliar Índice del área foliar Mecanización Labranza cero Preparación convencional. Área foliar Índice de área foliar Mecanização Plantio direto Preparo convencional. Leaf area Leaf area index Mechanization No-tillage Conventional preparation. Flora, Diandra Pinto Della Área foliar Índice del área foliar Mecanización Labranza cero Preparación convencional. Área foliar Índice de área foliar Mecanização Plantio direto Preparo convencional. Leaf area Leaf area index Mechanization No-tillage Conventional preparation. |
title_short |
Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems |
title_full |
Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems |
title_fullStr |
Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems |
title_sort |
Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems |
author |
Flora, Diandra Pinto Della |
author_facet |
Flora, Diandra Pinto Della Flora, Diandra Pinto Della Cortez, Jorge Wilson Aguero, Nayra Fernandes López, Nilsa Maria León Donaire, Lucas de Oliveira Fagundes Neto, Delíbio Bastos Mariano, Gabriel Irala Santos, Matheus Schiavoni dos Cortez, Jorge Wilson Aguero, Nayra Fernandes López, Nilsa Maria León Donaire, Lucas de Oliveira Fagundes Neto, Delíbio Bastos Mariano, Gabriel Irala Santos, Matheus Schiavoni dos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cortez, Jorge Wilson Aguero, Nayra Fernandes López, Nilsa Maria León Donaire, Lucas de Oliveira Fagundes Neto, Delíbio Bastos Mariano, Gabriel Irala Santos, Matheus Schiavoni dos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Flora, Diandra Pinto Della Cortez, Jorge Wilson Aguero, Nayra Fernandes López, Nilsa Maria León Donaire, Lucas de Oliveira Fagundes Neto, Delíbio Bastos Mariano, Gabriel Irala Santos, Matheus Schiavoni dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Área foliar Índice del área foliar Mecanización Labranza cero Preparación convencional. Área foliar Índice de área foliar Mecanização Plantio direto Preparo convencional. Leaf area Leaf area index Mechanization No-tillage Conventional preparation. |
topic |
Área foliar Índice del área foliar Mecanización Labranza cero Preparación convencional. Área foliar Índice de área foliar Mecanização Plantio direto Preparo convencional. Leaf area Leaf area index Mechanization No-tillage Conventional preparation. |
description |
The objective was to evaluate the morphological components of white oats grown in soil management systems. The work was developed at the Experimental Farm of Agricultural Sciences at UFGD, in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. The treatments consisted of the managements: EC = cross chiseling followed by harrowing; E = a scarification; EG = scarification followed by harrowing; GR = a harrowing; SM = without mobilization; PC = plowing followed by two harrows. In the white oat culture, stand, height, number of tillers, biomass, dry leaf biomass, dry shoot biomass, leaf area index, specific leaf area, leaf mass ratio and leaf area ratio were evaluated. Data analysis was performed by analysis of variance and, when significant, the Tukey test was applied at 5% probability. The white oat stand is uniform in the area and is not affected by soil management systems. The height of the oats and the number of tillers are affected by the treatments that the scarifier contains. The systems without mobilization and scarifier benefited the production of white oat biomass, as well as the dry biomass of the leaves and shoots and the leaf area index. The leaf area ratio and specific leaf area were influenced by the systems with scarifier and conventional preparation, and the leaf mass ratio by the cross scarification systems, without mobilization and conventional preparation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7301 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7301 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7301 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7301 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7301/6420 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e275997301 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e275997301 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e275997301 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822178535145472000 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7301 |