Evaluation of polymers for upper limb orthosis through computer simulation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Thiago
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Marcio de, Oliveira, Luís, Silva, Lidiane
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34937
Resumo: Material selection is one of the most relevant and challenging steps in engineering projects. In this study, we focused on selecting polymers with low density and stiffness for upper limb orthoses that help in the recovery of patients who have undergone cerebrovascular accident (CVA). CES EduPack 2011 software was used to compare the density and Young's modulus of different polymers. The merit index aided in the classification of these materials, which were applied to 3D orthosis models for computer simulations in FreeCAD 0.19.4 software. Using the simulation data, a decision matrix was developed using the Pahl & Beitz method to classify polymers according to the weighted property index. The decision matrix using the simulated and merit index data indicated polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polylactic acid (PLA) as the best polymers for upper limb orthoses. The weighted property index values were 127.34 and 123.19, respectively. It is noteworthy that polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG - adaptation of PET) is an alternative to 3D printing filaments, and PLA is one of the main filaments.
id UNIFEI_5c95d607b8e646810781d3edd26c3e2f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34937
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of polymers for upper limb orthosis through computer simulationEvaluación de polímeros para órtesis de miembro superior mediante simulación por computadoraAvaliação de polímeros para órtese de membro superior através de simulação computacionalSelección de materialesÍndice de méritoSimulación por computadoraDispositivo ortopédicoÓrtesis.Seleção de materiaisÍndice de méritoSimulação computacionalDispositivo ortopédicoÓrtese.Materials selectionMerit indexComputer simulationOrthopedic applianceOrthosis.Material selection is one of the most relevant and challenging steps in engineering projects. In this study, we focused on selecting polymers with low density and stiffness for upper limb orthoses that help in the recovery of patients who have undergone cerebrovascular accident (CVA). CES EduPack 2011 software was used to compare the density and Young's modulus of different polymers. The merit index aided in the classification of these materials, which were applied to 3D orthosis models for computer simulations in FreeCAD 0.19.4 software. Using the simulation data, a decision matrix was developed using the Pahl & Beitz method to classify polymers according to the weighted property index. The decision matrix using the simulated and merit index data indicated polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polylactic acid (PLA) as the best polymers for upper limb orthoses. The weighted property index values were 127.34 and 123.19, respectively. It is noteworthy that polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG - adaptation of PET) is an alternative to 3D printing filaments, and PLA is one of the main filaments.La selección de materiales es uno de los pasos más relevantes y desafiantes en los proyectos de ingeniería. En este estudio, el enfoque está en la selección de polímeros de baja densidad y buena rigidez para ortesis de miembros superiores que ayuden en la recuperación de pacientes que han sufrido un accidente cerebrovascular. Se utilizó el software CES EduPack 2011 para comparar la densidad y el módulo de Young de diferentes polímeros. El índice de mérito ayudó en la clasificación de estos materiales, que se aplicaron a modelos de órtesis 3D para simulaciones por computadora en el software FreeCAD 0.19.4. A partir de los datos de simulación, se desarrolló una matriz de decisión utilizando el método de Pahl & Beitz para clasificar los polímeros según el índice de propiedad ponderado. La matriz de decisión que utilizó los datos del índice de mérito y simulado mostró que el tereftalato de polietileno (PET) y el ácido poliláctico (PLA) eran los mejores polímeros para ortesis de miembros superiores. Los valores del índice de propiedad ponderado fueron 127,34 y 123,19, respectivamente. Cabe destacar que el polietilen tereftalato glicol (PETG - derivado del PET) es una alternativa para los filamentos de impresión 3D, además de que el PLA es uno de los principales filamentos.A seleção de materiais é uma das etapas mais relevantes e desafiadoras nos projetos de engenharia. Neste estudo, tem-se o foco da seleção de polímeros de baixa densidade e boa rigidez para órteses de membro superior que auxiliem na recuperação de pacientes que sofreram acidente vascular cerebral (AVC). O software CES EduPack 2011 foi utilizado para comparar a densidade e o módulo de Young de diferentes polímeros. O índice de mérito auxiliou na classificação destes materiais, os quais foram aplicados aos modelos de órteses 3D para simulações computacionais no software FreeCAD 0.19.4. A partir dos dados de simulação, foi desenvolvida uma matriz de decisão utilizando o método de Pahl & Beitz para classificar os polímeros de acordo com o índice de propriedade ponderada. A matriz de decisão utilizando os dados simulados e de índice de mérito apresentou o polietileno tereftalato (PET) e o ácido polilático (PLA) como os melhores polímeros para órteses de membros superiores. Os valores do índice de propriedade ponderada foram 127,34 e 123,19, respectivamente. Destaca-se que o polietileno tereftalato glicol (PETG - derivação de PET) é uma alternativa para filamentos de impressão 3D, além do PLA ser um dos principais filamentos.Research, Society and Development2022-09-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3493710.33448/rsd-v11i12.34937Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e585111234937Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e585111234937Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e5851112349372525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34937/29398Copyright (c) 2022 Thiago Oliveira; Marcio de Oliveira; Luís Oliveira; Lidiane Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, ThiagoOliveira, Marcio deOliveira, LuísSilva, Lidiane2022-09-26T11:56:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34937Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:50:02.201616Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of polymers for upper limb orthosis through computer simulation
Evaluación de polímeros para órtesis de miembro superior mediante simulación por computadora
Avaliação de polímeros para órtese de membro superior através de simulação computacional
title Evaluation of polymers for upper limb orthosis through computer simulation
spellingShingle Evaluation of polymers for upper limb orthosis through computer simulation
Oliveira, Thiago
Selección de materiales
Índice de mérito
Simulación por computadora
Dispositivo ortopédico
Órtesis.
Seleção de materiais
Índice de mérito
Simulação computacional
Dispositivo ortopédico
Órtese.
Materials selection
Merit index
Computer simulation
Orthopedic appliance
Orthosis.
title_short Evaluation of polymers for upper limb orthosis through computer simulation
title_full Evaluation of polymers for upper limb orthosis through computer simulation
title_fullStr Evaluation of polymers for upper limb orthosis through computer simulation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of polymers for upper limb orthosis through computer simulation
title_sort Evaluation of polymers for upper limb orthosis through computer simulation
author Oliveira, Thiago
author_facet Oliveira, Thiago
Oliveira, Marcio de
Oliveira, Luís
Silva, Lidiane
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Marcio de
Oliveira, Luís
Silva, Lidiane
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Thiago
Oliveira, Marcio de
Oliveira, Luís
Silva, Lidiane
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Selección de materiales
Índice de mérito
Simulación por computadora
Dispositivo ortopédico
Órtesis.
Seleção de materiais
Índice de mérito
Simulação computacional
Dispositivo ortopédico
Órtese.
Materials selection
Merit index
Computer simulation
Orthopedic appliance
Orthosis.
topic Selección de materiales
Índice de mérito
Simulación por computadora
Dispositivo ortopédico
Órtesis.
Seleção de materiais
Índice de mérito
Simulação computacional
Dispositivo ortopédico
Órtese.
Materials selection
Merit index
Computer simulation
Orthopedic appliance
Orthosis.
description Material selection is one of the most relevant and challenging steps in engineering projects. In this study, we focused on selecting polymers with low density and stiffness for upper limb orthoses that help in the recovery of patients who have undergone cerebrovascular accident (CVA). CES EduPack 2011 software was used to compare the density and Young's modulus of different polymers. The merit index aided in the classification of these materials, which were applied to 3D orthosis models for computer simulations in FreeCAD 0.19.4 software. Using the simulation data, a decision matrix was developed using the Pahl & Beitz method to classify polymers according to the weighted property index. The decision matrix using the simulated and merit index data indicated polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polylactic acid (PLA) as the best polymers for upper limb orthoses. The weighted property index values were 127.34 and 123.19, respectively. It is noteworthy that polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG - adaptation of PET) is an alternative to 3D printing filaments, and PLA is one of the main filaments.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34937
10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34937
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34937
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34937
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34937/29398
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Thiago Oliveira; Marcio de Oliveira; Luís Oliveira; Lidiane Silva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Thiago Oliveira; Marcio de Oliveira; Luís Oliveira; Lidiane Silva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e585111234937
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e585111234937
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e585111234937
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052827559788544