The mescling in the use of standard, cult and colloquial standards in opinion articles in the new school magazine
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2960 |
Resumo: | This article originated from the discussions held in the classes of the discipline of Grammar, Variation and Teaching of PROFLETRAS / UEPB and is justified by the need to expand these discussions in the academic and school environment. Thus, the objective was to analyze the use of standard, cultured and colloquial norms in Opinion Articles in the Nova Escola magazine, in line with communicative intentions from different contexts, making a linguistic analysis in relation to the use of these norms, verifying the lexical choices that justify one or the other use of these norms in the construction of these texts according to the communicative intention of the producers, in order to bring the distinction as well as the discursive intentionality between one and another variety. For this purpose, we used as contributions the contributions of Gagné (2002), Antunes (2003), Bakhtin (2003), Veiga (1998), Bagno (2002), Bazerman (2005), among others, which guide the use of the standards mentioned . A descriptive and interpretive bibliographic analysis was used as methodology, presenting the journal's approach in relation to the use of these variants based on the analysis of three articles that served as the object of study. The results pointed out that the articles produced in the magazine, even though they turned, in general, to teachers, seek to adapt their discursive purpose, to debate issues related to teaching that may include different professionals and not only those of the Portuguese language. Therefore, it is concluded that even with the frequent use of the standard norm, there is a predominance of the cultured and colloquial language ensuring a close relationship between text / reader. |
id |
UNIFEI_598e4b5802d5fad1ef868cdcb3cca54e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2960 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The mescling in the use of standard, cult and colloquial standards in opinion articles in the new school magazineLa mesclación en el uso de las normas estándar, culta y coloquial en artículos de opinión en la revista nueva escuelaA mesclagem no uso das normas padrão, culta e coloquial em artigos de opinião na revista nova escolaNorma estándarEstándar de cultoNorma coloquialArtículo de opiniónNueva escuela.Norma PadrãoNorma CultaNorma coloquialArtigo de OpiniãoNova Escola.Standard NormCult StandardColloquial normOpinion articleNew school.This article originated from the discussions held in the classes of the discipline of Grammar, Variation and Teaching of PROFLETRAS / UEPB and is justified by the need to expand these discussions in the academic and school environment. Thus, the objective was to analyze the use of standard, cultured and colloquial norms in Opinion Articles in the Nova Escola magazine, in line with communicative intentions from different contexts, making a linguistic analysis in relation to the use of these norms, verifying the lexical choices that justify one or the other use of these norms in the construction of these texts according to the communicative intention of the producers, in order to bring the distinction as well as the discursive intentionality between one and another variety. For this purpose, we used as contributions the contributions of Gagné (2002), Antunes (2003), Bakhtin (2003), Veiga (1998), Bagno (2002), Bazerman (2005), among others, which guide the use of the standards mentioned . A descriptive and interpretive bibliographic analysis was used as methodology, presenting the journal's approach in relation to the use of these variants based on the analysis of three articles that served as the object of study. The results pointed out that the articles produced in the magazine, even though they turned, in general, to teachers, seek to adapt their discursive purpose, to debate issues related to teaching that may include different professionals and not only those of the Portuguese language. Therefore, it is concluded that even with the frequent use of the standard norm, there is a predominance of the cultured and colloquial language ensuring a close relationship between text / reader.Este artículo se originó a partir de las discusiones sostenidas en las clases de la disciplina de Gramática, Variación y Enseñanza de PROFLETRAS / UEPB y se justifica por la necesidad de expandir estas discusiones en el ámbito académico y escolar. Por lo tanto, el objetivo era analizar el uso de normas estándar, culturales y coloquiales en los Artículos de Opinión en la revista Nova Escola, en línea con las intenciones comunicativas de diferentes contextos, haciendo un análisis lingüístico en relación con el uso de estas normas, verificando el elecciones léxicas que justifiquen el uso de estas normas en la construcción de estos textos de acuerdo con la intención comunicativa de los productores, para lograr la distinción y la intencionalidad discursiva entre una y otra variedad. Para este propósito, utilizamos como contribuciones las contribuciones de Gagné (2002), Antunes (2003), Bakhtin (2003), Veiga (1998), Bagno (2002), Bazerman (2005), entre otras, que guían el uso de los estándares mencionados. Se utilizó un análisis bibliográfico descriptivo e interpretativo como metodología, presentando el enfoque de la revista en relación con el uso de estas variantes basado en el análisis de tres artículos que sirvieron como objeto de estudio. Los resultados mostraron que los artículos producidos en la revista, incluso si se volvieron, en general, a maestros, buscan adaptar su propósito discursivo, debatir temas relacionados con la enseñanza que pueden incluir diferentes profesionales y no solo los de la lengua portuguesa. Por lo tanto, se concluye que incluso con el uso frecuente de la norma estándar, existe un predominio del uso del lenguaje cultural y coloquial que garantiza una estrecha relación entre el texto / lector.Este artigo originou-se das discussões travadas nas aulas da disciplina de Gramática, Variação e Ensino do PROFLETRAS/UEPB e se justifica pela necessidade de ampliação dessas discussões no âmbito acadêmico e escolar. Desse modo, o objetivo foi analisar o uso das normas padrão, culta e coloquial em Artigos de Opinião na revista Nova Escola, em consonância com as intenções comunicativas a partir dos diversos contextos, fazendo uma análise linguística em relação ao uso dessas normas, verificando as escolhas lexicais que justificam um ou outro uso dessas normas na construção desses textos de acordo com a intenção comunicativa dos produtores, a fim de trazer a distinção bem como a intencionalidade discursiva entre uma e outra variedade. Para tanto, usamos como aportes teóricos as contribuições de Gagné (2002), Antunes (2003), Bakhtin (2003), Veiga (1998), Bagno (2002), Bazerman (2005), entre outros, que orientam o uso das normas citadas. Foi utilizada como metodologia uma análise bibliográfica de caráter descritivo e interpretativista, apresentando a abordagem da revista em relação ao uso dessas variantes a partir da análise de três artigos que serviram como objeto de estudo. Os resultados apontaram que os artigos produzidos na revista, mesmo se voltando, de modo geral, aos professores, procuram adequar a sua finalidade discursiva, debater temas relativos ao ensino que podem abranger diferentes profissionais e não apenas os de língua portuguesa. Assim sendo, conclui-se que mesmo havendo o uso frequente da norma padrão, há a predominância do uso da linguagem culta e coloquial assegurando uma relação de proximidade entre texto/leitor.Research, Society and Development2020-03-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/296010.33448/rsd-v9i4.2960Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 4; e128942960Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 4; e128942960Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 4; e1289429602525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2960/2186Copyright (c) 2020 Maria do Livramento Paula da Silva, Osires de Medeiros Melo Neto, Gustavo Correia Basto da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Maria do Livramento Paula daMelo Neto, Osires de MedeirosAguiar, Geisielly Raquel da CruzSilva, Gustavo Correia Basto da2020-08-20T18:07:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2960Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:27:20.254520Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The mescling in the use of standard, cult and colloquial standards in opinion articles in the new school magazine La mesclación en el uso de las normas estándar, culta y coloquial en artículos de opinión en la revista nueva escuela A mesclagem no uso das normas padrão, culta e coloquial em artigos de opinião na revista nova escola |
title |
The mescling in the use of standard, cult and colloquial standards in opinion articles in the new school magazine |
spellingShingle |
The mescling in the use of standard, cult and colloquial standards in opinion articles in the new school magazine Silva, Maria do Livramento Paula da Norma estándar Estándar de culto Norma coloquial Artículo de opinión Nueva escuela. Norma Padrão Norma Culta Norma coloquial Artigo de Opinião Nova Escola. Standard Norm Cult Standard Colloquial norm Opinion article New school. |
title_short |
The mescling in the use of standard, cult and colloquial standards in opinion articles in the new school magazine |
title_full |
The mescling in the use of standard, cult and colloquial standards in opinion articles in the new school magazine |
title_fullStr |
The mescling in the use of standard, cult and colloquial standards in opinion articles in the new school magazine |
title_full_unstemmed |
The mescling in the use of standard, cult and colloquial standards in opinion articles in the new school magazine |
title_sort |
The mescling in the use of standard, cult and colloquial standards in opinion articles in the new school magazine |
author |
Silva, Maria do Livramento Paula da |
author_facet |
Silva, Maria do Livramento Paula da Melo Neto, Osires de Medeiros Aguiar, Geisielly Raquel da Cruz Silva, Gustavo Correia Basto da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Melo Neto, Osires de Medeiros Aguiar, Geisielly Raquel da Cruz Silva, Gustavo Correia Basto da |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Maria do Livramento Paula da Melo Neto, Osires de Medeiros Aguiar, Geisielly Raquel da Cruz Silva, Gustavo Correia Basto da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Norma estándar Estándar de culto Norma coloquial Artículo de opinión Nueva escuela. Norma Padrão Norma Culta Norma coloquial Artigo de Opinião Nova Escola. Standard Norm Cult Standard Colloquial norm Opinion article New school. |
topic |
Norma estándar Estándar de culto Norma coloquial Artículo de opinión Nueva escuela. Norma Padrão Norma Culta Norma coloquial Artigo de Opinião Nova Escola. Standard Norm Cult Standard Colloquial norm Opinion article New school. |
description |
This article originated from the discussions held in the classes of the discipline of Grammar, Variation and Teaching of PROFLETRAS / UEPB and is justified by the need to expand these discussions in the academic and school environment. Thus, the objective was to analyze the use of standard, cultured and colloquial norms in Opinion Articles in the Nova Escola magazine, in line with communicative intentions from different contexts, making a linguistic analysis in relation to the use of these norms, verifying the lexical choices that justify one or the other use of these norms in the construction of these texts according to the communicative intention of the producers, in order to bring the distinction as well as the discursive intentionality between one and another variety. For this purpose, we used as contributions the contributions of Gagné (2002), Antunes (2003), Bakhtin (2003), Veiga (1998), Bagno (2002), Bazerman (2005), among others, which guide the use of the standards mentioned . A descriptive and interpretive bibliographic analysis was used as methodology, presenting the journal's approach in relation to the use of these variants based on the analysis of three articles that served as the object of study. The results pointed out that the articles produced in the magazine, even though they turned, in general, to teachers, seek to adapt their discursive purpose, to debate issues related to teaching that may include different professionals and not only those of the Portuguese language. Therefore, it is concluded that even with the frequent use of the standard norm, there is a predominance of the cultured and colloquial language ensuring a close relationship between text / reader. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2960 10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2960 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2960 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2960 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2960/2186 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 4; e128942960 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 4; e128942960 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 4; e128942960 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052734847844352 |