Statistical allocation methods used in randomized controlled trials on bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an integrative literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Georgeto, Sergio Murilo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Fernandes, Karen Barros Parron, Oliveira Junior, Eros de, Andraus, Rodrigo Antônio Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35671
Resumo: The objective of this review was to verify the available scientific evidence on allocation and concealment methods, and the statistical analyses used in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on bilateral CTS. An integrative literature review was conducted, based on searches of databases for the period from 2014 to 2021. One-hundred-and-ten articles were found, of which 22 were considered eligible for inclusion. The statistical analyses methods used in the presence of bilateral pathologies was not clear in six (27.27%) cases and was inappropriate in another six (27.27%). A further five (22.72%) articles included only the most severely affected wrist for evaluation, while data from the right and left wrist were analyzed and described separately in four (18.18%) reports. Finally, only one (4.54%) RCT showed an adequate statistical approach. RCTs on clinical and surgical therapy of CTS do not use statistical models that include data repetition due to bilaterality when assessing outcomes.
id UNIFEI_5c73ed4fab3fac06b6835219d68431ff
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35671
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Statistical allocation methods used in randomized controlled trials on bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an integrative literature reviewMétodos de asignación estadística utilizados en ensayos controlados aleatorios sobre el síndrome del túnel carpiano bilateral: una revisión integrativa de la literaturaMétodos de alocação estatística usados em ensaios clínicos randomizados sobre síndrome do túnel do carpo bilateral: uma revisão integrativa da literaturaSíndrome del Túnel CarpianoAnálisis de DatosMétodos de asignación.Carpal Tunnel SyndromeData AnalysisRandom allocation.Síndrome do Túnel do CarpoAnálise de DadosEstudos randomizados.The objective of this review was to verify the available scientific evidence on allocation and concealment methods, and the statistical analyses used in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on bilateral CTS. An integrative literature review was conducted, based on searches of databases for the period from 2014 to 2021. One-hundred-and-ten articles were found, of which 22 were considered eligible for inclusion. The statistical analyses methods used in the presence of bilateral pathologies was not clear in six (27.27%) cases and was inappropriate in another six (27.27%). A further five (22.72%) articles included only the most severely affected wrist for evaluation, while data from the right and left wrist were analyzed and described separately in four (18.18%) reports. Finally, only one (4.54%) RCT showed an adequate statistical approach. RCTs on clinical and surgical therapy of CTS do not use statistical models that include data repetition due to bilaterality when assessing outcomes.El objetivo de esta revisión fue verificar la evidencia científica disponible sobre los métodos de asignación y los análisis estadísticos utilizados en los ensayos clínicos aleatorios (ECA) sobre el STC bilateral. Se realizó una revisión integrativa de la literatura, basada en búsquedas en bases de datos para el período de 2014 a 2021. Se encontraron ciento diez artículos, de los cuales 22 se consideraron elegibles para inclusión. El método de análisis estadístico utilizado ante la presencia de patologías bilaterales no fue claro en seis (27,27%) casos y fue inadecuado en otros seis (27,27%). Otros cinco artículos (22,72 %) incluyeron solo la muñeca más gravemente afectada para su evaluación, mientras que los datos de la muñeca derecha e izquierda se analizaron y describieron por separado en cuatro informes (18,18 %). Finalmente, solo un ECA (4,54%) mostró un enfoque estadístico adecuado. Los ECA sobre el tratamiento clínico y quirúrgico del STC no utilizan modelos estadísticos que incluyan la repetición de datos debido a la bilateralidad al evaluar los resultados.O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar as evidências científicas disponíveis sobre métodos de alocação e as análises estatísticas utilizadas em ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR’s) sobre Síndrome do Túnel do Carpo (STC) bilateral. Foi realizada uma revisão integrativa da literatura, a partir de buscas em bases de dados no período de 2014 a 2021. Foram encontrados 110 artigos, dos quais 22 foram considerados elegíveis para inclusão. Os métodos de análise estatística utilizados na presença de patologias bilaterais não foram claros em seis (27,27%) casos e inadequados em outros seis (27,27%). Outros cinco (22,72%) artigos incluíram apenas o punho mais gravemente afetado para avaliação, enquanto os dados do punho direito e esquerdo foram analisados e descritos separadamente em quatro (18,18%) relatórios. Por fim, apenas um (4,54%) ECR apresentou abordagem estatística adequada. Os ECR’s sobre terapia clínica e cirúrgica da STC não utilizam modelos estatísticos que incluam repetição de dados devido à bilateralidade na avaliação dos desfechos.Research, Society and Development2022-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3567110.33448/rsd-v11i14.35671Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 14; e16111435671Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 14; e16111435671Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 14; e161114356712525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35671/30242Copyright (c) 2022 Sergio Murilo Georgeto; Karen Barros Parron Fernandes; Eros de Oliveira Junior; Rodrigo Antônio Carvalho Andraushttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGeorgeto, Sergio MuriloFernandes, Karen Barros ParronOliveira Junior, Eros deAndraus, Rodrigo Antônio Carvalho2022-11-08T13:36:27Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35671Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:50:30.318534Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Statistical allocation methods used in randomized controlled trials on bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an integrative literature review
Métodos de asignación estadística utilizados en ensayos controlados aleatorios sobre el síndrome del túnel carpiano bilateral: una revisión integrativa de la literatura
Métodos de alocação estatística usados em ensaios clínicos randomizados sobre síndrome do túnel do carpo bilateral: uma revisão integrativa da literatura
title Statistical allocation methods used in randomized controlled trials on bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an integrative literature review
spellingShingle Statistical allocation methods used in randomized controlled trials on bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an integrative literature review
Georgeto, Sergio Murilo
Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano
Análisis de Datos
Métodos de asignación.
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Data Analysis
Random allocation.
Síndrome do Túnel do Carpo
Análise de Dados
Estudos randomizados.
title_short Statistical allocation methods used in randomized controlled trials on bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an integrative literature review
title_full Statistical allocation methods used in randomized controlled trials on bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an integrative literature review
title_fullStr Statistical allocation methods used in randomized controlled trials on bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an integrative literature review
title_full_unstemmed Statistical allocation methods used in randomized controlled trials on bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an integrative literature review
title_sort Statistical allocation methods used in randomized controlled trials on bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an integrative literature review
author Georgeto, Sergio Murilo
author_facet Georgeto, Sergio Murilo
Fernandes, Karen Barros Parron
Oliveira Junior, Eros de
Andraus, Rodrigo Antônio Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Fernandes, Karen Barros Parron
Oliveira Junior, Eros de
Andraus, Rodrigo Antônio Carvalho
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Georgeto, Sergio Murilo
Fernandes, Karen Barros Parron
Oliveira Junior, Eros de
Andraus, Rodrigo Antônio Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano
Análisis de Datos
Métodos de asignación.
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Data Analysis
Random allocation.
Síndrome do Túnel do Carpo
Análise de Dados
Estudos randomizados.
topic Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano
Análisis de Datos
Métodos de asignación.
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Data Analysis
Random allocation.
Síndrome do Túnel do Carpo
Análise de Dados
Estudos randomizados.
description The objective of this review was to verify the available scientific evidence on allocation and concealment methods, and the statistical analyses used in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on bilateral CTS. An integrative literature review was conducted, based on searches of databases for the period from 2014 to 2021. One-hundred-and-ten articles were found, of which 22 were considered eligible for inclusion. The statistical analyses methods used in the presence of bilateral pathologies was not clear in six (27.27%) cases and was inappropriate in another six (27.27%). A further five (22.72%) articles included only the most severely affected wrist for evaluation, while data from the right and left wrist were analyzed and described separately in four (18.18%) reports. Finally, only one (4.54%) RCT showed an adequate statistical approach. RCTs on clinical and surgical therapy of CTS do not use statistical models that include data repetition due to bilaterality when assessing outcomes.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35671
10.33448/rsd-v11i14.35671
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35671
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i14.35671
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35671/30242
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 14; e16111435671
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 14; e16111435671
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 14; e16111435671
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052725241839616