Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Flora, Diandra Pinto Della
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Cortez, Jorge Wilson, Aguero, Nayra Fernandes, López, Nilsa Maria León, Donaire, Lucas de Oliveira, Fagundes Neto, Delíbio Bastos, Mariano, Gabriel Irala, Santos, Matheus Schiavoni dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7301
Resumo: The objective was to evaluate the morphological components of white oats grown in soil management systems. The work was developed at the Experimental Farm of Agricultural Sciences at UFGD, in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. The treatments consisted of the managements: EC = cross chiseling followed by harrowing; E = a scarification; EG = scarification followed by harrowing; GR = a harrowing; SM = without mobilization; PC = plowing followed by two harrows. In the white oat culture, stand, height, number of tillers, biomass, dry leaf biomass, dry shoot biomass, leaf area index, specific leaf area, leaf mass ratio and leaf area ratio were evaluated. Data analysis was performed by analysis of variance and, when significant, the Tukey test was applied at 5% probability. The white oat stand is uniform in the area and is not affected by soil management systems. The height of the oats and the number of tillers are affected by the treatments that the scarifier contains. The systems without mobilization and scarifier benefited the production of white oat biomass, as well as the dry biomass of the leaves and shoots and the leaf area index. The leaf area ratio and specific leaf area were influenced by the systems with scarifier and conventional preparation, and the leaf mass ratio by the cross scarification systems, without mobilization and conventional preparation.
id UNIFEI_55f5ffb4f928c02eaa54b266cd56ccd4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7301
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Morphological components of white oats in soil management systemsComponentes morfológicos de la avena blanca en los sistemas de manejo del sueloComponentes morfológicos da aveia branca em sistemas de manejo de soloÁrea foliarÍndice del área foliarMecanizaciónLabranza ceroPreparación convencional.Área foliarÍndice de área foliarMecanizaçãoPlantio diretoPreparo convencional.Leaf areaLeaf area indexMechanizationNo-tillageConventional preparation.The objective was to evaluate the morphological components of white oats grown in soil management systems. The work was developed at the Experimental Farm of Agricultural Sciences at UFGD, in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. The treatments consisted of the managements: EC = cross chiseling followed by harrowing; E = a scarification; EG = scarification followed by harrowing; GR = a harrowing; SM = without mobilization; PC = plowing followed by two harrows. In the white oat culture, stand, height, number of tillers, biomass, dry leaf biomass, dry shoot biomass, leaf area index, specific leaf area, leaf mass ratio and leaf area ratio were evaluated. Data analysis was performed by analysis of variance and, when significant, the Tukey test was applied at 5% probability. The white oat stand is uniform in the area and is not affected by soil management systems. The height of the oats and the number of tillers are affected by the treatments that the scarifier contains. The systems without mobilization and scarifier benefited the production of white oat biomass, as well as the dry biomass of the leaves and shoots and the leaf area index. The leaf area ratio and specific leaf area were influenced by the systems with scarifier and conventional preparation, and the leaf mass ratio by the cross scarification systems, without mobilization and conventional preparation.El objetivo fue evaluar los componentes morfológicos de la avena blanca cultivada en sistemas de manejo de suelos. El trabajo se desarrolló en la Granja Experimental de Ciencias Agrícolas en UFGD, en un diseño de bloques al azar, con cuatro repeticiones. Los tratamientos consistieron en el manejo: CE = cincelado cruzado seguido de desgarrado; E = una escarificación; EG = escarificación seguida de desgarrador; GR = un desgarrador; SM = sin movilización; PC = arado seguido de dos gradas. En el cultivo de avena blanca, se evaluaron el soporte, la altura, el número de macollos, la biomasa, la biomasa de la hoja seca, la biomasa del brote seco, el índice de área de la hoja, el área específica de la hoja, la relación de masa de la hoja y la relación del área de la hoja. El análisis de datos se realizó mediante análisis de varianza y, cuando fue significativo, se aplico la prueba de Tukey con una probabilidad del 5%. El soporte de avena blanca es uniforme en el área y no se ve afectado por los sistemas de manejo del suelo. La altura de la avena y el número de macollos se ven afectados por los tratamientos que contiene el escarificador. Los sistemas sin movilización y escarificador beneficiaron la producción de biomasa de avena blanca, así como la biomasa seca de las hojas y brotes y el índice de área foliar. La relación del área foliar y el área foliar específica fueron influenciadas por los sistemas con escarificador y preparación convencional, y la relación de masa foliar por los sistemas de escarificación cruzada, sin movilización y preparación convencional.Objetivou-se avaliar os componentes morfológicos da aveia branca cultivada em sistemas de manejo de solo. O trabalho foi desenvolvido na Fazenda Experimental de Ciências Agrárias da UFGD, em delineamento de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições. Os tratamentos consistiram dos manejos: EC = escarificação cruzada seguida de uma gradagem; E = um escarificação; EG = uma escarificação seguida de uma gradagem; GR = uma gradagem; SM = sem mobilização; PC = uma aração seguida de duas gradagens. Na cultura da aveia branca foram avaliados: estande, altura, número de perfilhos, biomassa, biomassa seca das folhas, biomassa seca da parte aérea, índice de área foliar, área foliar específica, razão de massa foliar e razão de área foliar. A análise dos dados foi realizada pela análise de variância e, quando significativo, aplicado o teste de Tukey a 5% de probabilidade. O estande da aveia branca é uniforme na área e não sendo afetado pelos sistemas de manejos do solo. A altura da aveia e o número de perfilhos são afetados pelos tratamentos que contém o escarificador. Os sistemas sem mobilização e escarificador beneficiaram a produção de biomassa da aveia branca, bem como a biomassa seca das folhas e da parte aérea e o índice de área foliar. A razão de área foliar e área foliar específica foram influenciadas pelos sistemas com escarificador e preparo convencional, e a razão de massa foliar pelos sistemas de escarificação cruzada, sem mobilização e preparo convencional.Research, Society and Development2020-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/730110.33448/rsd-v9i9.7301Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e275997301Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e275997301Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e2759973012525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7301/6420Copyright (c) 2020 Diandra Pinto Della Flora; Jorge Wilson Cortez; Nayra Fernandes Aguero; Nilsa Maria León López; Lucas de Oliveira Donaire; Delíbio Bastos Fagundes Neto; Gabriel Irala Mariano; Matheus Schiavoni dos Santoshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFlora, Diandra Pinto DellaCortez, Jorge WilsonAguero, Nayra FernandesLópez, Nilsa Maria LeónDonaire, Lucas de OliveiraFagundes Neto, Delíbio BastosMariano, Gabriel IralaSantos, Matheus Schiavoni dos2020-09-18T01:42:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7301Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:30:04.037221Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems
Componentes morfológicos de la avena blanca en los sistemas de manejo del suelo
Componentes morfológicos da aveia branca em sistemas de manejo de solo
title Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems
spellingShingle Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems
Flora, Diandra Pinto Della
Área foliar
Índice del área foliar
Mecanización
Labranza cero
Preparación convencional.
Área foliar
Índice de área foliar
Mecanização
Plantio direto
Preparo convencional.
Leaf area
Leaf area index
Mechanization
No-tillage
Conventional preparation.
title_short Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems
title_full Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems
title_fullStr Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems
title_full_unstemmed Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems
title_sort Morphological components of white oats in soil management systems
author Flora, Diandra Pinto Della
author_facet Flora, Diandra Pinto Della
Cortez, Jorge Wilson
Aguero, Nayra Fernandes
López, Nilsa Maria León
Donaire, Lucas de Oliveira
Fagundes Neto, Delíbio Bastos
Mariano, Gabriel Irala
Santos, Matheus Schiavoni dos
author_role author
author2 Cortez, Jorge Wilson
Aguero, Nayra Fernandes
López, Nilsa Maria León
Donaire, Lucas de Oliveira
Fagundes Neto, Delíbio Bastos
Mariano, Gabriel Irala
Santos, Matheus Schiavoni dos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Flora, Diandra Pinto Della
Cortez, Jorge Wilson
Aguero, Nayra Fernandes
López, Nilsa Maria León
Donaire, Lucas de Oliveira
Fagundes Neto, Delíbio Bastos
Mariano, Gabriel Irala
Santos, Matheus Schiavoni dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Área foliar
Índice del área foliar
Mecanización
Labranza cero
Preparación convencional.
Área foliar
Índice de área foliar
Mecanização
Plantio direto
Preparo convencional.
Leaf area
Leaf area index
Mechanization
No-tillage
Conventional preparation.
topic Área foliar
Índice del área foliar
Mecanización
Labranza cero
Preparación convencional.
Área foliar
Índice de área foliar
Mecanização
Plantio direto
Preparo convencional.
Leaf area
Leaf area index
Mechanization
No-tillage
Conventional preparation.
description The objective was to evaluate the morphological components of white oats grown in soil management systems. The work was developed at the Experimental Farm of Agricultural Sciences at UFGD, in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. The treatments consisted of the managements: EC = cross chiseling followed by harrowing; E = a scarification; EG = scarification followed by harrowing; GR = a harrowing; SM = without mobilization; PC = plowing followed by two harrows. In the white oat culture, stand, height, number of tillers, biomass, dry leaf biomass, dry shoot biomass, leaf area index, specific leaf area, leaf mass ratio and leaf area ratio were evaluated. Data analysis was performed by analysis of variance and, when significant, the Tukey test was applied at 5% probability. The white oat stand is uniform in the area and is not affected by soil management systems. The height of the oats and the number of tillers are affected by the treatments that the scarifier contains. The systems without mobilization and scarifier benefited the production of white oat biomass, as well as the dry biomass of the leaves and shoots and the leaf area index. The leaf area ratio and specific leaf area were influenced by the systems with scarifier and conventional preparation, and the leaf mass ratio by the cross scarification systems, without mobilization and conventional preparation.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7301
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7301
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7301
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7301
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7301/6420
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e275997301
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e275997301
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e275997301
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052739165880320