Methods of mass stream dimensions with and without flooring of standard NBR 6118: 2014

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amador Salomão, Pedro Emílio
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pereira, Edna Alves, Santiago, Acly Ney Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1058
Resumo: The lack of knowledge and influence of third parties often leads to the choice of saving materials that are often not safe, but it is up to the engineer to demonstrate the conditions to have a safe and economical structure. It presents first some types of slabs and their characteristics, immediately is exposed the definitions of the massive slab. Next, it is presented the calculation of this structure on the criteria and recommendations of NBR 6118: 2014: Concrete Structures Project - Procedure, incorporating basic concepts on the subject for the execution of the same. Four designs of slabs were adopted in order to carry out the study of this structure. Subsequently, the comparison of slab calculations with and without safety coefficients is performed. The objective of this work is to conclude the most advantageous structure, due to the comparative of the quantitative results of the structure where the advantages of a secure structure were analyzed.
id UNIFEI_5d489d02f1b4a2bec0288b725aae480a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1058
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Methods of mass stream dimensions with and without flooring of standard NBR 6118: 2014Métodos de dimensionamiento de lajes macizos con y sin el embasamiento de la norma NBR 6118: 2014Métodos de dimensionamentos de lajes maciças com e sem o embasamento da norma NBR 6118:2014Projectsstructurestandard comparisonslabs.Projetosestruturacomparação de normalajes.Proyectosestructuracomparación de normalosas.The lack of knowledge and influence of third parties often leads to the choice of saving materials that are often not safe, but it is up to the engineer to demonstrate the conditions to have a safe and economical structure. It presents first some types of slabs and their characteristics, immediately is exposed the definitions of the massive slab. Next, it is presented the calculation of this structure on the criteria and recommendations of NBR 6118: 2014: Concrete Structures Project - Procedure, incorporating basic concepts on the subject for the execution of the same. Four designs of slabs were adopted in order to carry out the study of this structure. Subsequently, the comparison of slab calculations with and without safety coefficients is performed. The objective of this work is to conclude the most advantageous structure, due to the comparative of the quantitative results of the structure where the advantages of a secure structure were analyzed.La ausencia de conocimiento e influencia de terceros ocasiona muchas veces la elección por economía de materiales que muchas veces no segura, pero cabe al ingeniero demostrar condiciones para tener una estructura segura y económica. Se presentan primero algunos tipos de losas y sus características, inmediatamente se exponen las definiciones de la losa maciza. A continuación, se presenta el cálculo de esta estructura sobre los criterios y recomendaciones de la NBR 6118: 2014: Proyecto de Estructuras de Concreto - Procedimiento, incorporando conceptos básicos sobre el tema para la ejecución de la misma. Se adoptaron cuatro dimensionamientos de losas a fin de tener la realización del estudio de esta estructura. Posteriormente, se tiene el comparativo de los cálculos de los forjados con y sin coeficientes de seguridad. El objetivo de este trabajo acaba concluyendo en la constatación de la estructura más ventajosa, debido al comparativo de los resultados cuantitativos de la estructura donde se analizó las ventajas de una estructura segura.A ausência de conhecimento e influência de terceiros ocasiona muitas vezes a escolha por economia de materiais que muitas vezes não segura, no entanto cabe ao engenheiro demostrar condições para se ter uma estrutura segura e econômica. Apresenta-se primeiramente alguns tipos de lajes e suas características, imediatamente é exposto as definições da laje maciça. Em seguida, é apresentado o cálculo desta estrutura sobre os critérios e recomendações da NBR 6118:2014: Projeto de Estruturas de Concreto – Procedimento, incorporando conceitos básicos sobre o tema para a execução da mesma. Foram adotados quatro dimensionamentos de lajes a fim de ter a realização do estudo desta estrutura. Posteriormente, tem-se o comparativo dos cálculos das lajes com e sem coeficientes de segurança. O objetivo deste trabalho acaba concluindo na constatação da estrutura mais vantajosa, devido ao comparativo dos resultados quantitativos da estrutura onde se analisou as vantagens de uma estrutura segura.Research, Society and Development2019-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/105810.33448/rsd-v8i6.1058Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 No. 6; e26861058Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 Núm. 6; e26861058Research, Society and Development; v. 8 n. 6; e268610582525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1058/883Copyright (c) 2019 Pedro Emílio Amador Salomão, Edna Alves Pereira, Acly Ney Santiago de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAmador Salomão, Pedro EmílioPereira, Edna AlvesSantiago, Acly Ney Oliveira2020-03-25T16:07:00Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1058Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:26:14.978503Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methods of mass stream dimensions with and without flooring of standard NBR 6118: 2014
Métodos de dimensionamiento de lajes macizos con y sin el embasamiento de la norma NBR 6118: 2014
Métodos de dimensionamentos de lajes maciças com e sem o embasamento da norma NBR 6118:2014
title Methods of mass stream dimensions with and without flooring of standard NBR 6118: 2014
spellingShingle Methods of mass stream dimensions with and without flooring of standard NBR 6118: 2014
Amador Salomão, Pedro Emílio
Projects
structure
standard comparison
slabs.
Projetos
estrutura
comparação de norma
lajes.
Proyectos
estructura
comparación de norma
losas.
title_short Methods of mass stream dimensions with and without flooring of standard NBR 6118: 2014
title_full Methods of mass stream dimensions with and without flooring of standard NBR 6118: 2014
title_fullStr Methods of mass stream dimensions with and without flooring of standard NBR 6118: 2014
title_full_unstemmed Methods of mass stream dimensions with and without flooring of standard NBR 6118: 2014
title_sort Methods of mass stream dimensions with and without flooring of standard NBR 6118: 2014
author Amador Salomão, Pedro Emílio
author_facet Amador Salomão, Pedro Emílio
Pereira, Edna Alves
Santiago, Acly Ney Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Edna Alves
Santiago, Acly Ney Oliveira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amador Salomão, Pedro Emílio
Pereira, Edna Alves
Santiago, Acly Ney Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Projects
structure
standard comparison
slabs.
Projetos
estrutura
comparação de norma
lajes.
Proyectos
estructura
comparación de norma
losas.
topic Projects
structure
standard comparison
slabs.
Projetos
estrutura
comparação de norma
lajes.
Proyectos
estructura
comparación de norma
losas.
description The lack of knowledge and influence of third parties often leads to the choice of saving materials that are often not safe, but it is up to the engineer to demonstrate the conditions to have a safe and economical structure. It presents first some types of slabs and their characteristics, immediately is exposed the definitions of the massive slab. Next, it is presented the calculation of this structure on the criteria and recommendations of NBR 6118: 2014: Concrete Structures Project - Procedure, incorporating basic concepts on the subject for the execution of the same. Four designs of slabs were adopted in order to carry out the study of this structure. Subsequently, the comparison of slab calculations with and without safety coefficients is performed. The objective of this work is to conclude the most advantageous structure, due to the comparative of the quantitative results of the structure where the advantages of a secure structure were analyzed.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1058
10.33448/rsd-v8i6.1058
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1058
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v8i6.1058
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1058/883
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Pedro Emílio Amador Salomão, Edna Alves Pereira, Acly Ney Santiago de Oliveira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Pedro Emílio Amador Salomão, Edna Alves Pereira, Acly Ney Santiago de Oliveira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 No. 6; e26861058
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 Núm. 6; e26861058
Research, Society and Development; v. 8 n. 6; e26861058
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052643331276800

Registros relacionados