The algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis: an integrative review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31447 |
Resumo: | Syphilis is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum), which can progress to a chronic disease, with irreversible sequelae for affected individuals. Its transmission is by unprotected sexual contact, blood transfusion or vertical transmission. The disease is classified as primary, secondary, latent or tertiary. Despite the request for prevention, in 2020 the World Health Organization (WHO) counted 7 million new cases worldwide, so accurate diagnosis becomes essential. Currently, there is no laboratory test that is considered a reliable gold standard, so different diagnostic algorithms have been applied, three of which are the most common for serological diagnosis, being the traditional, reverse algorithm and the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Therefore, the present study aimed to perform an integrative review on the algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis, for this purpose the following descriptors "Syphilis" and "Treponema pallidum" and "Diagnostic algorithms" and "Serological tests" were used in the different databases for the selection of articles. In total, 21 articles were included in the study. After analyzing the included articles, it was evidenced that the reverse algorithm has a better ability to detect cases of early and late syphilis. Quantitative non-treponemais trials on active infections and treatment follow-up are recommended. Despite this data, the choice of which algorithm to use should be based on local epidemiology, workload, automation needs, and available budget. |
id |
UNIFEI_59cf94ce2e317cfc8d9ac67d6e838de1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31447 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis: an integrative reviewLos algoritmos utilizados para el diagnóstico de la sífilis: una revisión integradoraOs algoritmos utilizados para o diagnóstico da sífilis: uma revisão integrativaSífilisTreponema pallidumAlgoritmos de DiagnósticosPruebas serológicas.SífilisTreponema pallidumAlgoritmos de DiagnósticoTestes sorológicos.SyphilisTreponema pallidumDiagnostic AlgorithmsSerological tests.Syphilis is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum), which can progress to a chronic disease, with irreversible sequelae for affected individuals. Its transmission is by unprotected sexual contact, blood transfusion or vertical transmission. The disease is classified as primary, secondary, latent or tertiary. Despite the request for prevention, in 2020 the World Health Organization (WHO) counted 7 million new cases worldwide, so accurate diagnosis becomes essential. Currently, there is no laboratory test that is considered a reliable gold standard, so different diagnostic algorithms have been applied, three of which are the most common for serological diagnosis, being the traditional, reverse algorithm and the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Therefore, the present study aimed to perform an integrative review on the algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis, for this purpose the following descriptors "Syphilis" and "Treponema pallidum" and "Diagnostic algorithms" and "Serological tests" were used in the different databases for the selection of articles. In total, 21 articles were included in the study. After analyzing the included articles, it was evidenced that the reverse algorithm has a better ability to detect cases of early and late syphilis. Quantitative non-treponemais trials on active infections and treatment follow-up are recommended. Despite this data, the choice of which algorithm to use should be based on local epidemiology, workload, automation needs, and available budget.La sífilis es una enfermedad infecciosa causada por la bacteria Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum), que puede progresar a una enfermedad crónica, con secuelas irreversibles para los individuos afectados. Su transmisión es por contacto sexual sin protección, transfusión de sangre o transmisión vertical. La enfermedad se clasifica como primaria, secundaria, latente o terciaria. A pesar del llamado a la prevención, en 2020 la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) contabilizó 7 millones de nuevos casos en todo el mundo, por lo que el diagnóstico preciso se vuelve esencial. Actualmente, no existe ninguna prueba de laboratorio que se considere un estándar de oro confiable, por lo que se han aplicado diferentes algoritmos de diagnóstico, tres de los cuales son los más comunes para el diagnóstico serológico, siendo el algoritmo tradicional, inverso y del Centro Europeo para la Prevención y el Control de Enfermedades (ECDC). Por lo tanto, el presente estudio tuvo como objetivo realizar una revisión integradora sobre los algoritmos utilizados para el diagnóstico de la sífilis, para ello, se utilizaron los siguientes descriptores "Sífilis" y "Treponema pallidum" y "Algoritmos diagnósticos" y "Pruebas serológicas" en las diferentes bases de datos. para la selección de artículos. En total, se incluyeron 21 artículos en el estudio. El análisis posterior de los artículos incluidos mostró que el algoritmo inverso tiene una mejor capacidad para detectar casos de sífilis temprana y tardía. Se recomienda realizar ensayos cuantitativos no treponémicos en infecciones activas y seguimiento del tratamiento. A pesar de estos datos, la elección de qué algoritmo utilizar debe basarse en la epidemiología local, la carga de trabajo, las necesidades de automatización y el presupuesto disponible.A sífilis é uma doença infecciosa, causada pela bactéria Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum), que pode evoluir para uma enfermidade crônica, com sequelas irreversíveis para os indivíduos acometidos. A sua transmissão é por contato sexual desprotegido, transfusão de sangue ou por transmissão vertical. A doença é classificada em primária, secundária, latente ou terciária. Apesar do apelo a prevenção, em 2020 a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) contabilizou 7 milhões de novos casos no mundo, deste modo, o diagnóstico preciso torna-se essencial. Atualmente, não existe um exame laboratorial que seja considerado um padrão-ouro confiável, sendo assim, diferentes algoritmos de diagnóstico vêm sendo aplicados, sendo três deles os mais comuns para o diagnóstico sorológico, sendo eles, o tradicional, o reverso e o algoritmo do Centro Europeu de Prevenção e Controle de Doenças (ECDC). Logo, o presente estudo teve como objetivo realizar uma revisão integrativa sobre os algoritmos utilizados para o diagnóstico da sífilis, para tanto, os seguintes descritores “Syphilis” and “Treponema pallidum” and “Diagnostic Algorithms” and “Serological Tests” foram utilizados nas diferentes bases de dados para a seleção dos artigos. Ao todo, 21 artigos foram incluídos no estudo. Após análise dos artigos incluídos, evidenciou-se que o algoritmo reverso apresenta melhor capacidade de detectar casos de sífilis precoce e tardia. É recomendado a realização de ensaios não treponêmicos quantitativos, em infecções ativas e monitoramento do tratamento. Apesar desses dados, a escolha de qual algoritmo utilizar, deve basear-se na epidemiologia local, na carga de trabalho, na necessidade de automação e no orçamento disponível.Research, Society and Development2022-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3144710.33448/rsd-v11i8.31447Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e56211831447Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e56211831447Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e562118314472525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31447/26800Copyright (c) 2022 Claudio Peçanha Júnior; Girlandia Alexandre Brasilhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeçanha Júnior, ClaudioBrasil, Girlandia Alexandre 2022-07-01T13:34:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31447Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:47:47.344500Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis: an integrative review Los algoritmos utilizados para el diagnóstico de la sífilis: una revisión integradora Os algoritmos utilizados para o diagnóstico da sífilis: uma revisão integrativa |
title |
The algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis: an integrative review |
spellingShingle |
The algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis: an integrative review Peçanha Júnior, Claudio Sífilis Treponema pallidum Algoritmos de Diagnósticos Pruebas serológicas. Sífilis Treponema pallidum Algoritmos de Diagnóstico Testes sorológicos. Syphilis Treponema pallidum Diagnostic Algorithms Serological tests. |
title_short |
The algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis: an integrative review |
title_full |
The algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis: an integrative review |
title_fullStr |
The algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis: an integrative review |
title_full_unstemmed |
The algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis: an integrative review |
title_sort |
The algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis: an integrative review |
author |
Peçanha Júnior, Claudio |
author_facet |
Peçanha Júnior, Claudio Brasil, Girlandia Alexandre |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Brasil, Girlandia Alexandre |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peçanha Júnior, Claudio Brasil, Girlandia Alexandre |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sífilis Treponema pallidum Algoritmos de Diagnósticos Pruebas serológicas. Sífilis Treponema pallidum Algoritmos de Diagnóstico Testes sorológicos. Syphilis Treponema pallidum Diagnostic Algorithms Serological tests. |
topic |
Sífilis Treponema pallidum Algoritmos de Diagnósticos Pruebas serológicas. Sífilis Treponema pallidum Algoritmos de Diagnóstico Testes sorológicos. Syphilis Treponema pallidum Diagnostic Algorithms Serological tests. |
description |
Syphilis is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum), which can progress to a chronic disease, with irreversible sequelae for affected individuals. Its transmission is by unprotected sexual contact, blood transfusion or vertical transmission. The disease is classified as primary, secondary, latent or tertiary. Despite the request for prevention, in 2020 the World Health Organization (WHO) counted 7 million new cases worldwide, so accurate diagnosis becomes essential. Currently, there is no laboratory test that is considered a reliable gold standard, so different diagnostic algorithms have been applied, three of which are the most common for serological diagnosis, being the traditional, reverse algorithm and the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Therefore, the present study aimed to perform an integrative review on the algorithms used for the diagnosis of syphilis, for this purpose the following descriptors "Syphilis" and "Treponema pallidum" and "Diagnostic algorithms" and "Serological tests" were used in the different databases for the selection of articles. In total, 21 articles were included in the study. After analyzing the included articles, it was evidenced that the reverse algorithm has a better ability to detect cases of early and late syphilis. Quantitative non-treponemais trials on active infections and treatment follow-up are recommended. Despite this data, the choice of which algorithm to use should be based on local epidemiology, workload, automation needs, and available budget. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31447 10.33448/rsd-v11i8.31447 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31447 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i8.31447 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31447/26800 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Claudio Peçanha Júnior; Girlandia Alexandre Brasil https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Claudio Peçanha Júnior; Girlandia Alexandre Brasil https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e56211831447 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e56211831447 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e56211831447 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052716238766080 |